Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

What is clean eating?

2456731

Replies

  • sullus
    sullus Posts: 2,839 Member
    Now here's a question. I like fries.
    I buy frozen, noname brand, packaged fries in a bag with barcode and everything. -> Definitely processed food, no doubt about it.
    They only have 2 ingredients though: potatoes and sunflower oil. -> Nothing you can't pronounce and not exceeding the magical 4 ingredients.

    Clean or not?
    I'd bet you a tenner if we asked 100 clean eaters without each knowing what the others said, the answers would be split almost 50/50.

    I go with a similar example on Cape Cod potato chips and Fritos. Each is as close to nature as possible (washed, sliced/ground and cooked), has only 3 ingredients which can be pronounced (chips: Potatoes, sunflower oil, salt; Fritos: Corn, corn oil, salt)

    They both meet nearly every definition proposed above (can't meet them all because some are contradictory)

    Sure they both have an added chemical preservative (salt). But it seems like the clean eating people are cool with that one chemical preservative.
  • flaminica
    flaminica Posts: 304 Member
    I'd define "clean eating" as a shibboleth for its particular branch of dietary tribalism. This is why the phrase is frequently capitalised by its core proponents.
  • sullus
    sullus Posts: 2,839 Member
    auddii wrote: »
    sullus wrote: »
    x311Tifa wrote: »

    [*] Don't eat products that have a TV commercial.

    So.. I'm assuming any and all with commercials... so no fruits or veg with commercials.

    [*] Don't eat foods that have a mascot.

    Again with the fruits and veg included. The little Halos orange is a mascot of sorts. And goodbye Chiquita banana lady!

    Or eggs. Or Beef. Or Pork. anyone ever 30 in the US should remember "The incredible edible egg", "Beef; it's what's for dinner", and "Pork; the other white meat" ad campaigns that bombarded us.

    Except that pork is red meat. But you definitely have a point.

    Not according to my TV it's not. Who am I going to believe? The talking picture-box which soothes me in the evenings, or a bully like you?
  • auddii
    auddii Posts: 15,357 Member
    sullus wrote: »
    auddii wrote: »
    sullus wrote: »
    x311Tifa wrote: »

    [*] Don't eat products that have a TV commercial.

    So.. I'm assuming any and all with commercials... so no fruits or veg with commercials.

    [*] Don't eat foods that have a mascot.

    Again with the fruits and veg included. The little Halos orange is a mascot of sorts. And goodbye Chiquita banana lady!

    Or eggs. Or Beef. Or Pork. anyone ever 30 in the US should remember "The incredible edible egg", "Beef; it's what's for dinner", and "Pork; the other white meat" ad campaigns that bombarded us.

    Except that pork is red meat. But you definitely have a point.

    Not according to my TV it's not. Who am I going to believe? The talking picture-box which soothes me in the evenings, or a bully like you?

    *sigh* I'd side with the talky box too...
  • Need2Exerc1se
    Need2Exerc1se Posts: 13,575 Member
    I never really thought of eating as being "clean" or not until I came on these forums. For me, the word I would always use would be "healthy". And this begs the question, is "healthy" and "clean" eating synonymous?

    Not in the way I'm used to them being used. Clean is about how natural the food is, healthy is about how the food affects our health.
  • CollieFit
    CollieFit Posts: 1,683 Member
    An apple would be 'clean' based on it not requiring preparation, can be eaten in its natural state etc. But what if it was covered with pesticides? What about meat from animals who were pumped full of hormones to get bigger. Are those still 'clean'?
  • janejellyroll
    janejellyroll Posts: 25,763 Member
    To me, it means foods that are not processed, that you can take directly from nature and eat or drink with 0 to minimal preparation.

    How would you define preparation?

    Cooking time? Some other factor?

    Animals are natural, right? I know many people don't eat them, but I require more than 0 preparation when it comes to a chicken running around in the yard.

    Just about everyone likes *some* kind of processing and preparation for their meat, even if they are doing it themselves.
  • Need2Exerc1se
    Need2Exerc1se Posts: 13,575 Member
    sullus wrote: »
    Now here's a question. I like fries.
    I buy frozen, noname brand, packaged fries in a bag with barcode and everything. -> Definitely processed food, no doubt about it.
    They only have 2 ingredients though: potatoes and sunflower oil. -> Nothing you can't pronounce and not exceeding the magical 4 ingredients.

    Clean or not?
    I'd bet you a tenner if we asked 100 clean eaters without each knowing what the others said, the answers would be split almost 50/50.

    I go with a similar example on Cape Cod potato chips and Fritos. Each is as close to nature as possible (washed, sliced/ground and cooked), has only 3 ingredients which can be pronounced (chips: Potatoes, sunflower oil, salt; Fritos: Corn, corn oil, salt)

    They both meet nearly every definition proposed above (can't meet them all because some are contradictory)

    Sure they both have an added chemical preservative (salt). But it seems like the clean eating people are cool with that one chemical preservative.

    Fritos are pretty far from the natural state of corn.
  • janejellyroll
    janejellyroll Posts: 25,763 Member
    sullus wrote: »
    Now here's a question. I like fries.
    I buy frozen, noname brand, packaged fries in a bag with barcode and everything. -> Definitely processed food, no doubt about it.
    They only have 2 ingredients though: potatoes and sunflower oil. -> Nothing you can't pronounce and not exceeding the magical 4 ingredients.

    Clean or not?
    I'd bet you a tenner if we asked 100 clean eaters without each knowing what the others said, the answers would be split almost 50/50.

    I go with a similar example on Cape Cod potato chips and Fritos. Each is as close to nature as possible (washed, sliced/ground and cooked), has only 3 ingredients which can be pronounced (chips: Potatoes, sunflower oil, salt; Fritos: Corn, corn oil, salt)

    They both meet nearly every definition proposed above (can't meet them all because some are contradictory)

    Sure they both have an added chemical preservative (salt). But it seems like the clean eating people are cool with that one chemical preservative.

    Fritos are pretty far from the natural state of corn.

    Because they're ground?

    Does that mean that corn tortillas aren't "clean"? What about polenta?

    Or is it something else?
  • sullus
    sullus Posts: 2,839 Member
    Another one that really gets me is the honey vs high fructose corn syrup debate ... one is awesome and clean and great for you, and the other is the processed scourge of the earth, killing us all.

    But they're nearly the same thing. Their Glucose to Fructose ratios are quite similar and they act the same way in the body.

    They're both made pretty much the same way too. Both start with sugar water from plants, add enzymes to convert about 45% of the sugar to fructose, evaporate until sticky.
  • AnvilHead
    AnvilHead Posts: 18,343 Member
    Now here's a question. I like fries.
    I buy frozen, noname brand, packaged fries in a bag with barcode and everything. -> Definitely processed food, no doubt about it.
    They only have 2 ingredients though: potatoes and sunflower oil. -> Nothing you can't pronounce and not exceeding the magical 4 ingredients.

    Clean or not?
    I'd bet you a tenner if we asked 100 clean eaters without each knowing what the others said, the answers would be split almost 50/50.

    I can go a step further than that: I just looked in our freezer at a bag of Pictsweet frozen steam-in-the-bag Asparagus spears. They're packaged, thus have obviously been "processed", and have a bar code too, which would make them off-limits by some definitions of "clean eating". Yet when I look at the ingredients list, this is what it says:
    Ingredients: Asparagus

    One ingredient. A vegetable. A plant-based food. Veg*an friendly, gluten-free, nonfat, no added preservatives, coloring or flavoring. But it's processed, packaged and has a bar code. Oh, and it didn't come from the outside aisle of the grocery store. So un"clean". Yet it has the exact same ingredient list as the fresh asparagus spears over in the produce section on the outside aisle of the grocery store.

    That's how silly, nonsensical and arbitrary "clean eating" can be.
  • sullus
    sullus Posts: 2,839 Member
    sullus wrote: »
    Now here's a question. I like fries.
    I buy frozen, noname brand, packaged fries in a bag with barcode and everything. -> Definitely processed food, no doubt about it.
    They only have 2 ingredients though: potatoes and sunflower oil. -> Nothing you can't pronounce and not exceeding the magical 4 ingredients.

    Clean or not?
    I'd bet you a tenner if we asked 100 clean eaters without each knowing what the others said, the answers would be split almost 50/50.

    I go with a similar example on Cape Cod potato chips and Fritos. Each is as close to nature as possible (washed, sliced/ground and cooked), has only 3 ingredients which can be pronounced (chips: Potatoes, sunflower oil, salt; Fritos: Corn, corn oil, salt)

    They both meet nearly every definition proposed above (can't meet them all because some are contradictory)

    Sure they both have an added chemical preservative (salt). But it seems like the clean eating people are cool with that one chemical preservative.

    Fritos are pretty far from the natural state of corn.

    The only processing is grinding, shaping, cooking. They're pretty close to the natural state of corn.
  • T0M_K
    T0M_K Posts: 7,526 Member
    breakfast after my shower. clean eating. :/
  • Need2Exerc1se
    Need2Exerc1se Posts: 13,575 Member
    sullus wrote: »
    Now here's a question. I like fries.
    I buy frozen, noname brand, packaged fries in a bag with barcode and everything. -> Definitely processed food, no doubt about it.
    They only have 2 ingredients though: potatoes and sunflower oil. -> Nothing you can't pronounce and not exceeding the magical 4 ingredients.

    Clean or not?
    I'd bet you a tenner if we asked 100 clean eaters without each knowing what the others said, the answers would be split almost 50/50.

    I go with a similar example on Cape Cod potato chips and Fritos. Each is as close to nature as possible (washed, sliced/ground and cooked), has only 3 ingredients which can be pronounced (chips: Potatoes, sunflower oil, salt; Fritos: Corn, corn oil, salt)

    They both meet nearly every definition proposed above (can't meet them all because some are contradictory)

    Sure they both have an added chemical preservative (salt). But it seems like the clean eating people are cool with that one chemical preservative.

    Fritos are pretty far from the natural state of corn.

    Because they're ground?

    Does that mean that corn tortillas aren't "clean"? What about polenta?

    Or is it something else?

    Yes, because they are ground. Technically, shucked, decobbed (or whatever you call removing the kernels from the cob) and ground. I don't see how tortillas any different, polenta maybe a little cleaner as a single food.
  • stevencloser
    stevencloser Posts: 8,911 Member
    AnvilHead wrote: »
    Now here's a question. I like fries.
    I buy frozen, noname brand, packaged fries in a bag with barcode and everything. -> Definitely processed food, no doubt about it.
    They only have 2 ingredients though: potatoes and sunflower oil. -> Nothing you can't pronounce and not exceeding the magical 4 ingredients.

    Clean or not?
    I'd bet you a tenner if we asked 100 clean eaters without each knowing what the others said, the answers would be split almost 50/50.

    I can go a step further than that: I just looked in our freezer at a bag of Pictsweet frozen steam-in-the-bag Asparagus spears. They're packaged, thus have obviously been "processed", and have a bar code too, which would make them off-limits by some definitions of "clean eating". Yet when I look at the ingredients list, this is what it says:
    Ingredients: Asparagus

    One ingredient. A vegetable. A plant-based food. Veg*an friendly, gluten-free, nonfat, no added preservatives, coloring or flavoring. But it's processed, packaged and has a bar code. Oh, and it didn't come from the outside aisle of the grocery store. So un"clean". Yet it has the exact same ingredient list as the fresh asparagus spears over in the produce section on the outside aisle of the grocery store.

    That's how silly, nonsensical and arbitrary "clean eating" can be.

    I went with fries because I can imagine many clean eaters going "Not clean" for the fact it's fries alone already without caring about the rest. They're available at Fast Food joints after all.
  • janejellyroll
    janejellyroll Posts: 25,763 Member
    sullus wrote: »
    Now here's a question. I like fries.
    I buy frozen, noname brand, packaged fries in a bag with barcode and everything. -> Definitely processed food, no doubt about it.
    They only have 2 ingredients though: potatoes and sunflower oil. -> Nothing you can't pronounce and not exceeding the magical 4 ingredients.

    Clean or not?
    I'd bet you a tenner if we asked 100 clean eaters without each knowing what the others said, the answers would be split almost 50/50.

    I go with a similar example on Cape Cod potato chips and Fritos. Each is as close to nature as possible (washed, sliced/ground and cooked), has only 3 ingredients which can be pronounced (chips: Potatoes, sunflower oil, salt; Fritos: Corn, corn oil, salt)

    They both meet nearly every definition proposed above (can't meet them all because some are contradictory)

    Sure they both have an added chemical preservative (salt). But it seems like the clean eating people are cool with that one chemical preservative.

    Fritos are pretty far from the natural state of corn.

    Because they're ground?

    Does that mean that corn tortillas aren't "clean"? What about polenta?

    Or is it something else?

    Yes, because they are ground. Technically, shucked, decobbed (or whatever you call removing the kernels from the cob) and ground. I don't see how tortillas any different, polenta maybe a little cleaner as a single food.

    Would all ground foods be unclean or is this specific to corn?
  • sullus
    sullus Posts: 2,839 Member
    sullus wrote: »
    Now here's a question. I like fries.
    I buy frozen, noname brand, packaged fries in a bag with barcode and everything. -> Definitely processed food, no doubt about it.
    They only have 2 ingredients though: potatoes and sunflower oil. -> Nothing you can't pronounce and not exceeding the magical 4 ingredients.

    Clean or not?
    I'd bet you a tenner if we asked 100 clean eaters without each knowing what the others said, the answers would be split almost 50/50.

    I go with a similar example on Cape Cod potato chips and Fritos. Each is as close to nature as possible (washed, sliced/ground and cooked), has only 3 ingredients which can be pronounced (chips: Potatoes, sunflower oil, salt; Fritos: Corn, corn oil, salt)

    They both meet nearly every definition proposed above (can't meet them all because some are contradictory)

    Sure they both have an added chemical preservative (salt). But it seems like the clean eating people are cool with that one chemical preservative.

    Fritos are pretty far from the natural state of corn.

    Because they're ground?

    Does that mean that corn tortillas aren't "clean"? What about polenta?

    Or is it something else?

    Yes, because they are ground. Technically, shucked, decobbed (or whatever you call removing the kernels from the cob) and ground. I don't see how tortillas any different, polenta maybe a little cleaner as a single food.

    Would all ground foods be unclean or is this specific to corn?

    Whelp .. that knocks coffee and tea off the list of clean foods.
  • T0M_K
    T0M_K Posts: 7,526 Member
    bottled water....gone! well just all water..unless you suck it right out of the creek or your own well.
  • janejellyroll
    janejellyroll Posts: 25,763 Member
    sullus wrote: »
    sullus wrote: »
    Now here's a question. I like fries.
    I buy frozen, noname brand, packaged fries in a bag with barcode and everything. -> Definitely processed food, no doubt about it.
    They only have 2 ingredients though: potatoes and sunflower oil. -> Nothing you can't pronounce and not exceeding the magical 4 ingredients.

    Clean or not?
    I'd bet you a tenner if we asked 100 clean eaters without each knowing what the others said, the answers would be split almost 50/50.

    I go with a similar example on Cape Cod potato chips and Fritos. Each is as close to nature as possible (washed, sliced/ground and cooked), has only 3 ingredients which can be pronounced (chips: Potatoes, sunflower oil, salt; Fritos: Corn, corn oil, salt)

    They both meet nearly every definition proposed above (can't meet them all because some are contradictory)

    Sure they both have an added chemical preservative (salt). But it seems like the clean eating people are cool with that one chemical preservative.

    Fritos are pretty far from the natural state of corn.

    Because they're ground?

    Does that mean that corn tortillas aren't "clean"? What about polenta?

    Or is it something else?

    Yes, because they are ground. Technically, shucked, decobbed (or whatever you call removing the kernels from the cob) and ground. I don't see how tortillas any different, polenta maybe a little cleaner as a single food.

    Would all ground foods be unclean or is this specific to corn?

    Whelp .. that knocks coffee and tea off the list of clean foods.

    It would also remove nut butters, which I think are generally considered okay for clean eaters (but I'm not sure). Also ground meats and everyone I know personally who eats clean will eat ground meats.
  • diannethegeek
    diannethegeek Posts: 14,776 Member
    sullus wrote: »
    sullus wrote: »
    Now here's a question. I like fries.
    I buy frozen, noname brand, packaged fries in a bag with barcode and everything. -> Definitely processed food, no doubt about it.
    They only have 2 ingredients though: potatoes and sunflower oil. -> Nothing you can't pronounce and not exceeding the magical 4 ingredients.

    Clean or not?
    I'd bet you a tenner if we asked 100 clean eaters without each knowing what the others said, the answers would be split almost 50/50.

    I go with a similar example on Cape Cod potato chips and Fritos. Each is as close to nature as possible (washed, sliced/ground and cooked), has only 3 ingredients which can be pronounced (chips: Potatoes, sunflower oil, salt; Fritos: Corn, corn oil, salt)

    They both meet nearly every definition proposed above (can't meet them all because some are contradictory)

    Sure they both have an added chemical preservative (salt). But it seems like the clean eating people are cool with that one chemical preservative.

    Fritos are pretty far from the natural state of corn.

    Because they're ground?

    Does that mean that corn tortillas aren't "clean"? What about polenta?

    Or is it something else?

    Yes, because they are ground. Technically, shucked, decobbed (or whatever you call removing the kernels from the cob) and ground. I don't see how tortillas any different, polenta maybe a little cleaner as a single food.

    Would all ground foods be unclean or is this specific to corn?

    Whelp .. that knocks coffee and tea off the list of clean foods.

    It would also remove nut butters, which I think are generally considered okay for clean eaters (but I'm not sure). Also ground meats and everyone I know personally who eats clean will eat ground meats.

    Wouldn't it get rid of steel cut oats, too?
  • juggernaut1974
    juggernaut1974 Posts: 6,212 Member
    sullus wrote: »
    sullus wrote: »
    Now here's a question. I like fries.
    I buy frozen, noname brand, packaged fries in a bag with barcode and everything. -> Definitely processed food, no doubt about it.
    They only have 2 ingredients though: potatoes and sunflower oil. -> Nothing you can't pronounce and not exceeding the magical 4 ingredients.

    Clean or not?
    I'd bet you a tenner if we asked 100 clean eaters without each knowing what the others said, the answers would be split almost 50/50.

    I go with a similar example on Cape Cod potato chips and Fritos. Each is as close to nature as possible (washed, sliced/ground and cooked), has only 3 ingredients which can be pronounced (chips: Potatoes, sunflower oil, salt; Fritos: Corn, corn oil, salt)

    They both meet nearly every definition proposed above (can't meet them all because some are contradictory)

    Sure they both have an added chemical preservative (salt). But it seems like the clean eating people are cool with that one chemical preservative.

    Fritos are pretty far from the natural state of corn.

    Because they're ground?

    Does that mean that corn tortillas aren't "clean"? What about polenta?

    Or is it something else?

    Yes, because they are ground. Technically, shucked, decobbed (or whatever you call removing the kernels from the cob) and ground. I don't see how tortillas any different, polenta maybe a little cleaner as a single food.

    Would all ground foods be unclean or is this specific to corn?

    Whelp .. that knocks coffee and tea off the list of clean foods.

    That's it...I'm out...
  • Need2Exerc1se
    Need2Exerc1se Posts: 13,575 Member
    sullus wrote: »
    Now here's a question. I like fries.
    I buy frozen, noname brand, packaged fries in a bag with barcode and everything. -> Definitely processed food, no doubt about it.
    They only have 2 ingredients though: potatoes and sunflower oil. -> Nothing you can't pronounce and not exceeding the magical 4 ingredients.

    Clean or not?
    I'd bet you a tenner if we asked 100 clean eaters without each knowing what the others said, the answers would be split almost 50/50.

    I go with a similar example on Cape Cod potato chips and Fritos. Each is as close to nature as possible (washed, sliced/ground and cooked), has only 3 ingredients which can be pronounced (chips: Potatoes, sunflower oil, salt; Fritos: Corn, corn oil, salt)

    They both meet nearly every definition proposed above (can't meet them all because some are contradictory)

    Sure they both have an added chemical preservative (salt). But it seems like the clean eating people are cool with that one chemical preservative.

    Fritos are pretty far from the natural state of corn.

    Because they're ground?

    Does that mean that corn tortillas aren't "clean"? What about polenta?

    Or is it something else?

    Yes, because they are ground. Technically, shucked, decobbed (or whatever you call removing the kernels from the cob) and ground. I don't see how tortillas any different, polenta maybe a little cleaner as a single food.

    Would all ground foods be unclean or is this specific to corn?

    I'm not overly comfortable with the term 'unclean' when it comes to food. I'm old school and never heard it described as anything other clean in varying degrees (clean, sort of clean, not clean, stuff like that). And there is plenty of room for argument even amongst those that share my definition as it's not a black and white type definition. Lots of gray.

    But to me, no. Ground foods would not be clean. Those ground with the bran and germ included would cleaner than those with it removed. Those with it removed that are then bleached (e.g. white flour) are not clean.
  • auddii
    auddii Posts: 15,357 Member
    sullus wrote: »
    sullus wrote: »
    Now here's a question. I like fries.
    I buy frozen, noname brand, packaged fries in a bag with barcode and everything. -> Definitely processed food, no doubt about it.
    They only have 2 ingredients though: potatoes and sunflower oil. -> Nothing you can't pronounce and not exceeding the magical 4 ingredients.

    Clean or not?
    I'd bet you a tenner if we asked 100 clean eaters without each knowing what the others said, the answers would be split almost 50/50.

    I go with a similar example on Cape Cod potato chips and Fritos. Each is as close to nature as possible (washed, sliced/ground and cooked), has only 3 ingredients which can be pronounced (chips: Potatoes, sunflower oil, salt; Fritos: Corn, corn oil, salt)

    They both meet nearly every definition proposed above (can't meet them all because some are contradictory)

    Sure they both have an added chemical preservative (salt). But it seems like the clean eating people are cool with that one chemical preservative.

    Fritos are pretty far from the natural state of corn.

    Because they're ground?

    Does that mean that corn tortillas aren't "clean"? What about polenta?

    Or is it something else?

    Yes, because they are ground. Technically, shucked, decobbed (or whatever you call removing the kernels from the cob) and ground. I don't see how tortillas any different, polenta maybe a little cleaner as a single food.

    Would all ground foods be unclean or is this specific to corn?

    Whelp .. that knocks coffee and tea off the list of clean foods.

    Ground beef, salt, pepper, or any spice.

    I'm willing to concede on riced cauliflower; that's the work of the devil.
  • auddii
    auddii Posts: 15,357 Member
    Tomk652015 wrote: »
    bottled water....gone! well just all water..unless you suck it right out of the creek or your own well.

    But if animals dedicate in it, it would have lots of added ingredients.
  • eeejer
    eeejer Posts: 339 Member
    clean eating = preparing everything you eat yourself, knowing every single ingredient in your food because you put it there. Nothing premade at all. You start with raw ingredients (preferably bought from local sources you know). It is pretty much a meaningless term, but this is my definition of it.
  • T0M_K
    T0M_K Posts: 7,526 Member
    For me, those foods that promote the improvement and/or help to maintain you good vital health markers, such as cholesterol, sugar, blood pressure, triglycerides etc etc. obviously its darn near impossible unless you in the Alaskan wilderness and off the grid gathering and/or growing your own foods organically clean eating will have varying degrees.
  • janejellyroll
    janejellyroll Posts: 25,763 Member
    sullus wrote: »
    Now here's a question. I like fries.
    I buy frozen, noname brand, packaged fries in a bag with barcode and everything. -> Definitely processed food, no doubt about it.
    They only have 2 ingredients though: potatoes and sunflower oil. -> Nothing you can't pronounce and not exceeding the magical 4 ingredients.

    Clean or not?
    I'd bet you a tenner if we asked 100 clean eaters without each knowing what the others said, the answers would be split almost 50/50.

    I go with a similar example on Cape Cod potato chips and Fritos. Each is as close to nature as possible (washed, sliced/ground and cooked), has only 3 ingredients which can be pronounced (chips: Potatoes, sunflower oil, salt; Fritos: Corn, corn oil, salt)

    They both meet nearly every definition proposed above (can't meet them all because some are contradictory)

    Sure they both have an added chemical preservative (salt). But it seems like the clean eating people are cool with that one chemical preservative.

    Fritos are pretty far from the natural state of corn.

    Because they're ground?

    Does that mean that corn tortillas aren't "clean"? What about polenta?

    Or is it something else?

    Yes, because they are ground. Technically, shucked, decobbed (or whatever you call removing the kernels from the cob) and ground. I don't see how tortillas any different, polenta maybe a little cleaner as a single food.

    Would all ground foods be unclean or is this specific to corn?

    I'm not overly comfortable with the term 'unclean' when it comes to food. I'm old school and never heard it described as anything other clean in varying degrees (clean, sort of clean, not clean, stuff like that). And there is plenty of room for argument even amongst those that share my definition as it's not a black and white type definition. Lots of gray.

    But to me, no. Ground foods would not be clean. Those ground with the bran and germ included would cleaner than those with it removed. Those with it removed that are then bleached (e.g. white flour) are not clean.

    I understand you're not comfortable with it, but if certain foods are clean, what would you call the rest? "Not clean" doesn't seem that different from "unclean."

    But I don't want to get on a tangent with the "unclean" thing.

    You would consider almond butter, ground beef (let's say it's grass-fed for good measure), coffee, pepper, and oat milk (made from ground oats) to be "not clean" foods?

  • T0M_K
    T0M_K Posts: 7,526 Member
    auddii wrote: »
    Tomk652015 wrote: »
    bottled water....gone! well just all water..unless you suck it right out of the creek or your own well.

    But if animals dedicate in it, it would have lots of added ingredients.

    true...
  • 6502programmer
    6502programmer Posts: 515 Member
    clean eating: washing my vegetables before cooking them
  • californiagirl2012
    californiagirl2012 Posts: 2,625 Member
    It's about the silliest word ever for food. We all know what healthy is. Just do it.
This discussion has been closed.