Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
Basic human physiology & nutrition in schools
Replies
-
The problem with nutrition is that you don't actually look at anything useful. Do you know what I did in my 1 semester of nutrition? We read the book and spent the entire class in silence writing out both the question AND the answer in complete sentences. Like, How many servings of grains do you need in one day? You need X amount of servings of grains in one day. The teacher literally sat at his desk and did nothing except collect the papers at the end of the class; and it would always taken the full hour and thirty minutes to complete the questions at the end of the chapter.
There was very little taught about how much exercise it ACTUALLY TAKES to burn calories. And how many calories tend to be in bad foods. This was back before McDonald's started publishing on their menus that a medium fry is like 400 calories. And our schools often served nachos, french fries, hamburgers, etc for lunch. We had to pick a "vegetable" or a "fruit" side which often consisted of mashed potatoes, broccoli and cheese, or a jello fruit cup. So in addition to teaching me NOTHING about practical nutrition (like how large a serving size is!), the schools contributed to the problem by serving crappy lunches and cutting recess short. I had no clue, until at 27 years old, and after struggling with being overweight/obese since middle school, I bought a food scale, how small serving sizes really are.
I was never shown a hamburger with a sign that said "This is 600-1500 calories" (depending on the kind of burger, what came on it, etc). And then show me something healthy like half of a turkey and cheese sandwich and some baby carrots that had a sign that said it was 300-500 calories. That kind of stuff may have made a HUGE difference when I was growing up.5 -
I'm 44, and in my day we were theoretically taught about nutrition in health class every year, and it was all very vague and did nothing. From what my son (24) tells me it was pretty much the same when he was in school. I got the 4 food groups, he got the Food Pyramid. Neither is helpful at all, IMO.
It would be cool if kids learned about the science of nutrition, macronutrients and micronutrients, calories, how food fuels the body, etc. Not endorsing any specific type of diet. Just present the facts as they are known. Of course, that's a pipe dream. You only have to look at the utter crap they serve in school cafeterias to know that.
I also completely disagree with PackerJohn about physical education. My PE teachers all through the second part of grade school and junior high were hardcore, and you were going to run the mile unless you were dying (I did it for a whole semester while I had walking pneumonia, because they said that pain in my back would be relieved by running--and I'd been in track for a while by then so was conditioned to listen to Coach). We also had to do the stupid president challenge thing and I still can't do the flexed arm hang. It didn't make us all athletes; in fact I had to quit track because I basically ran myself into a hospital bed and six months of convalescence, and that was the end of my involvement with school athletics. I'd like to see them teach some purposeful exercise and train kids to be strong and explain to them why and encourage them, instead of just calling you a baby whale if you couldn't do sixty situps in a minute or run an 8-minute mile (not that I'm bitter).3 -
Packerjohn wrote: »The problem with PE in the schools is we have gotten too politically correct to make the kids actually put in some effort. Growing up, we ran laps and if we walked we had to run extra. Now, you go by a school and the kids are strolling around the track, if not stopping to talk or look at their phones.
If a teacher actually makes them put in some effort, kids complain to the parents who are in the principal's office demand the "mean" PE teacher be fired.
Yes it does happen.
I'm not going to argue that this kind of lowest common denominator downgrading of physical effort is a good thing, but equally, I think old school PE "teaching" was also pretty crappy as well. When it's running season, did the PE teacher establish the fitness level of the students and give them a programme aimed at developing them from a base level & gradually improving, or did he just say "cross country run! 5 miles! now! go!". If it's football season, did he start by introducing skills or did you just end up on a field playing and being shouted at (that one might be different for American football, which is far more technically complex than real football / soccer). The first time I played rugby, I had no idea at all of the rules, and no-one told me until I was on the bottom of a ruck holding onto the ball for dear life getting the crap kicked out of me - how does that instill a love of sport in a child?
Everyone who develops fitness or sport knows that you have to start from a base and build up, but that never happened to me at school, or to anyone I knew. 35 years later it didn't happen to my daughter either.
If it actually did happen, then maybe it would provide a chance for the unfit kids to participate (even if at a lesser level) as well as not holding back the sportier kids, and just maybe the less-fit kids would continue sports and fitness instead of dropping it at the earliest opportunity.3 -
Packerjohn wrote: »The problem with PE in the schools is we have gotten too politically correct to make the kids actually put in some effort. Growing up, we ran laps and if we walked we had to run extra. Now, you go by a school and the kids are strolling around the track, if not stopping to talk or look at their phones.
If a teacher actually makes them put in some effort, kids complain to the parents who are in the principal's office demand the "mean" PE teacher be fired.
Yes it does happen.
I'm not going to argue that this kind of lowest common denominator downgrading of physical effort is a good thing, but equally, I think old school PE "teaching" was also pretty crappy as well. When it's running season, did the PE teacher establish the fitness level of the students and give them a programme aimed at developing them from a base level & gradually improving, or did he just say "cross country run! 5 miles! now! go!". If it's football season, did he start by introducing skills or did you just end up on a field playing and being shouted at (that one might be different for American football, which is far more technically complex than real football / soccer). The first time I played rugby, I had no idea at all of the rules, and no-one told me until I was on the bottom of a ruck holding onto the ball for dear life getting the crap kicked out of me - how does that instill a love of sport in a child?
Everyone who develops fitness or sport knows that you have to start from a base and build up, but that never happened to me at school, or to anyone I knew. 35 years later it didn't happen to my daughter either.
If it actually did happen, then maybe it would provide a chance for the unfit kids to participate (even if at a lesser level) as well as not holding back the sportier kids, and just maybe the less-fit kids would continue sports and fitness instead of dropping it at the earliest opportunity.
I had asthma as a child but it went undiagnosed until well into adulthood because I have coughing spasms instead of wheezing.
I still have nightmares about being forced to run around a track over and over, and losing my recess time because I couldn't manage to run a mile nonstop at the age of 10 without pausing to cough. I remember the PE teacher telling me to stop whining and learn to push through the coughing. I honestly figured I was clearly not meant to be athletic at all.
In high school my parents insisted I join a sport. I procrastinated, mostly out of fear of tryouts, until spring when I only had one option: track and field. That was ok, I figured, because I liked jumping. The coughing while running thing resurfaced, big-time. No one picked up on the coughing being asthma at all during high school. In fact, I made it through college (and mandatory PE) and several years of grad school before diagnosis.
Something so simple as a single puff a day of a medicine to control my asthma has completely changed my outlook on exercise!
0 -
I'm 44, and in my day we were theoretically taught about nutrition in health class every year, and it was all very vague and did nothing. From what my son (24) tells me it was pretty much the same when he was in school. I got the 4 food groups, he got the Food Pyramid. Neither is helpful at all, IMO.
It would be cool if kids learned about the science of nutrition, macronutrients and micronutrients, calories, how food fuels the body, etc. Not endorsing any specific type of diet. Just present the facts as they are known. Of course, that's a pipe dream. You only have to look at the utter crap they serve in school cafeterias to know that.
I also completely disagree with PackerJohn about physical education. My PE teachers all through the second part of grade school and junior high were hardcore, and you were going to run the mile unless you were dying (I did it for a whole semester while I had walking pneumonia, because they said that pain in my back would be relieved by running--and I'd been in track for a while by then so was conditioned to listen to Coach). We also had to do the stupid president challenge thing and I still can't do the flexed arm hang. It didn't make us all athletes; in fact I had to quit track because I basically ran myself into a hospital bed and six months of convalescence, and that was the end of my involvement with school athletics. I'd like to see them teach some purposeful exercise and train kids to be strong and explain to them why and encourage them, instead of just calling you a baby whale if you couldn't do sixty situps in a minute or run an 8-minute mile (not that I'm bitter).
Sorry for your experience, but did you have a doctor's note saying you were sick? The PE teacher can't always tell if a kid is sick or just whining/dogging it.0 -
Packerjohn wrote: »The problem with PE in the schools is we have gotten too politically correct to make the kids actually put in some effort. Growing up, we ran laps and if we walked we had to run extra. Now, you go by a school and the kids are strolling around the track, if not stopping to talk or look at their phones.
If a teacher actually makes them put in some effort, kids complain to the parents who are in the principal's office demand the "mean" PE teacher be fired.
Yes it does happen.
I'm not going to argue that this kind of lowest common denominator downgrading of physical effort is a good thing, but equally, I think old school PE "teaching" was also pretty crappy as well. When it's running season, did the PE teacher establish the fitness level of the students and give them a programme aimed at developing them from a base level & gradually improving, or did he just say "cross country run! 5 miles! now! go!". If it's football season, did he start by introducing skills or did you just end up on a field playing and being shouted at (that one might be different for American football, which is far more technically complex than real football / soccer). The first time I played rugby, I had no idea at all of the rules, and no-one told me until I was on the bottom of a ruck holding onto the ball for dear life getting the crap kicked out of me - how does that instill a love of sport in a child?
Everyone who develops fitness or sport knows that you have to start from a base and build up, but that never happened to me at school, or to anyone I knew. 35 years later it didn't happen to my daughter either.
If it actually did happen, then maybe it would provide a chance for the unfit kids to participate (even if at a lesser level) as well as not holding back the sportier kids, and just maybe the less-fit kids would continue sports and fitness instead of dropping it at the earliest opportunity.
Very good points about establishing a baseline and training from there. I would agree that is how I would do it. I noted you're from England. One of the "challenges" in US schools now is the parents don't want their kids singled out. There would be people at the principal's office complaining if the PE teacher tested at the start of the year and put the less fit kids in a "special" group for remedial work.0 -
AmandaOmega wrote: »The problem with nutrition is that you don't actually look at anything useful. Do you know what I did in my 1 semester of nutrition? We read the book and spent the entire class in silence writing out both the question AND the answer in complete sentences. Like, How many servings of grains do you need in one day? You need X amount of servings of grains in one day. The teacher literally sat at his desk and did nothing except collect the papers at the end of the class; and it would always taken the full hour and thirty minutes to complete the questions at the end of the chapter.
There was very little taught about how much exercise it ACTUALLY TAKES to burn calories. And how many calories tend to be in bad foods. This was back before McDonald's started publishing on their menus that a medium fry is like 400 calories. And our schools often served nachos, french fries, hamburgers, etc for lunch. We had to pick a "vegetable" or a "fruit" side which often consisted of mashed potatoes, broccoli and cheese, or a jello fruit cup. So in addition to teaching me NOTHING about practical nutrition (like how large a serving size is!), the schools contributed to the problem by serving crappy lunches and cutting recess short. I had no clue, until at 27 years old, and after struggling with being overweight/obese since middle school, I bought a food scale, how small serving sizes really are.
I was never shown a hamburger with a sign that said "This is 600-1500 calories" (depending on the kind of burger, what came on it, etc). And then show me something healthy like half of a turkey and cheese sandwich and some baby carrots that had a sign that said it was 300-500 calories. That kind of stuff may have made a HUGE difference when I was growing up.
Yes!! We learned about the how many servings of the basic food groups we should be eating every day. But as far as I remember nothing about how many calories foods contain. Given that your weight is all about CICO, calories in food should be highlighted.
However kids really have no control as to the foods they are served. They aren't doing the grocery shopping and cooking. They aren't choosing the restaurants and takeout. I mean kids request but the parent or caregiver decides. Since we are in a phase of not saying no to kids, they eat foods that are high calorie without a lot of satisfying nutrition. So they get hungry again and eat more.
I have known it was CICO since the first time I decided I need to drop weight. What I didn't know was just how many calories foods have. It was a surprise finding out lunch at Mcdonalds could be your entire days allowance.
We had real recess and PE when I was in school. After recess stopped because of grade level, PE started every day. Doing something that made us run around for the entire class.period. That doesn't happen now in most school districts. It's once a week. In high school kids are only required to take two semesters of PE.
I want a national campaign about CICO. Programs in school, on TV and Internet. If it's simply CICO there isn't any need to get into specific foods.0 -
I want a national campaign about CICO. Programs in school, on TV and Internet. If it's simply CICO there isn't any need to get into specific foods. [/quote]
That is the ultimate truth that so many don't want to hear because it either requires some restraint-in-eating or more exercise, but it needs to go just a smidge deeper than that, IMO! It wasn't until I took Chemistry, that I learned that a calories is a calorie - doesn't matter if it came from a cookie or a leaf of kale. Biology taught that 3500 calories equal a pound. Then later, as an adult, I learned about Glycemic responses and began to realize that most of what kids LIKE to eat today, gets processed as "sugar" by the digestive system. They get all sugar-buzzed on a PB&J on white bread, or fries/ketchup, then they can't sit still in class for a few hours and by midafternoon, suffer a blood-sugar crash and WANT MORE SUGAR. As the starving kid scarfs down potato chips, the parent proudly says their child doesn't eat "sugar". (oh really??) So if you can teach kids (and adults) to avoid the high-glycemic foods, they can avoid those roller-coaster blood-sugar rides.
0 -
In the US, a lot of the school requirements are different from state to state. Where I lived, growing up, we learned about nutrition. It was the food pyramid, because that's the age I am. I actually remember in Junior High Health class being taught how large a portion size was. Some of it stuck (a slice of bread, half a roll, etc.) - some of it didn't (how much of a vegetable?). That doesn't mean the teacher never taught it. It means I didn't use it, so I didn't retain it.
Gym class was three days a week and it was a full hour in elementary school, 30-40 minutes in middle/high school. It was also taught by people who went to school - earned master's degrees - in Physical Fitness Education. That's a requirement in my home state. We had one teacher for our regular class and another for gym, even in elementary school.
At that point, it was before they changed things to not single out kids and I was in the "Adjusted Gym Class" in high school. That was the gym class for the non-athletic kids. They already had us separated from the "Average Class" and the "Advanced Class". I'd have loved for them to actually teach us how to play games. It would have made it a lot more fun to actually know how to hit a ball in softball or throw/catch a football. We also had to do the Presidential Fitness Challenge. I could get above 80% in everything except... the agility part of the challenge. (8 minute mile easily, flexed arm hang for longer than anyone in the class, I think it was 17 inches on the v-sit and reach...) Yeah... I'm still not agile. How do you improve that?
I say this to point out that a lot of the foolish questions you get here... it's not the fault of the schools or the parents. It's generally the media that promotes the latest fad or pseudoscience.0 -
I say this to point out that a lot of the foolish questions you get here... it's not the fault of the schools or the parents. It's generally the media that promotes the latest fad or pseudoscience.
At a certain point, though, you either choose to educate yourself or you choose to be ignorant. I am having a hard time not thinking that some of the ignorance that we see -- and I am also referring to topics well beyond nutrition, as I referenced before and Packerjohn elaborated on -- is willful, chosen. I don't understand this; it frustrates me. So much of what people repeat here not only is wrong, but just makes no sense if you think about it at all. I don't understand why people believe such things -- I think they must want to on some level.3 -
lemurcat12 wrote: »I say this to point out that a lot of the foolish questions you get here... it's not the fault of the schools or the parents. It's generally the media that promotes the latest fad or pseudoscience.
At a certain point, though, you either choose to educate yourself or you choose to be ignorant. I am having a hard time not thinking that some of the ignorance that we see -- and I am also referring to topics well beyond nutrition, as I referenced before and Packerjohn elaborated on -- is willful, chosen. I don't understand this; it frustrates me. So much of what people repeat here not only is wrong, but just makes no sense if you think about it at all. I don't understand why people believe such things -- I think they must want to on some level.
Not to link to specifics but theres a great example that @lemurcat12 is reminding me of, with her post. There's a couple of threads going about a waist trainer and its effectiveness for flattening a tummy while eating at a surplus. Although information to the contrary has been posted, some are still happy to continue even though the idea makes absolutely no sense, common or otherwise. Talk about willful.2 -
lemurcat12 wrote: »I say this to point out that a lot of the foolish questions you get here... it's not the fault of the schools or the parents. It's generally the media that promotes the latest fad or pseudoscience.
At a certain point, though, you either choose to educate yourself or you choose to be ignorant. I am having a hard time not thinking that some of the ignorance that we see -- and I am also referring to topics well beyond nutrition, as I referenced before and Packerjohn elaborated on -- is willful, chosen. I don't understand this; it frustrates me. So much of what people repeat here not only is wrong, but just makes no sense if you think about it at all. I don't understand why people believe such things -- I think they must want to on some level.
I think it's very hard when the media tells you something (like this pill will melt your weight off, you won't have to diet or exercise/this device melts off belly fat - no diet changes needed) and you want it to be that easy. It's very hard to learn that the media can - and does - lie to you, just to get your money, even if you really ought to know better. Mostly some folks just want a quick fix that doesn't require any real life style change. They want it so badly that they close their ears to the facts and... in that case, yeah, willful ignorance. However, no amount of education is going to change that type of thinking. You can give them all the information you want and they won't change their minds.
At that point, it's not about changing how stuff is taught in schools. It's about trying to get the media to stop all the lies they feed desperate people. Good luck with that.0 -
lemurcat12 wrote: »I say this to point out that a lot of the foolish questions you get here... it's not the fault of the schools or the parents. It's generally the media that promotes the latest fad or pseudoscience.
At a certain point, though, you either choose to educate yourself or you choose to be ignorant. I am having a hard time not thinking that some of the ignorance that we see -- and I am also referring to topics well beyond nutrition, as I referenced before and Packerjohn elaborated on -- is willful, chosen. I don't understand this; it frustrates me. So much of what people repeat here not only is wrong, but just makes no sense if you think about it at all. I don't understand why people believe such things -- I think they must want to on some level.
I think it's very hard when the media tells you something (like this pill will melt your weight off, you won't have to diet or exercise/this device melts off belly fat - no diet changes needed) and you want it to be that easy. It's very hard to learn that the media can - and does - lie to you, just to get your money, even if you really ought to know better. Mostly some folks just want a quick fix that doesn't require any real life style change. They want it so badly that they close their ears to the facts and... in that case, yeah, willful ignorance. However, no amount of education is going to change that type of thinking. You can give them all the information you want and they won't change their minds.
At that point, it's not about changing how stuff is taught in schools. It's about trying to get the media to stop all the lies they feed desperate people. Good luck with that.
Pretty much. It's only hard because people want any excuse to keep up their excessive eating habits. "My brain says I need this dammit! I's hangry!" Hell, just getting people to accept that their overeating has completely wrecked their hormone signaling would be a step in the right direction.1 -
If CICO is taught and hammered into kids heads all through school then maybe the waist trainer and the like industry will eventually die. If there was some kind of national campaign about CICO is king that could help get rid of the schemes. Maybe even market it as the "secret" to weight issues is CICO to appeal to people.
I don't have any animosity for people who want the easy way out. Eating at a deficit sucks. For some people their maintenance allowance sucks too. If there were an easy way out that worked, I would be laughing my way to my healthy weight self.1 -
lemurcat12 wrote: »I say this to point out that a lot of the foolish questions you get here... it's not the fault of the schools or the parents. It's generally the media that promotes the latest fad or pseudoscience.
At a certain point, though, you either choose to educate yourself or you choose to be ignorant. I am having a hard time not thinking that some of the ignorance that we see -- and I am also referring to topics well beyond nutrition, as I referenced before and Packerjohn elaborated on -- is willful, chosen. I don't understand this; it frustrates me. So much of what people repeat here not only is wrong, but just makes no sense if you think about it at all. I don't understand why people believe such things -- I think they must want to on some level.
I think it's very hard when the media tells you something (like this pill will melt your weight off, you won't have to diet or exercise/this device melts off belly fat - no diet changes needed) and you want it to be that easy.
I don't think it's hard at all, but it is the want. People seek out media (usually obviously disreputable media) that tells them what they want to believe.It's very hard to learn that the media can - and does - lie to you, just to get your money, even if you really ought to know better.
I think everyone knows to be cynical about the media these days. It's just it's become -- at least for many -- not actually about vetting sources but believing what you want and dismissing as biased or disreputable sources that say what you don't want to believe. Sometimes even citing a source for one thing while dismissing everything else it says.Mostly some folks just want a quick fix that doesn't require any real life style change. They want it so badly that they close their ears to the facts and... in that case, yeah, willful ignorance. However, no amount of education is going to change that type of thinking. You can give them all the information you want and they won't change their minds.
Agree.At that point, it's not about changing how stuff is taught in schools. It's about trying to get the media to stop all the lies they feed desperate people. Good luck with that.
IMO, it's not the fault of the media, although I wish it were more competent on average and didn't spread lies in the worst examples. We all know better, by now.0 -
Confirmation bias can be an obese person's worst enemy. Unfortunately, it's all over the place now. Between the people trying to sell them *kitten*, and the fat acceptance movement, is it any wonder that people have trouble with accepting facts?
I am reminded of a quote I heard a long time ago: "Reality exists, regardless of your perception of it."6 -
Sorry but I don't need the government "educating" (if you can even call it that) my future kids about food. Hell, I would prefer that they stick to the education basics (math, science, writing etc.) and leave the rest to their mother and myself.0
-
Nutrition is not a developed science where as many as 50% are in agreement on anything. As noted by others the financial conflicts of interest are high as well. When I earned my OD degree in 1986 we had pharmacology for the last three years I think but never remember one class on Nutrition. Type 2 diabetes is a leading cause of blindness that for the most part can be prevented from developing or reversed by diet.
The sad fact is Nutrition is not on the radar of the healthcare industry but Rx Meds are. Prevention medicine does not pay all that well.
@AmandaOmega I totally agree with you.1 -
Sorry but I don't need the government "educating" (if you can even call it that) my future kids about food. Hell, I would prefer that they stick to the education basics (math, science, writing etc.) and leave the rest to their mother and myself.
Just curious. Why do you choose to "outsource" math, scuence, etc education but want mom and dad to teach nutrition?3 -
Fat Activists would throw a fit if public schools tried to teach portion control and nutrition. Look at all the heat Michelle Obama gets over her trying to make school lunches more healthy.
Screw fat activists and their stupid agendas. For a group that proudly bellows "*kitten* your beauty standards!" they seem to be very concerned with the idea that they're called beautiful.1 -
Packerjohn wrote: »I'm 44, and in my day we were theoretically taught about nutrition in health class every year, and it was all very vague and did nothing. From what my son (24) tells me it was pretty much the same when he was in school. I got the 4 food groups, he got the Food Pyramid. Neither is helpful at all, IMO.
It would be cool if kids learned about the science of nutrition, macronutrients and micronutrients, calories, how food fuels the body, etc. Not endorsing any specific type of diet. Just present the facts as they are known. Of course, that's a pipe dream. You only have to look at the utter crap they serve in school cafeterias to know that.
I also completely disagree with PackerJohn about physical education. My PE teachers all through the second part of grade school and junior high were hardcore, and you were going to run the mile unless you were dying (I did it for a whole semester while I had walking pneumonia, because they said that pain in my back would be relieved by running--and I'd been in track for a while by then so was conditioned to listen to Coach). We also had to do the stupid president challenge thing and I still can't do the flexed arm hang. It didn't make us all athletes; in fact I had to quit track because I basically ran myself into a hospital bed and six months of convalescence, and that was the end of my involvement with school athletics. I'd like to see them teach some purposeful exercise and train kids to be strong and explain to them why and encourage them, instead of just calling you a baby whale if you couldn't do sixty situps in a minute or run an 8-minute mile (not that I'm bitter).
Sorry for your experience, but did you have a doctor's note saying you were sick? The PE teacher can't always tell if a kid is sick or just whining/dogging it.
I didn't *know* I was sick, I just knew I hurt and couldn't take a deep breath, which is why I asked the coach about it. When a kid tells you it hurts to breathe, the answer is "go to the doctor," not "run another mile." A coach should know this. Sure, kids whine. Sure, sometimes they try to get out of *kitten*. That doesn't make it legit to dismiss any kind of pain or problem a kid has.1 -
Packerjohn wrote: »They have no teachers who have a vast knowledge teaching them. Most will just go by the governments food pyramid and tell the kids that it's important they follow it. Even in most elementary schools now, PE is taught by the homeroom teacher, and they have NO EXPERIENCE in physical fitness at all.
A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
The problem with PE in the schools is we have gotten too politically correct to make the kids actually put in some effort. Growing up, we ran laps and if we walked we had to run extra. Now, you go by a school and the kids are strolling around the track, if not stopping to talk or look at their phones.
If a teacher actually makes them put in some effort, kids complain to the parents who are in the principal's office demand the "mean" PE teacher be fired.
Yes it does happen.
What is wrong with walking around a track? Walking is good exercise.3 -
KetoneKaren wrote: »Don't I remember that it was actually ketchup that was a vegetable?
It was tomato sauce. And it is a vegetable, obviously. The controversy was over whether the amount of tomato sauce on a slice of pizza should be considered a serving of vegetables. The USDA said no, but Congress voted yes. If you don't like this nonsense you should find out how your representative voted and let them know your feelings.0 -
So this had taken a slightly different turn than I'd expected as I realize I wasn't that clear. By nutrition I was thinking more along the lines of calories per gram, how each macro is broken down, what nutrients does the body need...etc. Certainly not suggesting that a particular diet or methodology be taught. Teach what starches, sugars and fiber is. What amino acids are, the various types of fat. The digestive system and how food is processed by the body. Things with as little bias as possible.5
-
Need2Exerc1se wrote: »KetoneKaren wrote: »Don't I remember that it was actually ketchup that was a vegetable?
It was tomato sauce. And it is a vegetable, obviously. The controversy was over whether the amount of tomato sauce on a slice of pizza should be considered a serving of vegetables. The USDA said no, but Congress voted yes. If you don't like this nonsense you should find out how your representative voted and let them know your feelings.
Two different but similar controversies, I suspect. The ketchup thing was in the Reagan administration, and the tomato sauce (pizza) thing was in 2011. Problem with seeing how people voted is that it was an omnibus bill and a lot of people who weren't necessarily for the interference with USDA recommendations thought the bill (and related funding) was needed.
Here's a short article on the 2011 thing: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-lunch-idUSTRE7AH000201111183 -
So this had taken a slightly different turn than I'd expected as I realize I wasn't that clear. By nutrition I was thinking more along the lines of calories per gram, how each macro is broken down, what nutrients does the body need...etc. Certainly not suggesting that a particular diet or methodology be taught. Teach what starches, sugars and fiber is. What amino acids are, the various types of fat. The digestive system and how food is processed by the body. Things with as little bias as possible.
Now this, I can absolutely get behind, assuming it remained based in science, and not whatever *kitten* agenda is being sloughed off upon the population on any given day. However, given that the same government pays into public schools, as pays into various ag subsidies, good luck with that one.2 -
Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Packerjohn wrote: »They have no teachers who have a vast knowledge teaching them. Most will just go by the governments food pyramid and tell the kids that it's important they follow it. Even in most elementary schools now, PE is taught by the homeroom teacher, and they have NO EXPERIENCE in physical fitness at all.
A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
The problem with PE in the schools is we have gotten too politically correct to make the kids actually put in some effort. Growing up, we ran laps and if we walked we had to run extra. Now, you go by a school and the kids are strolling around the track, if not stopping to talk or look at their phones.
If a teacher actually makes them put in some effort, kids complain to the parents who are in the principal's office demand the "mean" PE teacher be fired.
Yes it does happen.
What is wrong with walking around a track? Walking is good exercise.
Nothing wrong with walking as done at a brisk pace for exercise. Much too often you see kids slowly strolling, stopping looking at phones, etc.
So in their case not real effective.0 -
Packerjohn wrote: »They have no teachers who have a vast knowledge teaching them. Most will just go by the governments food pyramid and tell the kids that it's important they follow it. Even in most elementary schools now, PE is taught by the homeroom teacher, and they have NO EXPERIENCE in physical fitness at all.
A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
IDEA Fitness member
Kickboxing Certified Instructor
Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
The problem with PE in the schools is we have gotten too politically correct to make the kids actually put in some effort. Growing up, we ran laps and if we walked we had to run extra. Now, you go by a school and the kids are strolling around the track, if not stopping to talk or look at their phones.
If a teacher actually makes them put in some effort, kids complain to the parents who are in the principal's office demand the "mean" PE teacher be fired.
Yes it does happen.
Ha this brings back memories of primary school. Our pe teacher used to make us jog round and round the oval, which i hated! He chose a kid i disliked from our group to run behind me and push me in the back every time i slowed down.0 -
In order to teach it in school we first have to establish guidelines about what constitutes healthy eating. We would also have to include people with medical conditions and allergies and be able to offer alternatives. If one is allergic to peanuts but eats a plant based diet, what is a good protein for them to eat? If one is diabetic, what are the best foods for them to eat to avoid sugar spikes? These are both issues my daughters' classmates have dealt with and those would need to be addressed. Side note: the questions about what to eat are rhetorical. *I* know this information but if we are teaching it en masse answers need to be readily available.
Also, there is another side to this (if its been addressed already I apologize in advance) and that it financial. I don't know one, single, person who doesn't honestly know that baked chicken and veggies are healthier than mac n cheese or that oatmeal or a veggie omelet is healthier than biscuits and gravy. What I think people really need to be educated on is WAYS they can implement healthier eating when they are on a strict budget, and also when they are super stretched for time. Not to mention storage of foods. Its easier to store boxes of mac n cheese for a month than it is fresh produce so if one gets food once a month, they buy the mac n cheese. My state has a population that is largely unemployed and on some sort of assistance. They KNOW what is healthy. Deep down, we all know. How to do it is the real issue, in my opinion. Teaching it in school is good, teaching it to the parents would be better.0 -
I took basic nutrition and human antimony in both middle and high school. They usually teach the nutrition based on the USDA and other government factors. Back in my day we learned about the food pyramid.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions