Space

1171820222374

Replies

  • cee134
    cee134 Posts: 33,711 Member
    The Porpoise Galaxy

    rgrnmd6exh40.jpg
  • Timshel_
    Timshel_ Posts: 22,834 Member
  • SueSueDio
    SueSueDio Posts: 4,796 Member
    cee134 wrote: »
    The Porpoise Galaxy

    rgrnmd6exh40.jpg

    Beautiful picture, but I see a penguin rather than a porpoise... :)
  • This content has been removed.
  • cee134
    cee134 Posts: 33,711 Member
    The Calabas Clash Node.

    a50o5y28i92x.jpg
  • Jimb376mfp
    Jimb376mfp Posts: 6,236 Member
    gjr6s03i8eu6.jpg

    Why? BECAUSE I live on the ONLY planet that has intelligent life forms!
  • Timshel_
    Timshel_ Posts: 22,834 Member
    Okay, so I was reading about theories on Mars water and came across this interesting opt-ed piece on the collective progression of research. More so the that change from a stalwart front of discovery to a (subjectively) stranded, or thin collection of scientists.
    Here there is a paradox: Today, there are many more scientists, and much more money is spent on research, yet the pace of fundamental innovation, the kinds of theories and engineering practices that will feed the pipeline of future progress, appears, to some observers, including us, to be slowing. Why might that be the case?

    Interesting read, if your into this science.

    Opinion: Science in the age of selfies
  • SueSueDio
    SueSueDio Posts: 4,796 Member
    Timshel_ wrote: »
    Okay, so I was reading about theories on Mars water and came across this interesting opt-ed piece on the collective progression of research. More so the that change from a stalwart front of discovery to a (subjectively) stranded, or thin collection of scientists.
    Here there is a paradox: Today, there are many more scientists, and much more money is spent on research, yet the pace of fundamental innovation, the kinds of theories and engineering practices that will feed the pipeline of future progress, appears, to some observers, including us, to be slowing. Why might that be the case?

    Interesting read, if your into this science.

    Opinion: Science in the age of selfies

    I only read through that quickly, but one thing I didn't see mentioned was war. "Necessity is the mother of invention", and all that. An awful lot of technological progress has been due to war or the aftermath of it, and there hasn't been such a need for that pace of development in the past 50 years. (I realise that many of the areas of research mentioned might not necessarily seem related to that sort of endeavor, but making your armies and weapons more efficient trickles down into many other things eventually.)

    I have an interesting book written in the 50's about the future of rocket development, which was so driven by the Cold War that the author couldn't really describe the concepts he was trying to explain since "the enemy" might read it and know what America was up to!
  • Timshel_
    Timshel_ Posts: 22,834 Member
    SueSueDio wrote: »
    I have an interesting book written in the 50's about the future of rocket development, which was so driven by the Cold War that the author couldn't really describe the concepts he was trying to explain since "the enemy" might read it and know what America was up to!

    Agree with you on all of that. The article could be considered fringe science opinion as there is always strong suggestion that gov-sci is where the real cutting edge development and break-thru happen. And as you mention, very much driven by military wants and needs. I remember reading a 1960's book on NERVA engines for space exploration. It was presented as a generic hypothetical piece, with some mathematics, but there was a lot left out that everyone at the time in-the-know new was being developed and tested. But because of world politics and powers, we never get anything of substance.

    Most scientists believe that discoveries are at least 10 years behind because of govt black-outs on research. I dunno if that is true, but we are still finding out today discoveries, developments, and projects from 50 years ago because of classification.

  • SueSueDio
    SueSueDio Posts: 4,796 Member
    Timshel_ wrote: »
    Most scientists believe that discoveries are at least 10 years behind because of govt black-outs on research.

    That wouldn't surprise me in the slightest! :)
  • cee134
    cee134 Posts: 33,711 Member
    Butterfly Nebula

    o03otvpxzk1o.jpg
  • NorthCascades
    NorthCascades Posts: 10,968 Member
    Milky Way over the Grand Canyon

    image
  • cee134
    cee134 Posts: 33,711 Member
    A soccer ball originally packed onto space shuttle Challenger in 1986 is now orbiting the Earth on board the International Space Station, 31 years later.

    cjpwsaiogqxf.jpg
  • Timshel_
    Timshel_ Posts: 22,834 Member
    Just a random thought after watching some Star Trek last night....There is no atmosphere is space, so sound pressure and waves do not exist. There is no oxygen or other flammable gasses as such. Therefore, there are no explosions in space like in movies. Or any sound that would be made for anything.


    anigif_enhanced-12669-1395772365-1.gif
  • This content has been removed.
  • Timshel_
    Timshel_ Posts: 22,834 Member
    FFS.

    dumb1.gif


  • This content has been removed.
  • taco_inspector
    taco_inspector Posts: 7,223 Member
    edited February 2017
    Timshel_ wrote: »
    FFS.

    dumb1.gif

    Good to see that kids are still playing with Newtons first law of motion:
    An object at rest will remain at rest unless acted on by an unbalanced force. An object in motion continues in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force. This law is often called. "the law of inertia".An object at rest will remain at rest unless acted on by an unbalanced force. An object in motion continues in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force. This law is often called. "the law of inertia".
    Yeah, someone in that image is 'unbalanced' alright!
  • Timshel_
    Timshel_ Posts: 22,834 Member
    Timshel_ wrote: »
    FFS.

    dumb1.gif

    Good to see that kids are still playing with Newtons first law of motion:
    An object at rest will remain at rest unless acted on by an unbalanced force. An object in motion continues in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force. This law is often called. "the law of inertia".An object at rest will remain at rest unless acted on by an unbalanced force. An object in motion continues in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force. This law is often called. "the law of inertia".
    Yeah, someone in that image is 'unbalanced' alright!

    Right? I don't believe this particular gentleman has an understanding of these laws. Though, he does now understand that he was moving until he was stopped by the force of gravity and concrete.
  • cee134
    cee134 Posts: 33,711 Member
    Jupiter From Below (Enhanced Color)

    ywail5qzm6j0.jpg
  • cee134
    cee134 Posts: 33,711 Member
    Daphnis plows through Saturn's rings, leaving waves of dust in its wake

    8cdjltjl13l5.jpg
  • Hearts_2015
    Hearts_2015 Posts: 12,031 Member
    edited February 2017
    cee134 wrote: »
    cee134 wrote: »
    Google Sky app does the same thing.. it's super awesome

    That's cool.

    The program I was talking about actually shows you what the sky looks like from wherever you are standing at what ever time you choose. Then it tells you about the consolations, paths, and celestial happenings. For example, if I want to know what that bright star is, or if it's a planet, then I can easily look up what I'm looking at.

    Yes, Google Sky does the same.. you aim your phone or tablet at whatever you are looking at and it tells you nearby constellations, planets, everything. I love it!! If you haven't tried it, download it and see if you like it.

    Ahhhhhh. One of those phone thingys.

    I'm sure there's a desktop version of Google Sky Map for old folks. :D
    Just saw this thread....
    There's some incredibly awesome pictures on this thread! I'll have to Google for that "Old Folks Google Sky Map" :D

    Oh and..
    @kinkyslinky16
    that's nowhere NEAR enough gum in your mouth "Melissa Spicy"!! ;):laugh:

    Lovin the profile photo! :+1:
  • cee134
    cee134 Posts: 33,711 Member
    Space Station Flight Over Venice

    u59091qv66fa.jpg
  • This content has been removed.
  • cee134
    cee134 Posts: 33,711 Member
    Amazing lightning from space

    3pm4j8c9bxkf.jpg
  • cee134
    cee134 Posts: 33,711 Member
    Milky Way Mosaic

    qby9kbsi00jn.jpg
  • This content has been removed.
  • MrStabbems
    MrStabbems Posts: 3,110 Member
    should be getting my telescope mount soon. will take some photos!
  • This content has been removed.