If lifting is the way to get that 'toned' look, then why...?

xtxtxtx
xtxtxtx Posts: 83 Member
edited November 16 in Fitness and Exercise
I keep reading that the only way to get that sought-after 'lean, tight, toned' look is in fact to lift heavy and that muscles cannot be 'toned' or 'tightened,' they can only get bigger. But if this is true, then why do the women who lift that I know have bulging arm muscles, big thighs (muscular, but still), big butts, etc, while the runners and yogi and dancer women I know who have never touched weights have the lean, tight, toned look I want, and a completely different look altogether--narrow hips, thin legs, etc? Their muscles don't look big, they just look tight. Even if they aren't particularly thin...they have visible muscles, but not boxy ones like the lifters. We can't deny that the type of exercise you do matters--it's obvious that swimmer bodies are different from, say, runner bodies. So why do people claim that lifting is the only way to get that look?
«134567

Replies

  • xtxtxtx
    xtxtxtx Posts: 83 Member
    They say not to do that and that it's a myth! @merrysailor88 IDK anymore!
  • xtxtxtx
    xtxtxtx Posts: 83 Member
    Not the ones I know @SpotLighttt
  • SpotLighttt
    SpotLighttt Posts: 174 Member
    xtxtxtx wrote: »
    Not the ones I know @SpotLighttt

    ..then they are gifted with an abundance of testosterone.
  • Traveler120
    Traveler120 Posts: 712 Member
    You don't need to lift heavy as in deadlifts, bench, squat, to look lean and toned. There are plenty of men and women who look that way from just regular exercise combining bodyweight exercise, yoga, TRX, cycling, running etc.

    I don't like the big thighs and shoulders and arms you get from heavy lifting either. And there are plenty of women who do get that bulky look naturally without gear and just from lifting. I like the slim, low body fat, evident muscle, "toned" look on women.
  • rainbowbow
    rainbowbow Posts: 7,490 Member
    xtxtxtx wrote: »
    I keep reading that the only way to get that sought-after 'lean, tight, toned' look is in fact to lift heavy and that muscles cannot be 'toned' or 'tightened,' they can only get bigger. But if this is true, then why do the women who lift that I know have bulging arm muscles, big thighs (muscular, but still), big butts, etc, while the runners and yogi and dancer women I know who have never touched weights have the lean, tight, toned look I want, and a completely different look altogether--narrow hips, thin legs, etc? Their muscles don't look big, they just look tight. Even if they aren't particularly thin...they have visible muscles, but not boxy ones like the lifters. We can't deny that the type of exercise you do matters--it's obvious that swimmer bodies are different from, say, runner bodies. So why do people claim that lifting is the only way to get that look?

    what look.

    because it sounds like you and i have very different ideas about what is/is not an ideal look.
  • Isn't it a combination of both? Running or any cardio acivity that increases the heart rate will help shed the pounds (and keep it off) and bodyweight workouts using weights will tone and tighten? This is what I've been doing for the last 2months and I can see more definition in certain areas of my body and have lost inches but not pounds.
    If the physique you're after is more of a runner, dancer type etc why don't you give that activity a try and see if you get results?
  • peleroja
    peleroja Posts: 3,979 Member
    rainbowbow wrote: »
    xtxtxtx wrote: »
    I keep reading that the only way to get that sought-after 'lean, tight, toned' look is in fact to lift heavy and that muscles cannot be 'toned' or 'tightened,' they can only get bigger. But if this is true, then why do the women who lift that I know have bulging arm muscles, big thighs (muscular, but still), big butts, etc, while the runners and yogi and dancer women I know who have never touched weights have the lean, tight, toned look I want, and a completely different look altogether--narrow hips, thin legs, etc? Their muscles don't look big, they just look tight. Even if they aren't particularly thin...they have visible muscles, but not boxy ones like the lifters. We can't deny that the type of exercise you do matters--it's obvious that swimmer bodies are different from, say, runner bodies. So why do people claim that lifting is the only way to get that look?

    what look.

    because it sounds like you and i have very different ideas about what is/is not an ideal look.

    I think what OP is saying that when women post here about desiring that specific lean, narrow, slim-thighed look (the Victoria's Secret special, basically) the answer given is always LIFT HEAVY and she feels that anecdotally, the women she sees who have that shape don't lift and the ones who do have a shape she doesn't find desirable.

    I'm not touching whether or not any of that is objectively true or whatever, just trying to clarify as I think I understand what the OP was trying to say based on her own observations.
  • rainbowbow
    rainbowbow Posts: 7,490 Member
    peleroja wrote: »
    rainbowbow wrote: »
    xtxtxtx wrote: »
    I keep reading that the only way to get that sought-after 'lean, tight, toned' look is in fact to lift heavy and that muscles cannot be 'toned' or 'tightened,' they can only get bigger. But if this is true, then why do the women who lift that I know have bulging arm muscles, big thighs (muscular, but still), big butts, etc, while the runners and yogi and dancer women I know who have never touched weights have the lean, tight, toned look I want, and a completely different look altogether--narrow hips, thin legs, etc? Their muscles don't look big, they just look tight. Even if they aren't particularly thin...they have visible muscles, but not boxy ones like the lifters. We can't deny that the type of exercise you do matters--it's obvious that swimmer bodies are different from, say, runner bodies. So why do people claim that lifting is the only way to get that look?

    what look.

    because it sounds like you and i have very different ideas about what is/is not an ideal look.

    I think what OP is saying that when women post here about desiring that specific lean, narrow, slim-thighed look (the Victoria's Secret special, basically) the answer given is always LIFT HEAVY and she feels that anecdotally, the women she sees who have that shape don't lift and the ones who do have a shape she doesn't find desirable.

    I'm not touching whether or not any of that is objectively true or whatever, just trying to clarify as I think I understand what the OP was trying to say based on her own observations.

    oh, well i don't think anyone advises to lift heavy if you want to look like a victoria's secret angel. That's why i was asking.

    You acheive a dancer look by being... a dancer. Or a model by training like a model. ..And eating low calories of course.
  • sardelsa
    sardelsa Posts: 9,812 Member
    jemhh wrote: »
    Different goals.

    Your yoga friends may want to look more like Jessica Alba and your lifting friends may want more muscle mass, like Erin Stern.

    If you want a more slender look you won't chase progressive overload as much.


    https://bretcontreras.com/how-to-attain-a-slender-look-like-jessica-alba-zoe-saldana/


    I forgot about that article.. awesome stuff. OP just in case you missed it, please give it a read
  • moesis
    moesis Posts: 874 Member
    You need to look beyond what they do in the gym/studio and look at what happens in the kitchen. I can guarantee that you will see a drastic difference between the diet of a Power Lifter and a Yogi.
This discussion has been closed.