Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

Should your S.O./Spouse have a say so if they feel you are too thin or too large?

1262729313268

Replies

  • GottaBurnEmAll
    GottaBurnEmAll Posts: 7,722 Member
    aggelikik wrote: »
    tomteboda wrote: »
    The answer to bad moral character? I think everyone knows that's much, much harder than weight loss. A fat person (defined here as a person who is at 1 lb over the arbitrary WHO guide of BMI=25) can lose weight.They can bring joy to the lives of others. They can participate in athletic activities, be upstanding members of their communities, be generous and kind,and fun, and small good, and yes, have sex with ordinary humans without crushing them or breaking bones. And they can, as I said, lose the weight.

    A narrow, shallow, judgmental person changing is the stuff of fairy tales.

    I personally think anyone married to such a person is better off without the dead weight of that spouse.

    So, physical attraction is a matter of morals?
    I love it how everyone is supposedly for communication and honesty in marriages, as long as there is actually no real communication and honesty happening...

    It's not about physical attraction after a certain point. After all, we're all going to age, and wrinkled bits and sagging boobs and whatnot aren't all that.

    An established long-standing relationship becomes about more than physical attraction after a while. It stops mattering. You are making love to the person who has shared life's ups and downs with you and sex is about expressing everything you feel for each other.

    This has been the thrust of all the push back in this discussion. The idea of being turned on because they look hot just then and then going and having sex in a long-standing relationship is just not how it happens. I can remember that happening with my husband, way back in the early days, looking at him here and there and getting turned on, but that's just not how it works now.

  • SpotLighttt
    SpotLighttt Posts: 174 Member
    edited April 2017
    aggelikik wrote: »
    tomteboda wrote: »
    The answer to bad moral character? I think everyone knows that's much, much harder than weight loss. A fat person (defined here as a person who is at 1 lb over the arbitrary WHO guide of BMI=25) can lose weight.They can bring joy to the lives of others. They can participate in athletic activities, be upstanding members of their communities, be generous and kind,and fun, and small good, and yes, have sex with ordinary humans without crushing them or breaking bones. And they can, as I said, lose the weight.

    A narrow, shallow, judgmental person changing is the stuff of fairy tales.

    I personally think anyone married to such a person is better off without the dead weight of that spouse.

    So, physical attraction is a matter of morals?
    I love it how everyone is supposedly for communication and honesty in marriages, as long as there is actually no real communication and honesty happening...

    It's not about physical attraction after a certain point. After all, we're all going to age, and wrinkled bits and sagging boobs and whatnot aren't all that.

    An established long-standing relationship becomes about more than physical attraction after a while. It stops mattering. You are making love to the person who has shared life's ups and downs with you and sex is about expressing everything you feel for each other.

    This has been the thrust of all the push back in this discussion. The idea of being turned on because they look hot just then and then going and having sex in a long-standing relationship is just not how it happens. I can remember that happening with my husband, way back in the early days, looking at him here and there and getting turned on, but that's just not how it works now.

    not true. I understand exactly where you are coming from but it doesn't disappear for us all. This is why you will find a lot of long term couples who still workout, who still look well groomed, who still dress well and conduct themselves in a desirable manner. Some of these attributes are what individuals generally find attractive. Not everyone gives up because the ups and downs of life have worn them down. Some people are stronger, this is where varying personalities come in because some people manage lifes stresses differently to others. Some people are young at heart, they want to remain desirable, they have a high sex drive and they are youthful.
    Your way is not the only way even though I appreciate it gets the majority count.
    An established long term relationship is about everything you mention AND physical attraction for some.

    there really is no right or wrong answer here

    Also what is an established long standing relationship? 10 years? 20 years? 30 years? If a couple met when they were 15 and are together for 30 years then at 45 they still have a reasonable sex drive and it wont be abnormal to have physical/sexual interests as opposed to a couple in their 80's who's priorities are now shifted.

    Perspective is key here.
  • CSARdiver
    CSARdiver Posts: 6,252 Member
    pinuplove wrote: »
    CSARdiver wrote: »
    Realizing that the posters here are all inherently biased as we have all been more out of shape than we would like, realized this problem, and did something about it. This heavily skews the conversation as the participants are people that take responsibility for their actions. How do you impart this mindset and behavior to people you care about?

    To the larger point @heiliskrimsli is making - relationships take effort. It is easy to coast through when things naturally fall in place and both parties are aligned, but any long term relationship will hit rocky points and stressors. When one person stops putting in effort we make a judgment on how much we are going to tolerate before ending this. Are people taking this view personally because we have all been on the wrong side of this at one point? Another point is that most of the posters here are in relationships with good people that stood by us - this is not always the case.

    One of the most difficult points for me was realizing that I was in fact, not honoring my wife when I allowed myself to get so out of shape. I had stopped putting in the needed effort. Getting back into shape and conducting a detailed self analysis identified several root causes that I was ignoring - many willfully. The critical point is implementing changes and building habits to maintain and develop these positive habits.



    I appreciate what you're trying to say here, but I think the point some of us are trying to make is exactly this! That sometimes relationships take work, and walking away because a spouse hit 25.1 bmi and wasn't in the right place mentally or physically to change that just yet isn't an option for them. We've covered the full gambit in 19 pages here - pregnancy, mental health, physical disabilities, aging.

    I feel blessed beyond measure to have a spouse who has stood beside me no matter what for 17 years and counting. Even moreso now.

    I think this is an issue of talking past one another and taking things literally when they were intended as figuratively. There simply isn't enough time to address every "What if?" in these threads.

    Kudos to you both! We've just passed 11 years, but putting in the work to make this last to the vows.
  • pinuplove
    pinuplove Posts: 12,874 Member
    CSARdiver wrote: »
    pinuplove wrote: »
    CSARdiver wrote: »
    Realizing that the posters here are all inherently biased as we have all been more out of shape than we would like, realized this problem, and did something about it. This heavily skews the conversation as the participants are people that take responsibility for their actions. How do you impart this mindset and behavior to people you care about?

    To the larger point @heiliskrimsli is making - relationships take effort. It is easy to coast through when things naturally fall in place and both parties are aligned, but any long term relationship will hit rocky points and stressors. When one person stops putting in effort we make a judgment on how much we are going to tolerate before ending this. Are people taking this view personally because we have all been on the wrong side of this at one point? Another point is that most of the posters here are in relationships with good people that stood by us - this is not always the case.

    One of the most difficult points for me was realizing that I was in fact, not honoring my wife when I allowed myself to get so out of shape. I had stopped putting in the needed effort. Getting back into shape and conducting a detailed self analysis identified several root causes that I was ignoring - many willfully. The critical point is implementing changes and building habits to maintain and develop these positive habits.



    I appreciate what you're trying to say here, but I think the point some of us are trying to make is exactly this! That sometimes relationships take work, and walking away because a spouse hit 25.1 bmi and wasn't in the right place mentally or physically to change that just yet isn't an option for them. We've covered the full gambit in 19 pages here - pregnancy, mental health, physical disabilities, aging.

    I feel blessed beyond measure to have a spouse who has stood beside me no matter what for 17 years and counting. Even moreso now.

    I think this is an issue of talking past one another and taking things literally when they were intended as figuratively. There simply isn't enough time to address every "What if?" in these threads.

    Kudos to you both! We've just passed 11 years, but putting in the work to make this last to the vows.

    Truth. And once one side or the other (or both) gets on the defensive, it's difficult to overcome.

    Thanks! Honestly, it feels like no time. We just celebrated a kiddo's 16th birthday and I still have NO IDEA how that can even be possible.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member

    xmichaelyx wrote: »
    I am a reasonably fit person of normal weight. I expect the same of a partner.

    This gets to the heart of it. Many here are pretending that those of us who would not be in a relationship with an obese person would dump our SO without warning if their weight hits a certain number. That's not the case (and I can't imagine what kind of relationships they're in that would make them come to that conclusion).

    I'm a relatively active, fit person. Unless my SO is handicapped in some way, I expect her to be as well - this is something we've shared since the beginning, and that's valuable to me. I haven't pretended otherwise.

    One doesn't go from fit to obese overnight. If she chooses obesity, there will be a long transitional period where we'll communicate about our thoughts, desires, and expectations, just as we have throughout the rest of our relationship.

    We don't have kids, so if we choose to go our separate ways, that's fine. That's what adults who grow apart should do.

    People here have also made some hay over my weight and whether I'm actually a reasonably fit person because at one point I was overweight.

    I ran a 13 mile training run yesterday. That is not something an unfit person does.

    I didn't say you were unfit. That wasn't the point at all. I'd be interested in you responding to the actual point.

    I ran a marathon at 145, which is overweight at my height. Could have have run it faster if thinner? I am sure, but I ran it around 4:30, which is respectable enough for a first timer who didn't train that consistently, which was me at the time.

    Being overweight does not mean that you can't do physical activities. Does being a certain amount overweight mean that? Sure, of course. But your drawing the line at 25 and then saying it's because the person would have stopped being who you fell in love with or changed so much or no longer can share interests doesn't make sense, and that's part of why I pointed out that you were talking about a weight you were not so long ago.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    WMLizard wrote: »

    I ran a 13 mile training run yesterday. That is not something an unfit person does.

    Actually, this is an awful metric, and I think that's the point some people are trying to make. You don't have to be a normal BMI to be active. I've never been a normal BMI. I've run 3 marathons and many half marathons. I put on 50 pounds when my husband died (on my still-overweight frame) and still did a half marathon. A friend has always been about the same size as me and has done ultra-marathons.

    I kayak. I hike and camp.

    Were many of these things more comfortable at a lower weight? Absolutely.

    Are they only doable at a normal-BMI weight? Absolutely NOT.

    Yeah, all this, and you remind me that I did a half marathons when I was only a few months into losing and was still obese. I definitely find it easier when I am not (wanting to be faster is part of why I want to lose more weight even though I am a healthy weight), but the idea that someone can't go biking and hiking or kayaking or the rest is not true.

    And someone can stop being interested in those things without gaining weight, of course.
  • drawaimfire
    drawaimfire Posts: 83 Member
    Surprised this is still going!

    Even for a debate forum there has been little bits of nastiness, those that haven't seen it, lucky ducks! Or maybe they are less sensitive? Some of the comments have been hard to read but it's all been interesting in some form.

    Many are taking this quite personally and I hope any hostilities are winding now.

    Thanks to the OP for a very 'lively' topic to read and weigh in on. :#
  • heiliskrimsli
    heiliskrimsli Posts: 735 Member
    lemurcat12 wrote: »
    xmichaelyx wrote: »
    I am a reasonably fit person of normal weight. I expect the same of a partner.

    This gets to the heart of it. Many here are pretending that those of us who would not be in a relationship with an obese person would dump our SO without warning if their weight hits a certain number. That's not the case (and I can't imagine what kind of relationships they're in that would make them come to that conclusion).

    I'm a relatively active, fit person. Unless my SO is handicapped in some way, I expect her to be as well - this is something we've shared since the beginning, and that's valuable to me. I haven't pretended otherwise.

    One doesn't go from fit to obese overnight. If she chooses obesity, there will be a long transitional period where we'll communicate about our thoughts, desires, and expectations, just as we have throughout the rest of our relationship.

    We don't have kids, so if we choose to go our separate ways, that's fine. That's what adults who grow apart should do.

    People here have also made some hay over my weight and whether I'm actually a reasonably fit person because at one point I was overweight.

    I ran a 13 mile training run yesterday. That is not something an unfit person does.

    I didn't say you were unfit. That wasn't the point at all. I'd be interested in you responding to the actual point.

    I ran a marathon at 145, which is overweight at my height. Could have have run it faster if thinner? I am sure, but I ran it around 4:30, which is respectable enough for a first timer who didn't train that consistently, which was me at the time.

    Being overweight does not mean that you can't do physical activities. Does being a certain amount overweight mean that? Sure, of course. But your drawing the line at 25 and then saying it's because the person would have stopped being who you fell in love with or changed so much or no longer can share interests doesn't make sense, and that's part of why I pointed out that you were talking about a weight you were not so long ago.

    Being overweight is, as you yourself stated, a performance limiter.

    As for the rest of your comment, you've clearly missed the previous times I have explained in this thread that it is not some binary switch that is on at 24.9999999 and off at 25.0. It's a progressive less and less attractive as the BMI gets up to the overweight range (barring some very fit low body fat lifters I've seen) and then it just becomes a hard "No."

    And yep, a while ago, I was fat and unattractive. I fixed the problem and am working on getting even more fit and attractive. So no, you didn't find some mother lode of hypocrisy.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    aggelikik wrote: »
    I find it very hard to understand what the "correct"answer some posters want. They do not want a person to tell their partner that they hate his/her body changes.

    Did anyone say that? I think it could be said more nicely, but that's not the thread I am reading.
    They do not want this person to leave.

    If someone's feelings toward their partner are such that them becoming BMI 25-26 is a dealbreaker and they are no longer attracted to them at all and feel they are a different person, that does not to me seem like it was ever love in the first place. If someone said to be -- even though I have no intention of gaining weight again -- that their love was conditional on me not ever being overweight again, at least not for more than a couple of months, and that they would see me as a different person than they fell in love with, then I would not consider that person to be really in love with me, and I'd think they were more focused on outside appearances than I am personally comfortable with even though, of course, like everyone else physical appearance plays a role in who I am attracted to initially. I would also think, based on this, that the same person was likely to be focused on how attractive others were and if someone else were more attractive and interested or if I lost some of my attractiveness in aging or was less fun at some point due to a health problem, etc. It seems like the person is saying upfront that the relationship is to some degree superficial and conditional on many, many levels.

    It seems like people are going out of their way to say that it's not just physical appearance or more understandable (and again I am saying how I feel about it and why it seems strange to me -- I don't see why anyone else should care what I think any more than what my relationship deal-breakers should matter to them, but they put it into this thread for discussion). But anyway, it was said clearly that this was based just on the weight gain. I get that someone changing personality or no longer having any common interests or being unwilling to do anything but sit in front of the TV, etc. could affect one's relationship, obviously, but none of that is necessary part of a weight gain that leaves one BMI 25.5, say, which was what the original comments were about.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    aggelikik wrote: »
    tomteboda wrote: »
    The answer to bad moral character? I think everyone knows that's much, much harder than weight loss. A fat person (defined here as a person who is at 1 lb over the arbitrary WHO guide of BMI=25) can lose weight.They can bring joy to the lives of others. They can participate in athletic activities, be upstanding members of their communities, be generous and kind,and fun, and small good, and yes, have sex with ordinary humans without crushing them or breaking bones. And they can, as I said, lose the weight.

    A narrow, shallow, judgmental person changing is the stuff of fairy tales.

    I personally think anyone married to such a person is better off without the dead weight of that spouse.

    So, physical attraction is a matter of morals?
    I love it how everyone is supposedly for communication and honesty in marriages, as long as there is actually no real communication and honesty happening...

    It's not about physical attraction after a certain point. After all, we're all going to age, and wrinkled bits and sagging boobs and whatnot aren't all that.

    An established long-standing relationship becomes about more than physical attraction after a while. It stops mattering. You are making love to the person who has shared life's ups and downs with you and sex is about expressing everything you feel for each other.

    This has been the thrust of all the push back in this discussion. The idea of being turned on because they look hot just then and then going and having sex in a long-standing relationship is just not how it happens. I can remember that happening with my husband, way back in the early days, looking at him here and there and getting turned on, but that's just not how it works now.

    not true. I understand exactly where you are coming from but it doesn't disappear for us all. This is why you will find a lot of long term couples who still workout, who still look well groomed, who still dress well and conduct themselves in a desirable manner. Some of these attributes are what individuals generally find attractive. Not everyone gives up because the ups and downs of life have worn them down. Some people are stronger, this is where varying personalities come in because some people manage lifes stresses differently to others. Some people are young at heart, they want to remain desirable, they have a high sex drive and they are youthful.
    Your way is not the only way even though I appreciate it gets the majority count.
    An established long term relationship is about everything you mention AND physical attraction for some.

    And in life things happen. A lot of people have mentioned having things happen for a while and then making changes. People might find it harder to focus on fitness or to devote themselves to certain commonly enjoyed activities (two different things) during the first year of a baby's life or if a child was having health problems or when having to deal with parents with health problems or dying or with a worklife that becomes unmanageable. People go through periods where they may struggle with depression. People deal with health changes in different ways. My mother let herself go for a time after she had breast cancer and lost a breast. Yes, some might not. I don't think you can predict how you would react until you face the situation. That's definitely the case for aging. (And not everyone considers someone 65 being a little overweight = not caring about being attractive.)
    there really is no right or wrong answer here

    Sure. But it's a conversation, and I think talking about what you would consider right in a relationship is fair game and not being mean, as you seem to think. That's what the original question was about -- would you say something.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    CSARdiver wrote: »
    pinuplove wrote: »
    CSARdiver wrote: »
    Realizing that the posters here are all inherently biased as we have all been more out of shape than we would like, realized this problem, and did something about it. This heavily skews the conversation as the participants are people that take responsibility for their actions. How do you impart this mindset and behavior to people you care about?

    To the larger point @heiliskrimsli is making - relationships take effort. It is easy to coast through when things naturally fall in place and both parties are aligned, but any long term relationship will hit rocky points and stressors. When one person stops putting in effort we make a judgment on how much we are going to tolerate before ending this. Are people taking this view personally because we have all been on the wrong side of this at one point? Another point is that most of the posters here are in relationships with good people that stood by us - this is not always the case.

    One of the most difficult points for me was realizing that I was in fact, not honoring my wife when I allowed myself to get so out of shape. I had stopped putting in the needed effort. Getting back into shape and conducting a detailed self analysis identified several root causes that I was ignoring - many willfully. The critical point is implementing changes and building habits to maintain and develop these positive habits.



    I appreciate what you're trying to say here, but I think the point some of us are trying to make is exactly this! That sometimes relationships take work, and walking away because a spouse hit 25.1 bmi and wasn't in the right place mentally or physically to change that just yet isn't an option for them. We've covered the full gambit in 19 pages here - pregnancy, mental health, physical disabilities, aging.

    I feel blessed beyond measure to have a spouse who has stood beside me no matter what for 17 years and counting. Even moreso now.

    I think this is an issue of talking past one another and taking things literally when they were intended as figuratively.

    Ah, interesting take. I really don't think so, I think the points were made repeatedly and intended to be taken literally, but that take is enlightening and a possibility, I guess.
  • heiliskrimsli
    heiliskrimsli Posts: 735 Member
    lemurcat12 wrote: »
    lemurcat12 wrote: »
    xmichaelyx wrote: »
    I am a reasonably fit person of normal weight. I expect the same of a partner.

    This gets to the heart of it. Many here are pretending that those of us who would not be in a relationship with an obese person would dump our SO without warning if their weight hits a certain number. That's not the case (and I can't imagine what kind of relationships they're in that would make them come to that conclusion).

    I'm a relatively active, fit person. Unless my SO is handicapped in some way, I expect her to be as well - this is something we've shared since the beginning, and that's valuable to me. I haven't pretended otherwise.

    One doesn't go from fit to obese overnight. If she chooses obesity, there will be a long transitional period where we'll communicate about our thoughts, desires, and expectations, just as we have throughout the rest of our relationship.

    We don't have kids, so if we choose to go our separate ways, that's fine. That's what adults who grow apart should do.

    People here have also made some hay over my weight and whether I'm actually a reasonably fit person because at one point I was overweight.

    I ran a 13 mile training run yesterday. That is not something an unfit person does.

    I didn't say you were unfit. That wasn't the point at all. I'd be interested in you responding to the actual point.

    I ran a marathon at 145, which is overweight at my height. Could have have run it faster if thinner? I am sure, but I ran it around 4:30, which is respectable enough for a first timer who didn't train that consistently, which was me at the time.

    Being overweight does not mean that you can't do physical activities. Does being a certain amount overweight mean that? Sure, of course. But your drawing the line at 25 and then saying it's because the person would have stopped being who you fell in love with or changed so much or no longer can share interests doesn't make sense, and that's part of why I pointed out that you were talking about a weight you were not so long ago.

    Being overweight is, as you yourself stated, a performance limiter.

    Being over 25 doesn't prevent someone from being extremely fit and active. I haven't yet broken my 145 lb time in the marathon and I'm certainly fit and active now, after all.
    As for the rest of your comment, you've clearly missed the previous times I have explained in this thread that it is not some binary switch that is on at 24.9999999 and off at 25.0. It's a progressive less and less attractive as the BMI gets up to the overweight range (barring some very fit low body fat lifters I've seen) and then it just becomes a hard "No."

    I have acknowledged that several times -- you said you'd say something when the person started gaining (5 lbs or so), say something again if the weight gain continued, and then it would be a hard no at 25 if the person did not fix in in a month or two (with 24 being really quite a warning sign).

    I don't see how this is inconsistent with my comments at all.
    And yep, a while ago, I was fat and unattractive. I fixed the problem and am working on getting even more fit and attractive. So no, you didn't find some mother lode of hypocrisy.

    Again, you were barely below 25 as of last month. You are still losing, great. You are 100% convinced that no matter what happens you will never be overweight again and are angry with yourself for having been overweight and feel unforgiving of yourself and are expanding that to how you would feel with a partner -- that's what I'm seeing. My point is not really about hypocrisy. But whatever.

    I have never been attracted to overweight people. What is so hard to understand about that?

    Also, there's no way that I will be overweight again. It's entirely with my control and down to my choice, as always. I choose not to let that happen. The rest of your psychoanalysis is completely baseless.
  • LKArgh
    LKArgh Posts: 5,179 Member
    edited April 2017
    I think the analogy with aging keeps getting brought up because several of the people who said they would leave an overweight spouse said they would not leave an aging spouse. What sets some people off is that if I were ask most of you in your 20's, are you physically attracted to that lean, thinning hair, active, wrinkly 80yr old, most people would say no. However, if that is your spouse you have grown old with and you yourself are approaching 80, your answer would probably be yes.

    I think that's why so many people have a hard time wrapping their head around some posters inability to even imagine that they might still be physically attracted to a partner who has physically changed (including weight gain) slowly over the decades. When if you would show them a picture of a stranger, they would absolutely say no, I'm not attracted to someone who looks like that.

    Aging is inevitable and as we grow older, it is normal to feel attracted to older people too. I am not attracted to someone 20 years younger. I honestly think it is kind of "yucky", to put it mildly when I see a 50 year old with a 20 year old. Perhaps if I was myself obese, I would feel the same way about obesity. Since I find obese bodies unattractive, I am not letting myself become obese, so this matters too. If it was no big deal physically to me, I would probably have been obese myself, and I would not expect anything different from my husband.
  • STLBADGIRL
    STLBADGIRL Posts: 1,693 Member
    Wait, what, so the *d* word gets a pass but we gotta *kitten* and *asparagus* everything else?

    Just saying.

    :grumble: Right.... this is the same thing I was thinking.... Now let me finish reading.
  • mom23mangos
    mom23mangos Posts: 3,070 Member
    aggelikik wrote: »
    I think the analogy with aging keeps getting brought up because several of the people who said they would leave an overweight spouse said they would not leave an aging spouse. What sets some people off is that if I were ask most of you in your 20's, are you physically attracted to that lean, thinning hair, active, wrinkly 80yr old, most people would say no. However, if that is your spouse you have grown old with and you yourself are approaching 80, your answer would probably be yes.

    I think that's why so many people have a hard time wrapping their head around some posters inability to even imagine that they might still be physically attracted to a partner who has physically changed (including weight gain) slowly over the decades. When if you would show them a picture of a stranger, they would absolutely say no, I'm not attracted to someone who looks like that.

    Aging is inevitable and as we grow older, it is normal to feel attracted to older people too. I am not attracted to someone 20 years younger. I honestly think it is kind of "yucky", to put it mildly when I see a 50 year old with a 20 year old. Perhaps if I was myself obese, I would feel the same way about obesity. Since I find obese bodies unattractive, I am not letting myself become obese, so this matters too. If it was no big deal physically to me, I would probably have been obese myself, and I would not expect anything different from my husband.

    I get that one is a "choice" per se, but the bottom line people are trying to make is that you can't choose what you find physically attractive/repulsive. I don't find old people physically attractive. Does that mean I will leave my husband when he grows old? No. Will I probably find him attractive? Yes. Will I also still find young, buff men physically attractive? Probably. Would I want to be with them? No, gross, they would be my grandkids age.

    I see the same with weight. Am I physically attracted to overweight men? No. Am I physically attracted to my overweight spouse? Yes. Because so much goes into making someone attractive than just their weight/physical appearance. So strangers, yes I completely get it. Someone I've been married to for 22 years? Harder to imagine.

    But some people are just very black and white in their thinking and others have more shades of grey. The B&W people tend to know exactly what they do and don't want and make sure they get it. I admire that in many aspects.