Diet Coke, friend or foe?

145679

Replies

  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,990 Member
    So what happens here if I kneel for Diet Pepsi? :D:D:D

    At this point, I don't care what others think. I've had it in my diet for over 25+ years and have had no issues. And till I do and knowing it was the reason that caused it................................I'll keep drinking it.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png
  • Christine_72
    Christine_72 Posts: 16,049 Member
    sijomial wrote: »
    People are so insular on a www site!

    It's not just the FDA that regards diet drinks as safe -how many of the FDA equivalents in the c. 195 countries across the world have banned Diet Coke (or similar)?

    Balance that against "Ah yes but my Aunty Jane's best friends niece's husband saw a post on Facebook about diabeetus........".

    Probably the same reason they haven't banned cigarettes...

    Our government is trying to ban e-cigs, and have prohibited the sale of nicotine here in Aus. But they are more than happy to charge 30+ dollars for a pack of 25 cigarettes...

  • JustRobby1
    JustRobby1 Posts: 674 Member
    The all powerful illuminati has quite clearly contaminated the Diet Coke supply of the globe turning us all into obedient lemmings. The obvious exception is our ever-enlightened and benevolent friend in this thread who knows the real truth and is desperately trying to get us to see that Diet Coke is really akin to ingesting a slow acting hallucinogen that was secretly developed by an alien race thousands of years ago to enslave and subjugate mankind.

  • valkongr
    valkongr Posts: 27 Member
    Probably a foe on the long run. But I am unable to diet without coke. That's a battle for another day
  • AnvilHead
    AnvilHead Posts: 18,343 Member
    edited September 2017
    megpie41 wrote: »
    I agree that nothing is 100% safe, yet any time I mention questioning the safety of artificial sweeteners I am told I'm wrong and they have been proven to be completely safe...so what exactly are we debating? Semantics?

    Science has proven them to be just as safe as anything else we eat or drink. I haven't seen studies which conclusively prove that tap water is 100% safe under all conditions for everybody everywhere either, but I'm not afraid to drink it when I'm thirsty.

    If you look hard enough, you can find tinfoil hat fearmongerers who claim that virtually anything is unsafe or bad for you. If you believe all of them and the "studies" they quote, you'd not only rule out artificial sweeteners, but also all meat (hormones, bacteria, teh cancerz and undigested meat somehow rotting in your gut), milk (pus-filled death in a glass), all carbs (teh insulinz and teh diabeetus), any and every non-organically grown fruit and vegetable (pesticides), tap water (fluoride, industrial pollutants), bottled water (BPAs and generating excess waste products)....the list goes on and on. By the time you get to the point where you're only eating foods which are consensus choices as "100% safe", your options are looking pretty limited.

    I guess you'd probably be okay as long as you can subsist off dewdrops you collect from the leaves of plants high atop the Himalayas. I haven't seen anybody call those unsafe yet.
  • TonyB0588
    TonyB0588 Posts: 9,520 Member
    I don't often drink Coke. And I find Diet drinks taste horrible.
  • megpie41
    megpie41 Posts: 164 Member
    JustRobby1 wrote: »
    "The debate over artificial sweeteners continues to go on and on"

    Umm, no, it doesn't. Debate involves someone actually engaging with the available evidence in a meaningful and discernible way to form a valid counterpoint. Your paranoia and innuendo comes nowhere close to meeting this standard.

    I wasn't referring to me debating...I'm simply offering my unscientific opinion. I was referring to the many people in the world who still question it...hence the many threads on MFP on whether it is healthy or not.
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,990 Member
    Returning to this thread 7 pages later, I am sort of amazed at the amount of Facebook bro-science that people believe the instant they read it. Its like 50% of the population learned NOTHING in school.
    Lol, that's because they were of the mindset: "Why do we have to learn this stuff if we're never going to use it in REAL life?"

    SUPRISE.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png

  • amusedmonkey
    amusedmonkey Posts: 10,330 Member
    edited September 2017
    megpie41 wrote: »
    AnvilHead wrote: »
    megpie41 wrote: »
    I agree that nothing is 100% safe, yet any time I mention questioning the safety of artificial sweeteners I am told I'm wrong and they have been proven to be completely safe...so what exactly are we debating? Semantics?

    Science has proven them to be just as safe as anything else we eat or drink. I haven't seen studies which conclusively prove that tap water is 100% safe under all conditions for everybody everywhere either, but I'm not afraid to drink it when I'm thirsty.

    If you look hard enough, you can find tinfoil hat fearmongerers who claim that virtually anything is unsafe or bad for you. If you believe all of them and the "studies" they quote, you'd not only rule out artificial sweeteners, but also all meat (hormones, bacteria, teh cancerz and undigested meat somehow rotting in your gut), milk (pus-filled death in a glass), all carbs (teh insulinz and teh diabeetus), any and every non-organically grown fruit and vegetable (pesticides), tap water (fluoride, industrial pollutants), bottled water (BPAs and generating excess waste products)....the list goes on and on. By the time you get to the point where you're only eating foods which are consensus choices as "100% safe", your options are looking pretty limited.

    I guess you'd probably be okay as long as you can subsist off dewdrops you collect from the leaves of plants high atop the Himalayas. I haven't seen anybody call those unsafe yet.

    You're right, you can find people who will say just about anything is unhealthy/unsafe. I will avoid BPA, pesticides, growth hormones etc if I can, but sometimes it is hard to do. Avoiding artificial sweeteners is extremely easy...just buy the "regular" version of soda etc and you avoid them. They are the same price and in the same location...it's just a matter of reaching for the diet or regular soda (better yet, don't reach for either).

    Btw...I love how you go to such extremes at the end of your post...classic.

    Oh dear, let's hope the "HFCS" crowd don't catch you saying the bolded.

    Kidding aside, I really don't mind it when people put up limitations for themselves for whatever reason, backed up by science or not. None of my business if it makes them feel good about their choices. While diet soda will not cause you to spontaneously combust, there is no need for it to be a part of anyone's diet. It's just an add on for those who want it. My only quibble is when such choices make life unnecessarily harder for the person like someone who really likes soda but wouldn't drink it because of the boogie man. This doesn't appear to be the case for you, so rock on.

    Personally, I only drink it in the summer sometimes when I feel like sipping on something cold. Water doesn't work that way because I'm not used to sipping water as a cool drink. The way I use water is completely different: I drink water (and nothing but water) automatically when thirsty, like a means to satisfying a need. I don't consider it "a drink" or ponder the taste. It's just a mindless need-reaction thing for me. A cold drink is something different, it's enjoyable and refreshing. Hard to explain. That's why water as a drink is not an option for me.
  • megpie41
    megpie41 Posts: 164 Member
    megpie41 wrote: »
    AnvilHead wrote: »
    megpie41 wrote: »
    I agree that nothing is 100% safe, yet any time I mention questioning the safety of artificial sweeteners I am told I'm wrong and they have been proven to be completely safe...so what exactly are we debating? Semantics?

    Science has proven them to be just as safe as anything else we eat or drink. I haven't seen studies which conclusively prove that tap water is 100% safe under all conditions for everybody everywhere either, but I'm not afraid to drink it when I'm thirsty.

    If you look hard enough, you can find tinfoil hat fearmongerers who claim that virtually anything is unsafe or bad for you. If you believe all of them and the "studies" they quote, you'd not only rule out artificial sweeteners, but also all meat (hormones, bacteria, teh cancerz and undigested meat somehow rotting in your gut), milk (pus-filled death in a glass), all carbs (teh insulinz and teh diabeetus), any and every non-organically grown fruit and vegetable (pesticides), tap water (fluoride, industrial pollutants), bottled water (BPAs and generating excess waste products)....the list goes on and on. By the time you get to the point where you're only eating foods which are consensus choices as "100% safe", your options are looking pretty limited.

    I guess you'd probably be okay as long as you can subsist off dewdrops you collect from the leaves of plants high atop the Himalayas. I haven't seen anybody call those unsafe yet.

    You're right, you can find people who will say just about anything is unhealthy/unsafe. I will avoid BPA, pesticides, growth hormones etc if I can, but sometimes it is hard to do. Avoiding artificial sweeteners is extremely easy...just buy the "regular" version of soda etc and you avoid them. They are the same price and in the same location...it's just a matter of reaching for the diet or regular soda (better yet, don't reach for either).

    Btw...I love how you go to such extremes at the end of your post...classic.

    Oh dear, let's hope the "HFCS" crowd don't catch you saying the bolded.

    Kidding aside, I really don't mind it when people put up limitations for themselves for whatever reason, backed up by science or not. None of my business if it makes them feel good about their choices. While diet soda will not cause you to spontaneously combust, there is no need for it to be a part of anyone's diet. It's just an add on for those who want it. My only quibble is when such choices make life unnecessarily harder for the person like someone who really likes soda but wouldn't drink it because of the boogie man. This doesn't appear to be the case for you, so rock on.

    Personally, I only drink it in the summer sometimes when I feel like sipping on something cold. Water doesn't work that way because I'm not used to sipping water as a cool drink. The way I use water is completely different: I drink water (and nothing but water) automatically when thirsty, like a means to satisfying a need. I don't consider it "a drink" or ponder the taste. It's just a mindless need-reaction thing for me. A cold drink is something different, it's enjoyable and refreshing. Hard to explain. That's why water as a drink is not an option for me.

    Overall I agree with your post. I also appreciate the fact that you don't necessarily agree with me, but you can respect a different opinion. Thank you for that.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    edited September 2017
    megpie41 wrote: »
    kimny72 wrote: »
    megpie41 wrote: »
    I agree that nothing is 100% safe, yet any time I mention questioning the safety of artificial sweeteners I am told I'm wrong and they have been proven to be completely safe...so what exactly are we debating? Semantics?

    They have not been proven to do harm, which in the real world is the best you can do. So if you avoid artificial sweetener because it isn't proven to be 100% safe, and you agree that nothing is 100% safe, why do you avoid artificial sweetener? Serious question, I honestly don't understand at this point.

    I avoid them because I have read enough and spoken to enough people to make me have my doubts about them...it's not worth the possible risk for me. If I want to enjoy a soda (if I have 1 soda a month that would be a lot), I just assume have the real thing. I rarely drink soda anyways...I'd rather drink water because soda just makes me thirstier. I also avoid artificial sweeteners because I think it tastes horrible and gives me a weird tingling feeling in my mouth.

    So it sounds to me like you normally drank regular soda before you decided to (mostly) quit and don't care for diet. That's a really good reason not to consume them. I don't think anyone is claiming you should (or even caring if you privately believe something they consider irrational).

    For the record, some things I do personally that I would not insist are other than my own quirks: I happen to avoid a lot of things mostly because they are just not how I like to eat or I have environmental issues with them. I get grassfed or pastured meat and try to avoid industrial farmed (but know this is more expensive for many so wouldn't insist it's necessary or better for anyone but me and my preferences). I don't really approve of corn being in everything, for example, so I tend to avoid things that have HFCS and corn oil, etc. I think soy is in too much so generally avoid things with soy added where you wouldn't expect it, although I eat tofu and tempeh and soy beans (and make some exceptions for foods I eat occasionally that have soy, like a Quest bar), and for the most part I don't eat foods that have lots of ingredients because I prefer cooking for myself or using standard items like dried pasta that have been common for a long time. BUT, and I consider this a really important distinction, I acknowledge this is about my own preferences and NOT me being healthier than others or that there's any good evidence to think that consuming something with HFCS will be harmful (in reasonable amounts, of course).

    I also (like you and I assume like most people) don't consume foods I dislike. For example, I think putting sweetener in coffee is disgusting. However, I don't feel compelled to tell people who do like them that I read on FB that sweetener in coffee (sugar or otherwise) is really bad for you and that I avoid it for that reason. Instead, I simply don't comment on it, for the most part, since of course the reason I do not consume it is that I dislike it.

    It almost seems like you may be a little jealous that some people can consume soda whenever they want without worrying about it, since the soda they enjoy is calorie free (or close enough to it that it does not matter).

    I dunno, I don't consume soda all that often because more often than not there are other things I'd rather drink (this morning I'm having coffee plus an iced tea I made at home, I also drink lots of water, since I love it). Since soda isn't something I particularly want to drink a lot, I don't much think about it, and am not sure why someone would be that focused on the safety of something they rarely consumed. Whenever I do drink it I will drink diet, however, since as mentioned above I prefer the diet sodas I like to regular (which tastes too sweet and sticky to me after choosing the diet options for over 25 years).

    What I've seen is that the vast majority of the hard core "artificial sweeteners are unnatural and unsafe" things are from really questionable sources like FB or Food Babe (just realized they have the same initials, heh) whom I would be embarrassed to cite, especially in response to an analysis and explanation like Aaron did. Are their studies that say that it might be an issue in extremely large amounts or due to reasons that don't really apply if one is watching calories (the "it makes you crave sweet" thing)? Sure. The latter is something I am convinced is not true for me (it seems to be more the case for people who have messed up their palate and cannot appreciate less sweet foods, which has always struck me as odd anyway), but if I am having trouble sticking to my calories I can analyze why. (I don't consume much sweet stuff other than fruit, so it's certainly not craving sweets.)
  • Unknown
    edited September 2017
    This content has been removed.
This discussion has been closed.