What irks you?
Options
Replies
-
CanesGalactica wrote: »
But You ARE mine1 -
UrBaconMeCr8zy wrote: »UrBaconMeCr8zy wrote: »UrBaconMeCr8zy wrote: »When you are arguing with someone And they say "let's agree to disagree" . That's some real level *kitten* right here. Because I feel like two things.... 1) that person is a little *kitten* that can't finish an adult argument 2) they've just unofficially won the argument, because what can you really say to that?
Lol. I love this. It's so true and the sign of a quitter
Precisely
Or it's a sign of a reasonably intelligent person who is recognizing that a debate has been reduced to "I know you are, but what am I?" So it makes sense to end it already? I figure the one who pulls rank and calls it done is probably more intelligent that the one who continues to repeat their POV over and over... Seems banging your head against the wall would yield better results.
If you want to win an argument, you win it with facts, proof, articles etcc.... something that will undoubtedly prove your stance the superior.
And some people who open a debate are not interested in facts, proof, etc. They just want to be a right fighter. Total waste of time for anyone involved. But I guess I just file that under "it is what it is." Very few times in my life has anyone ever presented a debate, factual or not, that actually changed my mind.3 -
0
-
Having no nap opportunities.
0 -
UrBaconMeCr8zy wrote: »UrBaconMeCr8zy wrote: »UrBaconMeCr8zy wrote: »When you are arguing with someone And they say "let's agree to disagree" . That's some real level *kitten* right here. Because I feel like two things.... 1) that person is a little *kitten* that can't finish an adult argument 2) they've just unofficially won the argument, because what can you really say to that?
Lol. I love this. It's so true and the sign of a quitter
Precisely
Or it's a sign of a reasonably intelligent person who is recognizing that a debate has been reduced to "I know you are, but what am I?" So it makes sense to end it already? I figure the one who pulls rank and calls it done is probably more intelligent that the one who continues to repeat their POV over and over... Seems banging your head against the wall would yield better results.
If you want to win an argument, you win it with facts, proof, articles etcc.... something that will undoubtedly prove your stance the superior.
You should just agree to disagree with her
Or you could directly post that to me. Really, did that not occur to you? Wow!0 -
CanesGalactica wrote: »
keep the fans happy.0 -
UrBaconMeCr8zy wrote: »UrBaconMeCr8zy wrote: »UrBaconMeCr8zy wrote: »When you are arguing with someone And they say "let's agree to disagree" . That's some real level *kitten* right here. Because I feel like two things.... 1) that person is a little *kitten* that can't finish an adult argument 2) they've just unofficially won the argument, because what can you really say to that?
Lol. I love this. It's so true and the sign of a quitter
Precisely
Or it's a sign of a reasonably intelligent person who is recognizing that a debate has been reduced to "I know you are, but what am I?" So it makes sense to end it already? I figure the one who pulls rank and calls it done is probably more intelligent that the one who continues to repeat their POV over and over... Seems banging your head against the wall would yield better results.
If you want to win an argument, you win it with facts, proof, articles etcc.... something that will undoubtedly prove your stance the superior.
And some people who open a debate are not interested in facts, proof, etc. They just want to be a right fighter. Total waste of time for anyone involved. But I guess I just file that under "it is what it is." Very few times in my life has anyone ever presented a debate, factual or not, that actually changed my mind.
Probably more than 90% of the arguments I get into (or debates if you prefer that term) end up in this category. They aren't interested in being swayed, or in learning something new on the topic being discussed. They are only interested in being right. And yes, in that case "Agree to disagree" is really the only logical conclusion unless that person wants me to commit assault because they won't let it go.1 -
UrBaconMeCr8zy wrote: »UrBaconMeCr8zy wrote: »UrBaconMeCr8zy wrote: »When you are arguing with someone And they say "let's agree to disagree" . That's some real level *kitten* right here. Because I feel like two things.... 1) that person is a little *kitten* that can't finish an adult argument 2) they've just unofficially won the argument, because what can you really say to that?
Lol. I love this. It's so true and the sign of a quitter
Precisely
Or it's a sign of a reasonably intelligent person who is recognizing that a debate has been reduced to "I know you are, but what am I?" So it makes sense to end it already? I figure the one who pulls rank and calls it done is probably more intelligent that the one who continues to repeat their POV over and over... Seems banging your head against the wall would yield better results.
If you want to win an argument, you win it with facts, proof, articles etcc.... something that will undoubtedly prove your stance the superior.
You should just agree to disagree with her
Or you could directly post that to me. Really, did that not occur to you? Wow!
I just assumed banging my head against a wall would yield better results
I'm impressed. Repeating what I said, right back to me. That takes guts. Now you go feel good now. You deserved it.1 -
UrBaconMeCr8zy wrote: »CanesGalactica wrote: »UrBaconMeCr8zy wrote: »UrBaconMeCr8zy wrote: »UrBaconMeCr8zy wrote: »When you are arguing with someone And they say "let's agree to disagree" . That's some real level *kitten* right here. Because I feel like two things.... 1) that person is a little *kitten* that can't finish an adult argument 2) they've just unofficially won the argument, because what can you really say to that?
Lol. I love this. It's so true and the sign of a quitter
Precisely
Or it's a sign of a reasonably intelligent person who is recognizing that a debate has been reduced to "I know you are, but what am I?" So it makes sense to end it already? I figure the one who pulls rank and calls it done is probably more intelligent that the one who continues to repeat their POV over and over... Seems banging your head against the wall would yield better results.
If you want to win an argument, you win it with facts, proof, articles etcc.... something that will undoubtedly prove your stance the superior.
And some people who open a debate are not interested in facts, proof, etc. They just want to be a right fighter. Total waste of time for anyone involved. But I guess I just file that under "it is what it is." Very few times in my life has anyone ever presented a debate, factual or not, that actually changed my mind.
Probably more than 90% of the arguments I get into (or debates if you prefer that term) end up in this category. They aren't interested in being swayed, or in learning something new on the topic being discussed. They are only interested in being right. And yes, in that case "Agree to disagree" is really the only logical conclusion unless that person wants me to commit assault because they won't let it go.
If you are, without a shadow of a doubt, correct. Annd someone says, "oh well let's just agree to disagree"
Would that irk you?
No.
I'm not stuck on being "correct". My first concern in any debate is to be respectful and considerate of where the person is coming from. Second, I am more interested in someone learning something new as opposed to being "right". If they are unwilling to learn something even if it doesn't align with their belief or known knowledge on the subject or vice versa, I find no problem in letting it go at "agree to disagree".
There are more important things in the world than my getting uptight about someone not wanting to continue to debate with me. And I would be somewhat a disrespectful *kitten* for pushing it and continuing to talk/argue with said person when clearly, they want to end the discussion (for whatever reason).
It irks me when people aren't respectful of other people wanting to disengage from an argument in their pursuit of being "correct" or "right". Because then it isn't about the thing you are discussing, it is about the person being persistent, annoying and "right".4 -
RunHardBeStrong wrote: »
What is this? I want one
I am not sure but I kinda want one too.0 -
TeacupsAndToning wrote: »RunHardBeStrong wrote: »RunHardBeStrong wrote: »
What is this? I want one
I am not sure but I kinda want one too.
lol I was too lazy to look, so thanks!0 -
UrBaconMeCr8zy wrote: »By this logic, please correct me if I'm wrong, it is my understanding....
Before I continue that thought let's throw in the disclaimer of, never argue on the taboo topics of race, religion, politics etccc...opinions
You are perfectly "ok" with ignorance. Not just ignorance but after you've, again, without a shadow of a doubt, proven a point with viable information that is fact driven and proven.... still willingly will walk away with agree to disagree...
On a personal level: No, I dislike ignorance.
On a level in which I function as a human in a society in which people are at different levels of learning, understanding and emotional development: Yes, I must accept that it exists and that I alone cannot change their hearts or their minds.
When and if those people want to "see the light", they will usually do it on their own and come to people or sources they know they can learn from. Others never will.
Plus, most of the topics I see people "agree to disagree" on are actually those taboo topics.. or issues relating to sex/assault/women's rights. There are facts within most of these topics, but a lot is left up to opinion or the unknown.4 -
People who will write a check at walmart and then not move until they've balanced their checkbook. I'm like do what ya gotta do but the line is a mile long move away and do that. Ugh...just left Wal-Mart0
-
TeacupsAndToning wrote: »
Me either! I can't believe people pay for checks when the stores run them as debit anyways.0 -
People who honk thier horns istead of tapping their breaks or moving out of the way. ESPECIALLY when the other person has right of way, or is far enough away that you were never in any real danger of being hit, you just didn't want to slow down for half a second.0
-
TL;DR0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.9K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.7K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 398 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 976 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.4K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions