Snap Judgments
Replies
-
dwrightlaw wrote: »dwrightlaw wrote: »dwrightlaw wrote: »I assume that you are, will or have lied to me...
How are you ever going to trust anyone?
I have more digits on one hand than the number of ppl I trust...Ronnie Reagan used to say "trust but verify" but for me it's "verify then trust"
That's just how I roll...sad, isn't it?
No. You can't trust without verifying. That's why that saying never made much sense to me. If you trust, you won’t insist on verifying, whereas if you insist on verifying, clearly you don’t trust.
True, BUT once you verify there is a foundation upon which trust may be built, right?
Correct which is why you can't trust then verify but you can verify then trust. Which is a good rule for the internet anyway (verify then trust).
For example, I am not really Mark Hamill (Luke Skywalker). I am just using this picture because I like it and the new Star Wars movie just came out.1 -
dwrightlaw wrote: »dwrightlaw wrote: »dwrightlaw wrote: »I assume that you are, will or have lied to me...
How are you ever going to trust anyone?
I have more digits on one hand than the number of ppl I trust...Ronnie Reagan used to say "trust but verify" but for me it's "verify then trust"
That's just how I roll...sad, isn't it?
No. You can't trust without verifying. That's why that saying never made much sense to me. If you trust, you won’t insist on verifying, whereas if you insist on verifying, clearly you don’t trust.
True, BUT once you verify there is a foundation upon which trust may be built, right?
Correct which is why you can't trust then verify but you can verify then trust. Which is a good rule for the internet anyway (verify then trust).
For example, I am not really Mark Hamill (Luke Skywalker). I am just using this picture because I like it and the new Star Wars movie just came out.
Wait....what??? I feel so deceived1 -
dwrightlaw wrote: »dwrightlaw wrote: »dwrightlaw wrote: »I assume that you are, will or have lied to me...
How are you ever going to trust anyone?
I have more digits on one hand than the number of ppl I trust...Ronnie Reagan used to say "trust but verify" but for me it's "verify then trust"
That's just how I roll...sad, isn't it?
No. You can't trust without verifying. That's why that saying never made much sense to me. If you trust, you won’t insist on verifying, whereas if you insist on verifying, clearly you don’t trust.
True, BUT once you verify there is a foundation upon which trust may be built, right?
Correct which is why you can't trust then verify but you can verify then trust. Which is a good rule for the internet anyway (verify then trust).
For example, I am not really Mark Hamill (Luke Skywalker). I am just using this picture because I like it and the new Star Wars movie just came out.
No *kitten*???0 -
dwrightlaw wrote: »dwrightlaw wrote: »dwrightlaw wrote: »I assume that you are, will or have lied to me...
How are you ever going to trust anyone?
I have more digits on one hand than the number of ppl I trust...Ronnie Reagan used to say "trust but verify" but for me it's "verify then trust"
That's just how I roll...sad, isn't it?
No. You can't trust without verifying. That's why that saying never made much sense to me. If you trust, you won’t insist on verifying, whereas if you insist on verifying, clearly you don’t trust.
True, BUT once you verify there is a foundation upon which trust may be built, right?
Correct which is why you can't trust then verify but you can verify then trust. Which is a good rule for the internet anyway (verify then trust).
For example, I am not really Mark Hamill (Luke Skywalker). I am just using this picture because I like it and the new Star Wars movie just came out.
Wait....what??? I feel so deceived
EDIT: I couldn't find one of Luke winking, so this is good enough.0 -
Has anyone made a snap judgement about milk pouring etiquette yet?0
-
eccomi_qui wrote: »Has anyone made a snap judgement about milk pouring etiquette yet?
Cereal and then milk..0 -
TenaciousGymKitten wrote: »eccomi_qui wrote: »Has anyone made a snap judgement about milk pouring etiquette yet?
Just drink it out of the container, no pouring needed.
You eat cereal dry?0 -
This content has been removed.
-
dwrightlaw wrote: »dwrightlaw wrote: »dwrightlaw wrote: »dwrightlaw wrote: »I assume that you are, will or have lied to me...
How are you ever going to trust anyone?
I have more digits on one hand than the number of ppl I trust...Ronnie Reagan used to say "trust but verify" but for me it's "verify then trust"
That's just how I roll...sad, isn't it?
No. You can't trust without verifying. That's why that saying never made much sense to me. If you trust, you won’t insist on verifying, whereas if you insist on verifying, clearly you don’t trust.
True, BUT once you verify there is a foundation upon which trust may be built, right?
Correct which is why you can't trust then verify but you can verify then trust. Which is a good rule for the internet anyway (verify then trust).
For example, I am not really Mark Hamill (Luke Skywalker). I am just using this picture because I like it and the new Star Wars movie just came out.
No *kitten*???
I verified that I am not Mark Hamill, so now you can trust I am not Mark Hamill. Except I didn't really verify anything I just stated something.0 -
UrBaconMeCr8zy wrote: »TenaciousGymKitten wrote: »eccomi_qui wrote: »Has anyone made a snap judgement about milk pouring etiquette yet?
Just drink it out of the container, no pouring needed.
Doesn't all the milk get in the way of your bacon?0 -
This content has been removed.
-
My morning radio station does an “That’s all I need to know about you” segment and it would be perfect for this thread0
-
This content has been removed.
-
i_squat_for_pizza wrote: »I assume that if you send me a Friend request with no message or making a perverted remark about my "hooter" you should know that you are not really giving me a good 1st impression so I will probably decline.
... but I commented about BOTH hooters, and alas...1 -
This content has been removed.
-
This content has been removed.
-
This content has been removed.
-
This content has been removed.
-
This content has been removed.
-
This content has been removed.
-
Soul_Radiation wrote: »New Years Resolution srs...thicker skin for real. I think too much, reply too much, type too much...it's dumb.
It's in process.
"I assume"
Mind if I piggyback onto this one as well?0 -
I assume that two bearded adult males piggy-backing might be better identified as bear-backing.5
-
I think if you seem like a quality person but you choose to ride the coat tails of aholes, I assume you're probably not a quality person after all and I see you as a wimp.5
-
This content has been removed.
-
This content has been removed.
-
This content has been removed.
-
This content has been removed.
-
This content has been removed.
-
Soul_Radiation wrote: »I assume that if you don't use your face for an avatar that it's not for a good reason.
What about the lower half of my face?1 -
This content has been removed.
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions