Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
Jack Lalanne's Advice
Replies
-
lemurcat12 wrote: »Granted, this is hilarious: http://www.sitchin.com/adam.htm
Are you sure you haven't confused Jan 1 with April 1?
Thanks for the genome information link on his website. My focus has been on human usage time line for grains for food sources. This afternoon I found his research points to 11,000 BC. Dr. Davis states 10K years ago.10 -
Nony_Mouse wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »There is some next level tinfoil-*kitten*hattery going on in here. Wow!
Every time I'm certain I've seen it all...
Yup. I think this is the winner of them all.
I just don't know what else to say. I'm rarely left speechless, so it's clearly impressive. This is full on tinfoil suit of armor.
I'm trying to formulate a response to how I feel about the audacity of questioning Nony's credentials and experience in the face of the "evidence" presented, and I just can't put an actual archaeologist up against this kittenpoo in any coherent way.
I'm so stunned at my credentials being questioned by someone who always plays his 'terminal degree' (never used) card that even I can't come up with a response.
But of course, it's a giant global conspiracy to suppress the truth. We all had to sign on to it at university if we wanted to continue in archaeology
You're going to get kicked out of the club 4 -
nutmegoreo wrote: »Nony_Mouse wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »There is some next level tinfoil-*kitten*hattery going on in here. Wow!
Every time I'm certain I've seen it all...
Yup. I think this is the winner of them all.
I just don't know what else to say. I'm rarely left speechless, so it's clearly impressive. This is full on tinfoil suit of armor.
I'm trying to formulate a response to how I feel about the audacity of questioning Nony's credentials and experience in the face of the "evidence" presented, and I just can't put an actual archaeologist up against this kittenpoo in any coherent way.
I'm so stunned at my credentials being questioned by someone who always plays his 'terminal degree' (never used) card that even I can't come up with a response.
But of course, it's a giant global conspiracy to suppress the truth. We all had to sign on to it at university if we wanted to continue in archaeology
You're going to get kicked out of the club
First rule of Conspiracy Club...7 -
Nony_Mouse wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »There is some next level tinfoil-*kitten*hattery going on in here. Wow!
Every time I'm certain I've seen it all...
Yup. I think this is the winner of them all.
I just don't know what else to say. I'm rarely left speechless, so it's clearly impressive. This is full on tinfoil suit of armor.
I'm trying to formulate a response to how I feel about the audacity of questioning Nony's credentials and experience in the face of the "evidence" presented, and I just can't put an actual archaeologist up against this kittenpoo in any coherent way.
I'm so stunned at my credentials being questioned by someone who always plays his 'terminal degree' (never used) card that even I can't come up with a response.
But of course, it's a giant global conspiracy to suppress the truth. We all had to sign on to it at university if we wanted to continue in archaeology
Wait, Them paying you off is how you afford all that lovely underwear isn't it!4 -
VintageFeline wrote: »Nony_Mouse wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »There is some next level tinfoil-*kitten*hattery going on in here. Wow!
Every time I'm certain I've seen it all...
Yup. I think this is the winner of them all.
I just don't know what else to say. I'm rarely left speechless, so it's clearly impressive. This is full on tinfoil suit of armor.
I'm trying to formulate a response to how I feel about the audacity of questioning Nony's credentials and experience in the face of the "evidence" presented, and I just can't put an actual archaeologist up against this kittenpoo in any coherent way.
I'm so stunned at my credentials being questioned by someone who always plays his 'terminal degree' (never used) card that even I can't come up with a response.
But of course, it's a giant global conspiracy to suppress the truth. We all had to sign on to it at university if we wanted to continue in archaeology
Wait, Them paying you off is how you afford all that lovely underwear isn't it!
I'm clearly in the wrong profession. I can't afford underwear...7 -
GaleHawkins wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Granted, this is hilarious: http://www.sitchin.com/adam.htm
Are you sure you haven't confused Jan 1 with April 1?
Thanks for the genome information link on his website. My focus has been on human usage time line for grains for food sources. This afternoon I found his research points to 11,000 BC. Dr. Davis states 10K years ago.
If you're interested in human use of grains, maybe try reading some actual scientific literature. Granted, it's not as spectacular as alien theories - a grinding stone with plant silica here, a couple of carbonised grains there - but a hell of a lot more interesting, imho.
Stuff like this: https://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot.co.nz/2017/10/crops-evolving-ten-millennia-before.html#F8mzBG8IJQ684EEL.97
I think 30kya well and truly trumps your guy's assertion of 11,000 BCE. Any basic introductory archaeology text will give you earlier dates than that. But maybe the aliens got to those places a lot earlier /sarcasm.9 -
Nony_Mouse wrote: »GaleHawkins wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Granted, this is hilarious: http://www.sitchin.com/adam.htm
Are you sure you haven't confused Jan 1 with April 1?
Thanks for the genome information link on his website. My focus has been on human usage time line for grains for food sources. This afternoon I found his research points to 11,000 BC. Dr. Davis states 10K years ago.
If you're interested in human use of grains, maybe try reading some actual scientific literature. Granted, it's not as spectacular as alien theories - a grinding stone with plant silica here, a couple of carbonised grains there - but a hell of a lot more interesting, imho.
Stuff like this: https://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot.co.nz/2017/10/crops-evolving-ten-millennia-before.html#F8mzBG8IJQ684EEL.97
I think 30kya well and truly trumps your guy's assertion of 11,000 BCE. Any basic introductory archaeology text will give you earlier dates than that. But maybe the aliens got to those places a lot earlier /sarcasm.
WE NEED THE AWESOME BUTTON BACK!8 -
VintageFeline wrote: »Nony_Mouse wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »There is some next level tinfoil-*kitten*hattery going on in here. Wow!
Every time I'm certain I've seen it all...
Yup. I think this is the winner of them all.
I just don't know what else to say. I'm rarely left speechless, so it's clearly impressive. This is full on tinfoil suit of armor.
I'm trying to formulate a response to how I feel about the audacity of questioning Nony's credentials and experience in the face of the "evidence" presented, and I just can't put an actual archaeologist up against this kittenpoo in any coherent way.
I'm so stunned at my credentials being questioned by someone who always plays his 'terminal degree' (never used) card that even I can't come up with a response.
But of course, it's a giant global conspiracy to suppress the truth. We all had to sign on to it at university if we wanted to continue in archaeology
Wait, Them paying you off is how you afford all that lovely underwear isn't it!
I'm buying it in anticipation of the large cheque I should be getting any day now. It's quite overdue...4 -
Nony_Mouse wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »There is some next level tinfoil-*kitten*hattery going on in here. Wow!
Every time I'm certain I've seen it all...
Yup. I think this is the winner of them all.
I just don't know what else to say. I'm rarely left speechless, so it's clearly impressive. This is full on tinfoil suit of armor.
I'm trying to formulate a response to how I feel about the audacity of questioning Nony's credentials and experience in the face of the "evidence" presented, and I just can't put an actual archaeologist up against this kittenpoo in any coherent way.
I'm so stunned at my credentials being questioned by someone who always plays his 'terminal degree' (never used) card that even I can't come up with a response.
But of course, it's a giant global conspiracy to suppress the truth. We all had to sign on to it at university if we wanted to continue in archaeology
Since your credentials haven't seen questioned in this thread are you willing to answer my two simple nonthreating questions?5 -
Nony_Mouse wrote: »GaleHawkins wrote: »lemurcat12 wrote: »Granted, this is hilarious: http://www.sitchin.com/adam.htm
Are you sure you haven't confused Jan 1 with April 1?
Thanks for the genome information link on his website. My focus has been on human usage time line for grains for food sources. This afternoon I found his research points to 11,000 BC. Dr. Davis states 10K years ago.
If you're interested in human use of grains, maybe try reading some actual scientific literature. Granted, it's not as spectacular as alien theories - a grinding stone with plant silica here, a couple of carbonised grains there - but a hell of a lot more interesting, imho.
Stuff like this: https://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot.co.nz/2017/10/crops-evolving-ten-millennia-before.html#F8mzBG8IJQ684EEL.97
I think 30kya well and truly trumps your guy's assertion of 11,000 BCE. Any basic introductory archaeology text will give you earlier dates than that. But maybe the aliens got to those places a lot earlier /sarcasm.
Further to the point, this is information you have shared on the forums before. It's also information that's available for anyone looking for scientific background on human consumption of grains who is adept at google searching.
I don't understand how Gale comes up with... what he came up with... when actual data is out there readily found.6 -
here we have some lovely ~32kya evidence for grinding grains into flour: http://popular-archaeology.com/issue/fall-2015/article/scientists-report-stone-age-flour-production
If the aliens were advanced enough to get here, why not just give us decent technology straight off? What's with all this mucking around with stones? We could have had food processors millennia ago ffs!!6 -
nutmegoreo wrote: »VintageFeline wrote: »Nony_Mouse wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »There is some next level tinfoil-*kitten*hattery going on in here. Wow!
Every time I'm certain I've seen it all...
Yup. I think this is the winner of them all.
I just don't know what else to say. I'm rarely left speechless, so it's clearly impressive. This is full on tinfoil suit of armor.
I'm trying to formulate a response to how I feel about the audacity of questioning Nony's credentials and experience in the face of the "evidence" presented, and I just can't put an actual archaeologist up against this kittenpoo in any coherent way.
I'm so stunned at my credentials being questioned by someone who always plays his 'terminal degree' (never used) card that even I can't come up with a response.
But of course, it's a giant global conspiracy to suppress the truth. We all had to sign on to it at university if we wanted to continue in archaeology
Wait, Them paying you off is how you afford all that lovely underwear isn't it!
I'm clearly in the wrong profession. I can't afford underwear...
OK, who hugged me on that one?
Creepy :laugh:7 -
Nony_Mouse wrote: »here we have some lovely ~32kya evidence for grinding grains into flour: http://popular-archaeology.com/issue/fall-2015/article/scientists-report-stone-age-flour-production
If the aliens were advanced enough to get here, why not just give us decent technology straight off? What's with all this mucking around with stones? We could have had food processors millennia ago ffs!!
But where would we have plugged them in?4 -
GaleHawkins wrote: »Nony_Mouse wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »There is some next level tinfoil-*kitten*hattery going on in here. Wow!
Every time I'm certain I've seen it all...
Yup. I think this is the winner of them all.
I just don't know what else to say. I'm rarely left speechless, so it's clearly impressive. This is full on tinfoil suit of armor.
I'm trying to formulate a response to how I feel about the audacity of questioning Nony's credentials and experience in the face of the "evidence" presented, and I just can't put an actual archaeologist up against this kittenpoo in any coherent way.
I'm so stunned at my credentials being questioned by someone who always plays his 'terminal degree' (never used) card that even I can't come up with a response.
But of course, it's a giant global conspiracy to suppress the truth. We all had to sign on to it at university if we wanted to continue in archaeology
Since your credentials haven't seen questioned in this thread are you willing to answer my two simple nonthreating questions?
If you're not questioning her credentials, why are you asking?0 -
nutmegoreo wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »VintageFeline wrote: »Nony_Mouse wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »There is some next level tinfoil-*kitten*hattery going on in here. Wow!
Every time I'm certain I've seen it all...
Yup. I think this is the winner of them all.
I just don't know what else to say. I'm rarely left speechless, so it's clearly impressive. This is full on tinfoil suit of armor.
I'm trying to formulate a response to how I feel about the audacity of questioning Nony's credentials and experience in the face of the "evidence" presented, and I just can't put an actual archaeologist up against this kittenpoo in any coherent way.
I'm so stunned at my credentials being questioned by someone who always plays his 'terminal degree' (never used) card that even I can't come up with a response.
But of course, it's a giant global conspiracy to suppress the truth. We all had to sign on to it at university if we wanted to continue in archaeology
Wait, Them paying you off is how you afford all that lovely underwear isn't it!
I'm clearly in the wrong profession. I can't afford underwear...
OK, who hugged me on that one?
Creepy :laugh:
Guilty as charged. I just thought it would be nice if you could have pretty things.3 -
GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »VintageFeline wrote: »Nony_Mouse wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »There is some next level tinfoil-*kitten*hattery going on in here. Wow!
Every time I'm certain I've seen it all...
Yup. I think this is the winner of them all.
I just don't know what else to say. I'm rarely left speechless, so it's clearly impressive. This is full on tinfoil suit of armor.
I'm trying to formulate a response to how I feel about the audacity of questioning Nony's credentials and experience in the face of the "evidence" presented, and I just can't put an actual archaeologist up against this kittenpoo in any coherent way.
I'm so stunned at my credentials being questioned by someone who always plays his 'terminal degree' (never used) card that even I can't come up with a response.
But of course, it's a giant global conspiracy to suppress the truth. We all had to sign on to it at university if we wanted to continue in archaeology
Wait, Them paying you off is how you afford all that lovely underwear isn't it!
I'm clearly in the wrong profession. I can't afford underwear...
OK, who hugged me on that one?
Creepy :laugh:
Guilty as charged. I just thought it would be nice if you could have pretty things.
And the very fact she has been asked if she has spoken with a crackpot would indicate said crackpot is worth listening to. Non.2 -
(This thread is making me laugh so hard. Thanks, all!)2
-
GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »VintageFeline wrote: »Nony_Mouse wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »There is some next level tinfoil-*kitten*hattery going on in here. Wow!
Every time I'm certain I've seen it all...
Yup. I think this is the winner of them all.
I just don't know what else to say. I'm rarely left speechless, so it's clearly impressive. This is full on tinfoil suit of armor.
I'm trying to formulate a response to how I feel about the audacity of questioning Nony's credentials and experience in the face of the "evidence" presented, and I just can't put an actual archaeologist up against this kittenpoo in any coherent way.
I'm so stunned at my credentials being questioned by someone who always plays his 'terminal degree' (never used) card that even I can't come up with a response.
But of course, it's a giant global conspiracy to suppress the truth. We all had to sign on to it at university if we wanted to continue in archaeology
Wait, Them paying you off is how you afford all that lovely underwear isn't it!
I'm clearly in the wrong profession. I can't afford underwear...
OK, who hugged me on that one?
Creepy :laugh:
Guilty as charged. I just thought it would be nice if you could have pretty things.
It would be nice, but my dogs break/ruin everything anyway. I've made my peace with not having the finer things in life.0 -
GaleHawkins wrote: »Nony_Mouse wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »There is some next level tinfoil-*kitten*hattery going on in here. Wow!
Every time I'm certain I've seen it all...
Yup. I think this is the winner of them all.
I just don't know what else to say. I'm rarely left speechless, so it's clearly impressive. This is full on tinfoil suit of armor.
I'm trying to formulate a response to how I feel about the audacity of questioning Nony's credentials and experience in the face of the "evidence" presented, and I just can't put an actual archaeologist up against this kittenpoo in any coherent way.
I'm so stunned at my credentials being questioned by someone who always plays his 'terminal degree' (never used) card that even I can't come up with a response.
But of course, it's a giant global conspiracy to suppress the truth. We all had to sign on to it at university if we wanted to continue in archaeology
Since your credentials haven't seen questioned in this thread are you willing to answer my two simple nonthreating questions?
Your questions are irrelevant. I do not need to have ever talked to the crackpot to know that he was a crackpot and his theories have no merit.
Where I've worked is also irrelevant, because that does not negate my ability to assess evidence, or lack thereof.
People like you who believe this garbage are by definition questioning both my ability as an archaeologist, and my personal and professional integrity, along with that of every other professional archaeologist.8 -
estherdragonbat wrote: »Nony_Mouse wrote: »here we have some lovely ~32kya evidence for grinding grains into flour: http://popular-archaeology.com/issue/fall-2015/article/scientists-report-stone-age-flour-production
If the aliens were advanced enough to get here, why not just give us decent technology straight off? What's with all this mucking around with stones? We could have had food processors millennia ago ffs!!
But where would we have plugged them in?
Those aliens knew how to generate electricity. They were clearly holding back the good stuff.1 -
Nony_Mouse wrote: »estherdragonbat wrote: »Nony_Mouse wrote: »here we have some lovely ~32kya evidence for grinding grains into flour: http://popular-archaeology.com/issue/fall-2015/article/scientists-report-stone-age-flour-production
If the aliens were advanced enough to get here, why not just give us decent technology straight off? What's with all this mucking around with stones? We could have had food processors millennia ago ffs!!
But where would we have plugged them in?
Those aliens knew how to generate electricity. They were clearly holding back the good stuff.
Wooly mammoth sized hamster wheels?6 -
Oh yeah, I hugged your lack of pretty underwear too @nutmegoreo. You know I think that is tragic.4
-
Nony_Mouse wrote: »Oh yeah, I hugged your lack of pretty underwear too @nutmegoreo. You know I think that is tragic.
I'll try to be less of a disappointment for both you and @GottaBurnEmAll this coming year.3 -
nutmegoreo wrote: »Nony_Mouse wrote: »Oh yeah, I hugged your lack of pretty underwear too @nutmegoreo. You know I think that is tragic.
I'll try to be less of a disappointment for both you and @GottaBurnEmAll this coming year.
Oh no, I'm disappointed FOR you, not in you. Sympathy hugs.1 -
nutmegoreo wrote: »Nony_Mouse wrote: »Oh yeah, I hugged your lack of pretty underwear too @nutmegoreo. You know I think that is tragic.
I'll try to be less of a disappointment for both you and @GottaBurnEmAll this coming year.
Wait wait wait. I hooked you up with amazing bras this year! Don't be playing that sympathy card!3 -
I feel like there must be some way we can tie poor old departed Jack into this new and exciting derailment. Perhaps the aliens gave him the info he needed to be strong and fit. And the blueprints to build his magical juicing machine! I'm glad the ancient alien guy's picture made it into this thread, I've always wondered how he manages a tin foil hat with that hair. :huh:11
-
I nominate this for Thread of the Year!7
-
snickerscharlie wrote: »I nominate this for Thread of the Year!
I'm not sure this is the thread I want to be remembered for for 2017!4 -
I was married to two archaeologists (not at the same time) and they never had any fancy underwear- or maybe I just didn't know about it. Feeling let down...7
-
Nony_Mouse wrote: »GaleHawkins wrote: »Nony_Mouse wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »GottaBurnEmAll wrote: »nutmegoreo wrote: »There is some next level tinfoil-*kitten*hattery going on in here. Wow!
Every time I'm certain I've seen it all...
Yup. I think this is the winner of them all.
I just don't know what else to say. I'm rarely left speechless, so it's clearly impressive. This is full on tinfoil suit of armor.
I'm trying to formulate a response to how I feel about the audacity of questioning Nony's credentials and experience in the face of the "evidence" presented, and I just can't put an actual archaeologist up against this kittenpoo in any coherent way.
I'm so stunned at my credentials being questioned by someone who always plays his 'terminal degree' (never used) card that even I can't come up with a response.
But of course, it's a giant global conspiracy to suppress the truth. We all had to sign on to it at university if we wanted to continue in archaeology
Since your credentials haven't seen questioned in this thread are you willing to answer my two simple nonthreating questions?
Your questions are irrelevant. I do not need to have ever talked to the crackpot to know that he was a crackpot and his theories have no merit.
Where I've worked is also irrelevant, because that does not negate my ability to assess evidence, or lack thereof.
People like you who believe this garbage are by definition questioning both my ability as an archaeologist, and my personal and professional integrity, along with that of every other professional archaeologist.
Thanks
5
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 430 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions