How to Find Your Maintenance Calorie Level

AnnPT77
AnnPT77 Posts: 34,197 Member
edited November 2022 in Goal: Maintaining Weight
People sometimes ask here about what to do at the end of weight loss, and some say they don't know how much to eat to maintain. A few are worried about sudden regain. I decided to write a standalone post with the advice I'd give. I welcome comments from others who've successfully navigated this shift, and maintained a healthy weight.

There are two common, pretty straightforward methods I'll mention but not explain, and two others I'll explain in more detail. Toward the end of this (long) post are comments about "regain anxiety" and how to think about monitoring at goal weight.

Here are the four methods:

1. MFP calculation: Change your MFP profile weight loss goal from "lose X pounds per week" to "maintain current weight", eat to the new net calorie goal, handling exercise calories just as you did during weight loss. If you lost weight at the expected rate using an MFP-generated calorie goal, this should work well.

2. TDEE calculator: Use an external TDEE calculator to get a maintenance calorie goal that includes your typical exercise, and manually set your MFP calorie goal to that number. Eat to that level, but don't separately log exercise calories or eat them back.

3. Estimate from history: Use your recent loss data to estimate maintenance calories, and eat to that level. This is useful if your MFP projected !oss rate differed materially from your actual loss rate. A more detailed explanation appears below.

4. Gradually increase: Experimentally determine your maintenance calories by increasing eating gradually. This may be combined with any of the above methods, too. A more detailed explanation appears below.

Method 3: Estimate from History:

IMO, your own loss history is your best guide to maintenance calories. Here's how to use your logging history to estimate maintenance:

A. Look at your last 4 weeks (or around that) of loss.

B. Average those weeks to get average weekly calories eaten, and average weekly pounds lost.

C. Multiply average weekly pounds lost by 3500 (roughly 3500 calories in a pound) to get average weekly calorie deficit

D. Add average weekly calories eaten to average weekly calorie deficit to get average weekly calories needed to maintain.

E. Divide average weekly calories needed to maintain by 7 (days per week) to get estimated daily calories needed to maintain.

If you've been logging exercise separately and eating it back and want to continue that, use net calories eaten in the above arithmetic. Otherwise, use gross calories eaten.

Either set your MFP calorie goal manually to this new value, or use it to inform method 4 below.

Method 4: Gradually Increase:

Another option is to gradually increase your daily calorie goal until your weight stabilizes.

Even if you have a maintenance calorie estimate from method 1, 2, or 3, but you want to minimize visible (though irrelevant ;) ) scale jump from glycogen replenishment and/or increased average digestive system contents, and maybe ease your way into eating more, you can increase calories eaten gradually.

To start, add 100-200 daily calories (depending on the size of your estimated total gap to be filled).

Eat that for a week, or until you satisfy yourself that you're not gaining fat (be reasonable - a weight-trending app and knowledge of your own fluctuation patterns will be helpful). Then add another 100 calories daily. Monitor again. Repeat until scale weight stabilizes.

You may find that you need to wait/monitor longer with each successive increase, in order to be sure of the effect. If so: Patience! ;)

Feeling Anxious About Regain?

If you stick to the "add gradually" approach, and keep your activity level more or less consistent, there's no possible way you'll gain a big bunch of weight suddenly. About the worst that can happen is that you'll overshoot by 50-100 calories daily, which is less than a one-pound gain in a month's time. And it's likely that by increasing gradually, you'll have dropped a pound or two along the way from a tiny and shrinking deficit , so you'll be even up right around goal weight.

Monitoring Goal Weight to Maintain It

To maintain goal weight realistically, set a goal weight range of a number of pounds that slightly exceeds your normal daily weight fluctuations. For example, if you rarely see more than a two pound daily fluctuation, set a range of goal weight plus/minus 3. If you go above the top of the range more than a day or three, cut back eating a little, or increase activity until you drop to a consistent lower weight in the range. If you drop below the low end, add a couple of walnuts to your oatmeal (or something) until your weight stabilizes higher.

Even if you don't have a way to estimate your maintenance calories all that accurately, you can do this "gradual add back" thing to find maintenance calories experimentally. You don't have to stress out about calculator estimates. :)

Hope this helps!
Tagged:
«134

Replies

  • Sashilz
    Sashilz Posts: 3 Member
    This was very helpful. Thank you
  • LivingtheLeanDream
    LivingtheLeanDream Posts: 13,342 Member
    Great post :smile:
  • This content has been removed.
  • MichelleWithMoxie
    MichelleWithMoxie Posts: 1,817 Member
    Great info, thank you!
  • swim777
    swim777 Posts: 599 Member
    Great guide from lots who have this down! Always good to hear what works!
  • jeanona
    jeanona Posts: 151 Member
    edited February 2018
    CoachJen71 wrote: »
    Adding a link to a helpful site that compares several TDEE algorithms. http://www.sailrabbit.com/bmr/. FWIW, my own data shows the levels roughly correlate to MFP's levels as follows, though YMMV:

    Sedentary on both is worth about 5K steps.
    Rabbit's Slightly Active/MFP's Lightly Active is 10K.
    Rabbit's Moderately Active and MFP's Active are worth around 15K steps.
    Rabbit's Very Active and MFP's Very Active are worth 20K steps.

    These seem low to me? From what I’ve read, I thought 10k steps would be Active, no?

    I average 10k per day and I lose weight if my setting is lightly active (Mfp gives me very low calories for this setting!)
  • CoachJen71
    CoachJen71 Posts: 1,200 Member
    jeanona wrote: »
    CoachJen71 wrote: »
    Adding a link to a helpful site that compares several TDEE algorithms. http://www.sailrabbit.com/bmr/. FWIW, my own data shows the levels roughly correlate to MFP's levels as follows, though YMMV:

    Sedentary on both is worth about 5K steps.
    Rabbit's Slightly Active/MFP's Lightly Active is 10K.
    Rabbit's Moderately Active and MFP's Active are worth around 15K steps.
    Rabbit's Very Active and MFP's Very Active are worth 20K steps.

    These seem low to me? From what I’ve read, I thought 10k steps would be Active, no?

    I average 10k per day and I lose weight if my setting is lightly active (Mfp gives me very low calories for this setting!)

    As I said, mileage may vary. :) I don't personally see 10K as particularly active, though several sites list it as the minimum number of steps for that level.
  • jeanona
    jeanona Posts: 151 Member
    CoachJen71 wrote: »
    jeanona wrote: »
    CoachJen71 wrote: »
    Adding a link to a helpful site that compares several TDEE algorithms. http://www.sailrabbit.com/bmr/. FWIW, my own data shows the levels roughly correlate to MFP's levels as follows, though YMMV:

    Sedentary on both is worth about 5K steps.
    Rabbit's Slightly Active/MFP's Lightly Active is 10K.
    Rabbit's Moderately Active and MFP's Active are worth around 15K steps.
    Rabbit's Very Active and MFP's Very Active are worth 20K steps.

    These seem low to me? From what I’ve read, I thought 10k steps would be Active, no?

    I average 10k per day and I lose weight if my setting is lightly active (Mfp gives me very low calories for this setting!)

    As I said, mileage may vary. :) I don't personally see 10K as particularly active, though several sites list it as the minimum number of steps for that level.

    That’s why I thought to ask since 10k is supposed to be considered active. You’re right though, I’ve seen a lot of posters in the forums having what I consider as very active lifestyles with a very high number of daily step count.

    I would personally classify what you’ve got one level above for the step counts since even on that setting, personally, I’m still losing very, very slowly (which is good to get rid of some unwanted pounds to get back to maintenance range!!) but as you say, it’s a very individual thing.
  • PAV8888
    PAV8888 Posts: 14,242 Member
    CoachJen71 wrote: »
    @PAV8888 Thanks! Also, at 5'2" I just need to get more steps to equal a similar burn for someone taller.

    Now that's something I've never considered.

    That # of steps may vary based on height.

    Maybe because the multipliers run off Mifflin St Jeor BMR which already takes height into account.

    But that doesn't mean that there is no possibility that stride length would have an additional effect.

    There is a concept of corrected MET values (most activity trackers including Fitbit that I use and MFP make use of published MET values to estimate burns).

    A brief search says that the met corrections predominantly have to do with BMI but that other issues including gender and age come into play.

    "Kozey et al. found that the standard MET misclassifies the intensity category 12.2% of the time compared to measured MET values with greater misclassification in individuals that are overweight, older, low fit, or women"

    But again, stride length may have something to do with it even though i personally think that there is also a very high probability that some of the additional step requirement in your particular case may be a consequence of exercise adaptation and AT due to weight loss.
  • whosshe
    whosshe Posts: 597 Member
    edited February 2018
    Nevermind
  • raeann_991
    raeann_991 Posts: 1 Member
    I am just starting maintenance. Currently I weigh myself weekly. Should I weigh myself more often to help learn the proper amount of calorie for me to maintain?
  • LivingtheLeanDream
    LivingtheLeanDream Posts: 13,342 Member
    edited February 2018
    raeann_991 wrote: »
    I am just starting maintenance. Currently I weigh myself weekly. Should I weigh myself more often to help learn the proper amount of calorie for me to maintain?

    If you've been happy before with weekly weigh ins there's no reason you need to move to daily ones. Some people like the data and to see the trends.

    You'll know what calories you maintain on according to what your weekly loss has been until now. E.g If it was 0.5lb a week loss then you'd have an extra 250 cals a day.
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,197 Member
    cypressfey wrote: »
    I just started maintenance a few weeks ago, and what you say, AnnPT77 is *super* helpful, thank you. I'm going to start weighing every day, with a long term overview, as you say.

    If you're not currently using a weight trending app, I'd consider it. These, too can be alarming or misleading, especially before you get 3 months or so of data in the app, and 3 months or so of experience with understanding the app in your head.(They can show an upward trend sometimes for a short period when you're not actually gaining!).

    You need to understand that they don't really predict anything magically, they just apply statistical formulas to history to guess what might likely happen next. But that can provide insights about patterns that are harder to see in other ways.

    Libra for Android, Happy Scale for iOS, Trendweight (you need a free Fitbit account but don't need a Fitbit device) are some examples.
  • CarvedTones
    CarvedTones Posts: 2,340 Member
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    If you're not currently using a weight trending app, I'd consider it

    I am avoiding this by having my goal be the upper limit; if spikes reach it, then I need to lose a little more.