Suits

Options
1262729313276

Replies

  • sugaraddict4321
    sugaraddict4321 Posts: 15,720 MFP Moderator
    Options
    That's a really great comparison, @leut_underpants - but I'm curious, why not buy a smaller waist pant instead of taking it in 2 inches? Also what is "suppressing the waist"? Making tucks or something?
  • betty_veronica4
    betty_veronica4 Posts: 196 Member
    Options
    Just have to say I LOVE the tailoring comparison. I have to get my clothes altered all the time. I am 6' tall and it is really hard to get things to fit right in length and waist/hips at same time. Good tailoring makes ALL the difference....and takes both pounds and years off of your appearance.
  • goatg
    goatg Posts: 1,399 Member
    Options
    That's a really great comparison, @leut_underpants - but I'm curious, why not buy a smaller waist pant instead of taking it in 2 inches? Also what is "suppressing the waist"? Making tucks or something?

    @sugaraddict4321 About to get wordy, sorry about that.

    Because in traditional suiting, you don't get a choice. Traditional suiting comes in a "drop" between jacket and pants, typically 6 inches. So 42L minus 6 = 36 pant. That may or may not work for the buyer, but it's typically close enough for alterations to not make the pant look crazy on them.

    Big trouble comes when I need a 44L, which I do with most manufacturers. There's also a magic number between chest and shoulders that not many people know about. Around my shoulders I measure 51 inches. Around my chest is short of 42. So I have a nearly ten inch drop between those two numbers. It's exceedingly rare to see more than 7, and what that means is that I have to buy a bigger size than my chest number indicates, because the shoulders won't fit if I don't...and that's really what needs to fit, rather than the chest. Chest is the number it's sold by, shoulders are what actually matter, along with the lay of the lapels and collar on the chest and neck. Has little to do with chest at all, other than a convenient place for the math to work out most of the time.

    This particular manufacturer makes this cut in such a way that it fits my shoulders really well using the lower size number.

    There are such a thing as suit separates (pants sold on their own). When they're available, they're great for a guy like me. Just weren't an option in this case.

    Suppressing the waist means taking it in along the seams that the manufacturer used in shaping it. There's usually 4 side seams and a back center seam. Cheaper tailors will take in excess via the center seam, which can lead to the jacket not looking right from behind if there's a lot to remove. Taking center can also leave less breadth across the back, and I need all of the room there.

    A more expensive option is to take out a little from each of the side seams. The tailor won't be altering the entire lower part of the jacket, instead just "pinching" at the waist, like a corset without any structure. Again, my weird dimensions make tailoring hard, this is why suits get expensive for me; it's 30-40% tailoring cost. A more normal proportioned person has less altering to do.

    This one is a better example of how it should all come together, eventually, and what good tailoring can do.

    0bc0o5ui9d93.jpg


    In another life you and I might get along quite well.
  • goatg
    goatg Posts: 1,399 Member
    edited March 2018
    Options
    goatg wrote: »
    That's a really great comparison, @leut_underpants - but I'm curious, why not buy a smaller waist pant instead of taking it in 2 inches? Also what is "suppressing the waist"? Making tucks or something?

    @sugaraddict4321 About to get wordy, sorry about that.

    Because in traditional suiting, you don't get a choice. Traditional suiting comes in a "drop" between jacket and pants, typically 6 inches. So 42L minus 6 = 36 pant. That may or may not work for the buyer, but it's typically close enough for alterations to not make the pant look crazy on them.

    Big trouble comes when I need a 44L, which I do with most manufacturers. There's also a magic number between chest and shoulders that not many people know about. Around my shoulders I measure 51 inches. Around my chest is short of 42. So I have a nearly ten inch drop between those two numbers. It's exceedingly rare to see more than 7, and what that means is that I have to buy a bigger size than my chest number indicates, because the shoulders won't fit if I don't...and that's really what needs to fit, rather than the chest. Chest is the number it's sold by, shoulders are what actually matter, along with the lay of the lapels and collar on the chest and neck. Has little to do with chest at all, other than a convenient place for the math to work out most of the time.

    This particular manufacturer makes this cut in such a way that it fits my shoulders really well using the lower size number.

    There are such a thing as suit separates (pants sold on their own). When they're available, they're great for a guy like me. Just weren't an option in this case.

    Suppressing the waist means taking it in along the seams that the manufacturer used in shaping it. There's usually 4 side seams and a back center seam. Cheaper tailors will take in excess via the center seam, which can lead to the jacket not looking right from behind if there's a lot to remove. Taking center can also leave less breadth across the back, and I need all of the room there.

    A more expensive option is to take out a little from each of the side seams. The tailor won't be altering the entire lower part of the jacket, instead just "pinching" at the waist, like a corset without any structure. Again, my weird dimensions make tailoring hard, this is why suits get expensive for me; it's 30-40% tailoring cost. A more normal proportioned person has less altering to do.

    This one is a better example of how it should all come together, eventually, and what good tailoring can do.

    0bc0o5ui9d93.jpg


    In another life you and I might get along quite well.

    I was unaware we weren't getting along now. Good to know. :ohwell:

    "quite well"

    Please stop making me feel like a grammarian? :flowerforyou:
  • Lift_Run_Eat
    Lift_Run_Eat Posts: 986 Member
    Options
    q57yf6dw6jx2.jpg

    x1yifu8btjdw.jpg

    Same size and model of suit. Light gray is out of the box. Obviously doesn't look great, but that's the point. Most guys would get the pants hemmed and call it good. Here's what actually needs to happen to this suit to make it look right.

    Take in waist on pants 2"
    Take in seat on pants a bit
    Hem pants to top of shoes
    Suppress waist in jacket about 3"
    Take up sleeves 1.5"
    Drop collar 1/2"

    The charcoal suit has had all of these alterations done, and looks pretty good. The unaltered suit jacket makes me look about 30 pounds heavier...not good. It's really boxy and unflattering, despite being a fairly trim cut of suit. Whatever size you are, get it to fit you.

    @Avocado_AS5
    @UrBaconMeCr8zy


    I'm glad you posted a before tailoring pic!

    I love that you posted the comparison. I like a guy in a perfect fitted suit. This proves the point how much better it looks. Adds more class too. Untailored just looks frumpy.

    I think because of you and this thread, I go around paying a lot more attention to guys in suits and how they are wearing them...not just if they look good in it or not.
  • _Captivated_
    _Captivated_ Posts: 5,669 Member
    Options
    That's a really great comparison, @leut_underpants - but I'm curious, why not buy a smaller waist pant instead of taking it in 2 inches? Also what is "suppressing the waist"? Making tucks or something?

    @sugaraddict4321 About to get wordy, sorry about that.

    Because in traditional suiting, you don't get a choice. Traditional suiting comes in a "drop" between jacket and pants, typically 6 inches. So 42L minus 6 = 36 pant. That may or may not work for the buyer, but it's typically close enough for alterations to not make the pant look crazy on them.

    Big trouble comes when I need a 44L, which I do with most manufacturers. There's also a magic number between chest and shoulders that not many people know about. Around my shoulders I measure 51 inches. Around my chest is short of 42. So I have a nearly ten inch drop between those two numbers. It's exceedingly rare to see more than 7, and what that means is that I have to buy a bigger size than my chest number indicates, because the shoulders won't fit if I don't...and that's really what needs to fit, rather than the chest. Chest is the number it's sold by, shoulders are what actually matter, along with the lay of the lapels and collar on the chest and neck. Has little to do with chest at all, other than a convenient place for the math to work out most of the time.

    This particular manufacturer makes this cut in such a way that it fits my shoulders really well using the lower size number.

    There are such a thing as suit separates (pants sold on their own). When they're available, they're great for a guy like me. Just weren't an option in this case.

    Suppressing the waist means taking it in along the seams that the manufacturer used in shaping it. There's usually 4 side seams and a back center seam. Cheaper tailors will take in excess via the center seam, which can lead to the jacket not looking right from behind if there's a lot to remove. Taking center can also leave less breadth across the back, and I need all of the room there.

    A more expensive option is to take out a little from each of the side seams. The tailor won't be altering the entire lower part of the jacket, instead just "pinching" at the waist, like a corset without any structure. Again, my weird dimensions make tailoring hard, this is why suits get expensive for me; it's 30-40% tailoring cost. A more normal proportioned person has less altering to do.

    This one is a better example of how it should all come together, eventually, and what good tailoring can do.

    0bc0o5ui9d93.jpg

    :love:
  • xxerniexx
    xxerniexx Posts: 104 Member
    Options
    just bought my first suit yesterday for the biggest interview of my life next month, i will post a pic when i get it back from being altered
  • xFunctionalStrengthx
    xFunctionalStrengthx Posts: 4,928 Member
    Options
    That's a really great comparison, @leut_underpants - but I'm curious, why not buy a smaller waist pant instead of taking it in 2 inches? Also what is "suppressing the waist"? Making tucks or something?

    @sugaraddict4321 About to get wordy, sorry about that.

    Because in traditional suiting, you don't get a choice. Traditional suiting comes in a "drop" between jacket and pants, typically 6 inches. So 42L minus 6 = 36 pant. That may or may not work for the buyer, but it's typically close enough for alterations to not make the pant look crazy on them.

    Big trouble comes when I need a 44L, which I do with most manufacturers. There's also a magic number between chest and shoulders that not many people know about. Around my shoulders I measure 51 inches. Around my chest is short of 42. So I have a nearly ten inch drop between those two numbers. It's exceedingly rare to see more than 7, and what that means is that I have to buy a bigger size than my chest number indicates, because the shoulders won't fit if I don't...and that's really what needs to fit, rather than the chest. Chest is the number it's sold by, shoulders are what actually matter, along with the lay of the lapels and collar on the chest and neck. Has little to do with chest at all, other than a convenient place for the math to work out most of the time.

    This particular manufacturer makes this cut in such a way that it fits my shoulders really well using the lower size number.

    There are such a thing as suit separates (pants sold on their own). When they're available, they're great for a guy like me. Just weren't an option in this case.

    Suppressing the waist means taking it in along the seams that the manufacturer used in shaping it. There's usually 4 side seams and a back center seam. Cheaper tailors will take in excess via the center seam, which can lead to the jacket not looking right from behind if there's a lot to remove. Taking center can also leave less breadth across the back, and I need all of the room there.

    A more expensive option is to take out a little from each of the side seams. The tailor won't be altering the entire lower part of the jacket, instead just "pinching" at the waist, like a corset without any structure. Again, my weird dimensions make tailoring hard, this is why suits get expensive for me; it's 30-40% tailoring cost. A more normal proportioned person has less altering to do.

    This one is a better example of how it should all come together, eventually, and what good tailoring can do.

    0bc0o5ui9d93.jpg

    Great explanation, and picture comparisons. I'm one who cannot buy off the shelf suits, as they all need to be tailored due to my body type. It's rare to find a longer length suit jacket, and they have to hem the pants legs quite a bit. Reminds me, I should check my suits to make sure they still fit.
  • Ready2befithealthy
    Ready2befithealthy Posts: 303 Member
    Options
    n4oqixtfbbnt.jpeg

    By the way, thank you for this thread! <3
  • goatg
    goatg Posts: 1,399 Member
    edited March 2018
    Options
    Unrelated but related. Bumble.

    I just can't do it. Sometimes running and spinning aren't enough.

    7yz9esqffim8.jpg
    g08gwvpw1cwa.jpg
  • xFunctionalStrengthx
    xFunctionalStrengthx Posts: 4,928 Member
    Options
    goatg wrote: »
    Also,`I bought the last guy I was dating a Varvatos shirt because his taste was horrible. If I had known how horrible I probably would have never....

    Whatever. It was what it was. He told me he couldn't accept a shirt that cost $250 and that he couldn't wear it. It was NYE.
    I didn't yell. I never yell. I calmly disagreed but accepted. He knew something was wrong. He apologized profusely over the next two hours. It was NYE and he was a rail-thin hair from starting the New Year freshly single.

    I've never even heard of this brand before. My jobs rarely require me to dress up more than business casual. Except in special occasions, such as meeting with the big brass. Or, special occasion for the FD, then I have to wear my class A's.

    Given that, in a way, I can agree with ihm. Other times, one just needs to STFU and accept the gift.
  • xFunctionalStrengthx
    xFunctionalStrengthx Posts: 4,928 Member
    Options
    goatg wrote: »
    goatg wrote: »
    Also,`I bought the last guy I was dating a Varvatos shirt because his taste was horrible. If I had known how horrible I probably would have never....

    Whatever. It was what it was. He told me he couldn't accept a shirt that cost $250 and that he couldn't wear it. It was NYE.
    I didn't yell. I never yell. I calmly disagreed but accepted. He knew something was wrong. He apologized profusely over the next two hours. It was NYE and he was a rail-thin hair from starting the New Year freshly single.

    I've never even heard of this brand before. My jobs rarely require me to dress up more than business casual. Except in special occasions, such as meeting with the big brass. Or, special occasion for the FD, then I have to wear my class A's.

    Given that, in a way, I can agree with ihm. Other times, one just needs to STFU and accept the gift.

    BTW, there's a huge caveat with what I mentioned....It was more about *him* and how kind of quickly we moved along, and less about the style. He put so much effort into working out his body for aesthetic purposes, and spent (what I considered, in a nonjudgmental way) extravagant amounts of money in other areas. If he couldn't afford it, that would be one thing. But it was his intrinsic value set and perspective....and, honestly, he was willing to learn. I just never saw it as a LT thing.

    There's this guy I really like now. A friend, actually. I've known him for a couple of years. And he'd never go to Varvatos and spend money on a shirt like that (actually, he might, but he'd say all day long that he wouldn't). And I *kitten* love him for it. Because he's brilliant, kind, empathic, and although he can afford the toys, I understand his set of values and how they no longer align with material goods. And I respect him. I didn't respect the other guy.

    So, of course....It's more about the man inside the suit. :)




    One dresses for their lifestyle, I suppose, right? I rarely wear makeup anymore. I can make myself look like a 9/10 but most of the time it's 6/7. It's a reflection of priorities. But it's nice having the tools available if you do decide on that special night out.....

    Off topic. Sorry! Ranting. Run now. Bye.

    Ahh, makes sense then and I agree it's about priorities and values we place on ourselves and within our lives. You're definitely far above a 6/7 I'd say. What's inside tends to reflect outwardly as well.
  • marissafit06
    marissafit06 Posts: 1,996 Member
    Options
    goatg wrote: »
    Unrelated but related. Bumble.

    I just can't do it. Sometimes running and spinning aren't enough.

    7yz9esqffim8.jpg
    g08gwvpw1cwa.jpg

    Hahahahaha
  • caco_ethes
    caco_ethes Posts: 11,962 Member
    Options
    ti0bcjxfd7jm.jpg
    7tuwoyxvymgo.jpg
    v4fuzcft93s5.jpg

    Ohhhh I love him so much
  • caco_ethes
    caco_ethes Posts: 11,962 Member
    Options
    caco_ethes wrote: »
    ti0bcjxfd7jm.jpg
    7tuwoyxvymgo.jpg
    v4fuzcft93s5.jpg

    Ohhhh I love him so much

    Andrew Scott can wear the hell out of dressed up.

    And he can Moriarty like no one else
  • caco_ethes
    caco_ethes Posts: 11,962 Member
    Options
    caco_ethes wrote: »
    caco_ethes wrote: »
    ti0bcjxfd7jm.jpg
    7tuwoyxvymgo.jpg
    v4fuzcft93s5.jpg

    Ohhhh I love him so much

    Andrew Scott can wear the hell out of dressed up.

    And he can Moriarty like no one else

    True. I don't know enough of his acting to say how he plays other characters, but I get the impression that he has a lot of range.

    He’s such a beautiful blend of crazy and entertaining. I love how he envisioned the character.