1200 calorie a day diet
Replies
-
Sorry I hadn’t read the comments after this, don’t know what to believe now. Il just carry on what I’m doing and maybe just have a cheat meal a week does anyone else do this?1
-
Do your own research. See Dr. Jason Fung, Dr. Walter Longo etc. 1200 cal is not a magic number, nor is it necessary a "starvation number". I won't belabor the topic but educate yourself. If what you are doing is working, great. If not then make a change.11
-
fyi - my comment was not intended as a chastise. I work in a related field and simply put you will get all sorts of advice, some good some not. Trust your body and pay attention to how you feel. Without posting your stat's, body fat, age etc etc it is impossible to say if 1200 cal's is appropriate. I initial response was meant for you to do some research of you own and to let you know that 1200 may be fine. If you feel ok you are likely just fine. Good Luck!7
-
fyi - my comment was not intended as a chastise. I work in a related field and simply put you will get all sorts of advice, some good some not. Trust your body and pay attention to how you feel. Without posting your stat's, body fat, age etc etc it is impossible to say if 1200 cal's is appropriate. I initial response was meant for you to do some research of you own and to let you know that 1200 may be fine. If you feel ok you are likely just fine. Good Luck!
Yes, a person will get all sorts of advice on the internet, some good and some nonsense. Yes, do some research, but from reputable sources. Don't be fooled by a "Dr" in front of someone's name, or platitudes like "if you feel OK you are likely fine".
You've attracted a lot of woo on this thread (which is bad, BTW), but this community has a lot of knowledgeable people who have successfully met their health & fitness goals and know what they are talking about, some of them professionals in science & fitness. Taken as a whole, you will find there is a consensus on these matters. You can find much of this excellent advice here:
https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10300331/most-helpful-posts-getting-started-must-reads#latest
https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10300319/most-helpful-posts-general-health-fitness-and-diet-must-reads#latest3 -
Sorry I hadn’t read the comments after this, don’t know what to believe now. Il just carry on what I’m doing and maybe just have a cheat meal a week does anyone else do this?
The problem with eating a bit too little isn't "starvation mode". It's that your body needs a certain amount of fuel (calories) to do what it does. If you are slightly undereating, you may "feel" fine. But many women who insist on starting low do great for the first couple of months and then start to suffer from feeling deprived, and feeling like a failure because they aren't fine anymore with the lowest calories. Eating a bit too little can also affect your energy a little - not enough so you notice it, but enough that you move a little less and burn a few less calories.
And let me tell you a little secret
- many people who insist they are full and happy on 1200 cals aren't using a food scale, are choosing not-so-accurate entries in the database, and are actually eating more like 1500 calories anyway! When I first started, I would've sworn on a Bible that I was barely eating 1400 cals and not losing weight. Then I got a food scale and realized I was eating more like 1700 calories.
Set a realistic weekly weight loss goal, log accurately and consistently, log your exercise and eat back at least some of those calories, and give it at least 4-6 weeks to really start clicking and moving. A wise MFPer once said, the one who eats the most to lose weight wins. No one gets bonus points for being satisfied with less.
Check out these posts when you get a chance, and good luck :drinker:
https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/1234699/logging-accurately-step-by-step-guide/p1
https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/1080242/a-guide-to-get-you-started-on-your-path-to-sexypants/p111 -
Sorry I hadn’t read the comments after this, don’t know what to believe now. Il just carry on what I’m doing and maybe just have a cheat meal a week does anyone else do this?
The problem with eating a bit too little isn't "starvation mode". It's that your body needs a certain amount of fuel (calories) to do what it does. If you are slightly undereating, you may "feel" fine. But many women who insist on starting low do great for the first couple of months and then start to suffer from feeling deprived, and feeling like a failure because they aren't fine anymore with the lowest calories. Eating a bit too little can also affect your energy a little - not enough so you notice it, but enough that you move a little less and burn a few less calories.
And let me tell you a little secret - many people who insist they are full and happy on 1200 cals aren't using a food scale, are choosing not-so-accurate entries in the database, and are actually eating more like 1500 calories anyway! When I first started, I would've sworn on a Bible that I was barely eating 1400 cals and not losing weight. Then I got a food scale and realized I was eating more like 1700 calories.
Set a realistic weekly weight loss goal, log accurately and consistently, log your exercise and eat back at least some of those calories, and give it at least 4-6 weeks to really start clicking and moving. A wise MFPer once said, the one who eats the most to lose weight wins. No one gets bonus points for being satisfied with less.
Check out these posts when you get a chance, and good luck :drinker:
https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/1234699/logging-accurately-step-by-step-guide/p1
https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/1080242/a-guide-to-get-you-started-on-your-path-to-sexypants/p1
I was hoping for more people like you and @estherdragonbat to come along, @kimny72
I often hesitate to mention accuracy in these discussions because I fear if a person thinks it's OK to net <1200 calories anyway, I don't want to give them the tools to be accurate about it 3 -
Sorry I hadn’t read the comments after this, don’t know what to believe now. Il just carry on what I’m doing and maybe just have a cheat meal a week does anyone else do this?
The problem with eating a bit too little isn't "starvation mode". It's that your body needs a certain amount of fuel (calories) to do what it does. If you are slightly undereating, you may "feel" fine. But many women who insist on starting low do great for the first couple of months and then start to suffer from feeling deprived, and feeling like a failure because they aren't fine anymore with the lowest calories. Eating a bit too little can also affect your energy a little - not enough so you notice it, but enough that you move a little less and burn a few less calories.
And let me tell you a little secret - many people who insist they are full and happy on 1200 cals aren't using a food scale, are choosing not-so-accurate entries in the database, and are actually eating more like 1500 calories anyway! When I first started, I would've sworn on a Bible that I was barely eating 1400 cals and not losing weight. Then I got a food scale and realized I was eating more like 1700 calories.
Set a realistic weekly weight loss goal, log accurately and consistently, log your exercise and eat back at least some of those calories, and give it at least 4-6 weeks to really start clicking and moving. A wise MFPer once said, the one who eats the most to lose weight wins. No one gets bonus points for being satisfied with less.
Check out these posts when you get a chance, and good luck :drinker:
https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/1234699/logging-accurately-step-by-step-guide/p1
https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/1080242/a-guide-to-get-you-started-on-your-path-to-sexypants/p1
I was hoping for more people like you and @estherdragonbat to come along, @kimny72
I often hesitate to mention accuracy in these discussions because I fear if a person thinks it's OK to net <1200 calories anyway, I don't want to give them the tools to be accurate about it
It's a conundrum - but I think most women would rather eat more, they just honestly believe they're supposed to eat less because so many other women say they do. For some reason it seems there's still this unspoken ideal that it's admirable for a woman to subsist on a light, ephemeral diet. We have to get more women on board the "eat more food, do more things" train
7 -
I do 1200 calories because I was told to by my doctor to lose weight. The doctor knows me, my history, weight etc. I am as of right now doing 1250 that MFP recommended, and try to eat some of the calories I work off if get a chance to walk. I lose and have always lost at this percentage. I am 5'2" 52yo, and classified as obese as I have at times been up to 260lbs. This year started out at 229lb in January and started again in February at 225.8; I am now on my way to losing and trying to stay active.
Me personally using the article mentioned and figuring calories to go by would make me feel very bloated and constantly not meeting my calorie goals.
However, if it works for most, awesome! We are all here for the same reasons and have to find what works for us.
@kimny72 I have food scale and do eat the amount of calories mention, actually are under but would agree if did not have food scale yes would actually be eating more than that, lol.
2 -
Sorry I hadn’t read the comments after this, don’t know what to believe now. Il just carry on what I’m doing and maybe just have a cheat meal a week does anyone else do this?
Some do this, but many of those who have been successful simply incorporate the foods they love throughout their week in portions that stay within their calorie allowance. Many find that over-restricting during the week can lead to binges that ultimately hamper their progress.
Think about how you are going to want to eat forever and start doing that now, only in smaller portions. Then, when you are ready to maintain, which is the longest part of the process, you will simply continue to do that only with a few hundred more calories to play with.
3 -
DeadlineMAY2019 wrote: »I’m on the 1200 cal a day too!
I’m doing spin classes at the gym 3 times a week. The biggest struggle I have though is eating at night. I just get hungry around 10-11ish 😓
I go to bed and bring 1 Hershey kids and a bottle of water.
For me it's Werther's hard candies. Three of them total 70 calories, and keep my mouth busy for a good while. i eat them while reading in bed, drink more water, brush teeth & go to sleep!0 -
I do 1200 calories because I was told to by my doctor to lose weight. The doctor knows me, my history, weight etc. I am as of right now doing 1250 that MFP recommended, and try to eat some of the calories I work off if get a chance to walk. I lose and have always lost at this percentage. I am 5'2" 52yo, and classified as obese as I have at times been up to 260lbs. This year started out at 229lb in January and started again in February at 225.8; I am now on my way to losing and trying to stay active.
Me personally using the article mentioned and figuring calories to go by would make me feel very bloated and constantly not meeting my calorie goals.
However, if it works for most, awesome! We are all here for the same reasons and have to find what works for us.
@kimny72 I have food scale and do eat the amount of calories mention, actually are under but would agree if did not have food scale yes would actually be eating more than that, lol.
It's worth pointing out that our discussion here is general and not meant to be for anyone facing specific health issues and under a doctor's care.
That being said, I find the statement I highlighted curious. You're saying that increasing your calories, even while still being in a calorie deficit, would cause you distress? Were you having this issue while gaining the weight?3 -
estherdragonbat wrote: »erikaashleykehn wrote: »Just be careful with this one, love. If your body actually needs more than 1200 (especially with working out), all you’ll be doing is throwing your body into starvation mode, which will kill your metabolism and do the exact OPPOSITE of what you want it to do.
Not a thing.
Nope. But do be careful on being to low.0 -
This content has been removed.
-
This content has been removed.
-
This content has been removed.
-
This content has been removed.
-
This content has been removed.
-
Honestly I don't get how women are eating these massive amounts of calories every day and still losing weight. Even with moderate exercise (30 minutes cardio and 30 minutes yoga) I get allocated like 1500 per day. I have been here for months and lost 0 pounds because I almost always go over. I suck at moderating, and a couple of days over kills my progress for the entire week if my deficit it that small. I have to go back to the restrictive diet I was going to start with or I literally will not lose the weight.
Good on everyone who is eating 1800 - 2000 calories per day and losing weight. I literally do not know how you do it. 0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Honestly I don't get how women are eating these massive amounts of calories every day and still losing weight. Even with moderate exercise (30 minutes cardio and 30 minutes yoga) I get allocated like 1500 per day. I have been here for months and lost 0 pounds because I almost always go over. I suck at moderating, and a couple of days over kills my progress for the entire week if my deficit it that small. I have to go back to the restrictive diet I was going to start with or I literally will not lose the weight.
Good on everyone who is eating 1800 - 2000 calories per day and losing weight. I literally do not know how you do it.
Those numbers just represent a calorie deficit for them based on their stats & activity level. They won't for everyone, particularly women who are very short, sedentary, and/or have relatively little to lose.
It's an unfortunate truth that, for those women who are very short, sedentary, or have little to lose, weight loss requires real determination and is a test of patience. Often, the losses experienced are small enough to be hidden by normal water weight fluctuations, and unless a person sticks with it for many weeks, they may not be able to see the real progress on the scale. However, sometimes it is a question of accuracy- not using a food scale, choosing inaccurate database entries, and/or over-estimated calorie burns- and a person may not think it's possible to lose on X number of calories, but it's just an issue of the data being skewed.
Yours sounds like a good example of what I mentioned earlier when people over-restrict and it leads to over-eating on other days. Does this look familiar?
<img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/5021879/uploads/editor/p5/0kjju2outt0d.png" alt="0kjju2outt0d.png"/>
In this case, the key is accepting a slower rate of loss and being really consistent & committed (while trying to minimize the hair loss experienced from pulling it out ).
2 -
Honestly I don't get how women are eating these massive amounts of calories every day and still losing weight. Even with moderate exercise (30 minutes cardio and 30 minutes yoga) I get allocated like 1500 per day. I have been here for months and lost 0 pounds because I almost always go over. I suck at moderating, and a couple of days over kills my progress for the entire week if my deficit it that small. I have to go back to the restrictive diet I was going to start with or I literally will not lose the weight.
Good on everyone who is eating 1800 - 2000 calories per day and losing weight. I literally do not know how you do it.
Like try2again said, different stats. I'm currently losing on 2070cal, but I'm 5'6, 219lbs currently and lightly active. I hear you on the struggle to moderate though. What worked for me was a lot of meal prep, portioning out ahead of time as many things as I can and lots of protein. And apples, they help in a pinch when I want something to snack on that's also sweet. Just got to find what will work for you.1 -
Honestly I don't get how women are eating these massive amounts of calories every day and still losing weight. Even with moderate exercise (30 minutes cardio and 30 minutes yoga) I get allocated like 1500 per day. I have been here for months and lost 0 pounds because I almost always go over. I suck at moderating, and a couple of days over kills my progress for the entire week if my deficit it that small. I have to go back to the restrictive diet I was going to start with or I literally will not lose the weight.
Good on everyone who is eating 1800 - 2000 calories per day and losing weight. I literally do not know how you do it.
Usually it comes with being a higher starting weight, more activity or more accurate logging.
If you're a higher starting weight you burn more calories than someone who is slimmer without even taking exercise into account. I am a higher weight than most - I started at 255lbs, I'm also just over 5'7", I'm currently at around 230lbs so my calorie burn without any exercise is around 2500 calories per day, as long as I eat less than that, I will lose weight.
When I add exercise - Hiking, Cycling, Rowing, Running, Pole Dancing Classes, Yoga & Weight Training, my daily burn can be anywhere up to 4000 calories per day, so you'd better believe I'm going to eat a lot to fuel that and still lose weight.
Then it's down to accuracy, an awful lot of people have simply no clue how much they're eating, sure they are logging, but not accurately - I used to guess that my cereal was about 40g - nope - try more like 60-100g depending on which cereal, I'd assume my pasta portions were correct - nope - try double what it should have been for a normal portion. Also there are the people who think they are burning 400 calories for a 15 minute workout because the machine readout or MFP's database said so, which is pretty unlikely unless you're extremely obese or doing an incredibly intense workout.
So if you're not losing weight, the first places to look are your accuracy, particularly if you're only in a small deficit.1 -
Honestly I don't get how women are eating these massive amounts of calories every day and still losing weight. Even with moderate exercise (30 minutes cardio and 30 minutes yoga) I get allocated like 1500 per day. I have been here for months and lost 0 pounds because I almost always go over. I suck at moderating, and a couple of days over kills my progress for the entire week if my deficit it that small. I have to go back to the restrictive diet I was going to start with or I literally will not lose the weight.
Good on everyone who is eating 1800 - 2000 calories per day and losing weight. I literally do not know how you do it.
I can say that at my heaviest, I opted for a less-aggressive weight loss plan (setting my goals to 1lb per week when I could safely lose 2). I didn't restrict anything but my portions and I lost. My calories have shrunk down a bit as I've shrunk down, but it's never felt onerous. Now that I'm nearly at goal, things have really slowed down. I'm set for 1/2lb per week, which puts me at 1340 before exercise. But I try to walk at least 2 hours daily and generally do so at 3.5mph. I strength train 5 days a week for roughly 45 minutes average. (Lower body days take about 30 minutes, upper body/core days take about an hour.) So, eating back half my exercise calories and using the rest as a cushion against inflated burns/inaccurate calories? I generally close out around 1700 or so.1 -
Instead of aiming for 1200 and trying to eat exercise calories, I'd suggest front loading calories to exercise, which may be helpful for some. But the mindset is that you do, in fact, get to eat a bit more with the aim to fuel your workout. If you're an early bird that works out in the morning, you've earned extra kcal to consume.
Mind you, the effect of caloric expenditure for exercise is grossly overestimated, and unless you're doing some moderately advanced training, you're simply not going to be burning the calorie count that most machines and smart watches tell you.
In any case, a very small group of people do require less than 1200 calories to lose fat, and I mean that figuratively and literally.. small/short/petite people may require less based on diet alone. The only way to get to eat more calories would be to increase activity, whether it's NEAT or volitional exercise.0 -
Honestly I don't get how women are eating these massive amounts of calories every day and still losing weight. Even with moderate exercise (30 minutes cardio and 30 minutes yoga) I get allocated like 1500 per day. I have been here for months and lost 0 pounds because I almost always go over. I suck at moderating, and a couple of days over kills my progress for the entire week if my deficit it that small. I have to go back to the restrictive diet I was going to start with or I literally will not lose the weight.
Good on everyone who is eating 1800 - 2000 calories per day and losing weight. I literally do not know how you do it.
I ate @ 1500 to lose weight. I found that protein and fiber helped me feel full on less calories, so I focused on building my day around those. I eliminated liquid calories, which didn't fill me up - switched to diet soda, learned to like my coffee with just a splash of milk, only had alcohol on rare occasions. I also focused on increasing my day to day activity level so I had a little wiggle room. And I lost an average of 0.5lbs per week. That would often show up on the scale as 3 weeks with no loss and then 1 lb off each of the next 2 weeks. It required patience, strategy, and a food scale!2 -
estherdragonbat wrote: »Honestly I don't get how women are eating these massive amounts of calories every day and still losing weight. Even with moderate exercise (30 minutes cardio and 30 minutes yoga) I get allocated like 1500 per day. I have been here for months and lost 0 pounds because I almost always go over. I suck at moderating, and a couple of days over kills my progress for the entire week if my deficit it that small. I have to go back to the restrictive diet I was going to start with or I literally will not lose the weight.
Good on everyone who is eating 1800 - 2000 calories per day and losing weight. I literally do not know how you do it.
I can say that at my heaviest, I opted for a less-aggressive weight loss plan (setting my goals to 1lb per week when I could safely lose 2)
This reminds me of a quote I've seen on here... it's better to lose 50 lbs in a year than 100 lbs never.
Those of us offering advice to choose a smaller rate weekly weight loss goal are not doing so because we don't mind being fat as much as you do, or we lack motivation, or we secretly want you to fail... we say that because the more comfortable you are during the process, the more likely you will stick with it for a long time. The key to any diet plan, at any calorie level, is sticking with it, and most women will tire of 1200 calories real quick. 6 -
I am so glad I found this discussion! Will definitely try the 1200 meal plan this week.0
-
estherdragonbat wrote: »Honestly I don't get how women are eating these massive amounts of calories every day and still losing weight. Even with moderate exercise (30 minutes cardio and 30 minutes yoga) I get allocated like 1500 per day. I have been here for months and lost 0 pounds because I almost always go over. I suck at moderating, and a couple of days over kills my progress for the entire week if my deficit it that small. I have to go back to the restrictive diet I was going to start with or I literally will not lose the weight.
Good on everyone who is eating 1800 - 2000 calories per day and losing weight. I literally do not know how you do it.
I can say that at my heaviest, I opted for a less-aggressive weight loss plan (setting my goals to 1lb per week when I could safely lose 2)
This reminds me of a quote I've seen on here... it's better to lose 50 lbs in a year than 100 lbs never.
Those of us offering advice to choose a smaller rate weekly weight loss goal are not doing so because we don't mind being fat as much as you do, or we lack motivation, or we secretly want you to fail... we say that because the more comfortable you are during the process, the more likely you will stick with it for a long time. The key to any diet plan, at any calorie level, is sticking with it, and most women will tire of 1200 calories real quick.
Yes this! I do like 2-3 lower calorie days a week to save up for weekend nights out, but I can't imagine doing that every day, every week, every month. It makes me hungry just thinking about it.0 -
Honestly I don't get how women are eating these massive amounts of calories every day and still losing weight. Even with moderate exercise (30 minutes cardio and 30 minutes yoga) I get allocated like 1500 per day. I have been here for months and lost 0 pounds because I almost always go over. I suck at moderating, and a couple of days over kills my progress for the entire week if my deficit it that small. I have to go back to the restrictive diet I was going to start with or I literally will not lose the weight.
Good on everyone who is eating 1800 - 2000 calories per day and losing weight. I literally do not know how you do it.
Those numbers just represent a calorie deficit for them based on their stats & activity level. They won't for everyone, particularly women who are very short, sedentary, and/or have relatively little to lose.
It's an unfortunate truth that, for those women who are very short, sedentary, or have little to lose, weight loss requires real determination and is a test of patience. Often, the losses experienced are small enough to be hidden by normal water weight fluctuations, and unless a person sticks with it for many weeks, they may not be able to see the real progress on the scale. However, sometimes it is a question of accuracy- not using a food scale, choosing inaccurate database entries, and/or over-estimated calorie burns- and a person may not think it's possible to lose on X number of calories, but it's just an issue of the data being skewed.
Yours sounds like a good example of what I mentioned earlier when people over-restrict and it leads to over-eating on other days. Does this look familiar?
<img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/5021879/uploads/editor/p5/0kjju2outt0d.png" alt="0kjju2outt0d.png"/>
In this case, the key is accepting a slower rate of loss and being really consistent & committed (while trying to minimize the hair loss experienced from pulling it out ).
Yep - that is me. I know I go over regularly. I am terrible at moderating and the message here of not "denying" yourself anything sure makes it easy to do that. I guess I figure if I went down to 1200 my deficit would be that much larger on the days I do stick to it - so my "overages" wouldn't totally kill my week? Maybe it would balance out better? haha
But I am neither short, sedentary nor do I have very little weight to lose. I am 5'10", 195, and want to lose at least 40 lbs (hoping for 50). My base calories from MFP at 1 lb per week are 1460. I do what I would consider moderate work outs 4 days per week.
Anyway - enough whining. I just need to suck it up and figure it out how to succeed at this somehow. Thanks all for taking the time to reply. 1 -
Honestly I don't get how women are eating these massive amounts of calories every day and still losing weight. Even with moderate exercise (30 minutes cardio and 30 minutes yoga) I get allocated like 1500 per day. I have been here for months and lost 0 pounds because I almost always go over. I suck at moderating, and a couple of days over kills my progress for the entire week if my deficit it that small. I have to go back to the restrictive diet I was going to start with or I literally will not lose the weight.
Good on everyone who is eating 1800 - 2000 calories per day and losing weight. I literally do not know how you do it.
Those numbers just represent a calorie deficit for them based on their stats & activity level. They won't for everyone, particularly women who are very short, sedentary, and/or have relatively little to lose.
It's an unfortunate truth that, for those women who are very short, sedentary, or have little to lose, weight loss requires real determination and is a test of patience. Often, the losses experienced are small enough to be hidden by normal water weight fluctuations, and unless a person sticks with it for many weeks, they may not be able to see the real progress on the scale. However, sometimes it is a question of accuracy- not using a food scale, choosing inaccurate database entries, and/or over-estimated calorie burns- and a person may not think it's possible to lose on X number of calories, but it's just an issue of the data being skewed.
Yours sounds like a good example of what I mentioned earlier when people over-restrict and it leads to over-eating on other days. Does this look familiar?
<img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/5021879/uploads/editor/p5/0kjju2outt0d.png" alt="0kjju2outt0d.png"/>
In this case, the key is accepting a slower rate of loss and being really consistent & committed (while trying to minimize the hair loss experienced from pulling it out ).
Yep - that is me. I know I go over regularly. I am terrible at moderating and the message here of not "denying" yourself anything sure makes it easy to do that. I guess I figure if I went down to 1200 my deficit would be that much larger on the days I do stick to it - so my "overages" wouldn't totally kill my week? Maybe it would balance out better? haha
But I am neither short, sedentary nor do I have very little weight to lose. I am 5'10", 195, and want to lose at least 40 lbs (hoping for 50). My base calories from MFP at 1 lb per week are 1460. I do what I would consider moderate work outs 4 days per week.
Anyway - enough whining. I just need to suck it up and figure it out how to succeed at this somehow. Thanks all for taking the time to reply.
I'm 5ft 8 183lbs and on a sedentary day I burn 1900 cals so I would get 1400 your 2inches taller and just over 10lbs heavier so your base calories should be more
0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions