Intermittent fasting, I don’t get it

Pretty much what the title says. I’ve seen all these posts about how 16:8 changed people’s lives, and I want to understand. Is it really so normal to be eating more than 8 hours a day anyway? I feel really stupid but I don’t understand how it’s different from just a normal day.
«13456

Replies

  • karsei01
    karsei01 Posts: 442 Member
    It's pretty much about that one skipped meal. But if that say cuts your daily intake by 500, thats a pound a week
  • SugaSugaNooo
    SugaSugaNooo Posts: 106 Member
    @thelandkraken do you not eat anything after 5pm? Previously I would have breakfast at 7 and my last snack could be as late as 10pm (12-15hrs). Now I eat between 12-8 (8hrs).
  • BarbaraHelen2013
    BarbaraHelen2013 Posts: 1,940 Member
    IF wouldn’t mean a skipped meal, though. If I understand right and it’s eating for an 8 hour window, that’s my normal meals anyway. Breakfast at 10 because I’m not hungry before that, lunch at 12, and dinner at 5.

    I’m sorry if I’m being dense I just don’t get how it’s different from the norm, but I feel I must be missing something because of all the people who swear by the results of it.

    I guess how suitable it is varies from one person to another. Your lifestyle works with the meal timings for you. But, perhaps if you’re up at 6am, grabbing a quick breakfast and then leave for a commute at 6:45, lunch break at 1pm or so, then maybe don’t get home until 8pm from the reverse commute things would look a little different? I’m guessing not everyone can have dinner at 5pm, for example due to work commitments or other family commitments.
  • thelandkraken
    thelandkraken Posts: 91 Member
    Thank you everyone for explaining it to me!

    From what you've all said, it's probably not for me as I naturally eat within 7-8 hours anyway, but I appreciate the different perspectives and reasoning.
  • amusedmonkey
    amusedmonkey Posts: 10,330 Member
    jayemes wrote: »
    hlwick12 wrote: »
    IF helped me. I was working 12-16 hour days (including gym time). If I ate throughout the entire work day, I’d eat significantly more calories. So, for a while, I’d skip breakfast (except a protein shake after the gym), and have my first meal at noon, then one around 3/4, then the last one around 7/8. A common misconception is that you have a “feeding window” - as a result, some people eat more during their 8 hours than they normally would (bc they eat throughout the 8 hours). However, you really should leave 3-4 hours between “meals.” Mostly a way to control calories in. Depends on your work/life schedule, dietary needs etc though

    Why exactly to the bolded part?

    Some people don't understand that calories still apply if they overeat during their feeding window. Spacing out meals helps the poster with calorie control, they just didn't choose their words carefully.
  • I have hypothyroidism so I deal with being really low energy and weight loss stalls. IF helps me absorb my thyroid medication better (give it a goog if you want more info). Since I've started I've seen a huge decrease in my symptoms. Also, splitting calories between two meals makes it easier to keep up with my calorie deficit.
  • riahmaxwell
    riahmaxwell Posts: 6 Member
    It’s actually worked really well for me. I used to snack more often, so my body didn’t get much of a break. So now for example I stop eating by 8 and start after noon. I used to get nauseous from hunger but none my body’s adjusted to longer periods of not eating and I feel fine. It was just used to eating every couple hours. I find it helps me maintain weight, control my appetite, and eat less overall. No breakfast is fewer calories, yes, but actually less likely to snack between lunch and dinner. I love intermittent fasting. Also coffee is my friend when I am hungry but have another hour or two to go.
  • hlwick12
    hlwick12 Posts: 135 Member
    jayemes wrote: »
    hlwick12 wrote: »
    IF helped me. I was working 12-16 hour days (including gym time). If I ate throughout the entire work day, I’d eat significantly more calories. So, for a while, I’d skip breakfast (except a protein shake after the gym), and have my first meal at noon, then one around 3/4, then the last one around 7/8. A common misconception is that you have a “feeding window” - as a result, some people eat more during their 8 hours than they normally would (bc they eat throughout the 8 hours). However, you really should leave 3-4 hours between “meals.” Mostly a way to control calories in. Depends on your work/life schedule, dietary needs etc though

    Why exactly to the bolded part?

    Some people don't understand that calories still apply if they overeat during their feeding window. Spacing out meals helps the poster with calorie control, they just didn't choose their words carefully.

    Now I see why the confusion... the “mostly a way to control calories in” was not related to my point regarding leaving time between meals. The last two sentences were referring to IF in general