A serving is WHAT????

2»

Replies

  • Alatariel75
    Alatariel75 Posts: 18,223 Member
    Lietchi wrote: »

    As @BartBVanBockstaele notes, listing calories per weight does allow for comparison to other foods, but I don't carry a scale with me everywhere I go!

    It's far from universal but I see quite a few nutritional labels with both here:
    - per 100gr
    - per unit/several units/portion size

    For example for After Eight mints, a serving is 2 mints:
    3vn6mwmo745k.png

    ...

    Here in Australia all labels have the info per serving and per 100g/ml it makes it so much easier to really assess what you're buying and eating
  • clicketykeys
    clicketykeys Posts: 6,577 Member
    Lietchi wrote: »

    As @BartBVanBockstaele notes, listing calories per weight does allow for comparison to other foods, but I don't carry a scale with me everywhere I go!

    It's far from universal but I see quite a few nutritional labels with both here:
    - per 100gr
    - per unit/several units/portion size

    For example for After Eight mints, a serving is 2 mints:
    3vn6mwmo745k.png

    I'm a huge fan of that for 'ready to eat' foods such as cookies.

    I was going to say that ridiculous serving sizes are a typically US thing, but I stand corrected. For a small 45gr bag of Lays chips, the stated portion size is 40 grams :mrgreen: Who on earth would leave 5 grams for another time?
    And on top of that, a large bag of exactly the same chips states 30gr as a portion...

    It's interesting that they're allowed to wiggle the portion sizes like that. I'd bet that it's because that way they can include the phrase "10 portions per container" (if it's 300gr) on the large one instead of "7.5 portions per container." ;)
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,203 Member
    I know this wasn't what you were aiming at, but I'd like to express outrage at US vegetable serving sizes, especially in restaurant sides.

    Three or four asparagus stalks is pathetic. A tiny heap of maybe a dozen green beans is sad.

    In home foods, I know I'm an eating preferences outlier, but the frozen broccoli I fall back on for lazy days says a pound (frozen weight) is 5 servings. Nah. That's just a smallish cereal bowl of broccoli, when cooked: One serving.
  • BartBVanBockstaele
    BartBVanBockstaele Posts: 623 Member
    Skyleen75 wrote: »
    @BartBVanBockstaele I’m working on my self control and I feel 1/4 jar is reasonable also regardless of jar size. I enjoy the economy school cafeteria style 64 ounce monster.
    Giggle, it seems we have the same problem.
  • BartBVanBockstaele
    BartBVanBockstaele Posts: 623 Member
    Lietchi wrote: »
    It's far from universal but I see quite a few nutritional labels with both here:
    - per 100gr
    - per unit/several units/portion size
    I have seen those as well, and in Canada at least, they tend to note the number of grams/ml per claimed 'serving' instead of per 100 g. While that is already something. Stating per 100 g should be universal in my opinion. It is how scientists do it, and even the USDA does it that way. The claim that stating per 'serving' is easier for Americans, essentially says that Americans are the dumbest of the dumb, and I refuse to accept that idea.

  • BartBVanBockstaele
    BartBVanBockstaele Posts: 623 Member
    Here in Australia all labels have the info per serving and per 100g/ml it makes it so much easier to really assess what you're buying and eating
    There are some of those in Canada as well, but –as far as I am aware– not many. It is a pity, really. On the other hand, if accuracy were to be enforced, that would certainly be a major improvement.

  • Lietchi
    Lietchi Posts: 6,826 Member
    Lietchi wrote: »

    As @BartBVanBockstaele notes, listing calories per weight does allow for comparison to other foods, but I don't carry a scale with me everywhere I go!

    It's far from universal but I see quite a few nutritional labels with both here:
    - per 100gr
    - per unit/several units/portion size

    For example for After Eight mints, a serving is 2 mints:
    3vn6mwmo745k.png

    I'm a huge fan of that for 'ready to eat' foods such as cookies.

    I was going to say that ridiculous serving sizes are a typically US thing, but I stand corrected. For a small 45gr bag of Lays chips, the stated portion size is 40 grams :mrgreen: Who on earth would leave 5 grams for another time?
    And on top of that, a large bag of exactly the same chips states 30gr as a portion...

    It's interesting that they're allowed to wiggle the portion sizes like that. I'd bet that it's because that way they can include the phrase "10 portions per container" (if it's 300gr) on the large one instead of "7.5 portions per container." ;)

    Nope, our packages don't state how many portions they contain. Just total weight. I think only nutritional info per 100gr is mandatory, and any other portion/serving/... is optional and (possibly) freely chosen. Sometimes a serving size, sometimes per piece, sometimes for several pieces, sometimes for the whole package (for example a ready meal). And sometimes no extra info at all, just let 100gr. I'm no expert on EU guidelines, but from the labels I've seen, it's so irregular that I don't think there are strict rules.
  • Skyleen75
    Skyleen75 Posts: 715 Member
    88ud9bjhe72t.jpg

    My lunch yesterday was a weighed out single serving of saag paneer (naan bread on the side) as I'm watching my saturated fat intake. It was delicious, but this just looks like a sad amount.

    I love you for your photographic evidence!!!
    It looks delicious but also like a SNACK!

  • Skyleen75
    Skyleen75 Posts: 715 Member
    Oh @suzysunshine99 that is AMAZINGLY stupid!!! I love it.
  • kshama2001
    kshama2001 Posts: 28,052 Member
    A quarter of a pint of Ben and Jerry's. Yeah, right. Everyone knows one pint equals one serving.

    jv1593dwpq6f.png

    I've given up trying to moderate pints of B&J and just don't buy them anymore :disappointed:

    No consolation, but the label now says there are three servings per container.
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,982 Member
    Poptarts. 200 calories each. Who eats just one?

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png
  • BeeHapppy101
    BeeHapppy101 Posts: 21 Member
    22 servings in a box of cereal. Really. Must be using toddler bowls.
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,982 Member
    IMO, the issue with Industrialized countries like the US and UK is that they are so used to huge portions of food that when a reasonable serving size (like those served outside the US) is considered small. There's a reason why other countries who don't have as much industry aren't suffering from weight issues due to the fact that their portions are much smaller. Where we eat off 13" plates, a lot of other countries use 9" plates or smaller as a reference.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png
  • BartBVanBockstaele
    BartBVanBockstaele Posts: 623 Member
    edited October 2022
    AnnPT77 wrote: »
    Three or four asparagus stalks is pathetic. A tiny heap of maybe a dozen green beans is sad.

    In home foods, I know I'm an eating preferences outlier, but the frozen broccoli I fall back on for lazy days says a pound (frozen weight) is 5 servings. Nah. That's just a smallish cereal bowl of broccoli, when cooked: One serving.
    I totally agree with that. I use one-third of 750 g bag, i.e. 250 g of frozen broccoli (about 60 Kcal) as a serving/portion and that is barely enough to even be aware that I ate something, despite the label stating that one serving is 85 g. At the beginning of my diet, I used 375 g which was half a bag and that wasn't very much either, but with weightloss also comes a reduction of calories needed, so I have had to adapt. Sometimes I wish I were fat again, 375 g (88 Kcal) would look a lot bigger now.

    And don't get me started on a "handful of baby spinach". What is that again? 6 or 7 g? And that is then usually followed by the advice that "you have to learn to throw things away". Hugh?