Help! I need a fast weight loss plan
Options
Replies
-
Do u read her original post? she said she wanted advice on quick weight loss & didnt want to hear responses like its unhealthy dont do it so yes Id assume she knows it may not be the best way to go. I really dont know how healthy or unhealthy it is as Im new to this board myself. But I know its possible & thats what she asked so I answered. Why is everyone so negative.
Because telling someone to eat 800-1000 (and I'm assuming you are not including eating back exercise cals either) is not only wrong, but also against the CG as it is promoting "Unsafe Weight-Loss Techniques". If you are going to do a VLCD, it should be under doctor supervision.0 -
He's responding for the same reason you are responding -- it touches a nerve. You could do the same you're saying Jof should do -- you could just ignore what he is saying and move on. The difference is his is constructive criticism of a real problem with people who REALLY do think that 'fast and easy' is the way to go instead of moderate to slow. Your criticism of his take on it is just that -- criticism.
You know what? I changed my mind. The "loose weight quick" mindset has no impact on me
I'm going to go google "safe effective weight loss" and read all the well-written articles offering practical advice based on peer reviewed literature.0 -
I want help. But not sane, reasonable advice. Lord, I get so tired of seeing this carp on the boards.0
-
He's responding for the same reason you are responding -- it touches a nerve. You could do the same you're saying Jof should do -- you could just ignore what he is saying and move on. The difference is his is constructive criticism of a real problem with people who REALLY do think that 'fast and easy' is the way to go instead of moderate to slow. Your criticism of his take on it is just that -- criticism.
I chose to respond and will not pretend not to care while still responding. There is a quite a bit of information in this thread that could be useful to people, despite the fact that the OP started off looking for a solution that is not optimal.
At no point did I say that anyone should or should not respond. What I said was that there seemed to be a lot of investment in perception that is not necessarily based on the OP's thoughts or intentions. She did not speak about anyone else's experience. She put herself and her reasoning right out there. She did not imply that anyone else's experience was invalid. That line of thinking was projected into the thread.
And again people who are looking for solid information, can find it in this thread. People who are not ready to look honestly at what they need to do individually to make changes will have a variety of outcomes.0 -
Our whole culture is based on instant results and fast, faster, fastest and hundreds of millions of dollars are spent annually to convince us that we can lose weight quickly (and spot reduce too) so I guess I wonder why wouldn't a lot of people think that? It's the message they've heard their whole life and it takes time and, in my case at least, a good deal of effort to unlearn that. And it's something people really want to believe too - I sure wish there was a quicker fix.
So I understand what you're saying but it doesn't make me angry. I just don't take it personally because I know people don't really mean it that way and they're not thinking about me but they're thinking about themselves.
Just my 2cents.
exactly. ... LOL
AND if I feel irritated by a numerous redundant topics I do not have to get sarcastic because I can easily not reply. Lmao...
No one is obligated or getting paid to post. Lol0 -
You're a personal/fitness trainer and that is your best answer?
I think many people on mfp forget that they were once new here, that they all had different motivations for joining, or starting their weight loss journey. The OP joined in March and has lost 4lbs. She may not realize that slow and steady is the best way. Giving her sarcastic answers isn't really helping. She may not realize that a 2lb per week weight loss is already a great thing. How about some actual good advice for someone who is asking for help.
OP, my advice is, Log all your food. Stay below your calorie goals, and work out for 30 minutes, 5 times a week. No, it's not going to get you shredded, but I guarantee after 5 weeks you will be feeling a lot better about yourself, whether you've lost 5 or 10 pounds. That was my plan when I first started. 5 weeks later, I just felt plain good. The working out is a must though! And 30 minutes a day is totally doable! Baby steps. You can do this!!
well said!!!0 -
You know what? I changed my mind. The "loose weight quick" mindset has no impact on me
I'm going to go google "safe effective weight loss" and read all the well-written articles offering practical advice based on peer reviewed literature.
NO. WAY. Get off of here with your logic, common sense, and grown up behavior!0 -
I chose to respond and will not pretend not to care while still responding. There is a quite a bit of information in this thread that could be useful to people, despite the fact that the OP started off looking for a solution that is not optimal.
At no point did I say that anyone should or should not respond. What I said was that there seemed to be a lot of investment in perception that is not necessarily based on the OP's thoughts or intentions. She did not speak about anyone else's experience. She put herself and her reasoning right out there. She did not imply that anyone else's experience was invalid. That line of thinking was projected into the thread.
And again people who are looking for solid information, can find it in this thread. People who are not ready to look honestly at what they need to do individually to make changes will have a variety of outcomes.
Actually, yes, yes you did. You flat out said if he was going to be negative then he shouldn't respond. However, HE said in his original post that his irritation wasn't aimed at OP, but rather the implication from others on this very thread that you CAN drop weight super fast and others just choose to ignore it. The problem with these threads is multi-fold with just a few right off the top of my head that they imply that you should do something that isn't healthy (she said she didn't want to hear that), that people here will help and encourage it (some folks sure did), and that the rules of MFP don't apply. So, while I get your point to some degree, your perception in this case is skewed quite wonky, too.0 -
NO. WAY. Get off of here with your logic, common sense, and grown up behavior!
Unfortunately, all I could find is 28-day-fixes and 8 foods to demonize.
So...I'm back.0 -
Unfortunately, all I could find is 28-day-fixes and 8 foods to demonize.
So...I'm back.0 -
0
-
That's called glycogen and it's not fat0 -
Because telling someone to eat 1000 (and I'm assuming you are not including eating back exercise cals either) is not only wrong, but also against the CG as it is promoting "Unsafe Weight-Loss Techniques". If you are going to do a VLCD, it should be under doctor supervision.
[/quote]
I cant believe the negativity on this board, I would never tell someone to do something that I thought was harmful, I have no idea what is deemed healthy & unhealthy. Im here to lose weight & learn better habits just like everyone else. Maybe Im uninformed but to me what I said seemed like a reasonable amount for short tern weight loss & its what IM currently doing so I suggested it.0 -
Actually, yes, yes you did. You flat out said if he was going to be negative then he shouldn't respond. However, HE said in his original post that his irritation wasn't aimed at OP, but rather the implication from others on this very thread that you CAN drop weight super fast and others just choose to ignore it. The problem with these threads is multi-fold with just a few right off the top of my head that they imply that you should do something that isn't healthy (she said she didn't want to hear that), that people here will help and encourage it (some folks sure did), and that the rules of MFP don't apply. So, while I get your point to some degree, your perception in this case is skewed quite wonky, too.
No I did not say what anyone should or should not do. I pointed out that going out of the way to say one does not care at length is inconsistent with not caring. The post is right there. There is nothing skewed about my perception.
The OP is responsible for herself, her journey and her feelings. Not taking advice is not a necessarily a reflection of the quality of the advice. The OP's post is about the OP. Implying that her intentions, or the intentions of people who make similar post, are inherently about other people's journeys just is a large leap at best. And in this case that leap is not based on anything the OP said. That is projection, and in this case anger base on an unfounded projection.
There is questionable advice in this thread, and many others. There is good advice in this thread and in many others. At no time are we as individuals not responsible for investigating what we see as good information further.
If quick fixes worked for sustained weight loss, gain or recomposition no one would need this tool. It's up to the individual to accept that and be honest in their commitment to their health. Not everyone is ready to make that change. Not everyone is successful in their first or fifth attempt. Not getting to that at place at any point is in no way inherently disrespectful to anyone else or a comment on any one else's experience.0 -
Because telling someone to eat 1000 (and I'm assuming you are not including eating back exercise cals either) is not only wrong, but also against the CG as it is promoting "Unsafe Weight-Loss Techniques". If you are going to do a VLCD, it should be under doctor supervision.I cant believe the negativity on this board, I would never tell someone to do something that I thought was harmful, I have no idea what is deemed healthy & unhealthy. Im here to lose weight & learn better habits just like everyone else. Maybe Im uninformed but to me what I said seemed like a reasonable amount for short tern weight loss & its what IM currently doing so I suggested it.0
-
As I previously said I didnt realize it was unhealthy, its what Im doing & its only 200 less calories then what mfp recommends so I thought it was fine.. simply saying ya know I think your doing things all wrong & are uninformed would have been sufficient.0
-
You -want- a fast weight loss plan. This is not a realistic want.
Your needs can be found on the back of the box, or at least some of them can be. Your best bet? Find stuff to wear that makes you look good and start on slowly losing weight.0 -
As I previously said I didnt realize it was unhealthy, its what Im doing & its only 200 less calories then what mfp recommends so I thought it was fine.. simply saying ya know I think your doing things all wrong & are uninformed would have been sufficient.
I call BS. MFP tells you that you are undereating if you close out your diary with fewer than 1200 calories.0 -
Just goto below link.. it definitely help you out
http://185cfmdpyjie628nil8fo8ls3l.hop.clickbank.net/0 -
Just goto below link.. it definitely help you out
http://185cfmdpyjie628nil8fo8ls3l.hop.clickbank.net/
You just made baby Jesus cry.0 -
I call BS. MFP tells you that you are undereating if you close out your diary with fewer than 1200 calories.
I didn't know that so tried it and you're right.
However, in huge writing it says a pretty attractive "If every day were like today you would weigh..... IN LARGE BOLDED RED TEXT! Pretty appealing
Then tucked away in small print is the warning of which you spoke
I'm pretty sure I would have missed that if I hadn't been looking - really wouldn't have taken much notice0 -
I didn't know that so tried it and you're right.
However, in huge writing it says a pretty attractive "If every day were like today you would weigh..... IN LARGE BOLDED RED TEXT! Pretty appealing
Then tucked away in small print is the warning of which you spoke
I'm pretty sure I would have missed that if I hadn't been looking - really wouldn't have taken much notice
Tucked away? That's a whole paragraph, with red lettering in it....0 -
Tucked away? That's a whole paragraph, with red lettering in it....
When I've done it (accidentally), there was also a pop-up.0 -
My 2 cents:
If you want to eat under 1200 calories and lose weight. Go for it.
Don't come back on the message boards in 2 months crying when you have gained all your weight back from binge eating or just actually eating.0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Tucked away? That's a whole paragraph, with red lettering in it....
It's 'tucked away' because it's small print.
Anyway it's a bit pointless arguing about this.
You're right - MFP does offer a warning when you go below 1200 calories; however, there is no doubt that it is 'smallprint' as it's literally 4 times smaller than any other typeface on the page. I would miss that for sure so I'm guessing there would be others too
Incidentally although there is a whole paragraph, on the same page there is also a whole paragraph in much bigger lettering offering me Accredited Nutritionist course which I also missed. As I did the advert for online shoes, the list of related ads and the large advert for Graze.com. There's a whole series of links at the bottom that I have never seen before too. I have seen the Water Consumption section but I always ignore that. Maybe I'm not very observant
But like I said, no arguments, you said it was there and it was0 -
When I've done it (accidentally), there was also a pop-up.
I didn't get a pop up - maybe it was blocked0 -
I'm enjoying reading the shenanigans in this threads and was mulling over a witty reply for the end but after reading this comment above I will say something now.
First off this is the internet, a public forum. Every single one of us chooses to be here for one reason or another. How vocal an individual is in the community is up to that person. You can like or dislike what someone says but just because you dislike something doesn't make it a rude comment. We could also argue some people are just way to sensitive. As it was stated on the previous page their are a lot of new, easily influenced people on this board every day and other members spreading misconceptions or giving out bad or sometimes just down right terrible advice is not going to serve those new people well. It may look like people gang up on one person when they say something that makes no sense but in reality it's not. It's a bunch of individuals with the same thought process responding similarly but it by no means is an orchestrated attack.
Now the person feeling attacked has options:
1. Defend their thought process with actual facts and bring forth a meaningful debate.
2. Cry about how everyone is a bully and thank only the ones that support their bad ideas resulting in the inability to learn valuable information due to stubbornness.
3. Get upset and say the won't post again and actually follow through with that threat. Which actually might benefit the new people because they won't have to worry about other members giving them so much bad advice like what happens here daily.
Now to address you directly. You said you assume the OP knows something is bad. Don't assume, some people are smarter than they look and some are not. You said you are not sure if it's healthy or not as you are new to this board yourself. So if you don't know the right approach, why give any advice on the subject at all? It's the blind leading the blind. Don't worry yourself about who's rude and who's not. Toughen up if you're going to come play in the sandbox but gather your thought before hand because it can get rough and mom's not here to put a bandaid on the wound.
To tell the truth, I probably would have eliminated the second part of my reply (the part about not caring how healthy something was) if we weren't already four pages in with increasing levels of advice about how misguided the question was. That's on me.
However, there WERE four pages of advice - if you are new to a site and aren't really experienced, it's probably a good idea to get a feel for some of the other responses before jumping in.
Additionally, you can't say that losing 15 pounds is "probably not healthy" and then defend yourself by saying that you are new and don't know what is healthy or not in the same thread. It just looks stupid. Especially since MFP provides warnings when you attempt to lose more than 2 pounds a week and if you enter fewer than 1200 calories a day. If you are going to lose weight, and especially if you are going to provide advice to others, it behooves you to find out how to do it safely.
I have given incorrect information on MFP in the past. When I've been told (bluntly) that it is incorrect, I try to verify it and acknowledge my mistake.
Once again, I apologize for the shortness of my response to this particular poster. However, I hope she chooses to learn from the exchange (and doesn't post another bully thread).0 -
This content has been removed.
-
I agree with you. I'm not sure if my reply showed it but I was directing towards Trishylocks.
I know. It probably wasn't clear from my reply, though.
Your response made me consider the pros and cons of mine. I don't 100% agree with "it's the internet, suck it up". I also really, really don't agree with "you are a bully if you call me on bad information". Especially when the person recognizes their info is harmful.
I probably should have scrolled back, but I'm on my phone.
Anyway, Thank You!0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 396.6K Introduce Yourself
- 44.2K Getting Started
- 260.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 176.3K Food and Nutrition
- 47.6K Recipes
- 232.8K Fitness and Exercise
- 450 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.7K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153.3K Motivation and Support
- 8.3K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.5K Chit-Chat
- 2.6K Fun and Games
- 4.5K MyFitnessPal Information
- 16 News and Announcements
- 18 MyFitnessPal Academy
- 1.4K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions