booty

nyboer

Here I am thinking we were all going to talk about pirate treasure. My mistake.

ohmygawd. :laugh: :laugh:

sunglasses_and_ocean_waves

I've recently learned that men like big butts. Mine is not flabby though.

yopeeps025

What about her personality? :huh:

What about it?

No_Finish_Line

To add, grammar policing is gross and ableist.

so, your saying that those with poor grammer are disabled?

likitisplit

To add, grammar policing is gross and ableist.

so, your saying that those with poor grammer are disabled?

Some people who have poor grammar have a disability that makes it hard to identify appropriate spelling/word order. Others are not native English speakers.

and then there is the incomprehensible OP, which is in a category by itself.

yopeeps025

The person with that comment has already explain it. Go back a few pages.

accelerashawn

I've recently learned that men like big butts. Mine is not flabby though.

You must have been living under one of these

yopeeps025

To add, grammar policing is gross and ableist.

so, your saying that those with poor grammer are disabled?

Some people who have poor grammar have a disability that makes it hard to identify appropriate spelling/word order. Others are not native English speakers.

and then there is the incomprehensible OP, which is in a category by itself.

Do you know what a IEP is? I will let you research it.

No_Finish_Line

reading through this thread has been interesting. Especially when comparing the responses in this one to responses in similar/worse posts. Hm.

To add, grammar policing is gross and ableist.

If grammar policing is ableist you are suggesting that those who have poor grammar are disabled or handicapped. I would argue that those with poor grammar are perhaps uneducated in the area of grammar but not disabled in any way.

Please do not try and twist my statement into something that it is not. There are people that have learning/cognitive disabilities that make it harder for them to process or understand arbitrary grammar rules. And since this is the internet, there is no way to know if it is a poor education or a disability that is effecting how a person communicates. People communicate how they communicate (culture plays into this as well).

Also, there is a difference between asking someone to explain/clarify a confusing statement and dragging someone for kiki's.

ETA: not implying that OP has a disability or trying to derail people that are calling him out on misogyny.

good explination. you certainly have a point. its wrong to brow beat someone over poor english without really knowing the cause, but on the other hand, I'm not sure that its entirely inappropriate to do so. its the internet and thats how we communicate.

No_Finish_Line

I was not clear enough so like a week ago my brother, cousin, and I had a convo have doggystyle and what butt we like the most. My cousin say yo the more fat the better like no muscle there at all. I was like I like a girl who squats.but I love the sound of body clashing together.

So you and your cousin had doggy style... together?

don't forget the brother

Do I really need to specify that we are all guys and the thread start with talking about women.

I think it's still physically possible to do what you describe. As a matter of fact, the only way you could have a three way doggy style thing is with men.

lol!

tfleischer

reading through this thread has been interesting. Especially when comparing the responses in this one to responses in similar/worse posts. Hm.

To add, grammar policing is gross and ableist.

If grammar policing is ableist you are suggesting that those who have poor grammar are disabled or handicapped. I would argue that those with poor grammar are perhaps uneducated in the area of grammar but not disabled in any way.

Please do not try and twist my statement into something that it is not. There are people that have learning/cognitive disabilities that make it harder for them to process or understand arbitrary grammar rules. And since this is the internet, there is no way to know if it is a poor education or a disability that is effecting how a person communicates. People communicate how they communicate (culture plays into this as well).

Also, there is a difference between asking someone to explain/clarify a confusing statement and dragging someone for kiki's.

ETA: not implying that OP has a disability or trying to derail people that are calling him out on misogyny.

good explination. you certainly have a point. its wrong to brow beat someone over poor english without really knowing the cause, but on the other hand, I'm not sure that its entirely inappropriate to do so. its the internet and thats how we communicate.

This begs the question: Are you a masochist or a brilliantly sardonic humorist? I hope it is the latter.

bewitched2982

reading through this thread has been interesting. Especially when comparing the responses in this one to responses in similar/worse posts. Hm.

To add, grammar policing is gross and ableist.

If grammar policing is ableist you are suggesting that those who have poor grammar are disabled or handicapped. I would argue that those with poor grammar are perhaps uneducated in the area of grammar but not disabled in any way.

Please do not try and twist my statement into something that it is not. There are people that have learning/cognitive disabilities that make it harder for them to process or understand arbitrary grammar rules. And since this is the internet, there is no way to know if it is a poor education or a disability that is effecting how a person communicates. People communicate how they communicate (culture plays into this as well).

Also, there is a difference between asking someone to explain/clarify a confusing statement and dragging someone for kiki's.

ETA: not implying that OP has a disability or trying to derail people that are calling him out on misogyny.

I wasn't trying to twist your statement, just to clarify your statement. I do agree with you that some people struggle with learning and definitely culture plays a huge role in how people communicate. I mainly wanted to be sure you weren't trying to insinuate that the OP was disabled.
I think the person who posted a link to grammar rules wasn't being rude, there weren't any comments associated with it that were mean. Helping to educate someone else is acceptable. But definitely there are times that correcting grammar is done just to make someone feel superior and that is not okay.

brower47

Grammar, butts, disability, butts, gifs, miscommunication, butts, more giffs, *kitten* (of the avian variety)... Is there anything this thread doesn't have?

Dear MFP gods, we thank you for this bounty you have provided us.

spicy618

To add, grammar policing is gross and ableist.

so, your saying that those with poor grammer are disabled?

Some people who have poor grammar have a disability that makes it hard to identify appropriate spelling/word order. Others are not native English speakers.

and then there is the incomprehensible OP, which is in a category by itself.

Do you know what a IEP is? I will let you research it.

Individual Educational Plan.

Do you have one?

yopeeps025

reading through this thread has been interesting. Especially when comparing the responses in this one to responses in similar/worse posts. Hm.

To add, grammar policing is gross and ableist.

If grammar policing is ableist you are suggesting that those who have poor grammar are disabled or handicapped. I would argue that those with poor grammar are perhaps uneducated in the area of grammar but not disabled in any way.

Please do not try and twist my statement into something that it is not. There are people that have learning/cognitive disabilities that make it harder for them to process or understand arbitrary grammar rules. And since this is the internet, there is no way to know if it is a poor education or a disability that is effecting how a person communicates. People communicate how they communicate (culture plays into this as well).

Also, there is a difference between asking someone to explain/clarify a confusing statement and dragging someone for kiki's.

ETA: not implying that OP has a disability or trying to derail people that are calling him out on misogyny.

I wasn't trying to twist your statement, just to clarify your statement. I do agree with you that some people struggle with learning and definitely culture plays a huge role in how people communicate. I mainly wanted to be sure you weren't trying to insinuate that the OP was disabled.
I think the person who posted a link to grammar rules wasn't being rude, there weren't any comments associated with it that were mean. Helping to educate someone else is acceptable. But definitely there are times that correcting grammar is done just to make someone feel superior and that is not okay.

When a person truly knows who they are words do not faze them anymore. I could careless about what half of you people think. Do I feel like I should explain myself on what a IEP is and what it does? I can careless

No_Finish_Line

reading through this thread has been interesting. Especially when comparing the responses in this one to responses in similar/worse posts. Hm.

To add, grammar policing is gross and ableist.

If grammar policing is ableist you are suggesting that those who have poor grammar are disabled or handicapped. I would argue that those with poor grammar are perhaps uneducated in the area of grammar but not disabled in any way.

Please do not try and twist my statement into something that it is not. There are people that have learning/cognitive disabilities that make it harder for them to process or understand arbitrary grammar rules. And since this is the internet, there is no way to know if it is a poor education or a disability that is effecting how a person communicates. People communicate how they communicate (culture plays into this as well).

Also, there is a difference between asking someone to explain/clarify a confusing statement and dragging someone for kiki's.

ETA: not implying that OP has a disability or trying to derail people that are calling him out on misogyny.

good explination. you certainly have a point. its wrong to brow beat someone over poor english without really knowing the cause, but on the other hand, I'm not sure that its entirely inappropriate to do so. its the internet and thats how we communicate.

This begs the question: Are you a masochist or a brilliantly sardonic humorist? I hope it is the latter.

can't it be a little of both?

broox80

HHD!!!!!!

tehboxingkitteh

this chic's *kitten* is totally hot, and it has a bit of a wave. are you saying this is bad? cause really, it's all about whether or not you're flexing.

Very nice *kitten*..... I love the shoes too!!! Please tell me I'm not the only girl to notice her shoes...

Am I the only one who noticed her begin spanked by another woman?

No_Finish_Line

^^ certainly not

yopeeps025

To add, grammar policing is gross and ableist.

so, your saying that those with poor grammer are disabled?

Some people who have poor grammar have a disability that makes it hard to identify appropriate spelling/word order. Others are not native English speakers.

and then there is the incomprehensible OP, which is in a category by itself.

Do you know what a IEP is? I will let you research it.

Individual Educational Plan.

Do you have one?

I did all throughout school. Speech class in grade school. I was not in special education in middle but my IEP allow unlimited time on test. As for English, English was my hardest subject which made it my worse subject. I hated reading and writing because it was difficult.

No_Finish_Line

i used to hate reading myself. still seems to take me like twice as long to read a paragraph as it does anyone else. Good for you my friend, you are a stand up guy, hanging in there amongst the negative comments, mine included

siobhanmarie440

Interesting!

yopeeps025

Now that this thread has been hi-jack by all types of other topic back on topic with a new question.

women

I sure every women wants there butt firmer or smaller. At least the major on my friends list do. Whatever it takes to have a smaller butt. You can answer that if you like that you have curvy butt or want it bigger? I'm sure there will be a select few that want a bigger butt.

Men

Do you also agree with Sir Mix a lot?

likitisplit

To add, grammar policing is gross and ableist.

so, your saying that those with poor grammer are disabled?

Some people who have poor grammar have a disability that makes it hard to identify appropriate spelling/word order. Others are not native English speakers.

and then there is the incomprehensible OP, which is in a category by itself.

Do you know what a IEP is? I will let you research it.

Yeah. It's when you throw big butts out into the main forums, without setting the stage at all, in a paragraph that is difficult to read that kind of puts it over the top - not the grammar issues themselves.

I tend to ignore grammar and spelling when I can understand the context of the post. It's decorative punctuation and caps lock that set me off. Or no punctuation at all.

No_Finish_Line

on that note, i now feel compelled to answer the original question lol.

firm is better then mushy... but shape is what really matters too me.

a nicely shaped *kitten* made bigger or smaller does not necessairly change my level of attraction

yopeeps025

i used to hate reading myself. still seems to take me like twice as long to read a paragraph as it does anyone else. Good for you my friend, you are a stand up guy, hanging in there amongst the negative comments, mine included

'

Talk is talk and a face to face would be real different.

No_Finish_Line

Now that this thread has been hi-jack by all types of other topic back on topic with a new question.

women

I sure every women wants there butt firmer or smaller. At least the major on my friends list do. Whatever it takes to have a smaller butt. You can answer that if you like that you have curvy butt or want it bigger? I'm sure there will be a select few that want a bigger butt.

Men

Do you also agree with Sir Mix a lot?

actually most of the women i see posting in the forum seem to want a bigger butt

likitisplit

Now that this thread has been hi-jack by all types of other topic back on topic with a new question.

women

I sure every women wants there butt firmer or smaller. At least the major on my friends list do. Whatever it takes to have a smaller butt. You can answer that if you like that you have curvy butt or want it bigger? I'm sure there will be a select few that want a bigger butt.

Men

Do you also agree with Sir Mix a lot?

I think this would have been a better start, except now you've creeped out most of MFP and offended roughly half of it.

Personally, I think a complete lack of muscle tone, when your hand sinks straight to the bones underneath kind of feels creepy. But I've always had a lot of muscle in my back and thighs.

No_Finish_Line

i used to hate reading myself. still seems to take me like twice as long to read a paragraph as it does anyone else. Good for you my friend, you are a stand up guy, hanging in there amongst the negative comments, mine included

'

Talk is talk and a face to face would be real different.

such is the nature of internet forums. don't pretend you are immune, at least i'm assuming you would not, in real life, walk into a room full of strange men and women and loudly inquire what thier stance on big butts are.

most would be pretty embarrased to do so and rightfully so

likitisplit

Now that this thread has been hi-jack by all types of other topic back on topic with a new question.

women

I sure every women wants there butt firmer or smaller. At least the major on my friends list do. Whatever it takes to have a smaller butt. You can answer that if you like that you have curvy butt or want it bigger? I'm sure there will be a select few that want a bigger butt.

Men

Do you also agree with Sir Mix a lot?

actually most of the women i see posting in the forum seem to want a bigger butt

Bigger but firmer.