booty
Options
Replies
-
Here I am thinking we were all going to talk about pirate treasure. My mistake.
ohmygawd. :laugh: :laugh:0 -
I've recently learned that men like big butts. Mine is not flabby though.0
-
What about her personality? :huh:
What about it?0 -
To add, grammar policing is gross and ableist.
so, your saying that those with poor grammer are disabled?0 -
To add, grammar policing is gross and ableist.
so, your saying that those with poor grammer are disabled?
Some people who have poor grammar have a disability that makes it hard to identify appropriate spelling/word order. Others are not native English speakers.
and then there is the incomprehensible OP, which is in a category by itself.0 -
The person with that comment has already explain it. Go back a few pages.0
-
I've recently learned that men like big butts. Mine is not flabby though.0
-
To add, grammar policing is gross and ableist.
so, your saying that those with poor grammer are disabled?
Some people who have poor grammar have a disability that makes it hard to identify appropriate spelling/word order. Others are not native English speakers.
and then there is the incomprehensible OP, which is in a category by itself.
Do you know what a IEP is? I will let you research it.0 -
reading through this thread has been interesting. Especially when comparing the responses in this one to responses in similar/worse posts. Hm.
To add, grammar policing is gross and ableist.
If grammar policing is ableist you are suggesting that those who have poor grammar are disabled or handicapped. I would argue that those with poor grammar are perhaps uneducated in the area of grammar but not disabled in any way.
Please do not try and twist my statement into something that it is not. There are people that have learning/cognitive disabilities that make it harder for them to process or understand arbitrary grammar rules. And since this is the internet, there is no way to know if it is a poor education or a disability that is effecting how a person communicates. People communicate how they communicate (culture plays into this as well).
Also, there is a difference between asking someone to explain/clarify a confusing statement and dragging someone for kiki's.
ETA: not implying that OP has a disability or trying to derail people that are calling him out on misogyny.
good explination. you certainly have a point. its wrong to brow beat someone over poor english without really knowing the cause, but on the other hand, I'm not sure that its entirely inappropriate to do so. its the internet and thats how we communicate.0 -
I was not clear enough so like a week ago my brother, cousin, and I had a convo have doggystyle and what butt we like the most. My cousin say yo the more fat the better like no muscle there at all. I was like I like a girl who squats.but I love the sound of body clashing together.
So you and your cousin had doggy style... together?
don't forget the brother
Do I really need to specify that we are all guys and the thread start with talking about women.
I think it's still physically possible to do what you describe. As a matter of fact, the only way you could have a three way doggy style thing is with men.
lol!0 -
reading through this thread has been interesting. Especially when comparing the responses in this one to responses in similar/worse posts. Hm.
To add, grammar policing is gross and ableist.
If grammar policing is ableist you are suggesting that those who have poor grammar are disabled or handicapped. I would argue that those with poor grammar are perhaps uneducated in the area of grammar but not disabled in any way.
Please do not try and twist my statement into something that it is not. There are people that have learning/cognitive disabilities that make it harder for them to process or understand arbitrary grammar rules. And since this is the internet, there is no way to know if it is a poor education or a disability that is effecting how a person communicates. People communicate how they communicate (culture plays into this as well).
Also, there is a difference between asking someone to explain/clarify a confusing statement and dragging someone for kiki's.
ETA: not implying that OP has a disability or trying to derail people that are calling him out on misogyny.
good explination. you certainly have a point. its wrong to brow beat someone over poor english without really knowing the cause, but on the other hand, I'm not sure that its entirely inappropriate to do so. its the internet and thats how we communicate.
This begs the question: Are you a masochist or a brilliantly sardonic humorist? I hope it is the latter.0 -
reading through this thread has been interesting. Especially when comparing the responses in this one to responses in similar/worse posts. Hm.
To add, grammar policing is gross and ableist.
If grammar policing is ableist you are suggesting that those who have poor grammar are disabled or handicapped. I would argue that those with poor grammar are perhaps uneducated in the area of grammar but not disabled in any way.
Please do not try and twist my statement into something that it is not. There are people that have learning/cognitive disabilities that make it harder for them to process or understand arbitrary grammar rules. And since this is the internet, there is no way to know if it is a poor education or a disability that is effecting how a person communicates. People communicate how they communicate (culture plays into this as well).
Also, there is a difference between asking someone to explain/clarify a confusing statement and dragging someone for kiki's.
ETA: not implying that OP has a disability or trying to derail people that are calling him out on misogyny.
I wasn't trying to twist your statement, just to clarify your statement. I do agree with you that some people struggle with learning and definitely culture plays a huge role in how people communicate. I mainly wanted to be sure you weren't trying to insinuate that the OP was disabled.
I think the person who posted a link to grammar rules wasn't being rude, there weren't any comments associated with it that were mean. Helping to educate someone else is acceptable. But definitely there are times that correcting grammar is done just to make someone feel superior and that is not okay.0 -
Grammar, butts, disability, butts, gifs, miscommunication, butts, more giffs, *kitten* (of the avian variety)... Is there anything this thread doesn't have?
Dear MFP gods, we thank you for this bounty you have provided us.0 -
To add, grammar policing is gross and ableist.
so, your saying that those with poor grammer are disabled?
Some people who have poor grammar have a disability that makes it hard to identify appropriate spelling/word order. Others are not native English speakers.
and then there is the incomprehensible OP, which is in a category by itself.
Do you know what a IEP is? I will let you research it.
Individual Educational Plan.
Do you have one?0 -
reading through this thread has been interesting. Especially when comparing the responses in this one to responses in similar/worse posts. Hm.
To add, grammar policing is gross and ableist.
If grammar policing is ableist you are suggesting that those who have poor grammar are disabled or handicapped. I would argue that those with poor grammar are perhaps uneducated in the area of grammar but not disabled in any way.
Please do not try and twist my statement into something that it is not. There are people that have learning/cognitive disabilities that make it harder for them to process or understand arbitrary grammar rules. And since this is the internet, there is no way to know if it is a poor education or a disability that is effecting how a person communicates. People communicate how they communicate (culture plays into this as well).
Also, there is a difference between asking someone to explain/clarify a confusing statement and dragging someone for kiki's.
ETA: not implying that OP has a disability or trying to derail people that are calling him out on misogyny.
I wasn't trying to twist your statement, just to clarify your statement. I do agree with you that some people struggle with learning and definitely culture plays a huge role in how people communicate. I mainly wanted to be sure you weren't trying to insinuate that the OP was disabled.
I think the person who posted a link to grammar rules wasn't being rude, there weren't any comments associated with it that were mean. Helping to educate someone else is acceptable. But definitely there are times that correcting grammar is done just to make someone feel superior and that is not okay.
When a person truly knows who they are words do not faze them anymore. I could careless about what half of you people think. Do I feel like I should explain myself on what a IEP is and what it does? I can careless0 -
reading through this thread has been interesting. Especially when comparing the responses in this one to responses in similar/worse posts. Hm.
To add, grammar policing is gross and ableist.
If grammar policing is ableist you are suggesting that those who have poor grammar are disabled or handicapped. I would argue that those with poor grammar are perhaps uneducated in the area of grammar but not disabled in any way.
Please do not try and twist my statement into something that it is not. There are people that have learning/cognitive disabilities that make it harder for them to process or understand arbitrary grammar rules. And since this is the internet, there is no way to know if it is a poor education or a disability that is effecting how a person communicates. People communicate how they communicate (culture plays into this as well).
Also, there is a difference between asking someone to explain/clarify a confusing statement and dragging someone for kiki's.
ETA: not implying that OP has a disability or trying to derail people that are calling him out on misogyny.
good explination. you certainly have a point. its wrong to brow beat someone over poor english without really knowing the cause, but on the other hand, I'm not sure that its entirely inappropriate to do so. its the internet and thats how we communicate.
This begs the question: Are you a masochist or a brilliantly sardonic humorist? I hope it is the latter.0 -
HHD!!!!!!0
-
this chic's *kitten* is totally hot, and it has a bit of a wave. are you saying this is bad? cause really, it's all about whether or not you're flexing.
Very nice *kitten*..... I love the shoes too!!! Please tell me I'm not the only girl to notice her shoes...0 -
^^ certainly not0
-
To add, grammar policing is gross and ableist.
so, your saying that those with poor grammer are disabled?
Some people who have poor grammar have a disability that makes it hard to identify appropriate spelling/word order. Others are not native English speakers.
and then there is the incomprehensible OP, which is in a category by itself.
Do you know what a IEP is? I will let you research it.
Individual Educational Plan.
Do you have one?
I did all throughout school. Speech class in grade school. I was not in special education in middle but my IEP allow unlimited time on test. As for English, English was my hardest subject which made it my worse subject. I hated reading and writing because it was difficult.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 392K Introduce Yourself
- 43.6K Getting Started
- 259.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.7K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 401 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 996 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.4K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions