PSA: Muscles do not weigh more than fat.
Options
Replies
-
I feel like this thread gets posted on a daily basis.... *sighs*0
-
a pound is a pound is a pound no matter how you weigh it. Just the space it takes up varies pending on the object. A pound of feathers take up more space than a pound of muscle.
I still don't get it. Could someone please explain it one more time but without all of the big complicated sciency words?
Eh, I'm probably just being DENSE. <--
1lb of fat is blobby 1lb of muscle = same weight = more trim and lean0 -
My 7yo son had a picture book on this topic back when he was five. He got it the first time through, and we never opened the book again. How has this thread gone on for 4 pages?0
-
Um, a pound of MUSCLE does weigh MORE than a pound of FAT.
If you put a pound of fat and a pound of muscle in water, only the muscle is going to sink because it's HEAVIER.
It's simple psychics, asimov's second law of motion. duh.
oh my god!! then a pebble must weigh more than a SHIP, according to your logic...
Unless it's the Titanic0 -
By this logic there is no difference between a feather and a pile of poop.
Oh, there's a difference. Has someone ever tried to tickle you with the latter?
Like I said, definitely a difference.
EDIT: to fixes a verb
hahahaha0 -
1lb of feathers = 1lb of poop. If you want to compare weight.
To make it simpler for everyone:
1lb of anything weighs the exact same as 1lb of anything else.
Any further questions?
Yes, but can you say the same thing about 1 kilo of something?0 -
Um, a pound of MUSCLE does weigh MORE than a pound of FAT.
If you put a pound of fat and a pound of muscle in water, only the muscle is going to sink because it's HEAVIER.
It's simple psychics, asimov's second law of motion. duh.
oh my god!! then a pebble must weigh more than a SHIP, according to your logic...
A pound of fat is a WITCH!0 -
Um, a pound of MUSCLE does weigh MORE than a pound of FAT.
If you put a pound of fat and a pound of muscle in water, only the muscle is going to sink because it's HEAVIER.
It's simple psychics, asimov's second law of motion. duh.
christ on a cracker
it sinks due to density, not weight.
Actually, something floats or sinks based on how much water is displaced. If the object has greater mass than the water it displaces, it sinks. It it doesn't, it floats. So really, it has more to do with shape than density. If you are going to be insulting and pretend you are smarter than someone make sure you are correct.0 -
Um, a pound of MUSCLE does weigh MORE than a pound of FAT.
If you put a pound of fat and a pound of muscle in water, only the muscle is going to sink because it's HEAVIER.
It's simple psychics, asimov's second law of motion. duh.
SIMPLE PHYSICS will tell us a POUND is a POUND...it's the density that causes it to sink/float...muscle is more dense than fat...not heavier. The amount of water displaced is dependent on the size, shape, and density of the object immersed....
At least that's what my physics teacher taught me
also Asimov's laws are about robotics...aren't they?0 -
christ on a cracker
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:0 -
fat doesn't do anything but sit there and look ugly.
Wrong. The purpose of adipose tissue is to provide insulation from heat and cold and also to provide padding and protection for various organs.
You said Adipose. All i can think of now is Doctor Who.0 -
a pound is a pound is a pound no matter how you weigh it.
That's not true. On some scales it will weigh 0.453592 kg.0 -
christ on a cracker
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:0 -
Ah man!!! Not again!!
0 -
Just reposting this because it's right.I think you know what people mean when they say it.
I don't see what's wrong about saying "muscle weighs more than fat" ... if you take a blob of fat and then take a blob of muscle of the same size, the muscle will weigh more. I wish people would stop nit picking everything that is said on here.0 -
Either way, the solution is obvious:
Eat 1200 daily calories.
The only question remaining is, what is the effect of eating back all, some, or none of my exercise calories?
I would be starving if I only ate 1200 calories! Seriously...
You'd be surprised what you can live with. I eat less than that because I am full before I hit 1200.
also, I'd rather have 1 lb of muscle over 1 lb of fat any day, thank you!:happy:0 -
I think you know what people mean when they say it.
I don't see what's wrong about saying "muscle weighs more than fat" ... if you take a blob of fat and then take a blob of muscle of the same size, the muscle will weigh more. I wish people would stop nit picking everything that is said on here.
This.0 -
Bacon?0
-
Bacon?0
-
Insert sarcasm here.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 390 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 922 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.3K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions