Got Milk?! Recovery Benefits of Milk
Replies
-
I agree with you Rocbola. That is my opinion.
Why is it "propaganda" if it's a vegan opinion and "fact" if it's an omnivore's opinion? There are facts and opinions on both sides of the issue. There are plenty of learned people and research papers that disagree with the safety of eating dairy products.
If the science says protein is good for workout recovery, why does it have to be dairy protein?0 -
I agree with you Rocbola. That is my opinion.
Why is it "propaganda" if it's a vegan opinion and "fact" if it's an omnivore's opinion? There are facts and opinions on both sides of the issue. There are plenty of learned people and research papers that disagree with the safety of eating dairy products.
If the science says protein is good for workout recovery, why does it have to be dairy protein?
It would be great if you could post these sources that saying drinking milk is unsafe. No-one is saying that it HAS to be dairy - just that milk is a good recovery drink. Also, the report, actually indicates that full fat is possibly better than skim milk.0 -
I agree with you Rocbola. That is my opinion.
Why is it "propaganda" if it's a vegan opinion and "fact" if it's an omnivore's opinion? There are facts and opinions on both sides of the issue. There are plenty of learned people and research papers that disagree with the safety of eating dairy products.
If the science says protein is good for workout recovery, why does it have to be dairy protein?
It would be great if you could post these sources that saying drinking milk is unsafe. No-one is saying that it HAS to be dairy - just that milk is a good recovery drink. Also, the report, actually indicates that full fat is possibly better than skim milk.
i've never heard that you should eat fat in the recovery meal. i think the benefit of milk, especially chocolate milk, is that it has the perfect 2/1 ratio of carbs to protein, and is cheap.0 -
I agree with you Rocbola. That is my opinion.
Why is it "propaganda" if it's a vegan opinion and "fact" if it's an omnivore's opinion? There are facts and opinions on both sides of the issue. There are plenty of learned people and research papers that disagree with the safety of eating dairy products.
If the science says protein is good for workout recovery, why does it have to be dairy protein?
It would be great if you could post these sources that saying drinking milk is unsafe. No-one is saying that it HAS to be dairy - just that milk is a good recovery drink. Also, the report, actually indicates that full fat is possibly better than skim milk.
i've never heard that you should eat fat in the recovery meal. i think the benefit of milk, especially chocolate milk, is that it has the perfect 2/1 ratio of carbs to protein, and is cheap.
I think that was the point of the topic and the study shown in the OP - to indicate that full fat milk is something to think about as well as the benefits of milk in general as a recovery meal.0 -
Milk truly is natures perfect food....... Just not for humans. Baby cows do well consuming milk.0
-
I agree with you Rocbola. That is my opinion.
Why is it "propaganda" if it's a vegan opinion and "fact" if it's an omnivore's opinion? There are facts and opinions on both sides of the issue. There are plenty of learned people and research papers that disagree with the safety of eating dairy products.
If the science says protein is good for workout recovery, why does it have to be dairy protein?
Did you read the original post? This thread isn't about recovery benefits of protein. Its about MILK. If you don't like milk, nobody is forcing you to have it. Other proteins have not been covered in the study. This is in the Fitness and Exercise forum, because it is specifically about RECOVERY from strength training and MILK. Other proteins are not relevant to the discussion. The discussion isn't about nutrition outside the scope of RECOVERY nutrition- so I didn't post it in that section.
Its vegan propaganda when it's regurgitated in an inappropriate thread. There is no omnivore discussion here. If you have something to share on MILK and RECOVERY it won't be vegan propaganda. Then, it would be an intelligent contribution to the thread rather than a pointless attempt to gross people out.0 -
Milk truly is natures perfect food....... Just not for humans. Baby cows do well consuming milk.
I do well as well thank you!0 -
Milk truly is natures perfect food....... Just not for humans. Baby cows do well consuming milk.
LOL, I haven't filled this out yet. LOL I haven't filled this out yet. LOL, I haven't filled this out yet....... and on and on and on....0 -
My diet has been really bad over the years, nothing but sugar and fat. The only thing I did right without knowing is drinking tons of milk. Poormans protein shake. No artificial color, flavoring, anti-caking agent, Palm oil, fructose etc.0
-
Excerpt copied from:Exercise Physiology FOR HEALTH, FITNESS, AND PERFORMANCE, Third Edition, Plowman & Smith
Got Milk? Protein Ingestion Enhances Protein Synthesis Following Resistance Exercise
Elliot, T. A., M. G. Cree, A. P. Sanford, R. R. Wolfe, & K. D. Tipton: Milk ingestion stimulates muscle protein synthesis following resistance exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise38(4):667–674 (2005).
A primary goal of many resistance training programs is to build muscle mass. As discussed in this chapter, manipulating program variables, particularly the load and volume, is an important factor infl uencing the extent of muscle hypertrophy. However, nutrients are also essential for the building of muscle mass, which is composed primarily of protein. For this reason, the scientific community and practitioners have long been interested in the role of various nutrients in increasing muscle mass. Much attention has recently focused on determining the ideal mix of nutrients to stimulate protein synthesis during recovery from resistance training.
In this study, the authors sought to determine the effect of drinking milk on net protein synthesis after a resistance exercise. Furthermore, the researchers investigated different types and quantities of milk (fat free versus whole milk) to determine if these factors affected protein synthesis. Participants were young, healthy men and women who were not resistance trained in the past 5 years. Participants were placed into one of three groups: a group that ingested 237 g (8 oz) of fat-free milk (FFM), a group that ingested 237 g of whole milk (WM), and a group that ingested 393 g (13 oz) of FFM with the same number of kcals as the whole milk (ISO-FFM). The two quantities of FFM allowed investigators to compare FFM and WM when the total calories consumed were the same (since 237 g of WM and 393 g of FFM provide the same number of kcals). Participants completed 10 sets of 8repetitions of leg extensions at 80%of 1-RM. Each set was completed in approximately 30 seconds, with a 2-minute rest period between sets. Blood samples and blood fl ow were measured for 5 hours after exercise (muscle biopsies were also obtained but are not discussed here).
The study revealed that the up take of the amino acids threonine and phenylalanine was significantly greater than 0 following the ingestion of WM and ISO-FFM. Furthermore, threonine uptake was significantly greater (2.8 fold higher) following WM ingestion versus FFM.
The primary finding of the study was that milk ingestion stimulated net uptake of the amino acids threonine and phenylalanine. Since threonine and phenylalanine are not oxidized in muscle, the uptake of these amino acids represented net protein synthesis following resistance exercise. This clearly suggests that milk is an appropriate recovery drink to stimulate protein synthesis following resistance training.
Next time you are looking to replace fluids after a workout, grab a container (8 oz) of cold milk!
So funny you posted this today because I was just having this conversation with our dieticians. For an extra boost try non-fat chocolate milk and 500 ml (a cup is 8 ounces and 240 ml).
Why? I'll be posting a blog later on this...but as I've alluded to many times...it's been shown that ATP stimulation and MPS (muscle protein synthesis), while it can vary a bit depending on size, sex, muscle mass - is linear (the more you eat the higher your rate) up until you hit 20 grams protein +/- 5 grams WITHIN THE HOUR following resistance training. Then it flatlines. (I have many resources that document this). Two hours after provided no benefit.
Many of the studies on Resistance training are done on 500 ml of fat free milk! that's about 20 grams of protein.
In addition, you need the carbs at that time for energy to stimulate ATP production and muscle synthesis.
Chocolate milk gives you protein and sugar...so don't sit on the couch and say this guy says chocolate milk is okay....lol NO, just in certain circumstances.
ONE MORE THING ABOUT MILK - it has been shown that particularly in women who ingested FF milk that CLA (Congugated Linoleic Acid) led to different body composition - IE gain in FFM (Fat free mass - muscle) and loss of FM (Fat mass). You lose fat and gain muscle. Not much weight change but who cares right?
In my reading there still is some issues with CLA as a supplement. The isomer in dairy is 9-cis, 11-trans. In the supplement it's a mix of this and 10-trans, 12-cis. Some people say that it's the 10-trans, 12-cis that leads to fat loss. Others have shown that you might lose belly fat but it's mearly a shift to visceral fat and fatty liver. That's not good...because then you get loss of insulin and glucose control - ie diabetes.
So more research on CLA and it's effects need to be done.....but as for Milk....especially FF milk....looking good for now baby!0 -
It is unnatural to drink the milk of another animal. We're the only animal on earth to drink the milk of another species. Think about it! When you're thirsty you don't look at a woman's breasts and go, 'mmm, I'm thirsty!' :laugh: Milk is meant for growing babies...cow milk is designed help a cow quadruple its weight in a short period of time...not to mention all the growth hormones & pus (yes, PUS, look it up) that milk contains.
I'll pass!0 -
I agree with you Rocbola. That is my opinion.
Why is it "propaganda" if it's a vegan opinion and "fact" if it's an omnivore's opinion? There are facts and opinions on both sides of the issue. There are plenty of learned people and research papers that disagree with the safety of eating dairy products.
If the science says protein is good for workout recovery, why does it have to be dairy protein?
It would be great if you could post these sources that saying drinking milk is unsafe. No-one is saying that it HAS to be dairy - just that milk is a good recovery drink. Also, the report, actually indicates that full fat is possibly better than skim milk.
Specific to this point; Benefit always has to be measure with potential harm.
Do you really want bigger muscles but raise your risk for vascular disease in the process?
What I mean by this is that although WM (whole milk) might (MIGHT) give you a slight advantage, does it really matter after your heart attack or stroke? Now I'm being a bit overboard, I admit, but the problem is that saturated fat is to be avoided when possible. Replace it with mono or poly-unsaturated fat as much as possible.
The American Heart Association recommends that your fat intake should be somewhere at 25-30 percent of calories and that of that 7% at most should be saturated fat. Less if you have heart issues.
In addition (VEGAN ISSUES) - SOY PROTEIN has been looked at and DID NOT provide the same benefits as cow milk or egg protein. Nice try, just doesn't work...I have references to articles and PM me if you are interested.
So limiting your saturated fat (ie Fat Free Milk) for Muscle growth seems like a decent trade off even if your muscles are a tad smaller.....well...in some places perhaps...LOL0 -
It is unnatural to drink the milk of another animal. We're the only animal on earth to drink the milk of another species. Think about it! When you're thirsty you don't look at a woman's breasts and go, 'mmm, I'm thirsty!' :laugh: Milk is meant for growing babies...cow milk is designed help a cow quadruple its weight in a short period of time...not to mention all the growth hormones & pus (yes, PUS, look it up) that milk contains.
I'll pass!
[/quote0 -
I agree with you Rocbola. That is my opinion.
Why is it "propaganda" if it's a vegan opinion and "fact" if it's an omnivore's opinion? There are facts and opinions on both sides of the issue. There are plenty of learned people and research papers that disagree with the safety of eating dairy products.
If the science says protein is good for workout recovery, why does it have to be dairy protein?
It would be great if you could post these sources that saying drinking milk is unsafe. No-one is saying that it HAS to be dairy - just that milk is a good recovery drink. Also, the report, actually indicates that full fat is possibly better than skim milk.
Specific to this point; Benefit always has to be measure with potential harm.
Do you really want bigger muscles but raise your risk for vascular disease in the process?
What I mean by this is that although WM (whole milk) might (MIGHT) give you a slight advantage, does it really matter after your heart attack or stroke? Now I'm being a bit overboard, I admit, but the problem is that saturated fat is to be avoided when possible. Replace it with mono or poly-unsaturated fat as much as possible.
The American Heart Association recommends that your fat intake should be somewhere at 25-30 percent of calories and that of that 7% at most should be saturated fat. Less if you have heart issues.
In addition (VEGAN ISSUES) - SOY PROTEIN has been looked at and DID NOT provide the same benefits as cow milk or egg protein. Nice try, just doesn't work...I have references to articles and PM me if you are interested.
So limiting your saturated fat (ie Fat Free Milk) for Muscle growth seems like a decent trade off even if your muscles are a tad smaller.....well...in some places perhaps...LOL
I do not want to get into a discussion about saturated fats as that is totally off topic, but I totally agree that it all needs to be looked at 'in the bigger picture' of your diet as a whole.
Not sure who the comment re soy is addressed to (sorry ), bit I am assuming its not me as I never mentioned soy and also agree that for the purposes of the topic at hand (and many other matters) that it does not have the same benefits as cow milk.
From my perspective, if full fat milk fits into my macros, it is something to consider, otherwise, I look to lower fat options (whether that be fat free, 1% or 2%, again, depending on my macros) and calorie target).0 -
It is unnatural to drink the milk of another animal. We're the only animal on earth to drink the milk of another species. Think about it! When you're thirsty you don't look at a woman's breasts and go, 'mmm, I'm thirsty!' :laugh: Milk is meant for growing babies...cow milk is designed help a cow quadruple its weight in a short period of time...not to mention all the growth hormones & pus (yes, PUS, look it up) that milk contains.
I'll pass!0 -
Specific to this point; Benefit always has to be measure with potential harm.
Do you really want bigger muscles but raise your risk for vascular disease in the process?
What I mean by this is that although WM (whole milk) might (MIGHT) give you a slight advantage, does it really matter after your heart attack or stroke? Now I'm being a bit overboard, I admit, but the problem is that saturated fat is to be avoided when possible. Replace it with mono or poly-unsaturated fat as much as possible.
The American Heart Association recommends that your fat intake should be somewhere at 25-30 percent of calories and that of that 7% at most should be saturated fat. Less if you have heart issues.
In addition (VEGAN ISSUES) - SOY PROTEIN has been looked at and DID NOT provide the same benefits as cow milk or egg protein. Nice try, just doesn't work...I have references to articles and PM me if you are interested.
So limiting your saturated fat (ie Fat Free Milk) for Muscle growth seems like a decent trade off even if your muscles are a tad smaller.....well...in some places perhaps...LOL
I don't want to derail this thread by getting off on a tangent of saturated fat. Suffice is to say that I don't agree that is to be avoided. Some of it is essential and if you are managing your macros effectively and working out regularly, the amount of saturated from milk would not be harmful in my opinion. As this study indicates and as has been suggested in other info, there is some positive correlation with the fat in Full Fat Milk and the utilization of IGF-1. It does all need to be viewed in the larger context of your total diet but to be honest, throwing out things like:
"Do you really want bigger muscles but raise your risk for vascular disease in the process?
What I mean by this is that although WM (whole milk) might (MIGHT) give you a slight advantage, does it really matter after your heart attack or stroke?"
borders on fear mongering.0 -
Specific to this point; Benefit always has to be measure with potential harm.
Do you really want bigger muscles but raise your risk for vascular disease in the process?
What I mean by this is that although WM (whole milk) might (MIGHT) give you a slight advantage, does it really matter after your heart attack or stroke? Now I'm being a bit overboard, I admit, but the problem is that saturated fat is to be avoided when possible. Replace it with mono or poly-unsaturated fat as much as possible.
The American Heart Association recommends that your fat intake should be somewhere at 25-30 percent of calories and that of that 7% at most should be saturated fat. Less if you have heart issues.
In addition (VEGAN ISSUES) - SOY PROTEIN has been looked at and DID NOT provide the same benefits as cow milk or egg protein. Nice try, just doesn't work...I have references to articles and PM me if you are interested.
So limiting your saturated fat (ie Fat Free Milk) for Muscle growth seems like a decent trade off even if your muscles are a tad smaller.....well...in some places perhaps...LOL
I don't want to derail this thread by getting off on a tangent of saturated fat. Suffice is to say that I don't agree that is to be avoided. Some of it is essential and if you are managing your macros effectively and working out regularly, the amount of saturated from milk would not be harmful in my opinion. As this study indicates and as has been suggested in other info, there is some positive correlation with the fat in Full Fat Milk and the utilization of IGF-1. It does all need to be viewed in the larger context of your total diet but to be honest, throwing out things like:
"Do you really want bigger muscles but raise your risk for vascular disease in the process?
What I mean by this is that although WM (whole milk) might (MIGHT) give you a slight advantage, does it really matter after your heart attack or stroke?"
borders on fear mongering.0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Very interesting OP.
Lyle McDonald's article on milk as a recovery drink is pretty groovy:
http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/research-review/milk-the-new-sports-drink-a-review-research-review.html
I think we can all agree that milk, particularly given its casein content, is superior to soy protein as a recovery aid (*runs for cover*)0 -
I enjoyed a cup of milk today... Thanks
:bigsmile:0 -
Very interesting OP.
Lyle McDonald's article on milk as a recovery drink is pretty groovy:
http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/research-review/milk-the-new-sports-drink-a-review-research-review.html
I think we can all agree that milk, particularly given its casein content, is superior to soy protein as a recovery aid (*runs for cover*)
Awesome read man! Thanks for posting.0 -
Milk truly is natures perfect food....... Just not for humans. Baby cows do well consuming milk.
And baby rabbits do well eating lots of vegetables. It's bulletproof logic you're using there.0 -
Looks like Pete got himself booted. Can't imagine why. What a class act he was.
I'm still alive and kicking brother!
Pete! Stick around and keep it respectful. Maybe we can all learn something from each other.0 -
It is unnatural to drink the milk of another animal. We're the only animal on earth to drink the milk of another species. Think about it! When you're thirsty you don't look at a woman's breasts and go, 'mmm, I'm thirsty!' :laugh: Milk is meant for growing babies...cow milk is designed help a cow quadruple its weight in a short period of time...not to mention all the growth hormones & pus (yes, PUS, look it up) that milk contains.
I'll pass!0 -
It is unnatural to drink the milk of another animal. We're the only animal on earth to drink the milk of another species. Think about it! When you're thirsty you don't look at a woman's breasts and go, 'mmm, I'm thirsty!' :laugh: Milk is meant for growing babies...cow milk is designed help a cow quadruple its weight in a short period of time...not to mention all the growth hormones & pus (yes, PUS, look it up) that milk contains.
I'll pass!
Oh I wasn't fear Mongering....just raising a point..lol Actually, I was mentioning that milk has Saturated fat and for many of you who mentioned if fat fits into your macros you eat it...I would say absolutely....just minimize your "SATURATED" fat. That's all. Two glasses of milk isn't going to do much harm. Again, I was just raising the point that be aware it is saturated fat and most of the studies I've seen that are good in the literature use fat free.
Now I do have one question about Chocolate milk. I went to the store and was very sad to see that chocholate milk (while it has plenty of "sugar" is made for the most part - many brands - with HFCS - High Fructose Corn Syrup. So here's my question to those of you who understand what I'm about to say: Fructose is not very helpful to those trying to build muscle or anything else. First off it isn't used directly by any other organ other than the liver. It's phosphorolated there by Fructose Kinase and eventually turned into Triglycerides and fat. That's the problem with HFCS. A little fructose signals the liver to let glucokinase migrate from the nucleus to the cytoplasm of the cell and get ready for an oncoming meal....glucose is metabolized by muscle and brain. Some fructose is converted into glucose...but not a lot. So my question is that if most of the sugar is Fructose in Chocholate milk...then it seems it's not worth using..and back to plain milk! ANyone?0 -
It is unnatural to drink the milk of another animal. We're the only animal on earth to drink the milk of another species. Think about it! When you're thirsty you don't look at a woman's breasts and go, 'mmm, I'm thirsty!' :laugh: Milk is meant for growing babies...cow milk is designed help a cow quadruple its weight in a short period of time...not to mention all the growth hormones & pus (yes, PUS, look it up) that milk contains.
I'll pass!
Oh I wasn't fear Mongering....just raising a point..lol Actually, I was mentioning that milk has Saturated fat and for many of you who mentioned if fat fits into your macros you eat it...I would say absolutely....just minimize your "SATURATED" fat. That's all. Two glasses of milk isn't going to do much harm. Again, I was just raising the point that be aware it is saturated fat and most of the studies I've seen that are good in the literature use fat free.
Now I do have one question about Chocolate milk. I went to the store and was very sad to see that chocholate milk (while it has plenty of "sugar" is made for the most part - many brands - with HFCS - High Fructose Corn Syrup. So here's my question to those of you who understand what I'm about to say: Fructose is not very helpful to those trying to build muscle or anything else. First off it isn't used directly by any other organ other than the liver. It's phosphorolated there by Fructose Kinase and eventually turned into Triglycerides and fat. That's the problem with HFCS. A little fructose signals the liver to let glucokinase migrate from the nucleus to the cytoplasm of the cell and get ready for an oncoming meal....glucose is metabolized by muscle and brain. Some fructose is converted into glucose...but not a lot. So my question is that if most of the sugar is Fructose in Chocholate milk...then it seems it's not worth using..and back to plain milk! ANyone?
try another store or somewhere like whole foods. one store i go to only has milk with HFCS. another store i go to (not whole foods, just a normal store) has one milk brand that is real sugar. the rest are HFCS. they also carry a milk with splenda but i always get the one with real sugar. but next time i'm going to whole foods to get it because i want organic.0 -
Oh I wasn't fear Mongering....just raising a point..lol Actually, I was mentioning that milk has Saturated fat and for many of you who mentioned if fat fits into your macros you eat it...I would say absolutely....just minimize your "SATURATED" fat. That's all. Two glasses of milk isn't going to do much harm. Again, I was just raising the point that be aware it is saturated fat and most of the studies I've seen that are good in the literature use fat free.
I respectfully disagree. When you start throwing out things about heart attacks and stroke, that is fear mongering. That's not "just raising a point". Also, I don't agree that saturated fat has to be "minimized" I just has to be managed as with any essential nutrient. The debate on saturated fat is for another thread so in the interest of not derailing, I'll just leave it that.
Which studies are you refering to that say fat is better. Any study I've seen, including the one from the OP as well as the article I posted from bodyrecomposition.com indicate that the full fat milk shows superior results for protein synthesis. Thus superior recovery. If you have different info, feel free to post your proof sources. You may also want to do a little research on the The Lipid Hypothesis Debunked. Saturated fats are not inherently bad and have some benefits in the appropriate dose and context. They are not automatically to be avoided.0 -
It is unnatural to drink the milk of another animal. We're the only animal on earth to drink the milk of another species. Think about it! When you're thirsty you don't look at a woman's breasts and go, 'mmm, I'm thirsty!' :laugh: Milk is meant for growing babies...cow milk is designed help a cow quadruple its weight in a short period of time...not to mention all the growth hormones & pus (yes, PUS, look it up) that milk contains.
I'll pass!
Oh I wasn't fear Mongering....just raising a point..lol Actually, I was mentioning that milk has Saturated fat and for many of you who mentioned if fat fits into your macros you eat it...I would say absolutely....just minimize your "SATURATED" fat. That's all. Two glasses of milk isn't going to do much harm. Again, I was just raising the point that be aware it is saturated fat and most of the studies I've seen that are good in the literature use fat free.
Now I do have one question about Chocolate milk. I went to the store and was very sad to see that chocholate milk (while it has plenty of "sugar" is made for the most part - many brands - with HFCS - High Fructose Corn Syrup. So here's my question to those of you who understand what I'm about to say: Fructose is not very helpful to those trying to build muscle or anything else. First off it isn't used directly by any other organ other than the liver. It's phosphorolated there by Fructose Kinase and eventually turned into Triglycerides and fat. That's the problem with HFCS. A little fructose signals the liver to let glucokinase migrate from the nucleus to the cytoplasm of the cell and get ready for an oncoming meal....glucose is metabolized by muscle and brain. Some fructose is converted into glucose...but not a lot. So my question is that if most of the sugar is Fructose in Chocholate milk...then it seems it's not worth using..and back to plain milk! ANyone?
I don't want to jump down your throat because I respect what you've posted as part of this discussion, but this post is an example of what was described as fear mongering- it's a good point about fructose metabolization and muscle building, but the whole idea is slightly off the mark because the premise is wrong- HFCS dosen't really have that much fructose. So the argument on the surface makes enough sense to confuse and upset people, but isn't really factually based. I'm not pro-HFCS at all, but based on your argument people should avoid added sugar, period, rather than get worked up about HFCS.
I have more to say about the saturated fat claims, but I need to think through my response so it's sensible rather than reactionary. Suffice it to say, I disagree that saturated fat should be avoided for most of the population.0 -
It is unnatural to drink the milk of another animal. We're the only animal on earth to drink the milk of another species. Think about it! When you're thirsty you don't look at a woman's breasts and go, 'mmm, I'm thirsty!' :laugh: Milk is meant for growing babies...cow milk is designed help a cow quadruple its weight in a short period of time...not to mention all the growth hormones & pus (yes, PUS, look it up) that milk contains.
I'll pass!
Oh I wasn't fear Mongering....just raising a point..lol Actually, I was mentioning that milk has Saturated fat and for many of you who mentioned if fat fits into your macros you eat it...I would say absolutely....just minimize your "SATURATED" fat. That's all. Two glasses of milk isn't going to do much harm. Again, I was just raising the point that be aware it is saturated fat and most of the studies I've seen that are good in the literature use fat free.
Now I do have one question about Chocolate milk. I went to the store and was very sad to see that chocholate milk (while it has plenty of "sugar" is made for the most part - many brands - with HFCS - High Fructose Corn Syrup. So here's my question to those of you who understand what I'm about to say: Fructose is not very helpful to those trying to build muscle or anything else. First off it isn't used directly by any other organ other than the liver. It's phosphorolated there by Fructose Kinase and eventually turned into Triglycerides and fat. That's the problem with HFCS. A little fructose signals the liver to let glucokinase migrate from the nucleus to the cytoplasm of the cell and get ready for an oncoming meal....glucose is metabolized by muscle and brain. Some fructose is converted into glucose...but not a lot. So my question is that if most of the sugar is Fructose in Chocholate milk...then it seems it's not worth using..and back to plain milk! ANyone?
Wrong on your first point
Wrong on your second point
Wrong on your third point
And yes, you were definitely fear mongering.
edited to add: so you have us out there looking for fat free, sugar free, lactose free milk? Can that legally be called milk?0 -
bump0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.7K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions