"Natural Flavor" ingredient exposed?

Options
145791016

Replies

  • peuglow
    peuglow Posts: 684 Member
    Options
    No... what people term as 'food addiction' is not even close to a chemical dependence.

    I think people can become emotionally dependent on a lot of things. And since emotions are just hormones which secrete chemicals in our body/brain to get a response from our consciousness, I think it's possible that we could be dependent on food other than survival. Just the same we are on anything else that brings us good feelings. The problem is we see "good tasting foods" as a reward and "poor tasting foods" as a punishment (eating cake versus eating brussel sprouts). It depends on how you were raised and how your parents convinced you to eat the "poor tasting foods" in my opinion. And once this preference is in the subconscious, it plays out like a record in our life day in and day out until we seek help.
    I think you use the term "we" and "I" Interchangably. Sweeping generalizations can be false presumptions.
  • firstsip
    firstsip Posts: 8,399 Member
    Options
    It's funny, because I've read every post, and I still can't see where someone has called you an "idiot" or a name...

    That's how passive aggression works. It goes under the radar. That's why you can never catch a person who is a back-stabber until after the backstabbing or rumor spreading is done and killed your reputation. It's aggression done in the covert. Most passive-aggression is done in the form of humor with a sharp tongue. But no worries, I seem to have it under control.

    Lol, YOU have been passive-aggressive throughout this thread, specifically to me. Someone calling your posts ignorant, your use of emotion as a reason for things to be "fact," etc... those are people legitimately calling out you and your source. That's not passive-aggression. I feel like you need to look up some of the terms you keep throwing around. Ignorance, passive-aggression, natural, artificial, addiction, etc. These are literally all terms you have misused in this thread.

    You posted misinformation, asked for opinions, and people gave it to you. You put YOUR opinion out as "fact." We have every right to judge what you have then said.
  • EccentricDad
    EccentricDad Posts: 875 Member
    Options
    Simple. I use logic and reason to evaluate the claims being made. I don't believe things because they make me feel good.

    That's how you find the truth. If that's anything you're interested in. If you'd rather just believe things that make you feel good you can feel free to do that. But stop being surprised when the information you attempt to pass off as valid gets shot to sunshine.

    ^^^Acceptable opinion and post. And I'm not looking for truth, I am looking for opinions. I clearly said in my OP "what's your thoughts on this". Thoughts are not scientific fact. If you don't like theory, abstract, or discussions that stray from the "truth" then maybe that's a problem with you and not me.
    I also don't post topics for debate and tell everyone who disagrees with me to stop attacking me. Because it's childish. Just look in the mirror and tell yourself how smart and pretty you are if that's what you're after. But if you post a topic for discussion you will get any manner of replies. Know that.

    ^^^^^^Unacceptable opinion that IS attacking me. I am not doing this for attention, for self esteem, or for self confidence. The fact that you are implying that I am doing this as an attention *kitten* or a drama queen is disrespectful. If you cannot enter a conversation that has differing opinions then that is YOUR problem. If the only way to sway someone is to attack their character then maybe you need to stop trying to sway people and let them be an individual. I am letting YOU be an individual aren't I? I never said you were WRONG, I just told you to stop attacking me.

    It's great you are a "thinking" type. But allow us emotional thinkers (me) think what we want in the matter, even if you have scientific proof that proves otherwise. Truth is, science contradicts itself so there is no stable "truth" in the world except what you want to believe.
  • DonniesGirl69
    DonniesGirl69 Posts: 644 Member
    Options
    I don't feel I need to seek help because I love cheesecake. Again, it's a matter of self control....not addiction.
  • candicelee80
    Options
    I think alot of it true! I was a competitive figure skater from the time I was 12 till I was 23? Then even as I grew up my parents limited processed foods, my mom made nearly EVERYTHING from scratch!! I didn't eat what my friends ate, I never wanted to eat it. They couldn't get enough and I never wanted to start! Then after I had my kids and was pressed for time, ( and had a husband who grew up on junk food) I began to let go and not be a strict about what my kids ate. I watched as my kiddos, who only ate veggies and fruit, or plain cheerios turned into monsters when daddy brought home the sugary cereal!! I still remember having doughnuts and one was not enough!!
    Then I went gluten free b/c I needed to for health reasons. I bought some gluten free doughnuts, since the hubby didn't stop buying them I wanted an option for me. I ate one and it was very good, but I only wanted one!! If I slip up and go back to the processed foods, I can't get enough!! But when I eat gluten free( which for me means ALOT of cooked from scratch!) I don't have these 'cravings'. My husband still does since he 'can't' give it up!
    I am not saying it is the only reason we are overweight as a nation. What I am saying is that if you are not aware of your body and what it is doing or if it is even abnormal? How do you know to change your thinking? If people have grown up 'addicted' then how do you see the difference until a major life experience makes them look at it?
    Some of these other posts need more compassion and realize that companies ARE out there to make money!! I worked retail and it was my job to make people think they NEEDED new whatever!! Its real! :)
  • EccentricDad
    EccentricDad Posts: 875 Member
    Options
    It's funny, because I've read every post, and I still can't see where someone has called you an "idiot" or a name...

    That's how passive aggression works. It goes under the radar. That's why you can never catch a person who is a back-stabber until after the backstabbing or rumor spreading is done and killed your reputation. It's aggression done in the covert. Most passive-aggression is done in the form of humor with a sharp tongue. But no worries, I seem to have it under control.

    Lol, YOU have been passive-aggressive throughout this thread, specifically to me. Someone calling your posts ignorant, your use of emotion as a reason for things to be "fact," etc... those are people legitimately calling out you and your source. That's not passive-aggression. I feel like you need to look up some of the terms you keep throwing around. Ignorance, passive-aggression, natural, artificial, addiction, etc. These are literally all terms you have misused in this thread.

    You posted misinformation, asked for opinions, and people gave it to you. You put YOUR opinion out as "fact." We have every right to judge what you have then said.

    It's fact for me. If it's not fact for you, then that's where you share your facts. But don't you dare push your facts on me as my facts are not the same.
  • BrettPGH
    BrettPGH Posts: 4,720 Member
    Options
    It's fact for me. If it's not fact for you, then that's where you share your facts. But don't you dare push your facts on me as my facts are not the same.

    Stop using the word fact if you don't know what it means.
  • tigersword
    tigersword Posts: 8,059 Member
    Options
    42577ba2-8600-e0cd.jpg

    Funny you post this picture because my wife is making me watch the documentary this guy is in. While it's fascinating to listen to someone else's perspective about how our ancestors did the fine cuts and made these huge pyramids, I think we are just insulting the intelligence of our ancestors by saying they were too stupid to figure out these things on their own and they needed aliens to help them. But quite ironic you are posting this right now and we are in the middle of watching it at the moment.
    That's not what ironic means.
  • melsmith612
    melsmith612 Posts: 727 Member
    Options
    42577ba2-8600-e0cd.jpg

    Did anyone who ever posts this picture actually SEE the special where this guy was featured? I did and I can't remember which one it was (thankfully) but this guy was credited as some sort of expert on something and he really was like "aliens" this and "aliens" that. So weird that his image went viral as a thread joke.



    For the OP: Don't know if it's true or really even care. I'm not a "clean" eater primarily because I can't afford to buy all clean foods and I can't afford to buy a house where I can grow/raise my own. Unfortunately my exposure to addictive ingredients, carcinogens, etc. is purely in the hands of the FDA. Which means, I'm effed.
  • DonniesGirl69
    DonniesGirl69 Posts: 644 Member
    Options
    It's funny, because I've read every post, and I still can't see where someone has called you an "idiot" or a name...

    That's how passive aggression works. It goes under the radar. That's why you can never catch a person who is a back-stabber until after the backstabbing or rumor spreading is done and killed your reputation. It's aggression done in the covert. Most passive-aggression is done in the form of humor with a sharp tongue. But no worries, I seem to have it under control.

    Lol, YOU have been passive-aggressive throughout this thread, specifically to me. Someone calling your posts ignorant, your use of emotion as a reason for things to be "fact," etc... those are people legitimately calling out you and your source. That's not passive-aggression. I feel like you need to look up some of the terms you keep throwing around. Ignorance, passive-aggression, natural, artificial, addiction, etc. These are literally all terms you have misused in this thread.

    You posted misinformation, asked for opinions, and people gave it to you. You put YOUR opinion out as "fact." We have every right to judge what you have then said.

    It's fact for me. If it's not fact for you, then that's where you share your facts. But don't you dare push your facts on me as my facts are not the same.

    I believe you're confusing "fact" with "belief".

    A fact is truth....undeniable. Like "water is wet". That is a fact. If you choose to believe that water is dry, that may be your "belief" but it does not make it "fact".
  • EccentricDad
    EccentricDad Posts: 875 Member
    Options
    I think someone in this thread is emotionally addicted to trolling people with misinformation.

    I enjoy giving information and watching people analyze it for credibility. The world isn't black and white, there will be some grays and even reds. You can't dismiss an entire article because you believe it isn't credible. It's like those people who believe in God and then dismiss everything that says he isn't real. Just open your mind a little is all I ask.
  • firstsip
    firstsip Posts: 8,399 Member
    Options
    Simple. I use logic and reason to evaluate the claims being made. I don't believe things because they make me feel good.

    That's how you find the truth. If that's anything you're interested in. If you'd rather just believe things that make you feel good you can feel free to do that. But stop being surprised when the information you attempt to pass off as valid gets shot to sunshine.

    ^^^Acceptable opinion and post. And I'm not looking for truth, I am looking for opinions. I clearly said in my OP "what's your thoughts on this". Thoughts are not scientific fact. If you don't like theory, abstract, or discussions that stray from the "truth" then maybe that's a problem with you and not me.
    I also don't post topics for debate and tell everyone who disagrees with me to stop attacking me. Because it's childish. Just look in the mirror and tell yourself how smart and pretty you are if that's what you're after. But if you post a topic for discussion you will get any manner of replies. Know that.

    ^^^^^^Unacceptable opinion that IS attacking me. I am not doing this for attention, for self esteem, or for self confidence. The fact that you are implying that I am doing this as an attention *kitten* or a drama queen is disrespectful. If you cannot enter a conversation that has differing opinions then that is YOUR problem. If the only way to sway someone is to attack their character then maybe you need to stop trying to sway people and let them be an individual. I am letting YOU be an individual aren't I? I never said you were WRONG, I just told you to stop attacking me.

    It's great you are a "thinking" type. But allow us emotional thinkers (me) think what we want in the matter, even if you have scientific proof that proves otherwise. Truth is, science contradicts itself so there is no stable "truth" in the world except what you want to believe.

    Are you seriously reading something different than what's on a screen? You seriously just CREATED words he did not say NOR did he imply. What he was saying, "If you just want people to tell you how GREAT your opinion is and NOT disagree with you, go find that. Since you are here, people will disagree with the article AND your opinions."

    I honestly have never seen anyone like you. This isn't an attack, it's a flat out observation. You literally create scenarios that are completely outside of what's happening. We all see the same text as you, but you see it as an attack or "passive-aggression" every time.

    This is a personal attack: "You're stupid, ignorant, fat, bla bla."
    This is not a personal attack: "It's childish to put a topic out for debate and get overly defensive and even antagonistic when people disagree with your topic AND your opinions."

    Do you see the difference?

    Edit: Oh, and you just redefined the word "fact" up there, I see. Too bad I can't upload .gifs right now, as I have a variety of very choice responses to that.
  • bunchesonothing
    bunchesonothing Posts: 1,015 Member
    Options
    I am letting YOU be an individual aren't I? I never said you were WRONG, I just told you to stop attacking me.

    It's great you are a "thinking" type. But allow us emotional thinkers (me) think what we want in the matter, even if you have scientific proof that proves otherwise. Truth is, science contradicts itself so there is no stable "truth" in the world except what you want to believe.

    Individuals are wrong all of the time, without being considered less of an individual. You're acting as if someone says something you believe is not based in reality, that it is YOU being attacked. No. Your belief is. It's important to understand the difference. If you don't, it's not a good idea to stir up "debate." The art of debate is based in logic and "thinking," not emotion. If you don't want to do it, don't start it.

    Science does not contradict itself. Studies sometimes do. And then the scientists find the confounding factors, peer review and come to a consensus.
  • WendyTerry420
    WendyTerry420 Posts: 13,274 Member
    Options
    I get sooooooo sick of people referring to the need for sustenance as an addiction! As a recovering addict, I find it completely offensive! There is a huge difference between lacking self control when it comes to food and being chemically dependent on a narcotic substance.

    The confusion comes in because some of the principles that are used to help drug addicts can also help people in other facets of life, including self-control and self-discipline, which can be applied to weight loss. But there is NO such thing as a 'food' addiction.

    Completely agree! It makes me angry as well. :grumble:
    Get over yourselves. Some people are just as devastatingly addicted to food, porn, co-dependence etc. than you were to dope. It is just as equally legitimate as your dope habit. I am a recovered drug addict for nearly 14 years. There is nothing offensive about this.

    I have no addiction to "dope." I have never had any addiction, except to nicotine. You are confusing me with another poster who stated they recovered from addiction. It is offensive to anyone who has truly studied addiction. Food and porn are emotional/mental dependencies. There is no withdrawal syndrome associated with either activity.
  • peuglow
    peuglow Posts: 684 Member
    Options
    I think someone in this thread is emotionally addicted to trolling people with misinformation.

    I enjoy giving information and watching people analyze it for credibility. The world isn't black and white, there will be some grays and even reds. You can't dismiss an entire article because you believe it isn't credible. It's like those people who believe in God and then dismiss everything that says he isn't real. Just open your mind a little is all I ask.
    lolololololol
  • BrettPGH
    BrettPGH Posts: 4,720 Member
    Options
    Translation of terms for anyone who might need it:

    Addiction = Preference

    Fact = Opinion

    Attack = Not Agreeing

    Discussion Which Strays From The Truth = BS
  • escloflowneCHANGED
    escloflowneCHANGED Posts: 3,038 Member
    Options
    It's fact for me. If it's not fact for you, then that's where you share your facts. But don't you dare push your facts on me as my facts are not the same.

    Stop using the word fact if you don't know what it means.

    Seriously! You need a dictionary!
  • WendyTerry420
    WendyTerry420 Posts: 13,274 Member
    Options
    I think someone in this thread is emotionally addicted to trolling people with misinformation.

    ^^ Truth

    :laugh:
  • EccentricDad
    EccentricDad Posts: 875 Member
    Options

    A fact is truth....undeniable. Like "water is wet". That is a fact. If you choose to believe that water is dry, that may be your "belief" but it does not make it "fact".

    I am a man of a very small vocabulary. I speak in hopes that people will understand what I'm trying to say instead of pedantically tell me I spoke wrong. Thank you for letting me know, the point I was trying to make with the word "belief" in the place of fact is still valid.
  • EccentricDad
    EccentricDad Posts: 875 Member
    Options
    It's fact for me. If it's not fact for you, then that's where you share your facts. But don't you dare push your facts on me as my facts are not the same.

    Stop using the word fact if you don't know what it means.

    Seriously! You need a dictionary!

    Agreed. Or I need other people to stop being pedantic. You knew what I meant, why can't you just accept me for who I am? I have.
This discussion has been closed.