Clean vs. Junk - does it really matter?

12021222325

Replies

  • DatMurse
    DatMurse Posts: 1,501 Member

    Lol who is in a hypercaloric state?
    im not

    I am, on purpose...better start eating more of dat der sucrose, or was it frustose... I get confused.

    well i meant on a sustained hypercaloric state like forever
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member

    Lol who is in a hypercaloric state?
    im not

    I am, on purpose...better start eating more of dat der sucrose, or was it frustose... I get confused.

    well i meant on a sustained hypercaloric state like forever

    I know...I was teasing, :happy:
  • EvgeniZyntx
    EvgeniZyntx Posts: 24,208 Member
    Eating processed foods and unnatural chemicals is fattening-starvation. Your body cannot process the foods but there are no nutrients in what you're eating that it needs to survive, so it takes and stores whatever it can from the crap you eat, and then fights like crazy to get rid of what it can't use or even digest. Do yourself a favor and clean it up! Eat food that's actually food, not the chemical crap the Fed is trying to pass for food these days.

    Next time you go to reach for a processed treat or something in the drive-thru, just take off your shoe and eat that instead. It'll be about the same nutritionally and will save you money. :p

    Lol, quoted for the cray and "the Fed" - what does the American Monetary Reserve have to do with donuts?

    Oh, I'm sorry. Apparently I need to be more descriptive. "The Fed" can also describe the FDA, which is the FEDERALLY RUN ADMINISTRATION implementing laws and criteria regarding the safe growing, selling and eating of food items under the United States Department of Health and Human Services. It's been my experience that "the Fed" is useful in describing circumstances involving "The Federal Government."

    Anyway....

    In all seriousness, it makes more sense to use the term "the feds" in that situation. "The fed" specifically means the Federal Reserve.

    It's like DOE. Technically it could be Department of Education, but it's used exclusively for the Department of Energy. The Department of Education is typically called the ED.

    Thanks for the lesson in Terminology. I found it to be both relevant and necessary to the topic of this thread. Also, thanks for calling me out on it. I was unaware that MFP threads counted as legal documents that require proper language before submittal. From now on I'll be sure to draft each one and error check before posting. :)

    Man, people really don't like to learn they did something wrong, do they? Good lord.

    I appreciate when people politely correct me when I make a mistake.

    Kind of off topic, but are you aware how corrupt the FDA is in the US? It's shocking, I had to do a research product on this in class (I'm from Australia) and seems the FDA gets all its funding from the pic pharma companies. Don't trust everything they put out there guys...

    Did you get an F? The FDA gets less than half of its funding from user fees. It's a fee per application basis not random interest funding. /smh

    meow, calm down and have a flower to cheer up :flowerforyou:

    Luckily I got a D. And in Australia D isn't bad it means I got about 80% actually (Distinction) so bite me.

    I was simply mentioning something far in the vaults of my memories. If you really want to argue PM me and I'll happily dig up the assignment for you, but I don't see the need. This is silly.

    Fair enough, I edited my post. :flowerforyou: back to you.
    But having worked on direct filings with the FDA it's pretty insulting to hear these "all corrupt" nonsense insults. There are issues, but it is a damn good structure.

    Suggest you read The Jungle. Good book.
  • EvgeniZyntx
    EvgeniZyntx Posts: 24,208 Member
    Eating processed foods and unnatural chemicals is fattening-starvation. Your body cannot process the foods but there are no nutrients in what you're eating that it needs to survive, so it takes and stores whatever it can from the crap you eat, and then fights like crazy to get rid of what it can't use or even digest. Do yourself a favor and clean it up! Eat food that's actually food, not the chemical crap the Fed is trying to pass for food these days.

    Next time you go to reach for a processed treat or something in the drive-thru, just take off your shoe and eat that instead. It'll be about the same nutritionally and will save you money. :p

    Lol, quoted for the cray and "the Fed" - what does the American Monetary Reserve have to do with donuts?

    Oh, I'm sorry. Apparently I need to be more descriptive. "The Fed" can also describe the FDA, which is the FEDERALLY RUN ADMINISTRATION implementing laws and criteria regarding the safe growing, selling and eating of food items under the United States Department of Health and Human Services. It's been my experience that "the Fed" is useful in describing circumstances involving "The Federal Government."

    Anyway....

    In all seriousness, it makes more sense to use the term "the feds" in that situation. "The fed" specifically means the Federal Reserve.

    It's like DOE. Technically it could be Department of Education, but it's used exclusively for the Department of Energy. The Department of Education is typically called the ED.

    Thanks for the lesson in Terminology. I found it to be both relevant and necessary to the topic of this thread. Also, thanks for calling me out on it. I was unaware that MFP threads counted as legal documents that require proper language before submittal. From now on I'll be sure to draft each one and error check before posting. :)

    Man, people really don't like to learn they did something wrong, do they? Good lord.

    I appreciate when people politely correct me when I make a mistake.

    Kind of off topic, but are you aware how corrupt the FDA is in the US? It's shocking, I had to do a research product on this in class (I'm from Australia) and seems the FDA gets all its funding from the pic pharma companies. Don't trust everything they put out there guys...

    Did you get an F? The FDA gets less than half of its funding from user fees. It's a fee per application basis not random interest funding. /smh

    People seem to think that the FDA does all the research in the world and is the 'face' of big pharma for some reason.

    they are inextricably linked... the FDA is what allows drugs to be put on the market for mass human testing...

    also what IS this thread?? haha

    See bold.

    Also...not all research is about drugs.

    Most research isn't about drugs. My entire research career was non-drug related. Drug research is highly visible but it's the pimple on butt of the walrus on the tip of the iceberg.
  • CoachReddy
    CoachReddy Posts: 3,949 Member
    Eating processed foods and unnatural chemicals is fattening-starvation. Your body cannot process the foods but there are no nutrients in what you're eating that it needs to survive, so it takes and stores whatever it can from the crap you eat, and then fights like crazy to get rid of what it can't use or even digest. Do yourself a favor and clean it up! Eat food that's actually food, not the chemical crap the Fed is trying to pass for food these days.

    Next time you go to reach for a processed treat or something in the drive-thru, just take off your shoe and eat that instead. It'll be about the same nutritionally and will save you money. :p

    Lol, quoted for the cray and "the Fed" - what does the American Monetary Reserve have to do with donuts?

    Oh, I'm sorry. Apparently I need to be more descriptive. "The Fed" can also describe the FDA, which is the FEDERALLY RUN ADMINISTRATION implementing laws and criteria regarding the safe growing, selling and eating of food items under the United States Department of Health and Human Services. It's been my experience that "the Fed" is useful in describing circumstances involving "The Federal Government."

    Anyway....

    In all seriousness, it makes more sense to use the term "the feds" in that situation. "The fed" specifically means the Federal Reserve.

    It's like DOE. Technically it could be Department of Education, but it's used exclusively for the Department of Energy. The Department of Education is typically called the ED.

    Thanks for the lesson in Terminology. I found it to be both relevant and necessary to the topic of this thread. Also, thanks for calling me out on it. I was unaware that MFP threads counted as legal documents that require proper language before submittal. From now on I'll be sure to draft each one and error check before posting. :)

    Man, people really don't like to learn they did something wrong, do they? Good lord.

    I appreciate when people politely correct me when I make a mistake.

    Kind of off topic, but are you aware how corrupt the FDA is in the US? It's shocking, I had to do a research product on this in class (I'm from Australia) and seems the FDA gets all its funding from the pic pharma companies. Don't trust everything they put out there guys...

    Did you get an F? The FDA gets less than half of its funding from user fees. It's a fee per application basis not random interest funding. /smh

    meow, calm down and have a flower to cheer up :flowerforyou:

    Luckily I got a D. And in Australia D isn't bad it means I got about 80% actually (Distinction) so bite me.

    I was simply mentioning something far in the vaults of my memories. If you really want to argue PM me and I'll happily dig up the assignment for you, but I don't see the need. This is silly.

    Fair enough, I edited my post. :flowerforyou: back to you.
    But having worked on direct filings with the FDA it's pretty insulting to hear these "all corrupt" nonsense insults. There are issues, but it is a damn good structure.

    Suggest you read The Jungle. Good book.

    Sorry dude, I appreciate that your perspective may be skewed because of your career, but the FDA is a joke when it comes to protecting the people from bad drugs, and telling us what foods we should be eating. Monsanto is pretty much the only word I need to mention on that front.

    We can argue about it after the roll though. Tablet typing is no fun.
  • mistesh
    mistesh Posts: 243 Member
    Suggest you read The Jungle. Good book.

    Yes, that (1906) and, while on muckraking a century ago, How the Other Half Lives (1890).

    I'm reminded of Gary Taubes' story about a young German physician, Hilde Bruch who "arrived in New York in 1934 and was "startled" by the number of fat kids she saw—"really fat ones, not only in clinics, but on the streets and subways, and in schools."

    What makes Bruch’s story relevant to the obesity problem today is that this was New York in the worst year of the Great Depression, an era of bread lines and soup kitchens, when 6 in 10 Americans were living in poverty."

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/05/06/why-the-campaign-to-stop-america-s-obesity-crisis-keeps-failing.html
  • EvgeniZyntx
    EvgeniZyntx Posts: 24,208 Member
    Eating processed foods and unnatural chemicals is fattening-starvation. Your body cannot process the foods but there are no nutrients in what you're eating that it needs to survive, so it takes and stores whatever it can from the crap you eat, and then fights like crazy to get rid of what it can't use or even digest. Do yourself a favor and clean it up! Eat food that's actually food, not the chemical crap the Fed is trying to pass for food these days.

    Next time you go to reach for a processed treat or something in the drive-thru, just take off your shoe and eat that instead. It'll be about the same nutritionally and will save you money. :p

    Lol, quoted for the cray and "the Fed" - what does the American Monetary Reserve have to do with donuts?

    Oh, I'm sorry. Apparently I need to be more descriptive. "The Fed" can also describe the FDA, which is the FEDERALLY RUN ADMINISTRATION implementing laws and criteria regarding the safe growing, selling and eating of food items under the United States Department of Health and Human Services. It's been my experience that "the Fed" is useful in describing circumstances involving "The Federal Government."

    Anyway....

    In all seriousness, it makes more sense to use the term "the feds" in that situation. "The fed" specifically means the Federal Reserve.

    It's like DOE. Technically it could be Department of Education, but it's used exclusively for the Department of Energy. The Department of Education is typically called the ED.

    Thanks for the lesson in Terminology. I found it to be both relevant and necessary to the topic of this thread. Also, thanks for calling me out on it. I was unaware that MFP threads counted as legal documents that require proper language before submittal. From now on I'll be sure to draft each one and error check before posting. :)

    Man, people really don't like to learn they did something wrong, do they? Good lord.

    I appreciate when people politely correct me when I make a mistake.

    Kind of off topic, but are you aware how corrupt the FDA is in the US? It's shocking, I had to do a research product on this in class (I'm from Australia) and seems the FDA gets all its funding from the pic pharma companies. Don't trust everything they put out there guys...

    Did you get an F? The FDA gets less than half of its funding from user fees. It's a fee per application basis not random interest funding. /smh

    meow, calm down and have a flower to cheer up :flowerforyou:

    Luckily I got a D. And in Australia D isn't bad it means I got about 80% actually (Distinction) so bite me.

    I was simply mentioning something far in the vaults of my memories. If you really want to argue PM me and I'll happily dig up the assignment for you, but I don't see the need. This is silly.

    Fair enough, I edited my post. :flowerforyou: back to you.
    But having worked on direct filings with the FDA it's pretty insulting to hear these "all corrupt" nonsense insults. There are issues, but it is a damn good structure.

    Suggest you read The Jungle. Good book.

    Sorry dude, I appreciate that your perspective may be skewed because of your career, but the FDA is a joke when it comes to protecting the people from bad drugs, and telling us what foods we should be eating. Monsanto is pretty much the only word I need to mention on that front.

    We can argue about it after the roll though. Tablet typing is no fun.

    Monsanto makes drugs? #thethingsyoulearnfromcoachreddy

    Let me just be clear - for drug companies the FDA is often the enemy.
    According to you all drugs are bad, all Pharma is bad and all the FDA is bad.
    I've seen your insidious posts on the industry.

    I'm on a tablet too - in any case, I'm not going to spend my time defending either Pharma or the FDA - each have issues.

    However, I'm quite happy with a career that has included seeing such things as the evolution of AIDS from a disease that kills 90% plus to a disease that can be completely managed as well as the Mectizan Donation program.

    If the FDA was not in place - the drug industry would be like the unregulated health and fitness industry - full of charlatan PTs and flimflam products.
  • volume77
    volume77 Posts: 670 Member
    wow lots of quotes
  • CoachReddy
    CoachReddy Posts: 3,949 Member
    Eating processed foods and unnatural chemicals is fattening-starvation. Your body cannot process the foods but there are no nutrients in what you're eating that it needs to survive, so it takes and stores whatever it can from the crap you eat, and then fights like crazy to get rid of what it can't use or even digest. Do yourself a favor and clean it up! Eat food that's actually food, not the chemical crap the Fed is trying to pass for food these days.

    Next time you go to reach for a processed treat or something in the drive-thru, just take off your shoe and eat that instead. It'll be about the same nutritionally and will save you money. :p

    Lol, quoted for the cray and "the Fed" - what does the American Monetary Reserve have to do with donuts?

    Oh, I'm sorry. Apparently I need to be more descriptive. "The Fed" can also describe the FDA, which is the FEDERALLY RUN ADMINISTRATION implementing laws and criteria regarding the safe growing, selling and eating of food items under the United States Department of Health and Human Services. It's been my experience that "the Fed" is useful in describing circumstances involving "The Federal Government."

    Anyway....

    In all seriousness, it makes more sense to use the term "the feds" in that situation. "The fed" specifically means the Federal Reserve.

    It's like DOE. Technically it could be Department of Education, but it's used exclusively for the Department of Energy. The Department of Education is typically called the ED.

    Thanks for the lesson in Terminology. I found it to be both relevant and necessary to the topic of this thread. Also, thanks for calling me out on it. I was unaware that MFP threads counted as legal documents that require proper language before submittal. From now on I'll be sure to draft each one and error check before posting. :)

    Man, people really don't like to learn they did something wrong, do they? Good lord.

    I appreciate when people politely correct me when I make a mistake.

    Kind of off topic, but are you aware how corrupt the FDA is in the US? It's shocking, I had to do a research product on this in class (I'm from Australia) and seems the FDA gets all its funding from the pic pharma companies. Don't trust everything they put out there guys...

    Did you get an F? The FDA gets less than half of its funding from user fees. It's a fee per application basis not random interest funding. /smh

    meow, calm down and have a flower to cheer up :flowerforyou:

    Luckily I got a D. And in Australia D isn't bad it means I got about 80% actually (Distinction) so bite me.

    I was simply mentioning something far in the vaults of my memories. If you really want to argue PM me and I'll happily dig up the assignment for you, but I don't see the need. This is silly.

    Fair enough, I edited my post. :flowerforyou: back to you.
    But having worked on direct filings with the FDA it's pretty insulting to hear these "all corrupt" nonsense insults. There are issues, but it is a damn good structure.

    Suggest you read The Jungle. Good book.

    Sorry dude, I appreciate that your perspective may be skewed because of your career, but the FDA is a joke when it comes to protecting the people from bad drugs, and telling us what foods we should be eating. Monsanto is pretty much the only word I need to mention on that front.

    We can argue about it after the roll though. Tablet typing is no fun.

    Monsanto makes drugs? #thethingsyoulearnfromcoachreddy

    Let me just be clear - for drug companies the FDA is often the enemy.
    According to you all drugs are bad, all Pharma is bad and all the FDA is bad.
    I've seen your insidious posts on the industry.

    I'm on a tablet too - in any case, I'm not going to spend my time defending either Pharma or the FDA - each have issues.

    However, I'm quite happy with a career that has included seeing such things as the evolution of AIDS from a disease that kills 90% plus to a disease that can be completely managed as well as the Mectizan Donation program.

    If the FDA was not in place - the drug industry would be like the unregulated health and fitness industry - full of charlatan PTs and flimflam products.

    We would have cured AIDS years ago if not for big pharma that makes a MINT off all those drug cocktails.
  • EvgeniZyntx
    EvgeniZyntx Posts: 24,208 Member
    Eating processed foods and unnatural chemicals is fattening-starvation. Your body cannot process the foods but there are no nutrients in what you're eating that it needs to survive, so it takes and stores whatever it can from the crap you eat, and then fights like crazy to get rid of what it can't use or even digest. Do yourself a favor and clean it up! Eat food that's actually food, not the chemical crap the Fed is trying to pass for food these days.

    Next time you go to reach for a processed treat or something in the drive-thru, just take off your shoe and eat that instead. It'll be about the same nutritionally and will save you money. :p

    Lol, quoted for the cray and "the Fed" - what does the American Monetary Reserve have to do with donuts?

    Oh, I'm sorry. Apparently I need to be more descriptive. "The Fed" can also describe the FDA, which is the FEDERALLY RUN ADMINISTRATION implementing laws and criteria regarding the safe growing, selling and eating of food items under the United States Department of Health and Human Services. It's been my experience that "the Fed" is useful in describing circumstances involving "The Federal Government."

    Anyway....

    In all seriousness, it makes more sense to use the term "the feds" in that situation. "The fed" specifically means the Federal Reserve.

    It's like DOE. Technically it could be Department of Education, but it's used exclusively for the Department of Energy. The Department of Education is typically called the ED.

    Thanks for the lesson in Terminology. I found it to be both relevant and necessary to the topic of this thread. Also, thanks for calling me out on it. I was unaware that MFP threads counted as legal documents that require proper language before submittal. From now on I'll be sure to draft each one and error check before posting. :)

    Man, people really don't like to learn they did something wrong, do they? Good lord.

    I appreciate when people politely correct me when I make a mistake.

    Kind of off topic, but are you aware how corrupt the FDA is in the US? It's shocking, I had to do a research product on this in class (I'm from Australia) and seems the FDA gets all its funding from the pic pharma companies. Don't trust everything they put out there guys...

    Did you get an F? The FDA gets less than half of its funding from user fees. It's a fee per application basis not random interest funding. /smh

    meow, calm down and have a flower to cheer up :flowerforyou:

    Luckily I got a D. And in Australia D isn't bad it means I got about 80% actually (Distinction) so bite me.

    I was simply mentioning something far in the vaults of my memories. If you really want to argue PM me and I'll happily dig up the assignment for you, but I don't see the need. This is silly.

    Fair enough, I edited my post. :flowerforyou: back to you.
    But having worked on direct filings with the FDA it's pretty insulting to hear these "all corrupt" nonsense insults. There are issues, but it is a damn good structure.

    Suggest you read The Jungle. Good book.

    Sorry dude, I appreciate that your perspective may be skewed because of your career, but the FDA is a joke when it comes to protecting the people from bad drugs, and telling us what foods we should be eating. Monsanto is pretty much the only word I need to mention on that front.

    We can argue about it after the roll though. Tablet typing is no fun.

    Monsanto makes drugs? #thethingsyoulearnfromcoachreddy

    Let me just be clear - for drug companies the FDA is often the enemy.
    According to you all drugs are bad, all Pharma is bad and all the FDA is bad.
    I've seen your insidious posts on the industry.

    I'm on a tablet too - in any case, I'm not going to spend my time defending either Pharma or the FDA - each have issues.

    However, I'm quite happy with a career that has included seeing such things as the evolution of AIDS from a disease that kills 90% plus to a disease that can be completely managed as well as the Mectizan Donation program.

    If the FDA was not in place - the drug industry would be like the unregulated health and fitness industry - full of charlatan PTs and flimflam products.

    We would have cured AIDS years ago if not for big pharma that makes a MINT off all those drug cocktails.

    Nevermind. Not worth it.
  • Joehenny
    Joehenny Posts: 1,222 Member
    Eating processed foods and unnatural chemicals is fattening-starvation. Your body cannot process the foods but there are no nutrients in what you're eating that it needs to survive, so it takes and stores whatever it can from the crap you eat, and then fights like crazy to get rid of what it can't use or even digest. Do yourself a favor and clean it up! Eat food that's actually food, not the chemical crap the Fed is trying to pass for food these days.

    Next time you go to reach for a processed treat or something in the drive-thru, just take off your shoe and eat that instead. It'll be about the same nutritionally and will save you money. :p

    Lol, quoted for the cray and "the Fed" - what does the American Monetary Reserve have to do with donuts?

    Oh, I'm sorry. Apparently I need to be more descriptive. "The Fed" can also describe the FDA, which is the FEDERALLY RUN ADMINISTRATION implementing laws and criteria regarding the safe growing, selling and eating of food items under the United States Department of Health and Human Services. It's been my experience that "the Fed" is useful in describing circumstances involving "The Federal Government."

    Anyway....

    In all seriousness, it makes more sense to use the term "the feds" in that situation. "The fed" specifically means the Federal Reserve.

    It's like DOE. Technically it could be Department of Education, but it's used exclusively for the Department of Energy. The Department of Education is typically called the ED.

    Thanks for the lesson in Terminology. I found it to be both relevant and necessary to the topic of this thread. Also, thanks for calling me out on it. I was unaware that MFP threads counted as legal documents that require proper language before submittal. From now on I'll be sure to draft each one and error check before posting. :)

    Man, people really don't like to learn they did something wrong, do they? Good lord.

    I appreciate when people politely correct me when I make a mistake.

    Kind of off topic, but are you aware how corrupt the FDA is in the US? It's shocking, I had to do a research product on this in class (I'm from Australia) and seems the FDA gets all its funding from the pic pharma companies. Don't trust everything they put out there guys...

    Did you get an F? The FDA gets less than half of its funding from user fees. It's a fee per application basis not random interest funding. /smh

    meow, calm down and have a flower to cheer up :flowerforyou:

    Luckily I got a D. And in Australia D isn't bad it means I got about 80% actually (Distinction) so bite me.

    I was simply mentioning something far in the vaults of my memories. If you really want to argue PM me and I'll happily dig up the assignment for you, but I don't see the need. This is silly.

    Fair enough, I edited my post. :flowerforyou: back to you.
    But having worked on direct filings with the FDA it's pretty insulting to hear these "all corrupt" nonsense insults. There are issues, but it is a damn good structure.

    Suggest you read The Jungle. Good book.

    Sorry dude, I appreciate that your perspective may be skewed because of your career, but the FDA is a joke when it comes to protecting the people from bad drugs, and telling us what foods we should be eating. Monsanto is pretty much the only word I need to mention on that front.

    We can argue about it after the roll though. Tablet typing is no fun.

    Monsanto makes drugs? #thethingsyoulearnfromcoachreddy

    Let me just be clear - for drug companies the FDA is often the enemy.
    According to you all drugs are bad, all Pharma is bad and all the FDA is bad.
    I've seen your insidious posts on the industry.

    I'm on a tablet too - in any case, I'm not going to spend my time defending either Pharma or the FDA - each have issues.

    However, I'm quite happy with a career that has included seeing such things as the evolution of AIDS from a disease that kills 90% plus to a disease that can be completely managed as well as the Mectizan Donation program.

    If the FDA was not in place - the drug industry would be like the unregulated health and fitness industry - full of charlatan PTs and flimflam products.

    We would have cured AIDS years ago if not for big pharma that makes a MINT off all those drug cocktails.

    Nevermind. Not worth it.

    LOL
  • DatMurse
    DatMurse Posts: 1,501 Member
    We would have cured AIDS years ago if not for big pharma that makes a MINT off all those drug cocktails.
    lol... wow...
  • I know two women who are almost the same weight (78 kgs) but one of them lives on a high-carb diet and looks close to 95 kgs despite what the scale says. The other, who eats clean, looks lighter than her 78 kgs. For me that's live proof on how our diet shapes our body even if one is watching their calorie intake.
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member
    I know two women who are almost the same weight (78 kgs) but one of them lives on a high-carb diet and looks close to 95 kgs despite what the scale says. The other, who eats clean, looks lighter than her 78 kgs. For me that's live proof on how our diet shapes our body even if one is watching their calorie intake.

    That is called a difference in muscle mass - and has nothing to do with eating clean.
  • Sarauk2sf
    Sarauk2sf Posts: 28,072 Member

    We would have cured AIDS years ago if not for big pharma that makes a MINT off all those drug cocktails.

    Wow, just wow.
  • DatMurse
    DatMurse Posts: 1,501 Member
    I know two women who are almost the same weight (78 kgs) but one of them lives on a high-carb diet and looks close to 95 kgs despite what the scale says. The other, who eats clean, looks lighter than her 78 kgs. For me that's live proof on how our diet shapes our body even if one is watching their calorie intake.
    no

    i dont watch my caloric intake and I can push up higher numbers than most guys in the gym and even on other numbers not many people can push up the same as me if they are bigger than me
    i have a mix between healthy and junk food. i just ate half a box of sweet tarts today
  • EvgeniZyntx
    EvgeniZyntx Posts: 24,208 Member

    We would have cured AIDS years ago if not for big pharma that makes a MINT off all those drug cocktails.

    Wow, just wow.

    Coach, you've out meme'd yourself.

    what-if-babies-and-aids-were-invented-by-condom-companies-to-make-money.jpg
  • jofjltncb6
    jofjltncb6 Posts: 34,415 Member
    In...

    ...to learn more about...

    :reads page 20 of pre-rolled thread:

    LOLWUT?
  • CoachReddy
    CoachReddy Posts: 3,949 Member
    In...

    ...to learn more about...

    :reads page 20 of pre-rolled thread:

    LOLWUT?

    haha right? i jumped the shark.

    I'll admit it was probably a bit unnecessarily inflammatory, but the reasoning behind it is simple. HIV/AIDS, cancer, etc, are a multi-billion dollar industry that keep a lot of people extremely rich. I'm not saying people haven't been working on finding cures, but the incentive to find a cure isn't as high as finding drugs that people have to take for life to "control" a disease.

    However, this is horribly off topic.
  • stealthq
    stealthq Posts: 4,298 Member
    You're kidding, right?

    The vast majority of HIV/AIDs research (at least in the US) is not done in big pharma but in independently funded academic labs. Big pharma has zero to do with the success or failure of that research. And if you think they have the resources and better minds and therefore do more or better research, you're mistaken. Big pharma is in big trouble, financially, and has been gradually shutting down research facilities and laying off top researchers for years. Plus, they don't make all that much off of HIV treatment anyway, though at this point every $ counts. They sell much more ($-wise) of drugs like Nexium and Abilify. I don't think AIDS treatments even make the top 100 drug sales list for 2012.

    But you're right, this is way off topic.