Lower Back Tattoos
Options
Replies
-
I think all tattoos are eyesores. They make attractive people look kind of trashy. Just my humble opinion.
You know what else makes people look kind of trashy? Judgmental comments.
Wooooooooord0 -
Would anyone have gotten their tattoos some decades ago when they weren't socially acceptable?
I got my first 16 years ago. It certainly wasn't socially acceptable where I lived. To be honest, I wanted it because it was one of the first decisions you can make as an adult. But, it was done in a place that could be covered if I decided I hated it later. I loved it and have gotten 4 more since. Yes, they are more socially acceptable, however in my profession I don't believe it's acceptable to have them exposed. So, they are all placed in locations that can be covered.0 -
I think all tattoos are eyesores. They make attractive people look kind of trashy. Just my humble opinion.
wait.. I wanna be trashy....0 -
Can they be cool/interesting/classy? Or are they always "tramp stamps"?
Personally I think it's unfortunate they get such a bad rap, since it's nice place for a tattoo.
But at the same time, I've never seen one in person that gave off a "classy" vibe...
What do you think?
Nope- don't see anything here about class not having tatoos. So I guess class is dependent on your actions/character. Classy people therefore have classy tattoos.0 -
<
is my tramp stamp trashy? :huh:0 -
it could be that phrase "tramp stamp" affecting my opinion here..but the only way i'd get a tattoo on my lower back is if it were smaller and to one side. i'm not a fan of anything that is centered, spans the whole back, or is symmetrical on either side.
like so:0 -
<
is my tramp stamp trashy? :huh:0 -
This is one of my favorites0
-
<
is my tramp stamp trashy? :huh:
oh man,now with this new info i'm going to have to sell the house and move into a trailer,possibly buy some american flags and more beer. all of that should be pretty simple but the mullet growing might be tough :laugh:0 -
This is one of my favorites
oh wow. there are just no words.... :noway:0 -
I hear this rationalization all the time, and disagree with it. People get tattoos for other people, not themselves. It's like saying you wear makeup for yourself. Say I like Superman; I know I like Superman, but I get the tattoo so that others know it too. It is an outward expression. One does not express oneself to oneself, they express themselves to others. It's a really cheap and shallow form of expression in my opinion, too. I would never reduce myself to expressing myself through designs painted on my body. End rant.
Go take your judgement and backwards thinking elsewhere.
So you need to put some design on your body to remember all this? You aren't capable of remembering this without it? The tattoo is totally superfluous. Tattoos are outward eccentricity compensating for inner mediocrity.
"“My crown is in my heart, not on my head; not decked with diamonds and Indian stones, nor to be seen: my crown is called content, a crown it is that seldom kings enjoy.”
My content is not on my skin. It isn't related to my appearance.0 -
I hear this rationalization all the time, and disagree with it. People get tattoos for other people, not themselves. It's like saying you wear makeup for yourself. Say I like Superman; I know I like Superman, but I get the tattoo so that others know it too. It is an outward expression. One does not express oneself to oneself, they express themselves to others. It's a really cheap and shallow form of expression in my opinion, too. I would never reduce myself to expressing myself through designs painted on my body. End rant.
Go take your judgement and backwards thinking elsewhere.
So you need to put some design on your body to remember all this? You aren't capable of remembering this without it? The tattoo is totally superfluous. Tattoos are outward eccentricity compensating for inner mediocrity.
"“My crown is in my heart, not on my head; not decked with diamonds and Indian stones, nor to be seen: my crown is called content, a crown it is that seldom kings enjoy.”
My content is not on my skin. It isn't related to my appearance.0 -
I hear this rationalization all the time, and disagree with it. People get tattoos for other people, not themselves. It's like saying you wear makeup for yourself. Say I like Superman; I know I like Superman, but I get the tattoo so that others know it too. It is an outward expression. One does not express oneself to oneself, they express themselves to others. It's a really cheap and shallow form of expression in my opinion, too. I would never reduce myself to expressing myself through designs painted on my body. End rant.
Go take your judgement and backwards thinking elsewhere.
So you need to put some design on your body to remember all this? You aren't capable of remembering this without it? The tattoo is totally superfluous. Tattoos are outward eccentricity compensating for inner mediocrity.
"“My crown is in my heart, not on my head; not decked with diamonds and Indian stones, nor to be seen: my crown is called content, a crown it is that seldom kings enjoy.”
My content is not on my skin. It isn't related to my appearance.
Do you need photos to remember your wedding? Postcards to remember your vacation? A diploma to commemorate your education? Memorializing or symbolizing an event, person, or sentiment with body art is just an extension of that.
If you don't like tattoos, don't get one.0 -
I don't know why, but I am always amazed at how people get so offended and need to attack when they have a differing opinion. I think that people who have tattoos are doing their own thing. The same way I am doing my own thing by not having any tattoos. I have been harshly criticized for being with no ink. I know some very productive, intelligent, trustworthy people with tattoos. Tattoos do not make a person a sub-standard human being. However, they look terrible. I suppose I should get into the habit of adding a mile of fine print to every comment so as not to offend the thin skinned folks in the world. :laugh:
Can you tell us exactly what the circumstances were that you happened to be "harshly criticized for being with no ink"?0 -
So you need to put some design on your body to remember all this? You aren't capable of remembering this without it? The tattoo is totally superfluous. Tattoos are outward eccentricity compensating for inner mediocrity.
"“My crown is in my heart, not on my head; not decked with diamonds and Indian stones, nor to be seen: my crown is called content, a crown it is that seldom kings enjoy.”
My content is not on my skin. It isn't related to my appearance.
Wow. You're kind of a jerk. If you don't like tattoos, just don't get one.
Edited to add: Saying someone has "inner mediocrity" based solely on the fact that they have a tattoo is what makes you a jerk, not the fact that you happen not to agree with people having them.0 -
I hear this rationalization all the time, and disagree with it. People get tattoos for other people, not themselves. It's like saying you wear makeup for yourself. Say I like Superman; I know I like Superman, but I get the tattoo so that others know it too. It is an outward expression. One does not express oneself to oneself, they express themselves to others. It's a really cheap and shallow form of expression in my opinion, too. I would never reduce myself to expressing myself through designs painted on my body. End rant.
Go take your judgement and backwards thinking elsewhere.
So you need to put some design on your body to remember all this? You aren't capable of remembering this without it? The tattoo is totally superfluous. Tattoos are outward eccentricity compensating for inner mediocrity.
"“My crown is in my heart, not on my head; not decked with diamonds and Indian stones, nor to be seen: my crown is called content, a crown it is that seldom kings enjoy.”
My content is not on my skin. It isn't related to my appearance.0 -
I hear this rationalization all the time, and disagree with it. People get tattoos for other people, not themselves. It's like saying you wear makeup for yourself. Say I like Superman; I know I like Superman, but I get the tattoo so that others know it too. It is an outward expression. One does not express oneself to oneself, they express themselves to others. It's a really cheap and shallow form of expression in my opinion, too. I would never reduce myself to expressing myself through designs painted on my body. End rant.
Go take your judgement and backwards thinking elsewhere.
So you need to put some design on your body to remember all this? You aren't capable of remembering this without it? The tattoo is totally superfluous. Tattoos are outward eccentricity compensating for inner mediocrity.
"“My crown is in my heart, not on my head; not decked with diamonds and Indian stones, nor to be seen: my crown is called content, a crown it is that seldom kings enjoy.”
My content is not on my skin. It isn't related to my appearance.0 -
it could be that phrase "tramp stamp" affecting my opinion here..but the only way i'd get a tattoo on my lower back is if it were smaller and to one side. i'm not a fan of anything that is centered, spans the whole back, or is symmetrical on either side.
like so:
Honey, that is really cute!0 -
This is one of my favorites
Umm well that is definately not "classy" :noway:0 -
<
is my tramp stamp trashy? :huh:
You look awesome. Love your design.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 392K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.8K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.7K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 400 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.8K Motivation and Support
- 7.9K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.4K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 990 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.4K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions