1200, and why it won't work

Options
1101113151626

Replies

  • Kate964
    Kate964 Posts: 33 Member
    Options
    bump
  • heath5913
    Options
    very interesting post!
  • BigBigBertha
    BigBigBertha Posts: 208 Member
    Options
    Thanks for the interesting read!
  • gardendolly
    gardendolly Posts: 125 Member
    Options
    Bump
  • Rays_Wife
    Rays_Wife Posts: 1,173 Member
    Options
    I didn't read through the pages of replies, but I wanted to say this is an excellent post! Thank you for taking the time to explain all that and share your client's experience. In case anybody is wondering, this is well worth the read! I totally agree with you. Why start at the BARE minimum when you don't have to?
  • shorthand73
    shorthand73 Posts: 118 Member
    Options
    bump
  • jchrisman717
    jchrisman717 Posts: 780 Member
    Options
    Great post and makes a lot of sense. Would love to have a personal trainer be that involved in helping to understand the whole process. I'm still working on what works for me and what is not working is mostly my not being consistent with working out but may take you up on advice in the future.
  • slhall0822
    slhall0822 Posts: 128 Member
    Options
    Nice post. Bump to save :)
  • mschickiepoo
    mschickiepoo Posts: 91 Member
    Options
    bump to read later Thanks:flowerforyou:
  • kcallas88
    kcallas88 Posts: 192
    Options
    Thanks for posting. I ate at 1200 calories a day for months and didn't really feel that bad but felt off and didn't loose weight. I upped my calories to 1600 and the weight came right off.

    For al the people saying 1200 works for you, it doesn't. Find out the nutrients you are eating, and make sure you are getting enough nutrients in your diet. Chances are, with 1200 calories, you're lacking in areas. And although you may not feel it now, it'll have an effect. It sure did with me, and i finally had to have a doctor tell me to eat more because i was damaging my body. Its not worth it and I love not having to worry about calories excessively.
  • Babeskeez
    Babeskeez Posts: 606 Member
    Options
    I'm sure the original poster posted this with good intention, but it is medical advice and people should be seeing actual nutritionists and doctors. I don't understand why, when people post other medical questions in MFP, members are quick to urge them to get to a doctor. However, when calculating your daily nutritional needs, people are gobbling up the info of someone who, "obtained [a] NASM personal training certification, which was a breeze." What? That's as dull as merely following MFP's recommendations without question. This fellow took a thirty minute exam after a few months of studying. Most medical doctors only have mere hours of nutritional training and that's still significant compared to what he has. The mythical "Monica" could have had a thyroid disorder or, like I have, PCOS. These things alter your metabolisms so significantly that you need someone truly skilled in helping you find the right balance. You might even, as I have had to do, have to see internists as well.

    If you're obese and looking for answers here, please stop. No, don't start at 1200. Don't start at 3000. Don't start without tests for diabetes, PCOS, Insulin Resistance, etc. "Monica" was rather lucky in this scenario, but it's hardly a case study; if you are obese or morbidly obese, there is a chance underlying conditions are helping you stay that way. You're going to feel better having medical clearance anyway when you want to begin exercise. For example, he had a six week period of Monica not loosing. Eventually she did again. We don't know how her diet's composition change. Did she alter carbs/fats/etc? Did she begin drinking more water? Taking supplements? How many people think 1200 isn't working and push on for six weeks without result? Not many. Yes, Monica seems to have had a decent amount of will power and a load of blind faith, but she could have very well had the same stall and restart at 1200, 1400, 1600, or 2000 calories. There are just too many factors to consider. She could have had more plateaus than he could have accounted for; what then?

    Two things I find wrong about this kind of hostility:

    1. I am a bio major. went through 2 years of med school, took all the orgo, chem, biochem, and associated classes, before deciding that 8 more years of school would put me into too much debt. for all educational purposes, I'm a doctor.

    2. most doctors are contact of last resort. you don't see a doctor while you are gaining weight, you see them when you've gained too much weight that it threatens your health. most doctors will tell you to eat less. they have NO idea about the current studies and literature pertaining to human weight loss, performance nutrition, and optimal disease prevention....that is unless they keep up with peer reviewed studies. If they do...it's in the area of disease correction, instead of prevention. Although all doctors have fundamental knowledge of how to prevent disease, not all of them update their knowledge profiles bi monthly.

    3. I exist in some grey space, outside of personal trainers who charge money, and oustide of doctors who know nothing about being "beach-ready". I exist to help. If you have a problem with that, I suggest you take it elsewhere.

    Actually, as you pointed out, you are eight years of school away from being a doctor. A lot of stuff happens in eight years of education; I've learned that working on my own doctorate.

    Doctor's don't and shouldn't have to be a last resort. I don't even get where you're saying that people don't see doctors while they are gaining weight. If people aren't getting regular physicals there are a lot of health problems they could be overlooking aside from obesity. Encouraging them to use you as a substitute isn't helping anyone. I'm also not sure your critical thinking skills are up to par. I clearly already outlined that people should see specialists in nutrition and internal medicine. I said myself that most doctors undergo only hours of nutritional training--but still they are more licensed and trained than you. That's a fact. Certainly a nutritionist would put you to shame.

    And finally, you did not seriously just champion yourself for your knowledge of "beach ready" bodies? Yeah, I don't think a lot of doctors are marketing that...you know...because a beach ready body isn't the main indicator of health.

    If you can't see the informative nature of my original response, where I even gave you the courtesy of saying you had good intentions, you're really off. This is a forum; it's a place of discussion. You have no need to be threatened. You seriously don't want obese and morbidly obese people to have a reminder to seek medical help, to find out if they have any underlying medical problems before jumping in to a diet? That's just negligence.

    First of all a "nutritionist" is just a glorified personal trainer. They, at best retain the knowledge of their textbooks, with some or little further following of the continued science in the field. And admittedly that's enough to address 99% of the issues we are facing in this overweight culture.

    So, no. A nutritionist will never put me to shame. They can only tell me what substrate metabolism aught to do. They will never be able to cater it to specific cases. They cannot cater profiles according to nutrient partitioning. They will not grant ideas on acetyle-COA pathways given substrate quality. Any undergrad bio major destroys all nutritionists by a mile. Once you cut into the cadavers in M2? Well you get the idea.

    The original post was to alert people to the danger of eating 1200 calories a day. You recommend to consult a doctor based on my more MODEST, and SAFE recommendation of finding a better baseline? Absurd. Most doctors will tell you that eating 1200 calories a day is insane.

    So...was it just a ploy to undermine my understanding of the subject, or did I really strike a personal chord? If so, I apologize, and let that be that.

    I am going to agree with the OP here.

    Just because a doctor is well...a doctor, it doesnt mean he knows about nutrition. GP's are just that. They know a general form of everything but not a whole lot of everything. I use this as an example since its close to my heart.

    With both my kids I chose a midwife (a lay midwife with my 2nd born at home). I would never chose an OBGYN or GP for a few reasons. One being, they don't specialize in childbirth and two, they *generally* dont see childbirth as a natural process but rather the female body as a machine that they can control. The amount of inductions are astronomical. It is ridiculous.

    So while you sit here and tout that we should not be talking to a personal trainer because he is not a Dr. is ridiculous. He specializes in the body, he knows how fat burning works, he knows how our bodies respond to eating. Why would I go to a Dr who most likely has no real grasp on how that works?
  • 000WhiteRose000
    000WhiteRose000 Posts: 266 Member
    Options
    I think the problem is what happens when you are not 300 pounds but 140 pounds and want to lose 4 pounds.
  • maaky3
    maaky3 Posts: 7 Member
    Options
    good explanation thanks!
  • hardymommy123
    hardymommy123 Posts: 32 Member
    Options
    I AGREE ONE BILLION PERCENT. I was one of those 1200 cal girls. Then I was an 1100 cal girl. Then a 1000. Talk about being miserable. And the second I broke down and started eating what I should....I gained 30 pounds in 3 months. I don't know if I will ever get my metabolism back to normal. 1400-1500 is my friend.

    Thanks for this post. One of the best I have read on here.
  • aelunyu
    aelunyu Posts: 486 Member
    Options
    Thanks guys...and I do understand the critical stances out there. Let it be said that if 1200 is working for you, and you've found it to be easy to follow, your results are measurable and sustainable, there's nothing that the original post can do for you. The ideas and experiences in it were indeed meant to empower those of you confused or frustrated in finding other avenues to achieve your weight loss goals.
  • dkward11
    dkward11 Posts: 11 Member
    Options
    I want to say I bet it would help to know where you're coming from. In the example of Monica she determined that she ate 3000-3300 calories a day before tracking and cutting and that 50% of those calories were fat. That's a huge advantage.

    My problem is that I smoked and drank pepsi literally from the moment I woke up until the time I went to bed. The only meal I ate was dinner and this was consistent for YEARS! Yes, I'm ashamed of this :( but what can you do except change.

    I quit smoking about 6 months ago and gained 20 pounds. I've been working on building new habits. I do an hour of step aerobics in the morning and burn about 210 calories according to wii fit.. lol! In the afternoon I walk for an hour on the treadmill at about 3.5 mph. I'm short, so anything faster and I would be running, but I am unable to run for long periods of time. MFP has me at 1330 calories and normally I don't exceed that when the exercise is included. I have been at this for two weeks and I have not lost a single pound. I'm depressed and frustrated and find that everything is just confusing!

    Not sure where to go from here. I feel like just going to bed!
  • aelunyu
    aelunyu Posts: 486 Member
    Options
    I want to say I bet it would help to know where you're coming from. In the example of Monica she determined that she ate 3000-3300 calories a day before tracking and cutting and that 50% of those calories were fat. That's a huge advantage.

    My problem is that I smoked and drank pepsi literally from the moment I woke up until the time I went to bed. The only meal I ate was dinner and this was consistent for YEARS! Yes, I'm ashamed of this :( but what can you do except change.

    I quit smoking about 6 months ago and gained 20 pounds. I've been working on building new habits. I do an hour of step aerobics in the morning and burn about 210 calories according to wii fit.. lol! In the afternoon I walk for an hour on the treadmill at about 3.5 mph. I'm short, so anything faster and I would be running, but I am unable to run for long periods of time. MFP has me at 1330 calories and normally I don't exceed that when the exercise is included. I have been at this for two weeks and I have not lost a single pound. I'm depressed and frustrated and find that everything is just confusing!

    Not sure where to go from here. I feel like just going to bed!

    Don't give up. When you quit smoking alot of crazy things happen in your body. The nicotine itself is a mild stimulant. I've read estimates ranging from 200-400 calories burned (depending on how heavy a smoker you are). The lungs have to work harder at rest to process the smoke, that burns even more calories. Lastly, smoking is an excellent appetite killer...you all those three things together and you will gain weight. I quit smoking when I was 24, after 7 years of smoking, and experienced much of the same thing...except i also had terrible nightmares and couldn't sleep, even a year later..which really destroyed my workout motivation.

    I don't have alot of experience with treadmill or generic calorie counting systems on cardio machines. But when I do do cardio indoors, I take whatever number the machine spits out, and subtract 100 from it. If it says I burned 500, i tell myself I only burned 400. I do the same thing with my food. If you look at my daily quotas, you'll notice I'm always 10 or so grams short on fats. I assume the cook or whoever made my food got heavy handed with the oil. If you are not getting the results you want, there are variables in your calculations that are either wrong, or you are overlooking. In your case, calories burned, perhaps may be high based on machine estimates. The effects of quitting smoking may still be with you and slowing your metabolism. Continue your course for 5-6 weeks. Do not get discouraged. 2 weeks is really not enough time to send a message to the body that it needs to start changing. Good luck!
  • kitka82
    kitka82 Posts: 350 Member
    Options
    Great information. I'm on the second leg of my weight loss journey. I went from 224 to 164 in a year with a moderate caloric deficit. I maintained 162-170 for about 2 years, and now I'm trying to get from 169 to 145 (I am 5'7").

    I feel like I'm starting over, and very confused about calories. I work out 3-5 times a week, strength training 2x a week and doing a good bit of cardio. I can't figure out how much I should be eating. Honestly, my calories are set according to MFP's guidelines to lose 2# a week. So my net is 1200, and I eat my exercise calories. I eat clean, 4-5 meals a day. No starch in my last 2 meals (except last night I had 1/4 cup of mashed potatoes). But I feel weak and crabby.
  • tjk71
    tjk71 Posts: 167
    Options
    bump
  • Iloveeyore78
    Iloveeyore78 Posts: 75 Member
    Options
    Incredible article!!! Thank you for sharing! :)