when did boycotting cardio become the cool thing to do?

Options
1101113151619

Replies

  • pcastagner
    pcastagner Posts: 1,606 Member
    Options
    You people are arguing which type of exercise YOU do, and which YOU think is best. To answer the OP questions, the reason people "boycott" cardio is because there is ZERO benefit that is exclusive to cardio. Any benefit that cardio offers, resistance training offers, and more.

    Runners are going to run, and lifters are going to lift. For the people that want to look/feel good, in the shortest amount of time, there is no reason to do cardio.

    And for people into more than just looking pretty, it's essential.
    Well no, not really.
    Yeah, I can see you disprove my point, so I take it back.
    Does a powerlifter need cardio to excel at their sport?

    No. What's your point?
  • Breezy3
    Breezy3 Posts: 52 Member
    Options
    I think cardio is important unless you are doing mega, consistent lifting. Better something thank nothing.

    I am just doing cardio now but plan to add lifting to my exercise routine. Can't afford a gym... maybe do some lifting cans, etc. Any ideas?
  • pcastagner
    pcastagner Posts: 1,606 Member
    Options
    You people are arguing which type of exercise YOU do, and which YOU think is best. To answer the OP questions, the reason people "boycott" cardio is because there is ZERO benefit that is exclusive to cardio. Any benefit that cardio offers, resistance training offers, and more.

    Runners are going to run, and lifters are going to lift. For the people that want to look/feel good, in the shortest amount of time, there is no reason to do cardio.

    And for people into more than just looking pretty, it's essential.

    Once you can offer me one benefit of steady cardio, that resistance training doesn't offer, I'll consider your argument.

    I already did. Rhythm was high on the list for skipping rope. Helps me in my job.

    And if "eye of the tiger" didn't convince you, you are lost and I can't help.

    Seriously though. Unless you are juicing, body part splits are a waste of time, which leaves full body and upper/lower, push/pull kinda splits. Which leaves you with rest days. Which means not training every day. Which means not being as well conditioned, or half as good at coitus.



    I can't imagine life without both resistance training and cardio. It would be either overtraining or under training.
  • CoachDreesTraining
    CoachDreesTraining Posts: 223 Member
    Options
    You people are arguing which type of exercise YOU do, and which YOU think is best. To answer the OP questions, the reason people "boycott" cardio is because there is ZERO benefit that is exclusive to cardio. Any benefit that cardio offers, resistance training offers, and more.

    Runners are going to run, and lifters are going to lift. For the people that want to look/feel good, in the shortest amount of time, there is no reason to do cardio.

    The only problem with that little theory is that I like to run races, I train for the races as well as to stay fit and also burn the calories - all in that order.

    Lifting weights and doing no cardio wouldn't do me any good, because when it came to me wanting to run my 10k race later on in the year, I wouldn't do very well now, would I.

    Running is simply a learned skill. Any physiological adaptions to improve endurance can be accomplished through resistance training.

    G2G get swole!!! We can continue the debate later.
  • CoachDreesTraining
    CoachDreesTraining Posts: 223 Member
    Options
    You people are arguing which type of exercise YOU do, and which YOU think is best. To answer the OP questions, the reason people "boycott" cardio is because there is ZERO benefit that is exclusive to cardio. Any benefit that cardio offers, resistance training offers, and more.

    Runners are going to run, and lifters are going to lift. For the people that want to look/feel good, in the shortest amount of time, there is no reason to do cardio.

    And for people into more than just looking pretty, it's essential.

    Once you can offer me one benefit of steady cardio, that resistance training doesn't offer, I'll consider your argument.

    I already did. Rhythm was high on the list for skipping rope. Helps me in my job.

    And if "eye of the tiger" didn't convince you, you are lost and I can't help.

    Seriously though. Unless you are juicing, body part splits are a waste of time, which leaves full body and upper/lower, push/pull kinda splits. Which leaves you with rest days. Which means not training every day. Which means not being as well conditioned, or half as good at coitus.



    I can't imagine life without both resistance training and cardio. It would be either overtraining or under training.

    I'm not sure what you consider rhythm, but if you're referring to the body's ability to rapidly relax antagonist muscles, then that is best accomplished through olympic lifting, plyometrics, speed squats, etc.
  • pcastagner
    pcastagner Posts: 1,606 Member
    Options
    You people are arguing which type of exercise YOU do, and which YOU think is best. To answer the OP questions, the reason people "boycott" cardio is because there is ZERO benefit that is exclusive to cardio. Any benefit that cardio offers, resistance training offers, and more.

    Runners are going to run, and lifters are going to lift. For the people that want to look/feel good, in the shortest amount of time, there is no reason to do cardio.

    The only problem with that little theory is that I like to run races, I train for the races as well as to stay fit and also burn the calories - all in that order.

    Lifting weights and doing no cardio wouldn't do me any good, because when it came to me wanting to run my 10k race later on in the year, I wouldn't do very well now, would I.

    Running is simply a learned skill. Any physiological adaptions to improve endurance can be accomplished through resistance training.

    G2G get swole!!! We can continue the debate later.

    Get a speed rope and let us know how you do. If you can keep up, you win and I'll gladly eat humble pie.


    Eye of the tiger man. There's a difference between a fighter who can make it to the last round and one who drops his hands, and it ain't lifting.
  • GnomeLove
    GnomeLove Posts: 379
    Options
    I love cardio!!! Helps with....endurance....if you know what I mean.
  • jwdieter
    jwdieter Posts: 2,582 Member
    Options
    Running is simply a learned skill. Any physiological adaptions to improve endurance can be accomplished through resistance training.

    Resistance training as a substitute to running while training for endurance running is beyond absurd.
  • pcastagner
    pcastagner Posts: 1,606 Member
    Options
    I love cardio!!! Helps with....endurance....if you know what I mean.

    Yeah, but power lifters are more efficient and powerful about it. They don't need cardio, but you might need batteries.

    Lol.
  • ironanimal
    ironanimal Posts: 5,922 Member
    Options
    You people are arguing which type of exercise YOU do, and which YOU think is best. To answer the OP questions, the reason people "boycott" cardio is because there is ZERO benefit that is exclusive to cardio. Any benefit that cardio offers, resistance training offers, and more.

    Runners are going to run, and lifters are going to lift. For the people that want to look/feel good, in the shortest amount of time, there is no reason to do cardio.

    And for people into more than just looking pretty, it's essential.
    Well no, not really.
    Yeah, I can see you disprove my point, so I take it back.
    Does a powerlifter need cardio to excel at their sport?

    No. What's your point?
    I think they're looking for more than pretty :)
  • pcastagner
    pcastagner Posts: 1,606 Member
    Options
    You people are arguing which type of exercise YOU do, and which YOU think is best. To answer the OP questions, the reason people "boycott" cardio is because there is ZERO benefit that is exclusive to cardio. Any benefit that cardio offers, resistance training offers, and more.

    Runners are going to run, and lifters are going to lift. For the people that want to look/feel good, in the shortest amount of time, there is no reason to do cardio.

    And for people into more than just looking pretty, it's essential.
    Well no, not really.
    Yeah, I can see you disprove my point, so I take it back.
    Does a powerlifter need cardio to excel at their sport?

    No. What's your point?
    I think they're looking for more than pretty :)

    Oh great, now we have some false equivalence to go with the false dilemma.


    If you are an elite powerlifter, and really have no time to spare for cardio, skip it then.


    Specialists... Specialize.


    Funny how you quote the statement to which I responded, then proceed to take my point out of context for your pointless exercise.
  • pcastagner
    pcastagner Posts: 1,606 Member
    Options
    You people are arguing which type of exercise YOU do, and which YOU think is best. To answer the OP questions, the reason people "boycott" cardio is because there is ZERO benefit that is exclusive to cardio. Any benefit that cardio offers, resistance training offers, and more.

    Runners are going to run, and lifters are going to lift. For the people that want to look/feel good, in the shortest amount of time, there is no reason to do cardio.

    And for people into more than just looking pretty, it's essential.

    Once you can offer me one benefit of steady cardio, that resistance training doesn't offer, I'll consider your argument.

    I already did. Rhythm was high on the list for skipping rope. Helps me in my job.

    And if "eye of the tiger" didn't convince you, you are lost and I can't help.

    Seriously though. Unless you are juicing, body part splits are a waste of time, which leaves full body and upper/lower, push/pull kinda splits. Which leaves you with rest days. Which means not training every day. Which means not being as well conditioned, or half as good at coitus.



    I can't imagine life without both resistance training and cardio. It would be either overtraining or under training.

    I'm not sure what you consider rhythm, but if you're referring to the body's ability to rapidly relax antagonist muscles, then that is best accomplished through olympic lifting, plyometrics, speed squats, etc.


    That's not rhythm. Rhythm is about timing along with what you just said. Did the rope hit your feet? You got no rhythm.


    Get a speed rope and challenge yourself. And get your head out of your *kitten*. Life is not divided into mutually exclusive goals all the time. Do your lifts and do your cardio. You won't regret being well rounded and the one wil only help the other if you do them right.
  • ironanimal
    ironanimal Posts: 5,922 Member
    Options
    Hah, you're funny.

    Sorry you falsely implied that the only reason to skip cardio would be to look pretty.

    My bad.
  • Joniboloney
    Joniboloney Posts: 127 Member
    Options
    Everyone should lift or otherwise do some sort of resistance training as well as cardio...most people I know who are at all into fitness do both because they understand that having an all around good level of fitness requires both.

    ^ This.

    The cardio bashing on this site has gotten a bit ridiculous, IMO.

    I also don't judge others by what exercises they choose to do. Unless it's washing the dishes, cooking, or vacuuming. Sorry, but that ain't exercise.

    NADw97D.gif

    This!
  • Azdak
    Azdak Posts: 8,281 Member
    Options
    Can anyone offer one benefit of cardio that resistance training doesn't offer?...besides being better at running, that is.

    I think you have to define your terms. I see the words "circulation" and "heart rate" and "fitness", "lifting weights", etc used indiscriminately in this discussion, so it is difficult to provide direct answers.

    For comparison purposes, for starters, I would focus on VO2 max as a definition of aerobic fitness and traditional weight lifting (i.e. reps and sets) as comparison points.

    And I am also referring to people who have been exercising for awhile, not newbie adaptations.

    Here are some some things I know and have found:

    In a story entitled "What are the advantages of Olympic Lifting?" I found this statement:
    First, the most surprising aspect of Olympic Lifting is its effect on the cardiovascular system. A few years ago, Doctor Michael Stone studied the cardiovascular benefits of Olympic Lifting. He was shocked to find the improvements made by this form of training.

    OK, so far so good. Olympic Lifting is not a big interest of mine, so I am open to learning new things. I noted that Dr Stone is a respected strength coach so he seems to have some credibility. Unfortunately, while attempting to get more detail or references to actual studies, all I could come up with was the same quote (and, in fact the entire article containing the quote) plagiarized and reprinted verbatim on 50 or 60 different web sites. With limited time to search, I gave up trying to find out more about Dr Stone's shocking discovery.

    If there are any links to actual data, I would be interested in looking at them. In my experience, weight lifters are desperate for social acclamation of the "superiority" of their sport, so they tend to exaggerate the cardio benefits. But that doesn't mean there aren't any, so I am curious to read anything factual.

    I have also seen two other areas of possible confusion. One is the relationship between heart rate and exercise. I did a quick little search on "cardiovascular benefits of weight lifting" and came up with a list of forum answers that illustrate my point. In response to the question, the overwhelming response was "YES!!", mostly from a bunch of NASM "Elite Trainers". The typical response read like this:
    Yes, definitely! The heart’s job is to pump oxygen, nutrients, and energy to our working muscles via the blood, regardless of the type of activity. With that said any activity that increases your breathing rate and requires the heart to pump and circulate more blood, such as weight lifting, will provide benefits similar to those from cardio training.

    OK--well this is just flat out wrong (and confirms everything I have ever thought about NASM training). As I have pointed out numerous times before, the elevated heart rate that occurs with heavy resistance training and the heart rate response that occurs during aerobic training are driven by two completely different physiologic mechanisms. The elevated heart rate that occurs during aerobic exercise results in increased cardiac output and increased oxygen uptake. The elevated heart rate that occurs during heavy resistance training is not. It is a pressure load, not a volume load.

    So, if the claims of "cardiovascular benefits" of weight lifting are based on an observation of increased heart rate, that would be a false conclusion, a false interpretation of the evidence. So how do we tell? I'll get back to that shortly.

    The second area of confusion is the conflation of different types of resistance training as "weight training". Specifically I am referring to the inclusion of "circuit training" under the heading of "weight training" and the cardiovascular effects of circuit training used to support the claims of "cardiovascular benefits" from weight training.

    Well, no.

    Circuit training is not "weight training" per se. Circuit training is "tain't training"---tain't weight lifting and tain't cardio. If you do traditional circuit training--i.e. alternating lifting sets with cardio intervals--then it's pretty obvious where the cardio benefits are coming from. If you do a circuit consisting of plyo exercises, kettlebell swings, etc, well that's not really "weight lifting" either. Just because you are not doing a traditional cardio movement --running, cycling, etc--doesn't mean you "aren't doing cardio". All movements have a resistive component and an aerobic component and they are more or less inversely proportional. So the more cardio effect a movement has, the less resistive effect, and vice versa. So anyone who is doing crossfit or metabolic circuits and saying "there is no reason to do cardio"--well, guess what: you are doing cardio.

    So back to: how do we test that a weight lifting routine actually has a cardio training effect? It's pretty simple: do a VO2 max pre-test, lift some weights for awhile, do a VO2 max post test.

    And what do we find?

    I work for a living so I didn't have time to do an exhaustive literature search for this purpose. However I invested a few minutes in a PubMed search on the topic "resistance training VO2 max" and here is what I got. Not complete by any means, but certainly consistent with all the other research I have read over the past decades. (Note: I am not going to cite the specific titles--it's easy enough to go to pubmed and type in the same search term I used if anyone wants more detail).

    1. "The effects of strength training on some parameters of aerobic and anaerobic endurance".
    11 young men, 12 weeks of "Olympic lifts" training. Results: 2.7% increase in VO2 max, no improvement in running performance at threshold.

    2. "Cardiopulmonary responses during high intensity weight training in male handball players" (note: European handball)
    The training consisted of 4 exercises (squat, bench press, lat pull, and neck press), each performed for ten repetitions at an intensity of 80% of one repetition maximum over a 30-seconds period with a 1:4 work/test ratio.
    RESULTS: During weight training, the VO2 ranged from 0.8 +/- 0.2 l x min(-1) to 2.4 +/- 0.4 l x min(-1). The lowest values were measured during load, while peak values were reached 40 to 70 seconds after load. Mean (+/- SE) VO2 was 1.22 +/- 0.05 l x min(-1), or 26.5% of the treadmill-determined VO2(max). Mean (+/- SE) HR was 117 +/- 4 beats x min(-1), or 61% of the treadmill-determined HR(max).
    CONCLUSION:
    The findings in the present study indicate that high intensity weight training is not able to produce adaptive improvement in cardiovascular function. The physiological responses measured during this experiment provide support to previous studies, that the lack of cardiovascular adaptation may be due to the low percentage of VO2(max)elicited by this form of training.

    (My Note: Two things: 1) VO2 during lifting was only 26.5% of VO2 max. 2) Mean HR was 61% of HRmax but VO2 was only 26.5% of VO2 max. This disconnect between the HR/VO2 relationship is why heart rate (and HRMs) cannot be used as a valid estimate of aerobic effect during weight training).

    3. "The effects of aerobic and resistance exercises in obese women"
    60 obese women assigned (20 each) to resistance group, aerobic group, control group. 12 weeks of training.
    RESULTS: VO2max increased in aerobic group only.
    CONCLUSION: aerobic exercise appeared to be beneficial with regard to improving depressive symptoms and maximum oxygen consumption, resistance exercise was beneficial in increasing muscle strength.

    (My Note: in all fairness, the increase in VO2max, while statistically significant, was minescule)

    4. "Physiological changes with periodized resistance training in women tennis players"
    The study was looking at the difference between a periodized and non-periodized resistance training program, but they did test for VO2max.
    RESULTS: Percent body fat and VO2(max) decreased significantly in the P and NV groups after training. (oops)

    (My Note: no details given in the abstract as to the structure of the resistance training program).

    At that point, I gave up.

    But as you can see, even in this brief summary, resistance training went 0 for 4. (unless someone wants to claim that 2.7% increase).

    Those research results are consistent with what I have seen in the past.

    A 2011 study by Christopher Scott of the aerobic, anerobic, and EPOC components of total energy expenditure during a bench press performed at 90% of 1RM showed that the aerobic component during the exercise was only 11% of total energy expenditure.

    Other studies have shown that VO2 during heavy squats at 2-4RM was equivalent to a moderate walk --3 or 4 METs.

    Again, I am presenting this so that we have a common basis for discussion. If you are going to make the claims of "there is ZERO benefit that is exclusive to cardio", I would be interested in the scientific basis -- similar to what I have presented -- for those claims.

    And I'm not even saying you are wrong--like I said, I haven't read every research study ever published. But what you are saying doesn't jive with the wealth of the published literature. So I am curious to see if you have data that I haven't seen or if the incongruity is more due to an inconsistent definition of terms.

    And if there is more of an effect than I have cited, it's important to know the extent of the effect and the precise conditions under which it is elicited--i.e. what types of lifts, intensity levels, etc. For example, if there is this cardiovascular effect for Olympic lifts, what practical benefit does that have, considering that very few people can do Olympic lifts?
  • __Di__
    __Di__ Posts: 1,630 Member
    Options
    You people are arguing which type of exercise YOU do, and which YOU think is best. To answer the OP questions, the reason people "boycott" cardio is because there is ZERO benefit that is exclusive to cardio. Any benefit that cardio offers, resistance training offers, and more.

    Runners are going to run, and lifters are going to lift. For the people that want to look/feel good, in the shortest amount of time, there is no reason to do cardio.

    The only problem with that little theory is that I like to run races, I train for the races as well as to stay fit and also burn the calories - all in that order.

    Lifting weights and doing no cardio wouldn't do me any good, because when it came to me wanting to run my 10k race later on in the year, I wouldn't do very well now, would I.

    Running is simply a learned skill. Any physiological adaptions to improve endurance can be accomplished through resistance training.

    G2G get swole!!! We can continue the debate later.

    Not when I want to run long distances it doesn't.

    You don't do any running do you.

    Get swole? Why?
  • astronomicals
    astronomicals Posts: 1,537 Member
    Options
    ive noticed in social media outlets more and more people are bragging about not doing cardio

    example: http://statigr.am/p/426009128144813040_144762381

    what kind of message does this send?

    where is the humble explanation for this? its always some guy or girl posing with a "cardio is for wussies" message attached
    you couldnt pay me to look like that guy and that is no offense to him. im sure he works hard and i could be inspired by that.
    i dont understand the narrow minded view that we should all lift and get big muscles and skip cardio because weak people do it and you dont want to look weak do you? if youre a girl, you should be ripped and have a six pack. if youre a guy, you should look like an NFL linebacker. when did this become the standard? so i am wasting my time doing cardio even though i really enjoy it and ive experienced benefits from it? i am a hamster in a wheel now? im not a spartan of the gym? personally i would get more satisfaction completing the tour de france than deadlifting 1,001 lbs. but why is social media holding that against me now? im not athletic? im not alpha male?

    id really like serious discussion about this because literally everyday i see these anti cardio messages on instagram, twitter, facebook from men and women alike.

    just bothers me :frown: that really amazing looking, hard working people (because thats how i see them) would want the general public to fall into THEIR mold

    nobody should cut out cardio.... many should do less... you can stop upping the weight when your happy with your muscular build... u dont need to get hooooooge... at that point all u gotta do is maintain your lean mass by doing about 1/3 of the volume of lifting you had been doing (at the same weights)... if you just wanna do cardio, go ahead... its kinda silly though
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    Options
    well this thread took a turn towards the absurd and petty

    it was expected from the beginning..just roll with it...
  • Carolyn_79
    Carolyn_79 Posts: 935 Member
    Options
    The ONLY reason I do weights and strength training is to make my legs stronger to become a better runner. I couldn't care less about abs or big muscles. I run. I'm a runner. It's what I do.

    Make that two. I love running and I strength train to enhance my running performance!
  • pcastagner
    pcastagner Posts: 1,606 Member
    Options
    Hah, you're funny.

    Sorry you falsely implied that the only reason to skip cardio would be to look pretty.

    My bad.


    Don't apologise. You clearly have demonstrated that lifting only doesn't necessarily lead to an aesthetically pleasing result and I concede.