We don't know what constitutes a true paleo diet!

11314151719

Replies

  • _John_
    _John_ Posts: 8,646 Member


    in a similar vein, look into "nutritional stress", or how much effort your body has to put into digesting certain foods vs others, as this is a big part of the issue with gluten IMO

    not saying you said this, but i'm playing joe bloe igmo right now...

    so it's either too tough to digest or it's so easy it may as well be sugar...it can't be both...
  • SunofaBeach14
    SunofaBeach14 Posts: 4,899 Member
    Look on Dr. Oz.com. One of the shows either on Thursday or Friday of last week explained the true paleo diet and what type of eater must follow the two types of diet. Also they showed the foods that constitute each diet.
    Hope this helps. :)
    Linda1163zz99

    Oh lawzy... :noway:

    Yep. It's gone from mildly amusing to tin foil hat.
  • jenn26point2
    jenn26point2 Posts: 429 Member
    Lucky for me, I haven't been sick one time since switching to Paleo... so I have had no need for an antibiotic... but prior, I could have purchased stock and done very well in Z-pack commodities...

    My doctor friended me on facebook b/c we went from seeing each other every other month to once a year. We talk about running now instead of mental health complaints, sniffles and sneezes and countless aches and pains.

    Thank you REAL FOOD diet.

    REAL FOOD = Paleo with a different name. :wink: :flowerforyou:

    What were you eating before you switched to a Paleo Diet?

    The Standard American Diet... calories in vs calories out. Eating what I wanted as long as it fit within those all so important numbers...
  • cwsreddy
    cwsreddy Posts: 998 Member


    in a similar vein, look into "nutritional stress", or how much effort your body has to put into digesting certain foods vs others, as this is a big part of the issue with gluten IMO

    not saying you said this, but i'm playing joe bloe igmo right now...

    so it's either too tough to digest or it's so easy it may as well be sugar...it can't be both...

    do you think there's a difference between whole grain minimally processed wheat products and refined, heavily processed, enriched white bread?
  • jenn26point2
    jenn26point2 Posts: 429 Member
    This is exactly my understanding of Neandermagon's point. This is a great diet for people with sensitivities.

    It has NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING to do with what humans evolved to eat.

    If the proponents of the diet framed it in a way that highlighted the benefits of the diet (nutritionally balanced way to live with food sensitivities) and didn't try to apply it to everybody else "Human evolved to eat certain things," the diet would be great and very credible.

    But, the argument behind the food sensitivities is due to evolution -- that so many people are having these sensitivities now is because the diet has changed significantly -- whether in consumption of amount of grain products, content of such products (how many vegetables, fruits and grains have been engineered and aren't as nutritious as their ancestral or non-modified version), differences in omega 3-6 balance seen in grain-fed beef, etc. Now, if you don't think that's true, we'll just have to agree to disagree.

    absolutely. the FOOD of today is vastly different from the food of 50 years ago and our bodies haven't had a chance to catch up, thus higher levels of food sensitivities across the board.

    it's pretty simple stuff really.

    That is your assumption. Is there any actual evidence that "our bodies haven't had a chance to catch up", and to what, exactly?

    I mean, I could move from the USA to India and after a week or so, my body would be caught up to their food stuff.

    well first of all it would probably take longer than a week to get used to their water supply.

    but genetic modification has created a wheat grain that is hardier than the grain of 50 years ago so that it can withstand pests/pesticides/weather conditions better. yes it's great that it can create more abundant crops, but this hardiness makes it also more difficult to digest. as we saw with milk, it takes generations and generations of adaptation for lactase persistence to exist, and the same will be true with wheat. It will take generations for our bodies to be able to process it correctly and THAT'S why there's been a 400% increase in celiac disease over the last 50 years.

    And at the rate Monsanto is going with genetic modification of food crops, we'll never catch up.

    There is currently no GM wheat on the market.


    But is ANYONE going to tell me all the awful things that have happened to wheat by normal breeding methods in the past 50 years that makes it so toxic now?

    No GMO Wheat crop?? That's not what Oregon says: http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2021737989_gmowheatxml.html
  • DamePiglet
    DamePiglet Posts: 3,730 Member

    Apparently, it's your responsibility to prove their assertions.
    it's not any of our responsibility to provide proof for anything. this is a message board. it's an exchange of ideas. if anyone sees an idea they find intriguing they can research it all they want and decide what to think for themselves. This whole "prove it" mentality where anyone who makes a claim has to spend an hour pouring through websites to find the articles and studies they didn't think to bookmark when reading, JUST so that people won't flame them for posting an opinion is... just silly. lol

    Except when people try to pass opinion off as fact.
    Then it becomes just fear mongering.
    But you already know that.

    you keep using that word. i do not think it means what you think it means.

    You keep trying to be funny. I do not think you know how.
  • Linda1163zz99
    Linda1163zz99 Posts: 3 Member
    regardless of what you think of Dr. Oz, I researched the info and it is correct. I don't follow what I see or hear on his or any other talk show. But this is backed by medical research. Check it out.
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    Lucky for me, I haven't been sick one time since switching to Paleo... so I have had no need for an antibiotic... but prior, I could have purchased stock and done very well in Z-pack commodities...

    My doctor friended me on facebook b/c we went from seeing each other every other month to once a year. We talk about running now instead of mental health complaints, sniffles and sneezes and countless aches and pains.

    Thank you REAL FOOD diet.

    REAL FOOD = Paleo with a different name. :wink: :flowerforyou:

    What were you eating before you switched to a Paleo Diet?

    The Standard American Diet... calories in vs calories out. Eating what I wanted as long as it fit within those all so important numbers...

    Do you think your results would have been drastically different if you'd switched to a diet rich in natural foods without the restrictions? A diet that was rich in vegetables, fruits, lean meats, whole minimally processed grains, legumes and vegetable fats. If so, why?
  • _John_
    _John_ Posts: 8,646 Member


    in a similar vein, look into "nutritional stress", or how much effort your body has to put into digesting certain foods vs others, as this is a big part of the issue with gluten IMO

    not saying you said this, but i'm playing joe bloe igmo right now...

    so it's either too tough to digest or it's so easy it may as well be sugar...it can't be both...

    do you think there's a difference between whole grain minimally processed wheat products and refined, heavily processed, enriched white bread?

    of course I do, but I'm Joe Bloe Igmo right now...

    so this makes white breads a "just calories" food (actually better since they intentionally add a lot of nutrients back that have some research saying they are thus more bioavailable than the whole grain)?
  • likitisplit
    likitisplit Posts: 9,420 Member
    Why is it such a big deal that we try to eat like people did thousands of years ago, whose life expectancy was at best 30-40 years?

    That may be the average due to high infant mortality, accident, etc. But there is actually considerable evidence that some of our ancestors lived considerably longer -- well into their 70s --- just not on average for other reasons.

    But I don't remember where I read that, so I can't cite the book/study.

    BAM!

    http://www.unm.edu/~hkaplan/KaplanHillLancasterHurtado_2000_LHEvolution.pdf
  • DamePiglet
    DamePiglet Posts: 3,730 Member
    looks like this thread is gonna rolllllll!
  • lindsey1979
    lindsey1979 Posts: 2,395 Member
    Except when people try to pass opinion off as fact.
    Then it becomes just fear mongering.
    But you already know that.

    you keep using that word. i do not think it means what you think it means.

    You keep trying to be funny. I do not think you know how.

    People disagree with you = fear mongering? That's all I've seen, and the hyperbole and wholly been on your side of the fence.
  • lindsey1979
    lindsey1979 Posts: 2,395 Member
    Except when people try to pass opinion off as fact.
    Then it becomes just fear mongering.
    But you already know that.

    you keep using that word. i do not think it means what you think it means.

    You keep trying to be funny. I do not think you know how.

    People disagree with you = fear mongering? That's all I've seen, and the hyperbole has wholly been on your side of the fence.
  • cwsreddy
    cwsreddy Posts: 998 Member
    of course I do, but I'm Joe Bloe Igmo right now...

    so this makes white breads a "just calories" food (actually better since they intentionally add a lot of nutrients back that have some research saying they are thus more bioavailable than the whole grain)?

    yes actually. white bread IS more bioavailable than whole grain.
  • RockWarrior84
    RockWarrior84 Posts: 840 Member
    how is this topic still going? reddy and lindsey have not gained any ground and more people have joined in against it.

    :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
  • cwsreddy
    cwsreddy Posts: 998 Member
    how is this topic still going? reddy and lindsey have not gained any ground and more people have joined in against it.

    :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

    have they? I don't consider your contributions "joining" anything tbh.
  • FlaxMilk
    FlaxMilk Posts: 3,452 Member
    In because why not at this point?
  • richardheath
    richardheath Posts: 1,276 Member
    In for the roll!!!

    And to respond to this:
    in a similar vein, look into "nutritional stress", or how much effort your body has to put into digesting certain foods vs others, as this is a big part of the issue with gluten IMO

    Nutritional stress is the stress that chronic nutrient shortage has on people. i.e. starvation and subsistence living.

    Do you mean the thermic effect of food (TEF)?
  • RockWarrior84
    RockWarrior84 Posts: 840 Member
    how is this topic still going? reddy and lindsey have not gained any ground and more people have joined in against it.

    :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

    have they? I don't consider your contributions "joining" anything tbh.

    just the way I like since I am not trying to put out opinions as facts. Still waiting for some back up on your genetically modified meets aka the pink cow I mentioned before. And any back up about evolution that you were stating like 200 posts back.
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    in…for the roll, and because I find this entertaining...
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    how is this topic still going? reddy and lindsey have not gained any ground and more people have joined in against it.

    :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

    have they? I don't consider your contributions "joining" anything tbh.

    just the way I like since I am not trying to put out opinions as facts. Still waiting for some back up on your genetically modified meets aka the pink cow I mentioned before. And any back up about evolution that you were stating like 200 posts back.

    you did not find the marks daily apple website that Lindsey cited to be a credible source?
  • lindsey1979
    lindsey1979 Posts: 2,395 Member
    how is this topic still going? reddy and lindsey have not gained any ground and more people have joined in against it.

    :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

    have they? I don't consider your contributions "joining" anything tbh.

    just the way I like since I am not trying to put out opinions as facts. Still waiting for some back up on your genetically modified meets aka the pink cow I mentioned before. And any back up about evolution that you were stating like 200 posts back.

    you did not find the marks daily apple website that Lindsey cited to be a credible source?

    He does often cite underlying studies, and then you can read them for yourself.
  • RockWarrior84
    RockWarrior84 Posts: 840 Member
    how is this topic still going? reddy and lindsey have not gained any ground and more people have joined in against it.

    :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

    have they? I don't consider your contributions "joining" anything tbh.

    just the way I like since I am not trying to put out opinions as facts. Still waiting for some back up on your genetically modified meets aka the pink cow I mentioned before. And any back up about evolution that you were stating like 200 posts back.

    you did not find the marks daily apple website that Lindsey cited to be a credible source?

    Lindsey has posted some sources, Reddy has done no such thing.
  • lindsey1979
    lindsey1979 Posts: 2,395 Member
    how is this topic still going? reddy and lindsey have not gained any ground and more people have joined in against it.

    :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

    have they? I don't consider your contributions "joining" anything tbh.

    just the way I like since I am not trying to put out opinions as facts. Still waiting for some back up on your genetically modified meets aka the pink cow I mentioned before. And any back up about evolution that you were stating like 200 posts back.

    you did not find the marks daily apple website that Lindsey cited to be a credible source?

    Lindsey has posted some sources, Reddy has done no such thing.

    Do you guys have any desire to actually read any of the underlying sources or discuss the issues they present? Because so far, I haven't seen any of that, so I can understand Reddy's decision to not bother with such disingenuous requests.
  • DamePiglet
    DamePiglet Posts: 3,730 Member
    Except when people try to pass opinion off as fact.
    Then it becomes just fear mongering.
    But you already know that.

    you keep using that word. i do not think it means what you think it means.

    You keep trying to be funny. I do not think you know how.

    People disagree with you = fear mongering? That's all I've seen, and the hyperbole has wholly been on your side of the fence.

    Nope. I accuse people who spit out theories that foods are harmful but can't back those up with science of fear mongering.

    No hyperbole whatsoever.

    You definitly don't want my opinion of biologists who boast their credentials then quote blog posts as scientific evidence. You wouldn't like it.
  • lindsey1979
    lindsey1979 Posts: 2,395 Member
    People disagree with you = fear mongering? That's all I've seen, and the hyperbole has wholly been on your side of the fence.

    Nope. I accuse people who spit out theories that foods are harmful but can't back those up with science of fear mongering.

    No hyperbole whatsoever.

    You definitly don't want my opinion of biologists who boast their credentials then quote blog posts as scientific evidence. You wouldn't like it.

    Even if those blogs and books do a decent job of gathering and citing the underlying, supporting scientific studies? No, that wouldn't make sense at all. How terribly logical and convenient.

    So far, you've given me very little reason to value your opinion, so I don't really care what it is either way. And, my degrees will still be there despite your opinion of it.
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    how is this topic still going? reddy and lindsey have not gained any ground and more people have joined in against it.

    :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

    have they? I don't consider your contributions "joining" anything tbh.

    just the way I like since I am not trying to put out opinions as facts. Still waiting for some back up on your genetically modified meets aka the pink cow I mentioned before. And any back up about evolution that you were stating like 200 posts back.

    you did not find the marks daily apple website that Lindsey cited to be a credible source?

    Lindsey has posted some sources, Reddy has done no such thing.

    Do you guys have any desire to actually read any of the underlying sources or discuss the issues they present? Because so far, I haven't seen any of that, so I can understand Reddy's decision to not bother with such disingenuous requests.

    if you post the study, I will read it…I have nothing better to do as I am stuck home with strep throat…

    Oh ok, so it is totally legit to say that Paleo is backed by nutritional science ,but then when someone requests the study, that persons request must be "disingenuous"….hmmmm interesting …

    I could tell you I can change copper to gold, but you would probably want some proof of that, yes?
  • HappyStack
    HappyStack Posts: 802 Member
    What amuses me is the "health benefits" of a paleo diet.

    http://www.paleodietevolved.com/benefits-of-the-paleo-diet.html#.Uw0oP87-nt8

    This has to be my favourite...
    The paleo diet recognizes that the human body digests fructose differently than other carbs. It's this reason that the paleo diet suggests limiting and strategically choosing the perfect fruit for the job!

    Skip the banana and eat a kiwi instead!

    Unless you know what you're doing, limit yourself to 2-3 pieces of fruit per day... Max.
  • RockWarrior84
    RockWarrior84 Posts: 840 Member
    how is this topic still going? reddy and lindsey have not gained any ground and more people have joined in against it.

    :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

    have they? I don't consider your contributions "joining" anything tbh.

    just the way I like since I am not trying to put out opinions as facts. Still waiting for some back up on your genetically modified meets aka the pink cow I mentioned before. And any back up about evolution that you were stating like 200 posts back.

    you did not find the marks daily apple website that Lindsey cited to be a credible source?

    Lindsey has posted some sources, Reddy has done no such thing.

    Do you guys have any desire to actually read any of the underlying sources or discuss the issues they present? Because so far, I haven't seen any of that, so I can understand Reddy's decision to not bother with such disingenuous requests.

    if you post the study, I will read it…I have nothing better to do as I am stuck home with strep throat…

    Oh ok, so it is totally legit to say that Paleo is backed by nutritional science ,but then when someone requests the study, that persons request must be "disingenuous"….hmmmm interesting …

    I could tell you I can change copper to gold, but you would probably want some proof of that, yes?

    If actual credible source is posted that I can read and not have to go buy a text book then I will read it.