Paleo vs. Clean eating?

1246717

Replies

  • wamydia
    wamydia Posts: 259 Member
    If you're goal is just to eat food that you feel is healthier, I would suggest that you just do that and not worry about definitions or what food belongs to which diet plan. Just gradually start cutting back on the things that you feel aren't so healthy and start introducing more of the ones you think are. No need to dump out your pantry if what is in there has been working for you. Just gradually shift your eating habits a little away from the boxed and processed to the fresh and lean. And I really do believe that a gradual shift is best. Making a sudden leap to a whole new way of eating can derail people sometimes.
  • geebusuk
    geebusuk Posts: 3,348 Member
    Thanks for the reply.
    I stated that For the calories you consume I think there are plenty of MICRO nutrients missing - compared to more nutrient efficient alternatives.
    Well yes, if you're eating anything but a vitamin pill, that statement can be true for ANY food! :)

    The rest of your answer goes on about a McDonalds meal. I was specifically talking about the meat.

    Interesting that you don't know the difference, yet are a big proponent of it.

    Me, I like to UNDERSTAND before I decide on my choices. So I've done a little research.
    As it goes, it turns out grass-fed beef likely does offer some advantages. (Organic won't make any difference that I know.
    The biggest advertised is Omega-3. Unfortunately most of the information comes from places trying to push this product/lifestyle and so on and it's taken me a while to wade through. They go on about ratios, but crucially don't mention AMOUNTS.
    This author is obviously very much 'pro' the product, but takes a much more balanced view:
    http://grassbasedhealth.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/is-grass-fed-beef-really-rich-in-omega.html
    But promoting grass fed beef because of its n-6:n-3 ratio is, at best, misleading. Beef, regardless of how it is fed, in not a “rich” source of n-3 or n-6 fatty acids
    It MAY/probably offer higher levels of few other micronutrients, but from what I can tell not to a significant amount. Unfortunately my example does make it a little harder to compare as details for McDonalds burgers include the bun and so on, while I can separate out pure grass-fed-beef - so the percentages for nutrients in the fast food meat will naturally be lower as it's not all meat as it's listed per 100g of product.

    So, from what I can see, in reality it's pretty similar in anything that actually matters when considering total amounts per 100g.

    So, lets get back on to the MEAT. Not comparing a pile of varied steamed veg with some bread. I had copied and pasted my question yet again, but this time I've made the words 'meat' bold, so you can more easily see these meaty word.

    Do you believe the meat in a McDonalds burger has less micronutrients than the meat you eat? Now that I've done my research - I'll add the caveat - to a degree that matters.
    If you do, could you provide some backup to explain why you believe that.

    Next, if you have already had enough micronutrients of that kind, do you think that having more will be beneficial?
  • DamePiglet
    DamePiglet Posts: 3,730 Member
    Therefore by that reasoning everybody is on a restrictive diet.

    This morning I was going to have some eggs - but I chose not to (I was late for work and didn't have time to cook them).

    So today I am on an Egg restricted diet.

    Okay that makes sense - thanks for clearing that up.

    Do you understand the difference between "I didn't have eggs this morning" and "I do not eat eggs"?

    Seriously just stop being obtuse.

    I'm sorry but I do not think I am the one who is slow to understand.

    People calling certain diets restrictive (for everyone) are basing there assumptions on their own limitations.

    Most people happily enjoying the benefits of paleo/primal/clean eating - you name it, have moved beyond craving food they choose not to eat and no longer want to eat those types of food - therefore there not restricting anything from their diets.


    I'll say this once. Slowly, simply. I know it won't sink in. But the idiot in me has to try.

    If you CHOOSE... to not eat a certain food... as a part of your diet... you've RESTRICTED IT...from your diet.

    That's it. That's how language works. Now you may not like the word "restrict" so you want to use something else, but that's too bad. Because you don't get to decide what words mean based on your little feelings.

    Now I will take the good advice above and put you on ignore. Because everything I've read in your postings leads me to believe you're not very bright or effective at getting ideas across. Whatever your motive is behind debating on a calorie counting website the ineffectiveness of calorie counting...trust me.. you won't find many takers here. You're free to continue to waste your time. But I can do the smart thing and not read anymore of it.

    Also even your memes have terrible spelling.

    +1
    If I DID choose to eat Paleo/Primal, I would tell NO ONE on MFP for fear of avoid being associated with certain posters.
  • tennisdude2004
    tennisdude2004 Posts: 5,609 Member
    Therefore by that reasoning everybody is on a restrictive diet.

    This morning I was going to have some eggs - but I chose not to (I was late for work and didn't have time to cook them).

    So today I am on an Egg restricted diet.

    Okay that makes sense - thanks for clearing that up.

    Do you understand the difference between "I didn't have eggs this morning" and "I do not eat eggs"?

    Seriously just stop being obtuse.

    I'm sorry but I do not think I am the one who is slow to understand.

    People calling certain diets restrictive (for everyone) are basing there assumptions on their own limitations.

    Most people happily enjoying the benefits of paleo/primal/clean eating - you name it, have moved beyond craving food they choose not to eat and no longer want to eat those types of food - therefore there not restricting anything from their diets.


    If you CHOOSE... to not eat a certain food... as a part of your diet... you've RESTRICTED IT...from your diet.

    That's it. That's how language works. Now you may not like the word "restrict" so you want to use something else, but that's too bad. Because you don't get to decide what words mean based on your little feelings.

    Now I will take the good advice above and put you on ignore. Because everything I've read in your postings leads me to believe you're not very bright or effective at getting ideas across. Whatever your motive is behind debating on a calorie counting website the ineffectiveness of calorie counting...trust me.. you won't find many takers here. You're free to continue to waste your time. But I can do the smart thing and not read anymore of it.

    Also even your memes have terrible spelling.

    +1
    If I DID choose to eat Paleo/Primal, I would tell NO ONE on MFP for fear of avoid being associated with certain posters.

    3981213+_9fe8be737ffe0ea20f0b4329f45be6d9.jpg
  • jmv7117
    jmv7117 Posts: 891 Member
    So I've been reading up on Paleo.. it looks pretty interesting? Do any of you do Paleo? or Eat Clean.. Im having a little bit trouble finding the true definition of Eating Clean.. Correct me if I'm wrong.. does it mean no processed food... as in nothing coming from a box? or is it something else?

    I'm hesitant to jump on the band wagon since i have a lot of stuff in my pantry but I'm really fascinated by it. Can anyone of you give me some insight or share your experience how you started or transitioned in to Paleo or Eating Clean

    Thank you
    Happy

    Our friends' daughter and her family eat Paleo. Her kids are the same age as our grandkids. They eat Paleo while our grandkids eat like us, pretty much clean most of the time. Her kids are always sick! I honestly can't believe how often they are sick whereas our grandkids are seldom sick. As far as clean goes, we were eating that way before it became trendy and I hesitate to call it clean eating. We rely heavily on locally produced foods free of food additives and avoid artificial anything. We prefer home grown, organic and organic foods. We buy directly from food producers so very little of our food dollar is spent at a conventional grocery store. We do try to adhere to foods produced within a 100 mile radius of our home. Our meat is bought directly from the farmer. It is grass-fed and hormone free. A large portion of the fish we eat is locally caught. We preserve our own foods by drying, freezing and canning when in season to get us through the rest of the year. We very rarely eat fast food, about once a year. So, our diet is fairly clean. Again, this is how we have always been. It would likely be a big change for someone who relies heavily on the grocery store and processed foods though.

    I eat Primal (a more relaxed form of paleo) and the diet you have just described as you are eating is exactly how anyone eating Primal would (ideally) eat organic produce (grass feed steak), limited junk food. Meat with plenty of veggies is kind of a staple meal (minus grains).

    Is it possible there may be another cause for your friend grandkids getting sick - have you covered all of the bases in your investigation of their health or is your conclusion based on just the observation of their diet (which in the end may be quite similar to your own)?

    We are quite close with the parents and see her and the kids on a regular basis. I'm getting it right from the parents (the kids grandparents) and the kids (parents of the kids) themselves. I will note that their diet is radical in comparison to ours which leads me to suspect on the basis of comments, some of their recipes and observations that although they are eating Paleo, their version is very restrictive.
  • lindsey1979
    lindsey1979 Posts: 2,395 Member
    However, adding things you don't enjoy or limiting things that you do because of over-blown health promises...that's where you need to consider your goals and whether the change will get you there if the health promises don't pan out.

    What are the over-blown health promises?

    The only one I know of is that you *might* feel better. I found that to be true for me and many others. What are the other ones?
  • Acg67
    Acg67 Posts: 12,142 Member
    However, adding things you don't enjoy or limiting things that you do because of over-blown health promises...that's where you need to consider your goals and whether the change will get you there if the health promises don't pan out.

    What are the over-blown health promises?

    The only one I know of is that you *might* feel better. I found that to be true for me and many others. What are the other ones?

    "Do you want to lose fat and stay young, all while avoiding cancer, diabetes, heart disease, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's and a host of other illnesses? The Paleo Solution incorporates the latest, cutting edge research from genetics, biochemistry and anthropology to help you look, feel and perform your best"

    http://www.amazon.com/The-Paleo-Solution-Original-Human/dp/0982565844/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1394725601&sr=8-6&keywords=paleo+diet
  • da_bears10089
    da_bears10089 Posts: 1,791 Member
    Clean Eating is an undefinable phrase. To one person it's one thing, and to another person it's another thing.

    All things in moderation here.
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    Im having a little bit trouble finding the true definition of Eating Clean.. Correct me if I'm wrong.. does it mean no processed food... as in nothing coming from a box? or is it something else?

    Yeah, clean eating has lost any single definition. When I first heard of it a few decades ago it referred simply to eating whole natural foods. The closer a food was to its natural state, the cleaner it was.

    But now there sites that specify meal timing, macro breakdowns, eliminating certain food groups, etc., all in the name of clean eating. Things that really have nothing to do with whether the food is natural or not.
  • ldula88
    ldula88 Posts: 169 Member
    It's just a fad, it seems most people would rather brag about themselves being Paleo or "clean eaters" than anything. I guess they think it's a status symbol to uneducated unfit people but the rest of us just think they are pretentious and wasting their time.

    Calorie deficit and get all of your nutrients and you will be healthy and lose weight! You could even eat McDonald's!!!!! O.o

    I.C.E. Cream Official Tester
    IKEA Professional Put Together-er
    Kickboxing Class Attender
    Been in fitness for about 2 years and have studied kinesiology, nutrition and Dinosaurs

    Ummm... ouch? I don't brag about eating paleo, and I've never told anyone else that they were wrong for not eating the way I do. As I've said before, Paleo makes me feel great and is the easiest lifestyle for me to maintain, but it's not for everyone. Rather, I find people who insist that Paleos follow a "fad diet" are rather more pretentious. I plan to eat this way for life, it's by no means a fad or a gimmick for me.
  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,865 Member
    I'm having a little bit trouble finding the true definition of Eating Clean

    Because there really isn't one. IMHO, a diet that is balanced and is rich in nutrient dense whole foods is the way to go...that's what I do.

    Overwhelmingly, my diet is rich in nutrient dense whole foods and I get very solid nutrition...but I also enjoy pizza from time to time...one of my favorite places to grab a quick bite is the Urban Hotdog Company where I like to have a big, old fashioned polish topped with grilled onions and sauerkraut....sometimes I use a jar of marinara sauce instead of making my own (I mean I have a full time job, 2 kids, a house to manage, etc...I don't always have time to spend hours on my marinara).

    I could go on and on..and as far as "clean" goes, everyone is going to have some different threshold of allowance. As far as paleo goes, I just can't get behind something that actually demonizes certain whole foods that are good for you and most people don't have issues with...I mean I kinda sorta get the demonization of processed foods (though I think most people go overboard)...but actually demonizing nutrient dense whole foods pretty much turned me off to that diet...not to mention they're wild claims of pretty much curing whatever ails you. I most definitely believe in food and nutrition as "medicine"...but some claims are just outlandish.
  • lilacmeddow
    lilacmeddow Posts: 16 Member
    It's just a fad, it seems most people would rather brag about themselves being Paleo or "clean eaters" than anything. I guess they think it's a status symbol to uneducated unfit people but the rest of us just think they are pretentious and wasting their time.

    Calorie deficit and get all of your nutrients and you will be healthy and lose weight! You could even eat McDonald's!!!!! O.o

    I.C.E. Cream Official Tester
    IKEA Professional Put Together-er
    Kickboxing Class Attender
    Been in fitness for about 2 years and have studied kinesiology, nutrition and Dinosaurs

    Ummm... ouch? I don't brag about eating paleo, and I've never told anyone else that they were wrong for not eating the way I do. As I've said before, Paleo makes me feel great and is the easiest lifestyle for me to maintain, but it's not for everyone. Rather, I find people who insist that Paleos follow a "fad diet" are rather more pretentious. I plan to eat this way for life, it's by no means a fad or a gimmick for me.

    I agree. I don't think there is any one "set" diet that works for everyone. I eat mostly Paleo because I like the energy it gives me and it makes my skin look great. It even mellows out my psoriasis a bit which is nice.

    Eating paleo has been around for literally thousands of years...... which I think by definition makes it the polar opposite of a fad....

    LOL

    Anyways dieting is a custom made thing everyone's a little different. I'm digging the way I'm eating right now. I need to go full force with it though and really get the most out of it.
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    Eating paleo has been around for literally thousands of years...... which I think by definition makes it the polar opposite of a fad....

    Has it really?
  • lindsey1979
    lindsey1979 Posts: 2,395 Member
    However, adding things you don't enjoy or limiting things that you do because of over-blown health promises...that's where you need to consider your goals and whether the change will get you there if the health promises don't pan out.

    What are the over-blown health promises?

    The only one I know of is that you *might* feel better. I found that to be true for me and many others. What are the other ones?

    "Do you want to lose fat and stay young, all while avoiding cancer, diabetes, heart disease, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's and a host of other illnesses? The Paleo Solution incorporates the latest, cutting edge research from genetics, biochemistry and anthropology to help you look, feel and perform your best"

    http://www.amazon.com/The-Paleo-Solution-Original-Human/dp/0982565844/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1394725601&sr=8-6&keywords=paleo+diet

    I guess I'm just lucky that I never read such a book about it. I don't often believe marketing as I realize that they push the envelope or just downright lie to sell a product. But, on the contrary, some products do live up to their marketing (I do love my car). Though I imagine many diet books promise just that, so it wouldn't be very persuasive to me for those reasons alone. I was more swayed by people's personal experiences and then looking into some of the reasons supporting their experiences.
  • Holly_Roman_Empire
    Holly_Roman_Empire Posts: 4,440 Member
    Eating paleo has been around for literally thousands of years...... which I think by definition makes it the polar opposite of a fad....

    Has it really?

    I'm confused too. I'd like to know the history of it.
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,431 MFP Moderator
    Thanks for the reply.
    I stated that For the calories you consume I think there are plenty of MICRO nutrients missing - compared to more nutrient efficient alternatives.
    Well yes, if you're eating anything but a vitamin pill, that statement can be true for ANY food! :)

    The rest of your answer goes on about a McDonalds meal. I was specifically talking about the meat.

    Interesting that you don't know the difference, yet are a big proponent of it.

    Me, I like to UNDERSTAND before I decide on my choices. So I've done a little research.
    As it goes, it turns out grass-fed beef likely does offer some advantages. (Organic won't make any difference that I know.
    The biggest advertised is Omega-3. Unfortunately most of the information comes from places trying to push this product/lifestyle and so on and it's taken me a while to wade through. They go on about ratios, but crucially don't mention AMOUNTS.
    This author is obviously very much 'pro' the product, but takes a much more balanced view:
    http://grassbasedhealth.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/is-grass-fed-beef-really-rich-in-omega.html
    But promoting grass fed beef because of its n-6:n-3 ratio is, at best, misleading. Beef, regardless of how it is fed, in not a “rich” source of n-3 or n-6 fatty acids
    It MAY/probably offer higher levels of few other micronutrients, but from what I can tell not to a significant amount. Unfortunately my example does make it a little harder to compare as details for McDonalds burgers include the bun and so on, while I can separate out pure grass-fed-beef - so the percentages for nutrients in the fast food meat will naturally be lower as it's not all meat as it's listed per 100g of product.

    So, from what I can see, in reality it's pretty similar in anything that actually matters when considering total amounts per 100g.

    So, lets get back on to the MEAT. Not comparing a pile of varied steamed veg with some bread. I had copied and pasted my question yet again, but this time I've made the words 'meat' bold, so you can more easily see these meaty word.

    Do you believe the meat in a McDonalds burger has less micronutrients than the meat you eat? Now that I've done my research - I'll add the caveat - to a degree that matters.
    If you do, could you provide some backup to explain why you believe that.

    Next, if you have already had enough micronutrients of that kind, do you think that having more will be beneficial?

    I too have seen minor research that suggest a favorable Omega 3 ratio. That question is the legitimacy of the sources and how much research has really been done. Personally, i find it rather ludicrous when people say "XX" food is better than "YY"" because its more nutrient pack. The major issue with a claim is doesn't take into consideration of your whole diet. Ones diet is supposed to support their requirements (daily lifestyle/exercise/etc). At what time are we going to start to think holistic.
  • Ive been eating paleo-ish. I was on a 3 month plateau until I started that and have lost an average of 2 lb a week since. I dont like to call it paleo but it basically is. I dont seek out all organic or grassfed though. When I have a good streak of it it makes me feel great & I havent touched my huge bottle of pepto in weeks lol. I have a cheesburger & soda every saturday. Really keeps me motivated all week haha
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    Ive been eating paleo-ish. I was on a 3 month plateau until I started that and have lost an average of 2 lb a week since. I dont like to call it paleo but it basically is. I dont seek out all organic or grassfed though. When I have a good streak of it it makes me feel great & I havent touched my huge bottle of pepto in weeks lol. I have a cheesburger & soda every saturday. Really keeps me motivated all week haha

    No, that basically is not paleo at all.
  • geebusuk
    geebusuk Posts: 3,348 Member
    No, that basically is not paleo at all.
    Yep, if you really wanted to eat a 'paelo' diet, you'd follow what is described through here:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMOjVYgYaG8

    Oddly enough, all 'paelo' followers I've seen don't come close :).
  • Ive been eating paleo-ish. I was on a 3 month plateau until I started that and have lost an average of 2 lb a week since. I dont like to call it paleo but it basically is. I dont seek out all organic or grassfed though. When I have a good streak of it it makes me feel great & I havent touched my huge bottle of pepto in weeks lol. I have a cheesburger & soda every saturday. Really keeps me motivated all week haha

    No, that basically is not paleo at all.
    Thats why I said ish. & its a whole lot closer to paleo then other diets. & yes I follow the BASIC guidlines. Boo I guess im not paleo enough :'(
  • likitisplit
    likitisplit Posts: 9,420 Member
    Our very own Neandermagon also has a bunch of great insight into the actual requirements of a paleolithic lifestyle.

    http://cavepeopleandstuff.wordpress.com/
  • likitisplit
    likitisplit Posts: 9,420 Member
    Ive been eating paleo-ish. I was on a 3 month plateau until I started that and have lost an average of 2 lb a week since. I dont like to call it paleo but it basically is. I dont seek out all organic or grassfed though. When I have a good streak of it it makes me feel great & I havent touched my huge bottle of pepto in weeks lol. I have a cheesburger & soda every saturday. Really keeps me motivated all week haha

    No, that basically is not paleo at all.
    Thats why I said ish. & its a whole lot closer to paleo then other diets. & yes I follow the BASIC guidlines. Boo I guess im not paleo enough :'(

    I'm paleo too, except for the grains, legumes, potatoes and dairy.
  • likitisplit
    likitisplit Posts: 9,420 Member
    Thanks for the reply.
    I stated that For the calories you consume I think there are plenty of MICRO nutrients missing - compared to more nutrient efficient alternatives.
    Well yes, if you're eating anything but a vitamin pill, that statement can be true for ANY food! :)

    The rest of your answer goes on about a McDonalds meal. I was specifically talking about the meat.

    Interesting that you don't know the difference, yet are a big proponent of it.

    Me, I like to UNDERSTAND before I decide on my choices. So I've done a little research.
    As it goes, it turns out grass-fed beef likely does offer some advantages. (Organic won't make any difference that I know.
    The biggest advertised is Omega-3. Unfortunately most of the information comes from places trying to push this product/lifestyle and so on and it's taken me a while to wade through. They go on about ratios, but crucially don't mention AMOUNTS.
    This author is obviously very much 'pro' the product, but takes a much more balanced view:
    http://grassbasedhealth.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/is-grass-fed-beef-really-rich-in-omega.html
    But promoting grass fed beef because of its n-6:n-3 ratio is, at best, misleading. Beef, regardless of how it is fed, in not a “rich” source of n-3 or n-6 fatty acids
    It MAY/probably offer higher levels of few other micronutrients, but from what I can tell not to a significant amount. Unfortunately my example does make it a little harder to compare as details for McDonalds burgers include the bun and so on, while I can separate out pure grass-fed-beef - so the percentages for nutrients in the fast food meat will naturally be lower as it's not all meat as it's listed per 100g of product.

    So, from what I can see, in reality it's pretty similar in anything that actually matters when considering total amounts per 100g.

    So, lets get back on to the MEAT. Not comparing a pile of varied steamed veg with some bread. I had copied and pasted my question yet again, but this time I've made the words 'meat' bold, so you can more easily see these meaty word.

    Do you believe the meat in a McDonalds burger has less micronutrients than the meat you eat? Now that I've done my research - I'll add the caveat - to a degree that matters.
    If you do, could you provide some backup to explain why you believe that.

    Next, if you have already had enough micronutrients of that kind, do you think that having more will be beneficial?

    I too have seen minor research that suggest a favorable Omega 3 ratio. That question is the legitimacy of the sources and how much research has really been done. Personally, i find it rather ludicrous when people say "XX" food is better than "YY"" because its more nutrient pack. The major issue with a claim is doesn't take into consideration of your whole diet. Ones diet is supposed to support their requirements (daily lifestyle/exercise/etc). At what time are we going to start to think holistic.

    No kidding. What is more nutrient dense: Squash, Sweet potato, Avocado, Grapefruit or Chocolate Chip cookies?

    If you count sugar and fat as nutrients (they are), the chocolate chip cookies probably win.

    If you're looking at nutrients per calorie? I'm not going to look it up...I'm just going to make sure that all of them are part of my diet.
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    this thread reminds me of an old school hip hop hook line..."round and round we go, round and round we go"
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    Ive been eating paleo-ish. I was on a 3 month plateau until I started that and have lost an average of 2 lb a week since. I dont like to call it paleo but it basically is. I dont seek out all organic or grassfed though. When I have a good streak of it it makes me feel great & I havent touched my huge bottle of pepto in weeks lol. I have a cheesburger & soda every saturday. Really keeps me motivated all week haha

    No, that basically is not paleo at all.
    Thats why I said ish. & its a whole lot closer to paleo then other diets. & yes I follow the BASIC guidlines. Boo I guess im not paleo enough :'(

    Paleo enough for what?

    My point was that your post is like most of the posts I've seen of those who claim to follow paleo, in that they don't follow it at all. They've simply decided to eat less processed foods and/or more whole foods and/or limit grains.
  • tennisdude2004
    tennisdude2004 Posts: 5,609 Member
    Thanks for the reply.
    I stated that For the calories you consume I think there are plenty of MICRO nutrients missing - compared to more nutrient efficient alternatives.
    Well yes, if you're eating anything but a vitamin pill, that statement can be true for ANY food! :)

    The rest of your answer goes on about a McDonalds meal. I was specifically talking about the meat.

    Interesting that you don't know the difference, yet are a big proponent of it.

    Me, I like to UNDERSTAND before I decide on my choices. So I've done a little research.
    As it goes, it turns out grass-fed beef likely does offer some advantages. (Organic won't make any difference that I know.
    The biggest advertised is Omega-3. Unfortunately most of the information comes from places trying to push this product/lifestyle and so on and it's taken me a while to wade through. They go on about ratios, but crucially don't mention AMOUNTS.
    This author is obviously very much 'pro' the product, but takes a much more balanced view:
    http://grassbasedhealth.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/is-grass-fed-beef-really-rich-in-omega.html
    But promoting grass fed beef because of its n-6:n-3 ratio is, at best, misleading. Beef, regardless of how it is fed, in not a “rich” source of n-3 or n-6 fatty acids
    It MAY/probably offer higher levels of few other micronutrients, but from what I can tell not to a significant amount. Unfortunately my example does make it a little harder to compare as details for McDonalds burgers include the bun and so on, while I can separate out pure grass-fed-beef - so the percentages for nutrients in the fast food meat will naturally be lower as it's not all meat as it's listed per 100g of product.

    So, from what I can see, in reality it's pretty similar in anything that actually matters when considering total amounts per 100g.

    So, lets get back on to the MEAT. Not comparing a pile of varied steamed veg with some bread. I had copied and pasted my question yet again, but this time I've made the words 'meat' bold, so you can more easily see these meaty word.

    Do you believe the meat in a McDonalds burger has less micronutrients than the meat you eat? Now that I've done my research - I'll add the caveat - to a degree that matters.
    If you do, could you provide some backup to explain why you believe that.

    Next, if you have already had enough micronutrients of that kind, do you think that having more will be beneficial?

    Oh yeh I see what you've done there Gee well done.

    I mention a McDonald's MEAL (breakfast in my statement) and then you flip it asking about just the burger! Which obviously is how everyone had the McDonald's - oh just the burger thanks hold the bun, crappy salad, sort of sauce stuff - no fries and left the coke!

    I would think that if you were just comparing he same number of calories based on the meat alone - I would answer - I don't know.

    But then my original point wasn't based on that.
  • The only reason im not paleo is my meat isnt grassfed & I have a cheat day. Thats all you had to go off of. A lot of paleo people are 80/20 so my saturday burger is well within guidlines. I try my best bc this diet seems to work for me whatever you wanna call it. Broke paleo I suppose since I cant affort top dollar meat. A lot of these paleo people wanna call themselves cavemen & theyre not. They are nothing like paleolithic people. Thats why I dont like calling it paleo even though I based my diet on that when I made the change. I really dont know why it matters at all though. If it helps ill retract that. Im NOT paleo. I just dont eat grains, legumes, dairy or processed foods MOST of the time.
  • likitisplit
    likitisplit Posts: 9,420 Member
    The only reason im not paleo is my meat isnt grassfed & I have a cheat day. Thats all you had to go off of. A lot of paleo people are 80/20 so my saturday burger is well within guidlines. I try my best bc this diet seems to work for me whatever you wanna call it. Broke paleo I suppose since I cant affort top dollar meat. A lot of these paleo people wanna call themselves cavemen & theyre not. They are nothing like paleolithic people. Thats why I dont like calling it paleo even though I based my diet on that when I made the change. I really dont know why it matters at all though. If it helps ill retract that. Im NOT paleo. I just dont eat grains, legumes, dairy or processed foods MOST of the time.

    That's a much better description :flowerforyou:
  • bcattoes
    bcattoes Posts: 17,299 Member
    The only reason im not paleo is my meat isnt grassfed & I have a cheat day. Thats all you had to go off of. A lot of paleo people are 80/20 so my saturday burger is well within guidlines. I try my best bc this diet seems to work for me whatever you wanna call it. Broke paleo I suppose since I cant affort top dollar meat. A lot of these paleo people wanna call themselves cavemen & theyre not. They are nothing like paleolithic people. Thats why I dont like calling it paleo even though I based my diet on that when I made the change. I really dont know why it matters at all though. If it helps ill retract that. Im NOT paleo. I just dont eat grains, legumes, dairy or processed foods MOST of the time.

    That's a much better description :flowerforyou:

    Agreed. My post was not meant as critism. Just to point out that most people that tout the benefits of paleo are really just touting the benefits of cleaning up their diet (or whatever non-"clean" term doesn't spark attack mode) and eating low carb.

    I apologize if I offended you. That was not my intention.
  • vmitch5
    vmitch5 Posts: 1 Member
    I have been eating clean for years, with an occasional cheat, I tried Paleo for a month with some friends, and found that I did feel less bloated, and felt like I had more energy. I am still abiding by the Paleo diet, with the exception of oatmeal, I teach fitness classes, and need a good carb that it going to sustain me for hours in the morning, and found that I just can't give up my oatmeal.
    %85 is the general rule, and do the best you can.
    I did try some recipes for cookies, brownies, for when I craved sweets, and they were really good, I just googled them.
    My family liked the treats too, and didn't even notice the veggies I added to them, and that there was no sugar in them