Why I hate Body Fat Percentage!

1356

Replies

  • Aaron_K123
    Aaron_K123 Posts: 7,122 Member
    I think what Vismal is saying (and he can correct me if I am wrong) is not so much omg don't do this its a waste of time so much as he is saying that too many people become myopically focused on achieving the magic number of 10% or 18% and ignore other factors that are arguably more important like...how much energy do they have....how strong are they feeling....how far can they run....what is their functional strength....how do they look.

    That said I think its perfectly fine to measure bodyfat percentage and have a goal in mind, just as long as you are rational enough to realize that measurements aren't 100% accurate and your goal might end up needing to shift as you learn more about your own body.

    That can be said about everything. Don't focus only on scale. Don't focus only on body fat. Don't focus only on looks (this can be one of the worst). There are tons of goal posts people have in fitness or weight loss and they let those determine their worth.

    Well yeah but if we distill it down like that then really the answer to every question ever posed on MFP is "Don't be dumb".

    I've seen you ask the same question that you have previously answered for others.

    So...you are saying don't be dumb? :-). Not sure what you are referring to unless you mean early on when I found for 6 weeks my scale weight wasn't decreasing. I wasn't so much worried about it (didn't change my routine) as I was just surprised by it. If you are referring to something else not sure what perhaps be more specific.
  • neandermagnon
    neandermagnon Posts: 7,436 Member
    this is why the number that's most important to me is the number of lbs on the barbell.
  • usmcmp
    usmcmp Posts: 21,219 Member
    very interesting read about how much muscle one can expect to naturally build (with out steroids, HGH, etc) till they reach thier genetic limit
    NOTE: All the formulas to arrive at your maximum muscle potential in this article are based on natural male bodybuilders who are extremely dedicated individuals and have lifted for oftentimes 10+ years.

    http://www.builtlean.com/2011/03/30/how-much-muscle-can-you-gain-naturally/
  • No_Finish_Line
    No_Finish_Line Posts: 3,661 Member
    number of holes down on the belt
  • No_Finish_Line
    No_Finish_Line Posts: 3,661 Member
    very interesting read about how much muscle one can expect to naturally build (with out steroids, HGH, etc) till they reach thier genetic limit
    NOTE: All the formulas to arrive at your maximum muscle potential in this article are based on natural male bodybuilders who are extremely dedicated individuals and have lifted for oftentimes 10+ years.

    http://www.builtlean.com/2011/03/30/how-much-muscle-can-you-gain-naturally/

    lol thanks i'm a little off today
  • erickirb
    erickirb Posts: 12,294 Member
    this is why the number that's most important to me is the number of lbs on the barbell.

    Not for me as my progress increases much faster during a bulk, and I would also like to remain relatively lean. I would be fat as fvck, with a lot of hidden muscle, if the weight on the bar was my main goal.

    I like seeing the number on the bar go up while scale stays relatively stable with slight downward trend, while looking better in the mirror, for a cut. When bulking I like the gain in the bar with scale moving slowly up, and looking jacked in the mirror. We all have different goals, and as such how we track progress will probably differ as well.
  • jim180155
    jim180155 Posts: 769 Member
    this is why the number that's most important to me is the number of lbs on the barbell.

    Heh. Those vary too.
  • yopeeps025
    yopeeps025 Posts: 8,680 Member
    this is why the number that's most important to me is the number of lbs on the barbell.

    LOL for me that like 25%. Appearance is like 25%. Clothes is like 25%. Scale weight is like 5%. Getting the girls I find attractive is 20%.
  • likitisplit
    likitisplit Posts: 9,420 Member
    I'll obsess if I darn well want to obsess, so there!
  • lthames0810
    lthames0810 Posts: 722 Member
    Late, but in because vismal's posts are always good.
  • HardyGirl4Ever
    HardyGirl4Ever Posts: 1,017 Member
    Good to know. My scale tells me my percentage. It depresses me.
  • likitisplit
    likitisplit Posts: 9,420 Member
    very interesting read about how much muscle one can expect to naturally build (with out steroids, HGH, etc) till they reach thier genetic limit
    NOTE: All the formulas to arrive at your maximum muscle potential in this article are based on natural male bodybuilders who are extremely dedicated individuals and have lifted for oftentimes 10+ years.

    http://www.builtlean.com/2011/03/30/how-much-muscle-can-you-gain-naturally/

    How close are the men's numbers to women, in your opinion?
  • usmcmp
    usmcmp Posts: 21,219 Member
    very interesting read about how much muscle one can expect to naturally build (with out steroids, HGH, etc) till they reach thier genetic limit
    NOTE: All the formulas to arrive at your maximum muscle potential in this article are based on natural male bodybuilders who are extremely dedicated individuals and have lifted for oftentimes 10+ years.

    http://www.builtlean.com/2011/03/30/how-much-muscle-can-you-gain-naturally/

    How close are the men's numbers to women, in your opinion?

    I ran mine and I think over a lifetime of lifting it is fairly close. I'm about two solid years in with about 133 pounds lean mass and it says my max is about 158.
  • likitisplit
    likitisplit Posts: 9,420 Member
    very interesting read about how much muscle one can expect to naturally build (with out steroids, HGH, etc) till they reach thier genetic limit
    NOTE: All the formulas to arrive at your maximum muscle potential in this article are based on natural male bodybuilders who are extremely dedicated individuals and have lifted for oftentimes 10+ years.

    http://www.builtlean.com/2011/03/30/how-much-muscle-can-you-gain-naturally/

    How close are the men's numbers to women, in your opinion?

    I ran mine and I think over a lifetime of lifting it is fairly close. I'm about two solid years in with about 133 pounds lean mass and it says my max is about 158.

    That's what I was thinking. I'm at about 129 pounds of lbm (hydrostatic assessment)and I'm hoping to get to 133 with a 12 week bulk this winter. Of course, my bf is and will be way higher than yours - you look awesome!
  • usmcmp
    usmcmp Posts: 21,219 Member
    very interesting read about how much muscle one can expect to naturally build (with out steroids, HGH, etc) till they reach thier genetic limit
    NOTE: All the formulas to arrive at your maximum muscle potential in this article are based on natural male bodybuilders who are extremely dedicated individuals and have lifted for oftentimes 10+ years.

    http://www.builtlean.com/2011/03/30/how-much-muscle-can-you-gain-naturally/

    How close are the men's numbers to women, in your opinion?

    I ran mine and I think over a lifetime of lifting it is fairly close. I'm about two solid years in with about 133 pounds lean mass and it says my max is about 158.

    That's what I was thinking. I'm at about 129 pounds of lbm (hydrostatic assessment)and I'm hoping to get to 133 with a 12 week bulk this winter. Of course, my bf is and will be way higher than yours - you look awesome!

    Thank you! My body fat is higher now than in the picture. I'm trying to gain. One thing to remember when gaining is that just like fat loss, lean gains are not linear. (Note: These are all approximates based on a wide variety of data) I gained 3 pounds of lean mass in my first 8 week coming off a strict diet. I gained 1 pound of lean mass the next 8 weeks and half a pound in the next 8 weeks. I'm going in for another weigh in next week.
  • chrisdavey
    chrisdavey Posts: 9,834 Member
    Good post. I personally track caliper measurements (with pro ones) but don't worry about the %'s it gives as they are likely BS. But if the caliper readings are trending down, waist measurement down, clothes fitting loosely and scale similar or down then that is a pretty good indicator of fat loss.

    The other thing I've seen is people have some random bf% they want to achieve, they get a dexa scan and it doesn't come back where they wanted to be. The day before they were happy with the progress they were making but when a number is put on it, they are disheartened. Not good for motivation generally.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Kevalicious99
    Kevalicious99 Posts: 1,131 Member
    Consumer grade .. BIA scales can be out as much as 8%.

    So .. yes, even in the manuals .. they say to monitor the trends and not the numbers

    But myself .. I totally believe in monitoring your body fat % and skip the stupid scale.
  • briansyuki
    briansyuki Posts: 11 Member
    I agree with you but this only applies to people who are not overweight or obese. I think if you are overweight it is important and necessary to keep track of your BF%.
  • likitisplit
    likitisplit Posts: 9,420 Member
    very interesting read about how much muscle one can expect to naturally build (with out steroids, HGH, etc) till they reach thier genetic limit
    NOTE: All the formulas to arrive at your maximum muscle potential in this article are based on natural male bodybuilders who are extremely dedicated individuals and have lifted for oftentimes 10+ years.

    http://www.builtlean.com/2011/03/30/how-much-muscle-can-you-gain-naturally/

    How close are the men's numbers to women, in your opinion?

    I ran mine and I think over a lifetime of lifting it is fairly close. I'm about two solid years in with about 133 pounds lean mass and it says my max is about 158.

    That's what I was thinking. I'm at about 129 pounds of lbm (hydrostatic assessment)and I'm hoping to get to 133 with a 12 week bulk this winter. Of course, my bf is and will be way higher than yours - you look awesome!

    Thank you! My body fat is higher now than in the picture. I'm trying to gain. One thing to remember when gaining is that just like fat loss, lean gains are not linear. (Note: These are all approximates based on a wide variety of data) I gained 3 pounds of lean mass in my first 8 week coming off a strict diet. I gained 1 pound of lean mass the next 8 weeks and half a pound in the next 8 weeks. I'm going in for another weigh in next week.

    I just tried and failed at a 12 week bulk. I'd go up a couple of pounds and then drift back to where I was. 4 1/2 pounds of lean mass is completely awesome, especially with your base.

    Consistently overeating is WAY harder than people think it is. I think more people eat at maintenance and then gain through binges than consistently adding too much to their plate
  • usmcmp
    usmcmp Posts: 21,219 Member
    very interesting read about how much muscle one can expect to naturally build (with out steroids, HGH, etc) till they reach thier genetic limit
    NOTE: All the formulas to arrive at your maximum muscle potential in this article are based on natural male bodybuilders who are extremely dedicated individuals and have lifted for oftentimes 10+ years.

    http://www.builtlean.com/2011/03/30/how-much-muscle-can-you-gain-naturally/

    How close are the men's numbers to women, in your opinion?

    I ran mine and I think over a lifetime of lifting it is fairly close. I'm about two solid years in with about 133 pounds lean mass and it says my max is about 158.

    That's what I was thinking. I'm at about 129 pounds of lbm (hydrostatic assessment)and I'm hoping to get to 133 with a 12 week bulk this winter. Of course, my bf is and will be way higher than yours - you look awesome!

    Thank you! My body fat is higher now than in the picture. I'm trying to gain. One thing to remember when gaining is that just like fat loss, lean gains are not linear. (Note: These are all approximates based on a wide variety of data) I gained 3 pounds of lean mass in my first 8 week coming off a strict diet. I gained 1 pound of lean mass the next 8 weeks and half a pound in the next 8 weeks. I'm going in for another weigh in next week.

    I just tried and failed at a 12 week bulk. I'd go up a couple of pounds and then drift back to where I was. 4 1/2 pounds of lean mass is completely awesome, especially with your base.

    Consistently overeating is WAY harder than people think it is. I think more people eat at maintenance and then gain through binges than consistently adding too much to their plate

    I have no problem eating. I gain more fat than I should because I can eat. I will have to go through lots of mini cuts. I do think a lot of people just fear eating if they've been fat before. They call it the former fat boy syndrome. Sometimes it's more successful (although seemingly very slow) to just try to recomposition.
    http://www.jcdfitness.com/2009/10/the-former-fat-boy-syndrome/
  • AlliSteff
    AlliSteff Posts: 211 Member
    Interesting- I know that for me, I have lost maybe 1 lb over the past few months, but with checkins at my gym (having a professional measure body fat with calipers), I have dropped almost 10 % body fat. I am stronger, in good cardio shape, look much smaller, and have dropped a clothing size. And basically have lost no weight.
  • No_Finish_Line
    No_Finish_Line Posts: 3,661 Member
    very interesting read about how much muscle one can expect to naturally build (with out steroids, HGH, etc) till they reach thier genetic limit
    NOTE: All the formulas to arrive at your maximum muscle potential in this article are based on natural male bodybuilders who are extremely dedicated individuals and have lifted for oftentimes 10+ years.

    http://www.builtlean.com/2011/03/30/how-much-muscle-can-you-gain-naturally/

    How close are the men's numbers to women, in your opinion?

    thats a good question.

    here is a link to a calculator that you put your hieght and a few other inch measurements and it gives you an idea of how much you would weight at your maximum muscle potential at a given BF %

    http://www.weightrainer.net/bodypred.html

    it doesn't toggle between male and female, which would suggest that it doesn't matter (or its a poorly constructed calculator).

    here is a link to an article with the formulas the calculator is based on. It doesn't specifically address the differences between men and women, other then to say that men will naturally have more muslce building potential because thier bodies produce more testosterone

    http://www.weightrainer.net/potential.html

    all we know is that the information is based on a study of Male natural BB. My bet is that the chart isn't that accurate for most women.




    All i wanted to say was that 26 lbs of muscle in a year, even your first year is very unlikely.

    if anyones done it they were probably well above average in genetics, and perhaps somehow underweight to begin with. or they used test or something.

    I was thinking about this last night, and i remembered a local guy that is the exact same height as me, but appears to have maybe twice as much muscle. Didn't really sync with my notions of whats really within the realm of possibility for a guy my size. so i chalked it up to him probably be well above average in genetics.

    then i remembered he was also the guy that offered to take me through a testosterone cycle.

    I guess my point is just that people should have more realistic expectations.
  • albayin
    albayin Posts: 2,524 Member
    very interesting read about how much muscle one can expect to naturally build (with out steroids, HGH, etc) till they reach thier genetic limit
    NOTE: All the formulas to arrive at your maximum muscle potential in this article are based on natural male bodybuilders who are extremely dedicated individuals and have lifted for oftentimes 10+ years.

    http://www.builtlean.com/2011/03/30/how-much-muscle-can-you-gain-naturally/

    How close are the men's numbers to women, in your opinion?

    I ran mine and I think over a lifetime of lifting it is fairly close. I'm about two solid years in with about 133 pounds lean mass and it says my max is about 158.

    That's what I was thinking. I'm at about 129 pounds of lbm (hydrostatic assessment)and I'm hoping to get to 133 with a 12 week bulk this winter. Of course, my bf is and will be way higher than yours - you look awesome!

    Thank you! My body fat is higher now than in the picture. I'm trying to gain. One thing to remember when gaining is that just like fat loss, lean gains are not linear. (Note: These are all approximates based on a wide variety of data) I gained 3 pounds of lean mass in my first 8 week coming off a strict diet. I gained 1 pound of lean mass the next 8 weeks and half a pound in the next 8 weeks. I'm going in for another weigh in next week.

    I just tried and failed at a 12 week bulk. I'd go up a couple of pounds and then drift back to where I was. 4 1/2 pounds of lean mass is completely awesome, especially with your base.

    Consistently overeating is WAY harder than people think it is. I think more people eat at maintenance and then gain through binges than consistently adding too much to their plate

    I have no problem eating. I gain more fat than I should because I can eat. I will have to go through lots of mini cuts. I do think a lot of people just fear eating if they've been fat before. They call it the former fat boy syndrome. Sometimes it's more successful (although seemingly very slow) to just try to recomposition.
    http://www.jcdfitness.com/2009/10/the-former-fat-boy-syndrome/

    I think you hit the nail on the head...yes, I am afraid of being fat-ter than now since I have been struggling all my life to be thinner but never succeeded...I am afraid if I eat, I will end up bigger
  • albayin
    albayin Posts: 2,524 Member
    Interesting- I know that for me, I have lost maybe 1 lb over the past few months, but with checkins at my gym (having a professional measure body fat with calipers), I have dropped almost 10 % body fat. I am stronger, in good cardio shape, look much smaller, and have dropped a clothing size. And basically have lost no weight.

    Seriously? I understand the scale number thing...but really 1 pound makes such difference? I am not doubting your words but it's just too good to be true...
  • Alastair007
    Alastair007 Posts: 673 Member
    If you cant measure it you cant manage it. We measure calories, probably with a fair degree of inaccuracy, but because we measure it we control the amount we eat. Looking in a mirror helps but to judge the difference week by week is quite difficult if not subjective and inaccurate. Any measure, scale, pinch test (body fat), tape measure, if done with reasonably good equipment and consistently at the same time each week, will show a trend over time.
    It is rare to gain muscle without gaining fat, and to loose fat without loosing muscle. And it would seem reasonable thing to do to measure body fat and watch the trend over time. This does not suggest that after a week and based on one result you change your whole exercise and diet program, but slight modifications over time.
  • AlliSteff
    AlliSteff Posts: 211 Member
    Interesting- I know that for me, I have lost maybe 1 lb over the past few months, but with checkins at my gym (having a professional measure body fat with calipers), I have dropped almost 10 % body fat. I am stronger, in good cardio shape, look much smaller, and have dropped a clothing size. And basically have lost no weight.

    Seriously? I understand the scale number thing...but really 1 pound makes such difference? I am not doubting your words but it's just too good to be true...

    I mean, I would LOVE it if my scale was wrong! But I weight myself once a week, same time of day....and yeah. The difference has really been the body fat for me (I upped my lifting game) anad it is definitely visible. I put on a dress yesterday with short sleeves (which were like a little too tight last year), and it fit perfectly. The shirts that I have purchased recently haven been smalls and extra smalls (except for Theory- why do they run so small!?), the dresses and skirts have all been smalls. They would have all been mediums last summer.
  • yopeeps025
    yopeeps025 Posts: 8,680 Member
    Interesting- I know that for me, I have lost maybe 1 lb over the past few months, but with checkins at my gym (having a professional measure body fat with calipers), I have dropped almost 10 % body fat. I am stronger, in good cardio shape, look much smaller, and have dropped a clothing size. And basically have lost no weight.

    Seriously? I understand the scale number thing...but really 1 pound makes such difference? I am not doubting your words but it's just too good to be true...

    I mean, I would LOVE it if my scale was wrong! But I weight myself once a week, same time of day....and yeah. The difference has really been the body fat for me (I upped my lifting game) anad it is definitely visible. I put on a dress yesterday with short sleeves (which were like a little too tight last year), and it fit perfectly. The shirts that I have purchased recently haven been smalls and extra smalls (except for Theory- why do they run so small!?), the dresses and skirts have all been smalls. They would have all been mediums last summer.

    Calipers are not that accurate and they only tell you the fat under the skin you have lost .You clearly loss something though. What about the Visceral fat? Time to take a ride in the body pod for better body fat % results.
  • likitisplit
    likitisplit Posts: 9,420 Member
    Interesting- I know that for me, I have lost maybe 1 lb over the past few months, but with checkins at my gym (having a professional measure body fat with calipers), I have dropped almost 10 % body fat. I am stronger, in good cardio shape, look much smaller, and have dropped a clothing size. And basically have lost no weight.

    Seriously? I understand the scale number thing...but really 1 pound makes such difference? I am not doubting your words but it's just too good to be true...

    I mean, I would LOVE it if my scale was wrong! But I weight myself once a week, same time of day....and yeah. The difference has really been the body fat for me (I upped my lifting game) anad it is definitely visible. I put on a dress yesterday with short sleeves (which were like a little too tight last year), and it fit perfectly. The shirts that I have purchased recently haven been smalls and extra smalls (except for Theory- why do they run so small!?), the dresses and skirts have all been smalls. They would have all been mediums last summer.

    Wasn't it "I Lift Heavy Acrylics" who did a year recomp - maintenance + heavy lifting. 134 to 134 lbs and the difference is breath-taking.
  • likitisplit
    likitisplit Posts: 9,420 Member
    Interesting- I know that for me, I have lost maybe 1 lb over the past few months, but with checkins at my gym (having a professional measure body fat with calipers), I have dropped almost 10 % body fat. I am stronger, in good cardio shape, look much smaller, and have dropped a clothing size. And basically have lost no weight.

    Seriously? I understand the scale number thing...but really 1 pound makes such difference? I am not doubting your words but it's just too good to be true...

    I mean, I would LOVE it if my scale was wrong! But I weight myself once a week, same time of day....and yeah. The difference has really been the body fat for me (I upped my lifting game) anad it is definitely visible. I put on a dress yesterday with short sleeves (which were like a little too tight last year), and it fit perfectly. The shirts that I have purchased recently haven been smalls and extra smalls (except for Theory- why do they run so small!?), the dresses and skirts have all been smalls. They would have all been mediums last summer.

    Calipers are not that accurate and they only tell you the fat under the skin you have lost .You clearly loss something though. What about the Visceral fat? Time to take a ride in the body pod for better body fat % results.

    If she wants to go that far. To the OP's point, aren't the results she's getting good enough to make a solid decision about what she's doing?
This discussion has been closed.