Be Smart... don't fall for Fads and scams :)

Options
11011121315

Replies

  • kncapitano
    Options
    :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

    Thank you for completely proving my point ^^^ :wink:

    Time to workout again! :heart: :heart: :heart:





    "Hyenas don't take down lions."
  • jofjltncb6
    jofjltncb6 Posts: 34,415 Member
    Options
    :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

    Thank you for completely proving my point ^^^ :wink:

    Time to workout again! :heart: :heart: :heart:





    "Hyenas don't take down lions."

    lion_hyena_T5216.jpg
  • redversustheblue
    redversustheblue Posts: 1,216 Member
    Options
    :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

    Thank you for completely proving my point ^^^ :wink:

    Time to workout again! :heart: :heart: :heart:





    "Hyenas don't take down lions."

    lion_hyena_T5216.jpg

    Nice.
  • Kalikel
    Kalikel Posts: 9,626 Member
    Options
    The OP didn't just feel attacked.

    The OP was attacked, mocked, insulted and patronized.

    I saw it and I didn't even see a lot of the posts, so it's probably worse than I know.
  • WinoGelato
    WinoGelato Posts: 13,454 Member
    Options
    Let me preface this post by saying that I'm primarily a lurker, and always swore that I'd remain as such. But you, OP, are that ever so persistent internet creature that I cannot resist: the "expert". In my travels (professional and non), I've met many like you. The "fitness experts", the personal trainers, the "enthusiasts" with their anecdotal "evidence" that means less than zero...I could go on. Hard science matters, not personal experience.

    I'll boil down the dissonance for you:

    "Clean eating" doesn't inherently mean anything. It's a marketing term at best and worst. However, the individual can assign whatever definition they please. Many people do it for various reasons: to feel superior, to sound important and/or "educated" amongst their peers, and so forth. "Clean eating" can mean eating only organic foods, eating only GMO-free foods (not attempting to start a discussion on that, so let's not go there), eating no animal products, eating no processed foods, and so forth.

    This is where the problem lies. You are using extremely broad terms to define what can only be determined by the individual. Perhaps in your professional community this is a common term. Fine. But when you are joining another community (even where there might be professional individuals similar to yourself) you CANNOT use the same broad terms and expect others to explicitly understand what you mean. This is the internet, where discussions are simply blocks of text and emoji. There is no nuance such as tone of voice, facial expression, etc. People cannot know your thought processes, even if they've had the same exact training and professional experience as you. This is where writing in a fashion that is clear, concise and appropriate to the group you're speaking to becomes essential. I would imagine what you meant by "clean eating" was eating foods that contain essential nutrients (if applicable to the individual): produce, lean meat/proteins, whole grains, dairy, etc. I think most rational people can agree on that point.

    BUT.

    Again, even if that's what you meant...it's not what was SAID. That's where everything went sideways. If you had seen that the initial problem was just a lack of written clarity, this would not have spiraled out of control the way it did.

    Your next mistake was resorting to ad hominem, claims of "bullying", people "being sensitive"/"negative" and mocking people using emoji and generally being petulant. I recognize that these things happen to the best of us and come from places where we feel frustrated and attacked. That being said, we're all adults here. Disagreements happen, and they aren't personal. Someone disagreeing with what verbiage you choose isn't about your character as a person. It makes your argument appear illogical and you a person who isn't to be taken seriously.

    The "debate" about pizza being better/worse than chicken is silly, and I think you know that. Chicken can be made "unhealthy" and pizza can be made "healthy" (in quotation marks purposely). No one is saying that one is inherently better than the other, as food dichotomies do everyone a disservice. The nonsense about 800 calories of donuts and candy bars made of kale is unnecessary, and you're attempting to have a laugh while being incredibly condescending to people who are attempting to discuss this topic with you. This tack is also not one that lends credence to your words. I think you initially meant well, weren't as clear as you should be (which is a forgivable mistake), things deteriorated rapidly and now here we are.

    Start over. Be clear and type precisely what you mean. It'll help you avoid stuff like this from happening in the future.

    That said, I'm going back to lurking.

    Good luck.

    I like you. Strong post for a lurker.
  • redversustheblue
    redversustheblue Posts: 1,216 Member
    Options
    The OP didn't just feel attacked.

    The OP was attacked, mocked, insulted and patronized.

    I saw it and I didn't even see a lot of the posts, so it's probably worse than I know.

    No, she really wasn't. And if you scrolled up in this page a bit higher, you'll find a nice post about all the things OP said about those "bullying" her, which was quite a bit ruder than anything I read from the "bullies."
  • diannethegeek
    diannethegeek Posts: 14,776 Member
    Options
    Any other day I would probably just let this thread die, but I'm on cold medicine today and the OP has rubbed me the wrong way. So, as this thread comes to an end, let's review some of the things the OP has said about us all, shall we? It's like a beautiful little snark poem:
    My friend and I last night were laughing at the "Hysteria" people made over a such simple word!

    They need to get overrrr it. It is NOT that big of a deal, no reason to cry over it. :sad:

    So many snobby people on this so called friendly health/fitness site... pretty sad actually. :sick:

    its almost pathetic the bullying that goes on in here it shouldn't even warrant a response.

    I don't plan on going anywhere, and ready to actually discuss the topic at hand without silly naysayers, negative nancy's, and sensitive sally's changing the subject.

    I really figured with age people would grow out of mockery

    Do you really listen/read what some of you are writing?

    Right now all I hear is blah blah blah since so many of you are arguing and knit picking every little thing.

    Ohhh I get it... YOU all are the experts... OOPS My bad lol. :::eye roll:::

    Thank you for not just "attacking" like the herd and actually putting thought into your post even if we might have some disagreements on the content.

    And now I'm due for another dose and a nap.

    Haha, nice! Feel better :flowerforyou:

    Thanks. Naps and cold medicine do wonders.
  • golfmonk
    golfmonk Posts: 119 Member
    Options
    I guess being a nationally certified trainer, fitness specialist, and working assistant to a doctor and nutritionist must mean I know nothing.
    Correct.
  • SLLRunner
    SLLRunner Posts: 12,943 Member
    Options
    The OP didn't just feel attacked.

    The OP was attacked, mocked, insulted and patronized.

    I saw it and I didn't even see a lot of the posts, so it's probably worse than I know.
    Nah......she wasn't.
  • golfmonk
    golfmonk Posts: 119 Member
    Options
    Let me preface this post by saying that I'm primarily a lurker, and always swore that I'd remain as such. But you, OP, are that ever so persistent internet creature that I cannot resist: the "expert". In my travels (professional and non), I've met many like you. The "fitness experts", the personal trainers, the "enthusiasts" with their anecdotal "evidence" that means less than zero...I could go on. Hard science matters, not personal experience.

    I'll boil down the dissonance for you:

    "Clean eating" doesn't inherently mean anything. It's a marketing term at best and worst. However, the individual can assign whatever definition they please. Many people do it for various reasons: to feel superior, to sound important and/or "educated" amongst their peers, and so forth. "Clean eating" can mean eating only organic foods, eating only GMO-free foods (not attempting to start a discussion on that, so let's not go there), eating no animal products, eating no processed foods, and so forth.

    This is where the problem lies. You are using extremely broad terms to define what can only be determined by the individual. Perhaps in your professional community this is a common term. Fine. But when you are joining another community (even where there might be professional individuals similar to yourself) you CANNOT use the same broad terms and expect others to explicitly understand what you mean. This is the internet, where discussions are simply blocks of text and emoji. There is no nuance such as tone of voice, facial expression, etc. People cannot know your thought processes, even if they've had the same exact training and professional experience as you. This is where writing in a fashion that is clear, concise and appropriate to the group you're speaking to becomes essential. I would imagine what you meant by "clean eating" was eating foods that contain essential nutrients (if applicable to the individual): produce, lean meat/proteins, whole grains, dairy, etc. I think most rational people can agree on that point.

    BUT.

    Again, even if that's what you meant...it's not what was SAID. That's where everything went sideways. If you had seen that the initial problem was just a lack of written clarity, this would not have spiraled out of control the way it did.

    Your next mistake was resorting to ad hominem, claims of "bullying", people "being sensitive"/"negative" and mocking people using emoji and generally being petulant. I recognize that these things happen to the best of us and come from places where we feel frustrated and attacked. That being said, we're all adults here. Disagreements happen, and they aren't personal. Someone disagreeing with what verbiage you choose isn't about your character as a person. It makes your argument appear illogical and you a person who isn't to be taken seriously.

    The "debate" about pizza being better/worse than chicken is silly, and I think you know that. Chicken can be made "unhealthy" and pizza can be made "healthy" (in quotation marks purposely). No one is saying that one is inherently better than the other, as food dichotomies do everyone a disservice. The nonsense about 800 calories of donuts and candy bars made of kale is unnecessary, and you're attempting to have a laugh while being incredibly condescending to people who are attempting to discuss this topic with you. This tack is also not one that lends credence to your words. I think you initially meant well, weren't as clear as you should be (which is a forgivable mistake), things deteriorated rapidly and now here we are.

    Start over. Be clear and type precisely what you mean. It'll help you avoid stuff like this from happening in the future.

    That said, I'm going back to lurking.

    Good luck.

    Nicely stated!!
  • Peloton73
    Peloton73 Posts: 148 Member
    Options
    Just as an FYI, the term "clean eating" has been around for decades. It's not a new buzz word but may feel that way due to the power of social media with regards to the insane amount of people it reaches. We used that term 25 years ago when I was heavy into weightlifting and was used years before that.
  • SLLRunner
    SLLRunner Posts: 12,943 Member
    Options
    Just as an FYI, the term "clean eating" has been around for decades. It's not a new buzz word but may feel that way due to the power of social media with regards to the insane amount of people it reaches. We used that term 25 years ago when I was heavy into weightlifting and was used years before that.
    That's interesting. I've been around for 52 years and I've only heard it during the last few years. However, when I was a kid, my mother used to push us (her family) to eat sensibly:

    ^Square meals came first- meat, starch, vegetable.
    ^Snacks were okay in between, but they were mostly fruits. Chips, candy, ice creams were treats, and we indulged often (I was the only one who was overweight in my immediate family).
    ^Fresh vegetables and fruits when possible, hand canned when fresh was not available
    ^Meat we raised.

    Finally, mother believed eating everything in moderation was important In regards to weight loss, she always told me it's not what you eat, it's how much you eat. She was very concerned when she saw me gravitating toward low fat, low sugar, etc. even though I was overweight.

    Mom has been gone a long time, but I think she was spot on with what she tried to teach us. It's how I eat today, and what I ate to lose 44 pounds.
  • Peloton73
    Peloton73 Posts: 148 Member
    Options
    I'm still guilty of saying "3 squares a day". Hehe. With regards to clean eating being used decades ago, I mostly heard it in the gym setting. I used to read it in the old Muscle Media magazines, etc.
  • kncapitano
    Options
    Goooood Morning Everyone! :happy: :wink:
  • Azdak
    Azdak Posts: 8,281 Member
    Options
    Goooood Morning Everyone! :happy: :wink:

    I'll throw out the ceremonial first cat picture.

    th_funny-pictures-cat-thinks-you-are-stupidcroppedsmall.jpg
  • RllyGudTweetr
    RllyGudTweetr Posts: 2,019 Member
    Options
    http://www.healthylivingheavylifting.com/how-clean-eating-made-me-fat-but-ice-cream-and-subway-got-me-lean/

    TL;DR:
    "It’s not an attempt to bash anyone for following any type of restrictive, or rules-based diet, like Paleo, Atkins, Primal, Dukan, or whatever, and it’s certainly not meant to encourage people to base their diets around junk foods.

    What it hopefully serves to do, however, is to make you realise that there’s much, much more to a diet than good vs. bad foods. You needn’t cut out any food when trying to lose fat"
  • SLLRunner
    SLLRunner Posts: 12,943 Member
    Options
    http://www.healthylivingheavylifting.com/how-clean-eating-made-me-fat-but-ice-cream-and-subway-got-me-lean/

    TL;DR:
    "It’s not an attempt to bash anyone for following any type of restrictive, or rules-based diet, like Paleo, Atkins, Primal, Dukan, or whatever, and it’s certainly not meant to encourage people to base their diets around junk foods.

    What it hopefully serves to do, however, is to make you realise that there’s much, much more to a diet than good vs. bad foods. You needn’t cut out any food when trying to lose fat"
    I haven't yet read the article, but anybody can get fat on a super duper clean eating and lose weight on a super duper high fat. It's all about the calorie deficit for weight loss. As for general health, there are too many factors to take into consideration, but I personally feel better with a dietary plan that is what I consider healthy most of the time with my lactose free ice cream almost every day. Of course, my idea of healthy might make someone else cringe. :bigsmile:
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    Options
    I think the issue in the article is that diets like paleo (and "clean eating" and low carb) are often advertised as a replacement for calorie counting and pushed by people who insist that if you eat the right foods calories don't matter. There was some poster who was pushing this recently, and it's most recently making the rounds through that Jonathan Baylor book, I think.

    Personally, as long as I stick strictly to something like paleo or low carb and have vaguely in the back of my mind that I'm dieting, so I don't go nuts with butter or indulge in any of the "paleo treats" with almond flour and the like, I would lose easily with one of those diets and not counting, but that's because I don't really believe you can eat as many calories as you want and so tend to eat more restrictively anyway and just have a notion of what serving size is with meat that I probably wouldn't exceed without pushing myself to. (I've learned that my tendency without counting if trying to lose weight is to overrestrict, particularly on carbs and fats.) But there's also a part of it related to the fact that for a lot of people (including me, but not everyone) you fill up really easily on lots of meat and veggies.

    I don't at all disagree that for some people these diets work in that they help them cut calories more easily and work with their natural preferences or by avoiding trigger foods (although I think it's better to work on not having trigger foods). I just find it annoying when people pretend like it's not related to calories. I tried paleo briefly because I don't care much about grains (love dairy though), and found that I was eating like 900 calories a day when I started logging. (Once I realized, I stopped that.) Luckily, it was never really intended to be longterm--just wanted to see if I felt better like so many people claim. (I did not. I felt good, but just as good now eating a balanced healthy diet of "three squares" plus ice cream in moderation, etc).

    I love podcasts and have listened to some paleo ones and at times you get people calling in with questions about not losing where they are clearly eating far too many calories, and the hosts won't acknowledge that's the issue. They just push keeping with it or finding hidden grains or some such, which is just ridiculous.