Male body pressure becoming the same as women?

Options
13468913

Replies

  • BusyRaeNOTBusty
    BusyRaeNOTBusty Posts: 7,166 Member
    Options
    I'm 5'9", am married to someone who is 5'9", have dated guys as short as 5'7" and would probably go shorter provided he wasn't much thinner than me.

    I also find the height requirement that a lot of women have a little silly. Only 15% of American men are over 6'. What are the chances of finding a good guy that you (hypothetical woman with 6' height requirement) get along with, are attracted to, have chemistry with, etc, in only that 15%? You'd have a much better chance if you broaden the selection pool. Finding someone you want to and actually can spend the rest of your life with (if that is your goal) is hard.
  • fatcity66
    fatcity66 Posts: 1,544 Member
    Options
    I'm 5'9", am married to someone who is 5'9", have dated guys as short as 5'7" and would probably go shorter provided he wasn't much thinner than me.

    I also find the height requirement that a lot of women have a little silly. Only 15% of American men are over 6'. What are the chances of finding a good guy that you (hypothetical woman with 6' height requirement) get along with, are attracted to, have chemistry with, etc, in only that 15%? You'd have a much better chance if you broaden the selection pool. Finding someone you want to and actually can spend the rest of your life with (if that is your goal) is hard.

    My preference is 5'9" or taller. When I wear anything with heels, I'm close to or actually 6' myself. And I was with a guy who was 5'9" for 5 years and engaged to him at one point.
  • fatcity66
    fatcity66 Posts: 1,544 Member
    Options
    Incidentally, all the men in my family are 6' or taller. And one of my aunts is 6' tall as well.
  • Khukhullatus
    Khukhullatus Posts: 361 Member
    Options
    My big pet peeve is hearing about how unrealistic Barbie is. Of course she's impossible to live up to, but have any of the people complaining ever looked at a G.I. Joe? I grew up with He-man and Lion-O in my toy chest. That's every bit as unrealistic as Barbie.
  • many_splendored
    many_splendored Posts: 113 Member
    Options
    I figure it's just something that we're more aware of. Disordered eating/self-images issues have never been gender-exclusive, but I think more guys are willing to admit these struggles.
  • Khukhullatus
    Khukhullatus Posts: 361 Member
    Options
    fatcity66 wrote: »
    My preference is 5'9" or taller. When I wear anything with heels, I'm close to or actually 6' myself. And I was with a guy who was 5'9" for 5 years and engaged to him at one point.

    At 6'4" I've noticed that girls over about 5'10" will usually give me a shot no matter what, just so that they can wear heals. I dated a girl who was my height for a while, and looking back, I'm not convinced she even liked me. I'm pretty sure we were just going out so she could "stop feeling weird walking around with her boyfriend in public." She mentioned it more than once, and those are her words, not mine.
  • fatcity66
    fatcity66 Posts: 1,544 Member
    Options
    I'm 5'9", am married to someone who is 5'9", have dated guys as short as 5'7" and would probably go shorter provided he wasn't much thinner than me.

    I also find the height requirement that a lot of women have a little silly. Only 15% of American men are over 6'. What are the chances of finding a good guy that you (hypothetical woman with 6' height requirement) get along with, are attracted to, have chemistry with, etc, in only that 15%? You'd have a much better chance if you broaden the selection pool. Finding someone you want to and actually can spend the rest of your life with (if that is your goal) is hard.

    Also, people are attracted to what they are attracted to. It's not necessarily a preference you can change.
  • fallenangelank
    fallenangelank Posts: 3 Member
    Options
    I wouldn't know. I'm not a guy.
  • fatcity66
    fatcity66 Posts: 1,544 Member
    Options
    fatcity66 wrote: »
    My preference is 5'9" or taller. When I wear anything with heels, I'm close to or actually 6' myself. And I was with a guy who was 5'9" for 5 years and engaged to him at one point.

    At 6'4" I've noticed that girls over about 5'10" will usually give me a shot no matter what, just so that they can wear heals. I dated a girl who was my height for a while, and looking back, I'm not convinced she even liked me. I'm pretty sure we were just going out so she could "stop feeling weird walking around with her boyfriend in public." She mentioned it more than once, and those are her words, not mine.

    LOL Well, I can say I've never done that, just dated someone because they were tall, even though I didn't like them!
  • Khukhullatus
    Khukhullatus Posts: 361 Member
    Options
    fatcity66 wrote: »
    Also, people are attracted to what they are attracted to. It's not necessarily a preference you can change.

    Agreed, and I'm not sure I'd want to date a girl who had overcome her lack of attraction towards me. I'm not everyone's type, just like they aren't all mine. I don't need her jaw to hang open every time I walk into a room, but it'd be nice to feel like I was at least somewhere on the positive end of her attraction scale.
  • Khukhullatus
    Khukhullatus Posts: 361 Member
    Options
    fatcity66 wrote: »
    LOL Well, I can say I've never done that, just dated someone because they were tall, even though I didn't like them!

    Haha, what I always found weird about it, was she was 6'4" at 14 or so. At some point, you'd think you'd get over it. I sort of understand a 5'10" girl being freaked out about it more, since it'd be easy for her to get well into adulthood without dating anyone shorter than her if she didn't want to, whereas my ex really would have had no choice if she didn't want to be mostly celibate.
  • sklarbodds
    sklarbodds Posts: 608 Member
    Options
    jemhh wrote: »
    sklarbodds wrote: »
    jemhh wrote: »
    Should have specified that I meant the miscers (not all guys) are much harsher on each other than women are on them But they are convinced that it is just women pushing the standards on them. I do realize it's a very specific demographic on that board and I have no idea what most men's thoughts are on the matter*. I just automatically thought of the misc because so much aligns with some of the things mentioned in the article.

    I would think the opposite, and I was married for 15 years and single for the last 2.5

    For instance, I'm 5'9" roughly and if any woman is 5'7" or taller I'm almost automatically not an option. I wish I was exaggerating, but I'm really not. I can't grow any taller. In a world where dating starts with a profile pic, the chiseled jaw line that some guys have is a clear advantage. I happen to have a beard (it's often the first thing women want to talk about when messaging), but I have friends who can't really grow one (looks sloppy and patchy when they do).

    My guy friends do say some things, but it doesn't ever feel judgy as much as jovial (maybe it's my perception?).

    Well you are clearly going to know more than I would what single people in your area are looking for. I've been married for 17 years and with my husband for 25 so I've never really dated and if I had, it would have been long enough ago that my data would be outdated.

    Out of curiosity, do you find it's the same with regular offline dating as it is with online dating, as far as automatic disqualification goes?

    That's a very good question and I'd say yes and no. In some ways it's worse (your photos might be your best foot forward), but in others it's not. For instance, on my profile I'm 5'9"...in real life I'm closer to 5'9.5" and if a girl has a 5'10" requirement, she's probably giving me a shot in RL, but not online because I didn't meet her height requirements (mostly you're skimming the profile and hitting 'next' when you see something you missed).

    Of course, I would actually say that online dating is generally that. How many times have you heard a bride or groom say, "She's not what I thought I would like, but now that she's in my life I can't live without her"...etc...etc. With online dating, you filter your results based on what you'd think you'd like and more than likely miss out on something that could be great.

    Not to mention, the other side of it is most don't want to commit. I can't tell you how many times I've heard the phrase, "I think it's just best for me to date a bunch of guys for a while and see what I want". Having multiple people that you're dating in my experience means you're not giving any one of them a real chance (when I first started dating, I dated multiple people at a time and realized I wasn't giving anyone a fair shot).

  • sklarbodds
    sklarbodds Posts: 608 Member
    Options
    fatcity66 wrote: »
    sklarbodds wrote: »
    fatcity66 wrote: »
    sklarbodds wrote: »
    jemhh wrote: »
    Should have specified that I meant the miscers (not all guys) are much harsher on each other than women are on them But they are convinced that it is just women pushing the standards on them. I do realize it's a very specific demographic on that board and I have no idea what most men's thoughts are on the matter*. I just automatically thought of the misc because so much aligns with some of the things mentioned in the article.

    I would think the opposite, and I was married for 15 years and single for the last 2.5

    For instance, I'm 5'9" roughly and if any woman is 5'7" or taller I'm almost automatically not an option. I wish I was exaggerating, but I'm really not. I can't grow any taller. In a world where dating starts with a profile pic, the chiseled jaw line that some guys have is a clear advantage. I happen to have a beard (it's often the first thing women want to talk about when messaging), but I have friends who can't really grow one (looks sloppy and patchy when they do).

    My guy friends do say some things, but it doesn't ever feel judgy as much as jovial (maybe it's my perception?).

    That's funny. I'm 5'9" and it frustrates me that all the tall guys seem to go for tiny women. I'm happy if a guy is at least equal to my height. I do, however, seem to get hit on a lot by dudes under 5'7". It feels like a fetish thing.

    Do you give the 5'7" guy a shot?

    Sometimes, but not usually. :)

    Well I appreciate the honest answer :)
  • eric_sg61
    eric_sg61 Posts: 2,925 Member
    Options
    sklarbodds wrote: »
    jemhh wrote: »
    Should have specified that I meant the miscers (not all guys) are much harsher on each other than women are on them But they are convinced that it is just women pushing the standards on them. I do realize it's a very specific demographic on that board and I have no idea what most men's thoughts are on the matter*. I just automatically thought of the misc because so much aligns with some of the things mentioned in the article.

    I would think the opposite, and I was married for 15 years and single for the last 2.5

    For instance, I'm 5'9" roughly and if any woman is 5'7" or taller I'm almost automatically not an option. I wish I was exaggerating, but I'm really not. I can't grow any taller. In a world where dating starts with a profile pic, the chiseled jaw line that some guys have is a clear advantage. I happen to have a beard (it's often the first thing women want to talk about when messaging), but I have friends who can't really grow one (looks sloppy and patchy when they do).

    My guy friends do say some things, but it doesn't ever feel judgy as much as jovial (maybe it's my perception?).

    yep and from an evolutionary stand point it makes sense
  • Slacker16
    Slacker16 Posts: 1,184 Member
    edited February 2015
    Options
    Body pressure manifests itself differently for men than for women.

    You'll never see men openly, and rarely even consciously, judging another based on how he looks but there's usually a distinct correlation between a man's physique and how other men treat him.
    dbmata wrote: »
    msf74 wrote: »
    dbmata wrote: »
    msf74 wrote: »
    dbmata wrote: »
    msf74 wrote: »
    dbmata wrote: »

    Who really wants to see a bunch of flannel wearing lumbersexuals sitting in a cafe sipping their philz coffee and talking about their flawed concepts on feelings and their importance to society?

    Sound dreadful.

    I much prefer not letting people express themselves how they wish.

    I much prefer expecting adults to act like adults, as opposed to socially maladjusted, immature dip wads who have an over inflated sense of self importance.

    Yes, I did just spend a weekend in SF's SoMa neighborhood.

    And maybe some men do not react the same way you do because they do not have the same coping mechanisms to deal with "adult life."




    True, not everyone had to earn what they have, or stand up on their own two feet.

    My suggestion, is that they try. I see no value to society or to the individual to celebrate immaturity or mediocrity.

    And maybe it is exactly attitudes like this which are the problem.

    If a man wants to be aspirational then great but what's wrong with being "mediocre"? Or, what's wrong with being a man who has an average physique, who earns a mediocre wage, who marries the girl next door and contributes in his own small way to the world he lives in?

    Hypermasculine males do not have the monopoly on masculinity or get to define what it means universally.
    Seriously? What's wrong with being mediocre? You really just asked that?

    Yeah, I get it, you may not be the next inductee into MENSA, or the Illuminati... but you don't want to be the best you that you can be?

    I don't even want to understand that type of approach to life.

    Women, children, and the weak do not have the monopoly on getting to define what masculine, or even maleness means universally. If you want the right to define something, earn that right, and be able to defend the definition. You can't do that by promoting mediocrity.

    Also, I'm sorry, if you aren't masculine, and don't want to be, you have no right to define for others what masculine is.
    It is literally impossible to be the best you that you can be.

    You have limited resources available for self-improvement to allocate for different purposes. Reaching full (or near) potential in one area means you have less time and energy to allocate for improvement in another area.

    Besides, the real goal is happiness - not excellence - and achievements have diminishing returns after awhile. There exists a point of equilibrium for everyone where you'd be happier vegging out than striving to work harder.

    That point is different from person to person but, make no mistake, nobody actually wants to be the best they can be.

    As for masculinity, I feel the dude defined it excellently...

    ETA:
    We bottom feeders now?
    Aw fuk bye.
  • fatcity66
    fatcity66 Posts: 1,544 Member
    Options
    fatcity66 wrote: »
    LOL Well, I can say I've never done that, just dated someone because they were tall, even though I didn't like them!

    Haha, what I always found weird about it, was she was 6'4" at 14 or so. At some point, you'd think you'd get over it. I sort of understand a 5'10" girl being freaked out about it more, since it'd be easy for her to get well into adulthood without dating anyone shorter than her if she didn't want to, whereas my ex really would have had no choice if she didn't want to be mostly celibate.

    Wow, that must have been hard for her to deal with.

  • fatcity66
    fatcity66 Posts: 1,544 Member
    Options
    fatcity66 wrote: »
    Also, people are attracted to what they are attracted to. It's not necessarily a preference you can change.

    Agreed, and I'm not sure I'd want to date a girl who had overcome her lack of attraction towards me. I'm not everyone's type, just like they aren't all mine. I don't need her jaw to hang open every time I walk into a room, but it'd be nice to feel like I was at least somewhere on the positive end of her attraction scale.

    Agreed!
  • fatcity66
    fatcity66 Posts: 1,544 Member
    Options
    sklarbodds wrote: »
    fatcity66 wrote: »
    sklarbodds wrote: »
    fatcity66 wrote: »
    sklarbodds wrote: »
    jemhh wrote: »
    Should have specified that I meant the miscers (not all guys) are much harsher on each other than women are on them But they are convinced that it is just women pushing the standards on them. I do realize it's a very specific demographic on that board and I have no idea what most men's thoughts are on the matter*. I just automatically thought of the misc because so much aligns with some of the things mentioned in the article.

    I would think the opposite, and I was married for 15 years and single for the last 2.5

    For instance, I'm 5'9" roughly and if any woman is 5'7" or taller I'm almost automatically not an option. I wish I was exaggerating, but I'm really not. I can't grow any taller. In a world where dating starts with a profile pic, the chiseled jaw line that some guys have is a clear advantage. I happen to have a beard (it's often the first thing women want to talk about when messaging), but I have friends who can't really grow one (looks sloppy and patchy when they do).

    My guy friends do say some things, but it doesn't ever feel judgy as much as jovial (maybe it's my perception?).

    That's funny. I'm 5'9" and it frustrates me that all the tall guys seem to go for tiny women. I'm happy if a guy is at least equal to my height. I do, however, seem to get hit on a lot by dudes under 5'7". It feels like a fetish thing.

    Do you give the 5'7" guy a shot?

    Sometimes, but not usually. :)

    Well I appreciate the honest answer :)

    Sure, why lie? To make a bunch of strangers on a dieting site think better of me? LOL
  • sklarbodds
    sklarbodds Posts: 608 Member
    Options
    fatcity66 wrote: »
    sklarbodds wrote: »
    fatcity66 wrote: »
    sklarbodds wrote: »
    fatcity66 wrote: »
    sklarbodds wrote: »
    jemhh wrote: »
    Should have specified that I meant the miscers (not all guys) are much harsher on each other than women are on them But they are convinced that it is just women pushing the standards on them. I do realize it's a very specific demographic on that board and I have no idea what most men's thoughts are on the matter*. I just automatically thought of the misc because so much aligns with some of the things mentioned in the article.

    I would think the opposite, and I was married for 15 years and single for the last 2.5

    For instance, I'm 5'9" roughly and if any woman is 5'7" or taller I'm almost automatically not an option. I wish I was exaggerating, but I'm really not. I can't grow any taller. In a world where dating starts with a profile pic, the chiseled jaw line that some guys have is a clear advantage. I happen to have a beard (it's often the first thing women want to talk about when messaging), but I have friends who can't really grow one (looks sloppy and patchy when they do).

    My guy friends do say some things, but it doesn't ever feel judgy as much as jovial (maybe it's my perception?).

    That's funny. I'm 5'9" and it frustrates me that all the tall guys seem to go for tiny women. I'm happy if a guy is at least equal to my height. I do, however, seem to get hit on a lot by dudes under 5'7". It feels like a fetish thing.

    Do you give the 5'7" guy a shot?

    Sometimes, but not usually. :)

    Well I appreciate the honest answer :)

    Sure, why lie? To make a bunch of strangers on a dieting site think better of me? LOL

    But what about your internet cred? :smile:
  • Khukhullatus
    Khukhullatus Posts: 361 Member
    Options
    fatcity66 wrote: »
    Wow, that must have been hard for her to deal with.

    sure, but I"m certain there are a hundred short girls at her high school pissed off because "clothes are designed for tall women." The grass is always greener.