Hit plateau, thinking of increasing calories?

13567

Replies

  • KJensen34
    KJensen34 Posts: 22 Member
    Metruis wrote: »
    What was the person who said "eating more is not the answer." Eating more is not the answer. If things like 'starvation mode' were real, all those starving children in Africa wouldn't be flesh and bones. There is no such thing as starvation mode. You are eating more than you think you are. Or your body is retaining water to recover. Or you're not drinking enough so your body is just retaining water period. Or you've substituted fat for leaner muscle mass, which is more dense, so it appears that you haven't lost fat, when in fact you have. Or or or. There's a billion reasons that weight loss isn't linear. You say you work out like crazy, so that tells me, your body is almost certainly clinging to water to repair. And it also tells me you're probably replacing fat with leaner muscle mass... are you meticulously measuring to see if your measurements have changed? My weight stuck at 236 for a good couple of weeks, but my waist lost 2 inches in that time... shenanigans?

    I actually just started taking bodily measurements this past week because the scale was being stubborn. So I'm hoping I notice inches being lost in the next couple weeks if the scale continues to not move. I don't believe I can gain the amount of muscle I am losing in (hopefully only) fat with the current deficit I have. I can always be hopeful I get an extra few pounds of 'noob' muscle gains (Does taking 2 years off from lifting let you get noob gains again I wonder?), but I don't think it would account for several pounds in the past couple weeks, though I really wish.

    I sometimes find it hard to listen to my body like you suggest and why I try to log as much data as possible, but I am feeling satiated throughout the day with my 1800, though I can definitely feel my workouts suffering if I don't get all my carbs in before working out at night. Thank you for taking the time to reply to my post too, I really enjoyed reading it
  • KJensen34
    KJensen34 Posts: 22 Member
    elphie754 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    KJensen34 wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    OP - I do not think that you would benefit from a re-feed. You have been dieting for seven weeks and lost 20 pounds, which is great progress. Eventually, you are going to have these little blips where you lose nothing, and then start losing again.
    -
    Weight loss is not going to be linear. If you plotted out some of my cuts you will see that there are peeks and valleys, but the overall trend is down. You really just need patience.

    I would highly suggest listening to MrM as I have known him for some time, and he as always given me solid advice....

    Question - have you readjusted your calories down to reflect your 20 pound loss?

    Do you think I need to adjust them down from 1800 calories a day? This amount is already 50% or so of my TDEE and I lift heavy 3-4 times a week. For what it's worth I'm 6' and roughly 28% body fat currently.

    OK - then keep them at 1800 ...

    I think you just need to keep doing what you are doing..

    I feel as if it's like talking to the wall. This guy wants specific answers and that's all. He keeps ignoring the fact that he isn't in a plateau. The fact that he has lost 20 lbs in 2 months but is still asking if he should lower carbs. Fortunately for him there are plenty of people on this site that are clueless that won't look at any of those factors and will tell him "check the accuracy of the logging or eat less".

    Maybe he will post the answer he wants and we can just copy and paste it back since he doesn't want to listen to anyone's advice.

    I must have missed the post by @MrM27 about me being like talking to a wall.
    MrM27 wrote: »
    He keeps ignoring the fact that he isn't in a plateau.
    I specifically mentioned that I probably wasn't in a plateau in a previous post. Just looking for help to not have the loss slow down.
    MrM27 wrote: »
    The fact that he has lost 20 lbs in 2 months but is still asking if he should lower carbs.
    The reason I asked about lowering carbs is because that was suggested by jacksonpt so I told him my macros and asked if he still would suggest doing that.

    The only thing specific I was trying to glean from this post was to see what people thought about eating below BMR and the affect of increasing calories to help speed weight loss since it was such a large deficit rather than the always suggested 20% or less deficit.
  • SezxyStef
    SezxyStef Posts: 15,268 Member
    KJensen34 wrote: »
    SezxyStef wrote: »
    I've never used a calculator to figure out my TDEE they are so off...

    Total calories consumed+(Total lbs lost x 3500)/# of days =TDEE

    So for for example while I was losing I took a 3 week span and logged consistently and accurately with my food scale etc.

    28168+(3.25x3500)/21=1883 (Sept 2013) no lifting
    46006+(4x3500)/21=2143 (Jan 2014 lifting for 5 months

    My Current TDEE is between 2000-2100
    Summer time TDEE is between 2350-2500 (lots more cardio done)

    OP use that if you want it's not mine ETP group has it...as for what to do...what you are doing seems to be working fine to me.

    This is intriguing to me and I most likely will try it in the following weeks. It makes complete sense and seems like an easy way to accomplish what @ndj1979 suggested previously without taking a full year to get it nailed down. Just for curiosity, how do your numbers compare to the online TDEE/BMR calculators? I have been using this one (http://www.health-calc.com/diet/energy-expenditure-advanced) because it appears to control for the most variables rather than just a simply activity multiplier?

    When I was losing they were high, too high...now that I am at goal they are pretty consistent with what I see....maybe a bit lower if I take Scooby and IIFYM and average they say about 1900 for winter time...
  • SezxyStef
    SezxyStef Posts: 15,268 Member
    KJensen34 wrote: »
    elphie754 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    KJensen34 wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    OP - I do not think that you would benefit from a re-feed. You have been dieting for seven weeks and lost 20 pounds, which is great progress. Eventually, you are going to have these little blips where you lose nothing, and then start losing again.
    -
    Weight loss is not going to be linear. If you plotted out some of my cuts you will see that there are peeks and valleys, but the overall trend is down. You really just need patience.

    I would highly suggest listening to MrM as I have known him for some time, and he as always given me solid advice....

    Question - have you readjusted your calories down to reflect your 20 pound loss?

    Do you think I need to adjust them down from 1800 calories a day? This amount is already 50% or so of my TDEE and I lift heavy 3-4 times a week. For what it's worth I'm 6' and roughly 28% body fat currently.

    OK - then keep them at 1800 ...

    I think you just need to keep doing what you are doing..

    I feel as if it's like talking to the wall. This guy wants specific answers and that's all. He keeps ignoring the fact that he isn't in a plateau. The fact that he has lost 20 lbs in 2 months but is still asking if he should lower carbs. Fortunately for him there are plenty of people on this site that are clueless that won't look at any of those factors and will tell him "check the accuracy of the logging or eat less".

    Maybe he will post the answer he wants and we can just copy and paste it back since he doesn't want to listen to anyone's advice.

    I must have missed the post by @MrM27 about me being like talking to a wall.
    MrM27 wrote: »
    He keeps ignoring the fact that he isn't in a plateau.
    I specifically mentioned that I probably wasn't in a plateau in a previous post. Just looking for help to not have the loss slow down.
    MrM27 wrote: »
    The fact that he has lost 20 lbs in 2 months but is still asking if he should lower carbs.
    The reason I asked about lowering carbs is because that was suggested by jacksonpt so I told him my macros and asked if he still would suggest doing that.

    The only thing specific I was trying to glean from this post was to see what people thought about eating below BMR and the affect of increasing calories to help speed weight loss since it was such a large deficit rather than the always suggested 20% or less deficit.

    eating below BMR for a period of time isn't gonna kill you...but I wouldn't do it for "years" per say.

    Increasing calories to help speed weight loss....say that out loud and tell me what it sounds like....adding in food to lose weight...I believe if you eat at a reasonable deficit you are good for the long haul personally...I was never one for staying at TDEE-20% I would go between 1600-1800 calories usually and that would mean I lost between 1/2 and 3/4lb a week...over the entire course of my weight loss which seems to work for me...even now I am eating between 1800-2200 a day and watch for my weekly totals.

  • NikiChicken
    NikiChicken Posts: 576 Member
    MrM27 wrote: »
    2 weeks is not a plateau, be more patient because weight loss its not linear.

    +1
  • jacksonpt
    jacksonpt Posts: 10,413 Member
    edited February 2015
    Here's the bottom line for people who are scared off by the whole "took me a year to figure out my numbers" thing.

    Come up with a daily calorie intake. Use a calculator like MFP or any of the zillions of other ones that are out there. Pick a number out of a hat. Throw darts at a dart board. I don't care, but pick one as a starting point. Eat that many calories per day for 4-6 weeks. Evaluate your progress. If you're losing and you feel good, keep going. If you're losing but lack energy, eat a little more. If you're not losing, eat a little less. Re-evalute in 4-6 weeks and tweak again if necessary.

    Part of getting started is feeling things out, and that often includes some trial and error. There's no way around it.
  • Snow3y
    Snow3y Posts: 1,412 Member
    Just a different kind of approach which may help: Try changing up your routine..
  • triciab79
    triciab79 Posts: 1,713 Member
    Starvation Mode is a myth. Increasing calories in order to lose weight is like adding more water to drain a pool. Calories are not magic devises, they are a unit that measures energy. The fat in your body is stored energy, if you add energy to stored energy the energy store goes up not down. There are no magic pills or secret tricks to losing weight and anyone who says otherwise is scamming you or repeating a scam they bought.

    http://www.aworkoutroutine.com/starvation-mode/
  • yopeeps025
    yopeeps025 Posts: 8,680 Member
    KJensen34 wrote: »
    elphie754 wrote: »
    MrM27 wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    KJensen34 wrote: »
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    OP - I do not think that you would benefit from a re-feed. You have been dieting for seven weeks and lost 20 pounds, which is great progress. Eventually, you are going to have these little blips where you lose nothing, and then start losing again.
    -
    Weight loss is not going to be linear. If you plotted out some of my cuts you will see that there are peeks and valleys, but the overall trend is down. You really just need patience.

    I would highly suggest listening to MrM as I have known him for some time, and he as always given me solid advice....

    Question - have you readjusted your calories down to reflect your 20 pound loss?

    Do you think I need to adjust them down from 1800 calories a day? This amount is already 50% or so of my TDEE and I lift heavy 3-4 times a week. For what it's worth I'm 6' and roughly 28% body fat currently.

    OK - then keep them at 1800 ...

    I think you just need to keep doing what you are doing..

    I feel as if it's like talking to the wall. This guy wants specific answers and that's all. He keeps ignoring the fact that he isn't in a plateau. The fact that he has lost 20 lbs in 2 months but is still asking if he should lower carbs. Fortunately for him there are plenty of people on this site that are clueless that won't look at any of those factors and will tell him "check the accuracy of the logging or eat less".

    Maybe he will post the answer he wants and we can just copy and paste it back since he doesn't want to listen to anyone's advice.

    I must have missed the post by @MrM27 about me being like talking to a wall.
    MrM27 wrote: »
    He keeps ignoring the fact that he isn't in a plateau.
    I specifically mentioned that I probably wasn't in a plateau in a previous post. Just looking for help to not have the loss slow down.
    MrM27 wrote: »
    The fact that he has lost 20 lbs in 2 months but is still asking if he should lower carbs.
    The reason I asked about lowering carbs is because that was suggested by jacksonpt so I told him my macros and asked if he still would suggest doing that.

    The only thing specific I was trying to glean from this post was to see what people thought about eating below BMR and the affect of increasing calories to help speed weight loss since it was such a large deficit rather than the always suggested 20% or less deficit.


    I cannot wrap my mind around how increasing calories would speed up your weigh loss? That is not how losing weight works
  • elphie754
    elphie754 Posts: 7,574 Member
    ndj1979 wrote: »
    » show previous quotes

    OK - then keep them at 1800 ...

    I think you just need to keep doing what you are doing..

    I feel as if it's like talking to the wall. this guy wants specific answers and that's all. He keeps ignoring the fact that he isn't in a plateau. The fact that he has lost 20 lbs in 2 months but is still asking if he should lower carbs. Fortunately for him there are plenty of people on this site that are clueless that won't look at any of those factors and will tell him "check the accuracy of the logging or eat less".
    *

    Just as long as the wall isn't talking back.
  • KJensen34
    KJensen34 Posts: 22 Member
    triciab79 wrote: »
    Starvation Mode is a myth. Increasing calories in order to lose weight is like adding more water to drain a pool. Calories are not magic devises, they are a unit that measures energy. The fat in your body is stored energy, if you add energy to stored energy the energy store goes up not down. There are no magic pills or secret tricks to losing weight and anyone who says otherwise is scamming you or repeating a scam they bought.

    http://www.aworkoutroutine.com/starvation-mode/
    I specifically said in my original post "I know I am not in 'starvation mode'". Thank you for taking the time to cite that article though. I had seen it before and thought it was very thorough
  • jacksonpt
    jacksonpt Posts: 10,413 Member
    One thing people constantly forget is: to adjust your TDEE lower as you lose. The general recommendation is adjust it down about every 10 lbs.

    Logically I know this is an issue as you lose weight, but I never knew what amount of loss (or gain), was significant enough to warrant a recalculation. 10lbs, huh? Thanks.
  • KJensen34
    KJensen34 Posts: 22 Member
    edited February 2015
    One thing people constantly forget is: to adjust your TDEE lower as you lose. The general recommendation is adjust it down about every 10 lbs.

    Thank you for the suggestion, but I am currently at roughly 50% of my TDEE@240 so don't know if I want to adjust down even further.
  • yopeeps025
    yopeeps025 Posts: 8,680 Member
    jacksonpt wrote: »
    One thing people constantly forget is: to adjust your TDEE lower as you lose. The general recommendation is adjust it down about every 10 lbs.

    Logically I know this is an issue as you lose weight, but I never knew what amount of loss (or gain), was significant enough to warrant a recalculation. 10lbs, huh? Thanks.

    MFP said to recalculate after 10 pound loss. I guess the same for increase too.
  • jacksonpt
    jacksonpt Posts: 10,413 Member
    jacksonpt wrote: »
    One thing people constantly forget is: to adjust your TDEE lower as you lose. The general recommendation is adjust it down about every 10 lbs.

    Logically I know this is an issue as you lose weight, but I never knew what amount of loss (or gain), was significant enough to warrant a recalculation. 10lbs, huh? Thanks.

    10 is a general recommendation. I've seen 5 lbs as well. What I do, is if my goal is to lose 1lb per week, and week over week, I see it shrinking, .8 then .5 etc, I'll just drop 100 cals, and that usually will get it going again. I'm not very scientific. I just look at results, and that tells me everything I need to know. All the analysis people go through freaks me out. Who has time for that. If I'm not losing, I drop cals. It's kind of simple, barring any medical conditions.

    mhmm. I keep gaining and losing the same 20ish lbs (usually intentionally), so my numbers are always pretty consistent.
  • KJensen34
    KJensen34 Posts: 22 Member
    I didn't know that this post/topic would go this far. Thank you for all of the input everyone, but I realize that I was too quick to say "plateau" and am just being impatient with my weight loss. I know it took several years to put on the weight so it's going to take more than a few months to take it back off. I was just frustrated this past week after having such good results the first few weeks so thought I'd be proactive and ask MFP. I guess I was just hoping for a 'secret' I didn't know existed, but you've all just confirmed it's accuracy, consistency, and patience like I already knew. I'll go back to being a non-talking wall now, haha.
  • maillemaker
    maillemaker Posts: 1,253 Member
    Did you even read the thread or did you just decide to spout of stuff? I love how every few months you reappear in the same position with the same type of advice.

    Yes, I did read the thread, and the "stuff" I "spouted" is directly relevant to his "problem".

    His weight loss has probably triggered a metabolic slow down which requires a further decrease in caloric intake to overcome.

    I don't know what is so difficult to understand about that. I provided citations from actual scientists and medical doctors from an actual medical journal (The Lancet) and the National Institute of Health.

    Any time you hit a plateau during weight loss the answer is always the same - less calories.

  • yopeeps025
    yopeeps025 Posts: 8,680 Member
    Did you even read the thread or did you just decide to spout of stuff? I love how every few months you reappear in the same position with the same type of advice.

    Yes, I did read the thread, and the "stuff" I "spouted" is directly relevant to his "problem".

    His weight loss has probably triggered a metabolic slow down which requires a further decrease in caloric intake to overcome.

    I don't know what is so difficult to understand about that. I provided citations from actual scientists and medical doctors from an actual medical journal (The Lancet) and the National Institute of Health.

    Any time you hit a plateau during weight loss the answer is always the same - less calories.

    OP did not hit a plateau which he also said.
  • elphie754
    elphie754 Posts: 7,574 Member
    KJensen34 wrote: »
    I didn't know that this post/topic would go this far. Thank you for all of the input everyone, but I realize that I was too quick to say "plateau" and am just being impatient with my weight loss. I know it took several years to put on the weight so it's going to take more than a few months to take it back off. I was just frustrated this past week after having such good results the first few weeks so thought I'd be proactive and ask MFP. I guess I was just hoping for a 'secret' I didn't know existed, but you've all just confirmed it's accuracy, consistency, and patience like I already knew. I'll go back to being a non-talking wall now, haha.

    I know that impatient feeling. I am the same way

  • kellycasey5
    kellycasey5 Posts: 486 Member
    To the "non talking wall" :smiley:
    Feel free to impatient away in my book. A 2 week stall is FRUSTRATING!

    I think you should give it a go with increasing the calories a bit. My loss didn't slow one bit from increasing from 1200 (BAD idea) to 1370. If anything, the 2 weeks where I stayed at 178 are gone and I am back to losing. It worked for me and I am a happy camper again. I MIGHT even increase to 1500 calories in a few weeks if it happens again. It is still a deficit :smile: