Cardio while bulking? If any, how much?

2

Replies

  • travisk8s
    travisk8s Posts: 24 Member
    SideSteel wrote: »
    travisk8s wrote: »
    I won't get into the science of doing HIIT while on a bulk but here are some cliffs:

    Increases metabolism
    Increases muscle mass
    Increases Vo2 max
    Increases protein synthesis
    Increases fat loss
    Increases testosterone

    Ultimately if you are having hard enough time consuming the required calories then maybe high volume weight training with little rest between sets = your cardio lol

    Best of luck!

    Not nearly this black and white.

    HIIT has a strong recovery component and so from a practical standpoint you could make a strong argument that the more HIIT you do, the less resistance training you can do because recovery is finite. Depending on the goal, someone might be better off adding additional resistance training volume instead of HIIT.

    This isn't me saying that HIIT is arbitrarily good or bad -- it's a tool that will cause a specific set of adaptations. Whether or not someone should incorporate it into a routine is goal dependent among other things.

    Additionally, you're claiming that HIIT will increase the loss of fat when in a caloric surplus. Good luck losing fat on a bulk.

    Lean bulk? Eat just enough over your maintenance to build muscle, but not enough to put on fat. Technically over the day and throughout the night your body will be burning fat HOWEVER it will not be as significant as a standard cut. All he needs to do is look up muscular potential to figure out how much he'd be able to gain in a year, and then divide that into the growth potential per day/week. If he goes too high his your calories this won't work but that doesn't sound like an issue for him.

    The best way to lose fat and gain muscle is to recomp. Which means to cycle your calories so on workout days you put yourself in a surplus and on rest days you put yourself in a deficit.
  • SideSteel
    SideSteel Posts: 11,068 Member
    travisk8s wrote: »
    SideSteel wrote: »
    travisk8s wrote: »
    I won't get into the science of doing HIIT while on a bulk but here are some cliffs:

    Increases metabolism
    Increases muscle mass
    Increases Vo2 max
    Increases protein synthesis
    Increases fat loss
    Increases testosterone

    Ultimately if you are having hard enough time consuming the required calories then maybe high volume weight training with little rest between sets = your cardio lol

    Best of luck!

    Not nearly this black and white.

    HIIT has a strong recovery component and so from a practical standpoint you could make a strong argument that the more HIIT you do, the less resistance training you can do because recovery is finite. Depending on the goal, someone might be better off adding additional resistance training volume instead of HIIT.

    This isn't me saying that HIIT is arbitrarily good or bad -- it's a tool that will cause a specific set of adaptations. Whether or not someone should incorporate it into a routine is goal dependent among other things.

    Additionally, you're claiming that HIIT will increase the loss of fat when in a caloric surplus. Good luck losing fat on a bulk.

    Lean bulk? Eat just enough over your maintenance to build muscle, but not enough to put on fat. Technically over the day and throughout the night your body will be burning fat HOWEVER it will not be as significant as a standard cut. All he needs to do is look up muscular potential to figure out how much he'd be able to gain in a year, and then divide that into the growth potential per day/week. If he goes too high his your calories this won't work but that doesn't sound like an issue for him.

    The best way to lose fat and gain muscle is to recomp. Which means to cycle your calories so on workout days you put yourself in a surplus and on rest days you put yourself in a deficit.

    That's not how nutrient partitioning works unfortunately, at least in the overwhelming majority of cases. Eating in an excess isn't going to just cause muscle tissue to accumulate without any fat accumulation.


  • travisk8s
    travisk8s Posts: 24 Member
    The body gets it's energy from several sources. If you can manipulate your cardio to oxidize fat, then you are burning fat while bulking without muscle loss =)

    The best method is probably to do 20 to 30 min moderate or LISS cardio after weightlifting. The body has already dug deep into glycogen stores and is definitely more likely to burn fat. It's a pretty common method.

    I like using BCAAs for a little added insurance before hopping on the treadmill. Seems to work.The BCAAs aren't a necessity. The nice thing about them is they've been shown to be in the bloodstream within 15 minutes of consumption. Whey, though still pretty fast, isn't as fast as that. If you are on a good high protein diet you will be fine.
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,427 MFP Moderator
    edited October 2016
    travisk8s wrote: »
    The body gets it's energy from several sources. If you can manipulate your cardio to oxidize fat, then you are burning fat while bulking without muscle loss =)

    The best method is probably to do 20 to 30 min moderate or LISS cardio after weightlifting. The body has already dug deep into glycogen stores and is definitely more likely to burn fat. It's a pretty common method.

    I like using BCAAs for a little added insurance before hopping on the treadmill. Seems to work.The BCAAs aren't a necessity. The nice thing about them is they've been shown to be in the bloodstream within 15 minutes of consumption. Whey, though still pretty fast, isn't as fast as that. If you are on a good high protein diet you will be fine.

    If you have a net positive energy balance, fat gains are inevitable and males can luckily get away with gaining roughly 50/50 for fat/muscle while lean bulking. You cannot gain 100% muscle, regardless of the exercise plan you follow.
  • SideSteel
    SideSteel Posts: 11,068 Member
    edited October 2016
    travisk8s wrote: »
    The body gets it's energy from several sources. If you can manipulate your cardio to oxidize fat, then you are burning fat while bulking without muscle loss =)

    Once again, this is not how things work when you zoom out and look at nutrient partitioning over larger periods of time.

    Just for example, when you look at fasted cardio studies you see an increase in fat oxidation when you train fasted but it DOES NOT lead to greater whole body fat loss.

    You can't look at substrate utilization in a vacuum. Oxidizing more fat during cardiovascular exercise does not at all mean that you lose a greater amount of body fat.


    Here's one example where acute fat oxidation is higher in one treatment group but whole body fat losses are comparable between groups.

    http://jissn.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12970-014-0054-7
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    edited October 2016
    travisk8s wrote: »
    It depends on how much of a surplus or calories over maintenance you're actually getting and your macros(how much if it is protein/carbs/fats) I recommend 40/40/20 protein/carb/fat && a 500-700 calorie surplus over maintenance. If he replaces the calories burned from cardio via diet and still gets his surplus it won't do a damn thing in terms of fat loss.

    We are not talking thermogenics here- it's calories in calories out.

    I understand more about physiology than you do
    ...
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    travisk8s wrote: »
    It depends on how much of a surplus or calories over maintenance you're actually getting and your macros(how much if it is protein/carbs/fats) I recommend 40/40/20 protein/carb/fat && a 500-700 calorie surplus over maintenance. If he replaces the calories burned from cardio via diet and still gets his surplus it won't do a damn thing in terms of fat loss.

    We are not talking thermogenics here- it's calories in calories out.

    I understand more about physiology than you do

    you just said the same thing that the person you are arguing with said...
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    travisk8s wrote: »
    SideSteel wrote: »
    travisk8s wrote: »
    I won't get into the science of doing HIIT while on a bulk but here are some cliffs:

    Increases metabolism
    Increases muscle mass
    Increases Vo2 max
    Increases protein synthesis
    Increases fat loss
    Increases testosterone

    Ultimately if you are having hard enough time consuming the required calories then maybe high volume weight training with little rest between sets = your cardio lol

    Best of luck!

    Not nearly this black and white.

    HIIT has a strong recovery component and so from a practical standpoint you could make a strong argument that the more HIIT you do, the less resistance training you can do because recovery is finite. Depending on the goal, someone might be better off adding additional resistance training volume instead of HIIT.

    This isn't me saying that HIIT is arbitrarily good or bad -- it's a tool that will cause a specific set of adaptations. Whether or not someone should incorporate it into a routine is goal dependent among other things.

    Additionally, you're claiming that HIIT will increase the loss of fat when in a caloric surplus. Good luck losing fat on a bulk.

    Lean bulk? Eat just enough over your maintenance to build muscle, but not enough to put on fat. Technically over the day and throughout the night your body will be burning fat HOWEVER it will not be as significant as a standard cut. All he needs to do is look up muscular potential to figure out how much he'd be able to gain in a year, and then divide that into the growth potential per day/week. If he goes too high his your calories this won't work but that doesn't sound like an issue for him.

    The best way to lose fat and gain muscle is to recomp. Which means to cycle your calories so on workout days you put yourself in a surplus and on rest days you put yourself in a deficit.

    that is called a recomp...

    and if you are eating 250 calories over maintenance about half of that surplus is going to be fat..
  • Z_I_L_L_A
    Z_I_L_L_A Posts: 2,399 Member
    edited October 2016
    B)
  • 11Templars
    11Templars Posts: 444 Member
    jolive7 wrote: »
    travisk8s wrote: »
    The purpose for doing cardio is to improve ur cardiovascular health- what does that have anything to do with bulking or losing weight?

    When did ppl start to associate it with fat loss or keeping lean lol

    There are a lot of people who are only interested in aesthetics, there are so many lean people in my gym who are NOT "fit". To me, that's absolutely crazy!

    I Agree totally... What's the whole point of looking great if you can't run 5k to get help for a injured friend etc.

    As an example; I run a few "Tough Mudders and Spartan races every year and it's always surprising to me how many "fit" looking ppl with their fancy gear on can't even run 3k with out dying...lol
  • Z_I_L_L_A
    Z_I_L_L_A Posts: 2,399 Member
    B)
  • travisk8s
    travisk8s Posts: 24 Member
    You 100% can eat a surplus then target and reduce existing body fat levels. You can reduce your bodyfat% while not losing any fat. In fact (sit own for this one dude) you can actually reduce your bodyfat% while gaining bodyfat levels. Its actually simple maths, not deep mind *kitten* science
  • 11Templars
    11Templars Posts: 444 Member
    travisk8s wrote: »
    You 100% can eat a surplus then target and reduce existing body fat levels. You can reduce your bodyfat% while not losing any fat. In fact (sit own for this one dude) you can actually reduce your bodyfat% while gaining bodyfat levels. Its actually simple maths, not deep mind *kitten* science


    What....?

    Do you have a source (Documentation) for that?

    As a regular bloke with a Bsc in both Comp. Sci and Actuarial Math ( I work at a bank)..lol I'd be interested looking at the "Maths" for this.
  • RoxieDawn
    RoxieDawn Posts: 15,488 Member
    travisk8s wrote: »
    You 100% can eat a surplus then target and reduce existing body fat levels. You can reduce your bodyfat% while not losing any fat. In fact (sit own for this one dude) you can actually reduce your bodyfat% while gaining bodyfat levels. Its actually simple maths, not deep mind *kitten* science

    Been following...

    Now I am curious about what this is about? Can you please clarify this????
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,427 MFP Moderator
    travisk8s wrote: »
    You 100% can eat a surplus then target and reduce existing body fat levels. You can reduce your bodyfat% while not losing any fat. In fact (sit own for this one dude) you can actually reduce your bodyfat% while gaining bodyfat levels. Its actually simple maths, not deep mind *kitten* science

    Umm what? How can one lose body fat and gain body fat concurrently... that really doesnt even make sense.
  • Hornsby
    Hornsby Posts: 10,322 Member
    travisk8s wrote: »
    You 100% can eat a surplus then target and reduce existing body fat levels. You can reduce your bodyfat% while not losing any fat. In fact (sit own for this one dude) you can actually reduce your bodyfat% while gaining bodyfat levels. Its actually simple maths, not deep mind *kitten* science

    Are you insinuating thisis because of muscle gain will outweigh the fat gain making the percent the smaller?
  • travisk8s
    travisk8s Posts: 24 Member
    psulemon wrote: »
    travisk8s wrote: »
    You 100% can eat a surplus then target and reduce existing body fat levels. You can reduce your bodyfat% while not losing any fat. In fact (sit own for this one dude) you can actually reduce your bodyfat% while gaining bodyfat levels. Its actually simple maths, not deep mind *kitten* science

    Umm what? How can one lose body fat and gain body fat concurrently... that really doesnt even make sense.

    Where you are getting confused is bodyfat levels vs bodyfat%. They are not the same...

    Back to work I'll explain later!
  • TR0berts
    TR0berts Posts: 7,739 Member
    The more you post, the clearer it is that you have absolutely no clue what you're talking about.
  • Anvil_Head
    Anvil_Head Posts: 251 Member
    edited October 2016
    TR0berts wrote: »
    The more you post, the clearer it is that you have absolutely no clue what you're talking about.

    I feel like I stumbled into the misc forum at BB.com by mistake. Or maybe an episode of the Dr. Oz show. :D
  • 11Templars
    11Templars Posts: 444 Member
    travisk8s wrote: »
    psulemon wrote: »
    travisk8s wrote: »
    You 100% can eat a surplus then target and reduce existing body fat levels. You can reduce your bodyfat% while not losing any fat. In fact (sit own for this one dude) you can actually reduce your bodyfat% while gaining bodyfat levels. Its actually simple maths, not deep mind *kitten* science

    Umm what? How can one lose body fat and gain body fat concurrently... that really doesnt even make sense.

    Where you are getting confused is bodyfat levels vs bodyfat%. They are not the same...

    Back to work I'll explain later!

    I'm probably missing something here so I'll await your replay. In fairness I am "assuming" that one typically measures "bodyfat" levels using "% - percent" of fat .vs Lean Muscle etc.
  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,809 Member
    travisk8s wrote: »
    The body gets it's energy from several sources. If you can manipulate your cardio to oxidize fat, then you are burning fat while bulking without muscle loss =)

    The best method is probably to do 20 to 30 min moderate or LISS cardio after weightlifting. The body has already dug deep into glycogen stores and is definitely more likely to burn fat. It's a pretty common method.

    .

    Roughly how many calories of glycogen do you think an average person eating over maintenance has stored?

    You really aren't making a lot of sense I'm afraid. The weightlifting session will make zero difference to the proportion of fat burned during LISS.


  • Anvil_Head
    Anvil_Head Posts: 251 Member
    edited October 2016
    sijomial wrote: »
    travisk8s wrote: »
    The body gets it's energy from several sources. If you can manipulate your cardio to oxidize fat, then you are burning fat while bulking without muscle loss =)

    The best method is probably to do 20 to 30 min moderate or LISS cardio after weightlifting. The body has already dug deep into glycogen stores and is definitely more likely to burn fat. It's a pretty common method.

    .

    Roughly how many calories of glycogen do you think an average person eating over maintenance has stored?

    You really aren't making a lot of sense I'm afraid. The weightlifting session will make zero difference to the proportion of fat burned during LISS.


    And as Sidesteel said, you can't look at substrate utilization in a vacuum. The "fat burning zone" has been proven to be a myth again and again. It's broscience.

    Actually, the time the body burns the highest percentage of fat is when at rest. So technically, for the most effective fat burning, one should just sleep all day. Which, of course, completely ignores that fact that you'd also be burning far fewer calories overall - but hey, almost all of them would be from fat!
  • sijomial
    sijomial Posts: 19,809 Member
    Anvil_Head wrote: »
    sijomial wrote: »
    travisk8s wrote: »
    The body gets it's energy from several sources. If you can manipulate your cardio to oxidize fat, then you are burning fat while bulking without muscle loss =)

    The best method is probably to do 20 to 30 min moderate or LISS cardio after weightlifting. The body has already dug deep into glycogen stores and is definitely more likely to burn fat. It's a pretty common method.

    .

    Roughly how many calories of glycogen do you think an average person eating over maintenance has stored?

    You really aren't making a lot of sense I'm afraid. The weightlifting session will make zero difference to the proportion of fat burned during LISS.


    And as Sidesteel said, you can't look at substrate utilization in a vacuum. The "fat burning zone" has been proven to be a myth again and again. It's broscience.

    Actually, the time the body burns the highest percentage of fat is when at rest. So technically, for the most effective fat burning, one should just sleep all day. Which, of course, completely ignores that fact that you'd also be burning far fewer calories overall - but hey, almost all of them would be from fat!

    Yep totally agree - my 50/50 point of carb/fat usage happens at about 130bpm. Doing a weights session beforehand isn't going to change that.
  • jolive7
    jolive7 Posts: 283 Member
    jolive7 wrote: »
    travisk8s wrote: »
    The purpose for doing cardio is to improve ur cardiovascular health- what does that have anything to do with bulking or losing weight?

    When did ppl start to associate it with fat loss or keeping lean lol

    There are a lot of people who are only interested in aesthetics, there are so many lean people in my gym who are NOT "fit". To me, that's absolutely crazy!

    I Agree totally... What's the whole point of looking great if you can't run 5k to get help for a injured friend etc.

    As an example; I run a few "Tough Mudders and Spartan races every year and it's always surprising to me how many "fit" looking ppl with their fancy gear on can't even run 3k with out dying...lol

    Yes! I'm with you, to me that would be much more satisfying and makes me feel so much healthier and fit that I can smash out a conditioning session! We run metcon sessions every Saturday and it's amazing how many of my "fit" friends have only come to one
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    travisk8s wrote: »
    You 100% can eat a surplus then target and reduce existing body fat levels. You can reduce your bodyfat% while not losing any fat. In fact (sit own for this one dude) you can actually reduce your bodyfat% while gaining bodyfat levels. Its actually simple maths, not deep mind *kitten* science

    I will take you know nothing for $500, Alex
  • arditarose
    arditarose Posts: 15,573 Member
    Whoa. What's going on here? lol
  • psuLemon
    psuLemon Posts: 38,427 MFP Moderator
    travisk8s wrote: »
    psulemon wrote: »
    travisk8s wrote: »
    You 100% can eat a surplus then target and reduce existing body fat levels. You can reduce your bodyfat% while not losing any fat. In fact (sit own for this one dude) you can actually reduce your bodyfat% while gaining bodyfat levels. Its actually simple maths, not deep mind *kitten* science

    Umm what? How can one lose body fat and gain body fat concurrently... that really doesnt even make sense.

    Where you are getting confused is bodyfat levels vs bodyfat%. They are not the same...

    Back to work I'll explain later!

    I assume this means body fat percentage vs fat mass?
  • comptonelizabeth
    comptonelizabeth Posts: 1,701 Member
    Can anyone tell me how I turn off notifications for this thread please? :wink:
  • RoxieDawn
    RoxieDawn Posts: 15,488 Member
    edited October 2016
    @travisk8s never came "back to explain later".. Oh well. :(