Recomposition: Maintaining weight while losing fat
Replies
-
Just want to add that Strong Curves is designed as 4x per week. It's a great group of programs. I did the beginner one and am currently starting on the Glute only program before trying the Advanced program. I really think you'll enjoy it.
Thanks for the insight and feedback on the program. I really am excited to do the program. I'm glad to hear that you enjoy it.
I had to modify a few things as I do all my lifting at home vs the gym. So there are a few exercises that I can't do as I don't have a cable system at home. Luckily the book has an awesome index so it's fairly easy to sub out another exercise in the same category
I went with 30p 30f and 40c breakdown (percentages) nutrition wise. My sedentary maintenance is 1790 but according to fitbit (which I've found about 90-95% accurate for me) my calories usually work out to 2000ish most days up to 2400 on heavy workout days.1 -
Just want to add that Strong Curves is designed as 4x per week. It's a great group of programs. I did the beginner one and am currently starting on the Glute only program before trying the Advanced program. I really think you'll enjoy it.
Thanks for the insight and feedback on the program. I really am excited to do the program. I'm glad to hear that you enjoy it.
I had to modify a few things as I do all my lifting at home vs the gym. So there are a few exercises that I can't do as I don't have a cable system at home. Luckily the book has an awesome index so it's fairly easy to sub out another exercise in the same category
I went with 30p 30f and 40c breakdown (percentages) nutrition wise. My sedentary maintenance is 1790 but according to fitbit (which I've found about 90-95% accurate for me) my calories usually work out to 2000ish most days up to 2400 on heavy workout days.
Thank you for that info. It's really helpful.0 -
How long does it take to truly see results? I've been trying recomp for about 2 months; I've actually gained weight, while loosing waist size. However, there is minimum change on my appearance as far as belly fat goes.0
-
How long does it take to truly see results? I've been trying recomp for about 2 months; I've actually gained weight, while loosing waist size. However, there is minimum change on my appearance as far as belly fat goes.
Gained how much in two months? You shouldn't be gaining weight in recomposition, so anything more than 2 pounds per month means your calorie intake is too high.
Recomp takes a long time usually. It depends on your starting weight and body fat percentage. If you had fairly low body fat to begin with you could possibly see results in 3-6 months. If your body fat was in the mid to higher 20's it could take a few years.4 -
How long does it take to truly see results? I've been trying recomp for about 2 months; I've actually gained weight, while loosing waist size. However, there is minimum change on my appearance as far as belly fat goes.
Gained how much in two months? You shouldn't be gaining weight in recomposition, so anything more than 2 pounds per month means your calorie intake is too high.
Recomp takes a long time usually. It depends on your starting weight and body fat percentage. If you had fairly low body fat to begin with you could possibly see results in 3-6 months. If your body fat was in the mid to higher 20's it could take a few years.
Am actually eating under my daily caloric requirements. I am 162 cm in height and was at 161 lbs of weight. Went on a strict diet and heavy hiit and dropped to 145 in about 2.5 months. I decided to stay at that level and took on weight lifting. I weighted myself almost a month ago, reaching 151 lbs. My caloric intake is supposed to be 2510c but I normally consume between 1800c and 1900c (50p, 25c, 25f).
Needless to say I'm a little confused about this.1 -
How long does it take to truly see results? I've been trying recomp for about 2 months; I've actually gained weight, while loosing waist size. However, there is minimum change on my appearance as far as belly fat goes.
Gained how much in two months? You shouldn't be gaining weight in recomposition, so anything more than 2 pounds per month means your calorie intake is too high.
Recomp takes a long time usually. It depends on your starting weight and body fat percentage. If you had fairly low body fat to begin with you could possibly see results in 3-6 months. If your body fat was in the mid to higher 20's it could take a few years.
Am actually eating under my daily caloric requirements. I am 162 cm in height and was at 161 lbs of weight. Went on a strict diet and heavy hiit and dropped to 145 in about 2.5 months. I decided to stay at that level and took on weight lifting. I weighted myself almost a month ago, reaching 151 lbs. My caloric intake is supposed to be 2510c but I normally consume between 1800c and 1900c (50p, 25c, 25f).
Needless to say I'm a little confused about this.
If you are only weighing yourself every month or so then you have no real data to judge if you are maintaining, losing or gaining weight.
I went up and down 6lbs last week so if I only weighed at the high of low points I would have a totally different belief of what my weight trend actually is.
Suggest you start gathering data if you are impatient to gauge progress (weight, tape measure, photos....).
If your numbers are accurate then that's a big deficit when trying to recomp.
My results are no doubt unique to me and my circumstances at that particular time but for perspective I slightly lost lean mass at 1lb/week (-500 cals a day average) deficit and could gain LBM at 1lb/month deficit. (c. -120 cals a day average).3 -
I feel like belly fat is always the very last to go. Hard to be patient, but I think this is what most people aren't happy with. If you are doing everything right, it will tighten up. It just takes time.How long does it take to truly see results? I've been trying recomp for about 2 months; I've actually gained weight, while loosing waist size. However, there is minimum change on my appearance as far as belly fat goes.1 -
How long does it take to truly see results? I've been trying recomp for about 2 months; I've actually gained weight, while loosing waist size. However, there is minimum change on my appearance as far as belly fat goes.
Gained how much in two months? You shouldn't be gaining weight in recomposition, so anything more than 2 pounds per month means your calorie intake is too high.
Recomp takes a long time usually. It depends on your starting weight and body fat percentage. If you had fairly low body fat to begin with you could possibly see results in 3-6 months. If your body fat was in the mid to higher 20's it could take a few years.
Am actually eating under my daily caloric requirements. I am 162 cm in height and was at 161 lbs of weight. Went on a strict diet and heavy hiit and dropped to 145 in about 2.5 months. I decided to stay at that level and took on weight lifting. I weighted myself almost a month ago, reaching 151 lbs. My caloric intake is supposed to be 2510c but I normally consume between 1800c and 1900c (50p, 25c, 25f).
Needless to say I'm a little confused about this.
If you are only weighing yourself every month or so then you have no real data to judge if you are maintaining, losing or gaining weight.
I went up and down 6lbs last week so if I only weighed at the high of low points I would have a totally different belief of what my weight trend actually is.
Suggest you start gathering data if you are impatient to gauge progress (weight, tape measure, photos....).
If your numbers are accurate then that's a big deficit when trying to recomp.
My results are no doubt unique to me and my circumstances at that particular time but for perspective I slightly lost lean mass at 1lb/week (-500 cals a day average) deficit and could gain LBM at 1lb/month deficit. (c. -120 cals a day average).
Decided to take care of that. Weighted myself today... Currently at 152 lbs.0 -
I feel like belly fat is always the very last to go. Hard to be patient, but I think this is what most people aren't happy with. If you are doing everything right, it will tighten up. It just takes time.How long does it take to truly see results? I've been trying recomp for about 2 months; I've actually gained weight, while loosing waist size. However, there is minimum change on my appearance as far as belly fat goes.
I am aware of that, and I am impatient. However, I wanted to get an estimate. Will it be months? A year? More? My guess is a year...0 -
I feel like belly fat is always the very last to go. Hard to be patient, but I think this is what most people aren't happy with. If you are doing everything right, it will tighten up. It just takes time.How long does it take to truly see results? I've been trying recomp for about 2 months; I've actually gained weight, while loosing waist size. However, there is minimum change on my appearance as far as belly fat goes.
I am aware of that, and I am impatient. However, I wanted to get an estimate. Will it be months? A year? More? My guess is a year...
In my case my stomach goes first and my thighs and hips take the longest. It blows but it is genetics for that. All you can do is slowly work on it and eventually there won't be any other fat for your body to burn.2 -
How your body reacts to different macro %s is usually genetics; but I have heard (and read) that cutting back on carbs (especially starchy/sugary carbs) and upping your protein will help. Sunflower is right though, it usually takes several months to a year to really see results. Ditching the steady state cardio for hiit (and keeping the session to 15 -20 min) also helps. You will have to experiment to see what works for you.3
-
There's a lot of talk about recomposition through the boards, so I wanted to have a place where we can compile research on it and experiences with it.
When is recomp appropriate? When you are at a decent weight for your height, but your body fat is still at a level that is undesirable to you recomposition is probably a good option. It's a way to maintain your weight, eat well and still lose fat. This is a slow process and can feel like spinning your wheels, but it can be less mentally stressful than bulk and cut cycles.
The keys to recomposition are:
1. At the end of the week you have eaten at about your TDEE. You may choose to cycle calories or eat at a flat rate every day, this should fit your personal preference. If you have a consistent workout schedule using a TDEE calculator should place your goal fairly close to your actual maintenance. The only way to know for sure is to monitor your weight and calories over time while adjusting calories when you have an up or down trend.
2. Getting adequate protein. Protein is a building block of muscle. The goal of recomposition is to build muscle and lose fat at the same time. Protein, carbohydrates and fats play different roles in the muscle building process, so make sure that you keep to a macronutrient set up that works for you. This may need to be adjusted over time.
3. Lift! Following a good lifting program is the key to the entire process. It's where the magic happens. Pick a program that you will enjoy and that is going to challenge you. Continue to focus on improving.
4. Take pictures and measure. It's a slow process and you may feel you are making no progress. Your measurements will help you see that you are making progress.
Feel free to share stories of recomposition and any research you have seen on it. Ask questions if you have any.
I have no idea what I'm doing and need basic help. WLS patient reached my goal need to maintain but don't understand recomp. From what I gather is continuing to eating at a deficit to lose fat.....ugh. I take classes that work with bodyweight exercises and lifting weights. And I take a cardiovascular class. Work out 3x a week 2 hours. My week looks like this rest Monday, tuesday buns and guns than cardio. Next day body weight class than cardio. Rest. Friday cardio total body class. Rest. Rest.
0 -
I feel like belly fat is always the very last to go. Hard to be patient, but I think this is what most people aren't happy with. If you are doing everything right, it will tighten up. It just takes time.How long does it take to truly see results? I've been trying recomp for about 2 months; I've actually gained weight, while loosing waist size. However, there is minimum change on my appearance as far as belly fat goes.
I am aware of that, and I am impatient. However, I wanted to get an estimate. Will it be months? A year? More? My guess is a year...
If patience is an issue, then a recomp might not be up your alley. Cut/bulk cycles might be more effective. The efficacy of a recomp is based on training protocol, nutrition, genetics and consistency. If any of those are out of whack, it may be ineffective or take very long. I worked with a lady who went fro 26% body fat to 18% in 1.5 years. In 2 years, it was down to 14% body fat (all validated through DEXA scans). But she was extremely consistent.4 -
griffinca2 wrote: »How your body reacts to different macro %s is usually genetics; but I have heard (and read) that cutting back on carbs (especially starchy/sugary carbs) and upping your protein will help. Sunflower is right though, it usually takes several months to a year to really see results. Ditching the steady state cardio for hiit (and keeping the session to 15 -20 min) also helps. You will have to experiment to see what works for you.
Carbs/starches aren't really a factor. Protein is important for maintaining/building muscle and stimulating protein synthesis (especially leucine), but even then if you are getting around .1.5g/kg to 2.2g/kg, then you should be in a solid position.0 -
There's a lot of talk about recomposition through the boards, so I wanted to have a place where we can compile research on it and experiences with it.
When is recomp appropriate? When you are at a decent weight for your height, but your body fat is still at a level that is undesirable to you recomposition is probably a good option. It's a way to maintain your weight, eat well and still lose fat. This is a slow process and can feel like spinning your wheels, but it can be less mentally stressful than bulk and cut cycles.
The keys to recomposition are:
1. At the end of the week you have eaten at about your TDEE. You may choose to cycle calories or eat at a flat rate every day, this should fit your personal preference. If you have a consistent workout schedule using a TDEE calculator should place your goal fairly close to your actual maintenance. The only way to know for sure is to monitor your weight and calories over time while adjusting calories when you have an up or down trend.
2. Getting adequate protein. Protein is a building block of muscle. The goal of recomposition is to build muscle and lose fat at the same time. Protein, carbohydrates and fats play different roles in the muscle building process, so make sure that you keep to a macronutrient set up that works for you. This may need to be adjusted over time.
3. Lift! Following a good lifting program is the key to the entire process. It's where the magic happens. Pick a program that you will enjoy and that is going to challenge you. Continue to focus on improving.
4. Take pictures and measure. It's a slow process and you may feel you are making no progress. Your measurements will help you see that you are making progress.
Feel free to share stories of recomposition and any research you have seen on it. Ask questions if you have any.
I have no idea what I'm doing and need basic help. WLS patient reached my goal need to maintain but don't understand recomp. From what I gather is continuing to eating at a deficit to lose fat.....ugh. I take classes that work with bodyweight exercises and lifting weights. And I take a cardiovascular class. Work out 3x a week 2 hours. My week looks like this rest Monday, tuesday buns and guns than cardio. Next day body weight class than cardio. Rest. Friday cardio total body class. Rest. Rest.
Recomp is essentially eating at maintenance and training hard (generally progressive overload lifting), which tends to be a bit harder with body weight training, mainly due to it's difficulty to add more volume (sets, reps, load). If you eat in a deficit and follow your current program, it might work to help maintain your current muscle mass, but that will be determined by caloric intake and protein intake in particular.0 -
griffinca2 wrote: »How your body reacts to different macro %s is usually genetics; but I have heard (and read) that cutting back on carbs (especially starchy/sugary carbs) and upping your protein will help. Sunflower is right though, it usually takes several months to a year to really see results. Ditching the steady state cardio for hiit (and keeping the session to 15 -20 min) also helps. You will have to experiment to see what works for you.
Why would cutting down on carbs (your high performance fuel remember) help?
Who would it help? How would it help?
It certainly wouldn't help me as it would compromise my exercise and make maintenance miserable.
Ditching steady state cardio for HIIT is also odd generic advice. It would be totally inappropriate for me and actually counter productive to my training aims.
A lot of people will find lifting and HIIT isn't a good combination at all due to the recovery needs from both.
Do agree with the "experiment to see what works for you" part though as it needs to be in context of the individual, their goals/capabilities/preferences/enjoyment etc.3 -
Whenever I see this image, it's funny because I don't look like any of those. Arms and legs and shoulders more like the 14-15% lady, belly much more like the 25-26% lady (I think). My guess is that I'm in the low 20s because I feel very lean, nothing is very squishy, and whenever I carry extra fat it NEVER goes on in a flattering way like the 25-26% lady has in that picture. Just dumpy - my "extra" is inevitably expressed as saddlebags and belly, not artfully arranged all over to give the curves and smooth look she has.12 -
Whenever I see this image, it's funny because I don't look like any of those. Arms and legs and shoulders more like the 14-15% lady, belly much more like the 25-26% lady (I think). My guess is that I'm in the low 20s because I feel very lean, nothing is very squishy, and whenever I carry extra fat it NEVER goes on in a flattering way like the 25-26% lady has in that picture. Just dumpy - my "extra" is inevitably expressed as saddlebags and belly, not artfully arranged all over to give the curves and smooth look she has.
These infographics are interesting as a general reference, but as you say, symmetry is key. The lighting is ideal on all these photos.0 -
Whenever I see this image, it's funny because I don't look like any of those. Arms and legs and shoulders more like the 14-15% lady, belly much more like the 25-26% lady (I think). My guess is that I'm in the low 20s because I feel very lean, nothing is very squishy, and whenever I carry extra fat it NEVER goes on in a flattering way like the 25-26% lady has in that picture. Just dumpy - my "extra" is inevitably expressed as saddlebags and belly, not artfully arranged all over to give the curves and smooth look she has.
I find those pictures frustrating. 17-18% doesn't show much muscle but 14-15% looks very muscular. Quite a jump. I have muscle, for sure and I guess I look more like the 14-15% photo but I got hydrostatic test in Spring and it said 20% because I have more lower body fat.0 -
Whenever I see this image, it's funny because I don't look like any of those. Arms and legs and shoulders more like the 14-15% lady, belly much more like the 25-26% lady (I think). My guess is that I'm in the low 20s because I feel very lean, nothing is very squishy, and whenever I carry extra fat it NEVER goes on in a flattering way like the 25-26% lady has in that picture. Just dumpy - my "extra" is inevitably expressed as saddlebags and belly, not artfully arranged all over to give the curves and smooth look she has.
I find those pictures frustrating. 17-18% doesn't show much muscle but 14-15% looks very muscular. Quite a jump. I have muscle, for sure and I guess I look more like the 14-15% photo but I got hydrostatic test in Spring and it said 20% because I have more lower body fat.
Wow. 20% is fantastic!1 -
Whenever I see this image, it's funny because I don't look like any of those. Arms and legs and shoulders more like the 14-15% lady, belly much more like the 25-26% lady (I think). My guess is that I'm in the low 20s because I feel very lean, nothing is very squishy, and whenever I carry extra fat it NEVER goes on in a flattering way like the 25-26% lady has in that picture. Just dumpy - my "extra" is inevitably expressed as saddlebags and belly, not artfully arranged all over to give the curves and smooth look she has.
I find those pictures frustrating. 17-18% doesn't show much muscle but 14-15% looks very muscular. Quite a jump. I have muscle, for sure and I guess I look more like the 14-15% photo but I got hydrostatic test in Spring and it said 20% because I have more lower body fat.
You look great, and 20% seems healthier as a maintenance level of fat. And yes, none of those pictures seem to have muscle until the 14-15% image, when more commonly a fit lady would carry both a healthy % of fat and muscle. By healthy I mean optimal for ongoing body functions and health, not "healthy" as a synonym for large.3 -
I know I thanked you all on here before, but thank you again! I love the body shape changes that have happened for me. I'm still noticing more improvements.0
-
Whenever I see this image, it's funny because I don't look like any of those. Arms and legs and shoulders more like the 14-15% lady, belly much more like the 25-26% lady (I think). My guess is that I'm in the low 20s because I feel very lean, nothing is very squishy, and whenever I carry extra fat it NEVER goes on in a flattering way like the 25-26% lady has in that picture. Just dumpy - my "extra" is inevitably expressed as saddlebags and belly, not artfully arranged all over to give the curves and smooth look she has.
I couldn't find that chart that I wanted when I was making my original post. I ended up finding the chart I wanted on a different site after I posted this one. But it got the job done to get my point across, lol. This is the chart I was looking for originally b/c it's more in line with my body. My body looks more like the 25% body shown in this image.
1 -
sijomial, My last statement was that "you will have to experiment to see what works for you." This means that what works for one person may not work for another. Also, I'm not saying to ditch carbs; just to cut back on the starchy/sugary ones. Eating good carbs (mostly green) is essential for good health.
1 -
@griffinca2griffinca2 wrote: »sijomial, My last statement was that "you will have to experiment to see what works for you." This means that what works for one person may not work for another. Also, I'm not saying to ditch carbs; just to cut back on the starchy/sugary ones. Eating good carbs (mostly green) is essential for good health.
But if I cut down on starchy carbs and sugary carbs my exercise performance would plummet and I would struggle to meet my daily calorie goal. I have zero need to reduce and very good reasons to keep them high. That you may want to is your choice. It's certainly not a general requirement for people exercising and recomping.
As an example on long ride days I'm eating 90g of mostly sugary carbs an hour and still can't keep up with my energy expenditure.
I also hugely enjoy my starchy carbs alongside what you term "good carbs" and plenty of protein and fat. Unnecessary restriction is not a good way to tackle long term maintenance.10 -
@griffinca2griffinca2 wrote: »sijomial, My last statement was that "you will have to experiment to see what works for you." This means that what works for one person may not work for another. Also, I'm not saying to ditch carbs; just to cut back on the starchy/sugary ones. Eating good carbs (mostly green) is essential for good health.
But if I cut down on starchy carbs and sugary carbs my exercise performance would plummet and I would struggle to meet my daily calorie goal. I have zero need to reduce and very good reasons to keep them high. That you may want to is your choice. It's certainly not a general requirement for people exercising and recomping.
As an example on long ride days I'm eating 90g of mostly sugary carbs an hour and still can't keep up with my energy expenditure.
I also hugely enjoy my starchy carbs alongside what you term "good carbs" and plenty of protein and fat. Unnecessary restriction is not a good way to tackle long term maintenance.
I'm with you. Starches are actually one of my best friends. Satiety is high for me, especially when combined with lean proteins.6 -
Whenever I see this image, it's funny because I don't look like any of those. Arms and legs and shoulders more like the 14-15% lady, belly much more like the 25-26% lady (I think). My guess is that I'm in the low 20s because I feel very lean, nothing is very squishy, and whenever I carry extra fat it NEVER goes on in a flattering way like the 25-26% lady has in that picture. Just dumpy - my "extra" is inevitably expressed as saddlebags and belly, not artfully arranged all over to give the curves and smooth look she has.
I couldn't find that chart that I wanted when I was making my original post. I ended up finding the chart I wanted on a different site after I posted this one. But it got the job done to get my point across, lol. This is the chart I was looking for originally b/c it's more in line with my body. My body looks more like the 25% body shown in this image.
haha I got thighs like 30% and abs like 15-17% so 45-47 /2 = 22.5-23.5% and hey bodpod said 22.4% so lol just cut some bodies in half and I am good.4 -
Random but does anyone else find they do better eating 3 larger meals a day vs smaller meals. Smaller meals I end up not satisfied and hungry and overeating where 3 larger meals hold me over longer between meals.2
-
sunflowerhippi wrote: »Random but does anyone else find they do better eating 3 larger meals a day vs smaller meals. Smaller meals I end up not satisfied and hungry and overeating where 3 larger meals hold me over longer between meals.
I find I do better with a small lunch and family dinner and no snacks. I don't feel deprived because I have a nice meal to look forward to in the evening. Plus I've never been very hungry in the mornings. I was hungry all of the time on 6 small 200 cal meals. I never felt like I had a true meal. It seemed like grazing on a bitty snack every 3 hours.2 -
sunflowerhippi wrote: »Random but does anyone else find they do better eating 3 larger meals a day vs smaller meals. Smaller meals I end up not satisfied and hungry and overeating where 3 larger meals hold me over longer between meals.
I have two large meals a day.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.6K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions