INTERMITTENT FASTING - A LIFESTYLE MAKEOVER
Replies
-
I was going to make a new thread, but my question fits well here.
Why do people believe IF means no "breakfast" (aka a morning meal)? Is it because that's what most IFers do?
Most likely because it's easiest to do a 16:8 fast over night, so you end up skipping breakfast time. Not breakfast itself. I have bacon and eggs and noon when I "break-my-fast" or breakfest ;-)4 -
I absolutely love IF. I was on just a 1200 calorie diet first with exercise. My husband stated talking about IF. At first, I didn't agree with it but got hooked on it. With other diets, as soon as I had my breakfast I would start feeling hungry. ALL THE TIME. I would eat every 3 hours. Always busy with my food and my diet. Now, with IF, my last meal goes in at 7pm and my first meal goes in at 1pm (sometimes noon3
-
ChristinaOne21 wrote: »Intermittent Fasting might help with your Weight Loss too...
I have just started with My Fitness Pal logging food and calorie counting for 1200 calories a day.
I've also stopped smoking, lowered alcohol intake from my daily glass (or 4) of wine, to just 1 this week and I'm doing 10,000 steps a day for Steptember (sometimes
)
It may sound like I am the motivated type (that has fallen off the band wagon), but I am far from that normally and more of a couch potato - in fact lying in bed working on my computer has been my comfort zone for a long time.
However, I discovered Intermittent Fasting online (see links below) and I have been doing the 16/8 - that's 16 hours no food and 8 hours of eating and it is working miracles! I am also incorporating the Primal eating type lifestyle to a point - more protein, less carbs, lots of veggies, no packaged chemical ridden crap, avoiding sugar apart from some fruit.
Our Primal ancestors probably didn't eat breakfast, let alone 6 meals a day, or take a snack everywhere with them and I've learnt that these type of diets just don't cut it for me. I simply become food obsessed and always hungry.
I have found IF actually does work for me. I am not hungry during the fasting time at all and tend to eat a lot less in the 8 hour window I've allocated myself. Now I do 2 meals rather than 3 and find I don't need anything in between, so taking in a lot less calories overall. I also have motivation to make all of the above lifestyle changes for the first time in many years and energy to get up and moving. And I'm sleeping better as well - insomnia and sleep apnoea has been an ongoing nightmare for me, but maybe the change in overall eating patterns has helped with this.
I am only just on the start of my journey, so I am not sure whether I will have the willpower to keep it up - my willpower with anything is usually non existent. However, I have set myself a goal of 30kgs (66 pounds) to lose by April and right now I am determined to make it happen - hence the blog post to keep me accountable!
I'm only about a week in now and I have already found that eating the IF way has set me free from a life long struggle where I have been eating emotionally - when bored, lonely, depressed, grieving, self-sabotaging relationships - heck even when everything was fine and I was happy I'd still eat. I was never really listening to my body’s own hunger or satiety signals and just eating because I could and because food was readily available. I was not stopping when full - to the point I would go back for second or even third helpings and then feel ill from overeating - but be hungry again in a few hours.
I'm ditching that cycle for good!
Now I only get an empty, growly tummy just before 1pm when my eating window is about to start, the first few days was more often - but I discovered that being hungry didn't mean I had to give in to it. And then the hunger pangs would disappear after a few minutes.
What a great feeling of control and empowerment I have today. And what an unusual feeling that is for me.
I recommend reading up on Intermittent Fasting and giving it a go if you want to lose weight or improve your overall wellbeing - it's proven to be great for a myriad of other health reasons too.
It's free; nobody is making money out of a diet gimmick, pills and protein shakes, or selling you a book - you can google everything you need to know; humans have been doing it for centuries...
Did I mention it costs nothing?
In fact it may save you money, especially if you end up eating less like me and drinking more water - rather than wine
And even if you don't reduce your calorie intake or increase your exercise output your body will still get a few hours of fat burning time, so even the most sedentary couch potato has a chance of success!
Thanks for reading and hope this blog helps others like me
Christina
Some good articles that have helped me understand the benefits of IF:
http://jamesclear.com/the-beginners-guide-to-intermittent-fasting
http://mamasweeds.com/weight-loss/intermittent-fasting-for-weight-loss/
I'm a huge fan of fasting. It resets your body and mind. Eating just to eat is why I've struggled. I dont regularly fast like you but it sounds like a good idea for me. I will typically fast after I've had a day where I've gone off the rails with food. It gets me right back on track.5 -
Did u stick to it? And how did it go?4
-
Yes, TELL US CristinaOne21 did you do it?0
-
She hasn't been on for awhile, so she might have fallen off... at least from MFP.0
-
No advice on the topic here but just wanted to say congrats on quitting smoking! That's major to do on top of all the other stuff. 1
-
This content has been removed.
-
Thank you for this. I just joined.2 -
EvgeniZyntx wrote: »ChristinaOne21 wrote: »
Nope. That's mumbo jumbo.
If you eat 1300 calories spread out over 10 meals or only eat 1300 calories in one meal a day you'll burn the same amount of fat.
I do not believe that statement to be true. The only thing I can agree with is that if you consume 1300 calories at once or over time, you will have consumed 1,300 calories. It's how your body REACTS to consuming 1,300 calories that matters. Most people will lose weight on 1,300 calories/day, even without exercise, if they are very overweight, regardless of the method used. However, for those of us who are INSULIN RESISTANT or have METABOLIC SYNDROME, fasting is very different from calorie restriction. In addition to following Dr. Jason Fung (search for him on YouTube), I have queried several endocrinologists within the health system that I work in, and all agree that intermittent fasting (fasting begins after 12 hours of not eating) boosts your metabolism/energy and fat burning to the maximum.
I have a friend who is calorie counting (1,200 calories per day) and one who is doing IF (1,200) calories per day. Both started January 1st of this year. The person who is calorie counting has lost 8 lbs, the one who is doing IF has lost 15 lbs (almost double). Both are women in mid-life.
3 -
Here I am! Thank you for those private messages that came into my inbox as it has reminded me that tuning in here each day is the way to keep accountable to myself. IF has become a daily part of my lifestyle - not every day but the majority of the week. Just over three weeks to go until our wedding and unfortunately I haven't got anywhere near my goal - life kind of got in the way and a few things fell by the wayside. However I am feeling pretty happy in my own skin despite not achieving all my goals. I think the main thing I need to get back on track is having the evening meals earlier and not too much and the right things - a big meal in the evening makes me more hungry the next morning - especially if it isn't balanced - whereas smaller portions and a better mix of protein, veges and good carbs earlier in the evening means I can happily not eat for another 16 hours.3
-
DeeDiddyGee wrote: »EvgeniZyntx wrote: »ChristinaOne21 wrote: »
Nope. That's mumbo jumbo.
If you eat 1300 calories spread out over 10 meals or only eat 1300 calories in one meal a day you'll burn the same amount of fat.
I do not believe that statement to be true. The only thing I can agree with is that if you consume 1300 calories at once or over time, you will have consumed 1,300 calories. It's how your body REACTS to consuming 1,300 calories that matters. Most people will lose weight on 1,300 calories/day, even without exercise, if they are very overweight, regardless of the method used. However, for those of us who are INSULIN RESISTANT or have METABOLIC SYNDROME, fasting is very different from calorie restriction. In addition to following Dr. Jason Fung (search for him on YouTube), I have queried several endocrinologists within the health system that I work in, and all agree that intermittent fasting (fasting begins after 12 hours of not eating) boosts your metabolism/energy and fat burning to the maximum.
I have a friend who is calorie counting (1,200 calories per day) and one who is doing IF (1,200) calories per day. Both started January 1st of this year. The person who is calorie counting has lost 8 lbs, the one who is doing IF has lost 15 lbs (almost double). Both are women in mid-life.
Does Fung have any studies that hold macros and calories constant to back his claims? Most of what i have seen from his is largely anecdotal or based on preliminary research.
There is some research to suggest there might be a small increase in metabolism and increase insulin sensitivity.2 -
DeeDiddyGee wrote: »EvgeniZyntx wrote: »ChristinaOne21 wrote: »
Nope. That's mumbo jumbo.
If you eat 1300 calories spread out over 10 meals or only eat 1300 calories in one meal a day you'll burn the same amount of fat.
I do not believe that statement to be true. The only thing I can agree with is that if you consume 1300 calories at once or over time, you will have consumed 1,300 calories. It's how your body REACTS to consuming 1,300 calories that matters. Most people will lose weight on 1,300 calories/day, even without exercise, if they are very overweight, regardless of the method used. However, for those of us who are INSULIN RESISTANT or have METABOLIC SYNDROME, fasting is very different from calorie restriction. In addition to following Dr. Jason Fung (search for him on YouTube), I have queried several endocrinologists within the health system that I work in, and all agree that intermittent fasting (fasting begins after 12 hours of not eating) boosts your metabolism/energy and fat burning to the maximum.
I have a friend who is calorie counting (1,200 calories per day) and one who is doing IF (1,200) calories per day. Both started January 1st of this year. The person who is calorie counting has lost 8 lbs, the one who is doing IF has lost 15 lbs (almost double). Both are women in mid-life.
Does Fung have any studies that hold macros and calories constant to back his claims? Most of what i have seen from his is largely anecdotal or based on preliminary research.
There is some research to suggest there might be a small increase in metabolism and increase insulin sensitivity.
@psuLemon that is interesting about the increased insulin sensitivity. When I was googling the term I found the below supplement that claims to increase insulin sensitivity as well plus a host of other things.
lifeextension.com/magazine/2014/5/how-lipoic-acid-preserves-critical-mitochondrial-function/page-02?p=10 -
GaleHawkins wrote: »DeeDiddyGee wrote: »EvgeniZyntx wrote: »ChristinaOne21 wrote: »
Nope. That's mumbo jumbo.
If you eat 1300 calories spread out over 10 meals or only eat 1300 calories in one meal a day you'll burn the same amount of fat.
I do not believe that statement to be true. The only thing I can agree with is that if you consume 1300 calories at once or over time, you will have consumed 1,300 calories. It's how your body REACTS to consuming 1,300 calories that matters. Most people will lose weight on 1,300 calories/day, even without exercise, if they are very overweight, regardless of the method used. However, for those of us who are INSULIN RESISTANT or have METABOLIC SYNDROME, fasting is very different from calorie restriction. In addition to following Dr. Jason Fung (search for him on YouTube), I have queried several endocrinologists within the health system that I work in, and all agree that intermittent fasting (fasting begins after 12 hours of not eating) boosts your metabolism/energy and fat burning to the maximum.
I have a friend who is calorie counting (1,200 calories per day) and one who is doing IF (1,200) calories per day. Both started January 1st of this year. The person who is calorie counting has lost 8 lbs, the one who is doing IF has lost 15 lbs (almost double). Both are women in mid-life.
Does Fung have any studies that hold macros and calories constant to back his claims? Most of what i have seen from his is largely anecdotal or based on preliminary research.
There is some research to suggest there might be a small increase in metabolism and increase insulin sensitivity.
@psuLemon that is interesting about the increased insulin sensitivity. When I was googling the term I found the below supplement that claims to increase insulin sensitivity as well plus a host of other things.
lifeextension.com/magazine/2014/5/how-lipoic-acid-preserves-critical-mitochondrial-function/page-02?p=1
You should consider this as well. As usual its overhyped in humans.
https://examine.com/supplements/conjugated-linoleic-acid/3 -
GaleHawkins wrote: »DeeDiddyGee wrote: »EvgeniZyntx wrote: »ChristinaOne21 wrote: »
Nope. That's mumbo jumbo.
If you eat 1300 calories spread out over 10 meals or only eat 1300 calories in one meal a day you'll burn the same amount of fat.
I do not believe that statement to be true. The only thing I can agree with is that if you consume 1300 calories at once or over time, you will have consumed 1,300 calories. It's how your body REACTS to consuming 1,300 calories that matters. Most people will lose weight on 1,300 calories/day, even without exercise, if they are very overweight, regardless of the method used. However, for those of us who are INSULIN RESISTANT or have METABOLIC SYNDROME, fasting is very different from calorie restriction. In addition to following Dr. Jason Fung (search for him on YouTube), I have queried several endocrinologists within the health system that I work in, and all agree that intermittent fasting (fasting begins after 12 hours of not eating) boosts your metabolism/energy and fat burning to the maximum.
I have a friend who is calorie counting (1,200 calories per day) and one who is doing IF (1,200) calories per day. Both started January 1st of this year. The person who is calorie counting has lost 8 lbs, the one who is doing IF has lost 15 lbs (almost double). Both are women in mid-life.
Does Fung have any studies that hold macros and calories constant to back his claims? Most of what i have seen from his is largely anecdotal or based on preliminary research.
There is some research to suggest there might be a small increase in metabolism and increase insulin sensitivity.
@psuLemon that is interesting about the increased insulin sensitivity. When I was googling the term I found the below supplement that claims to increase insulin sensitivity as well plus a host of other things.
lifeextension.com/magazine/2014/5/how-lipoic-acid-preserves-critical-mitochondrial-function/page-02?p=1
You should consider this as well. As usual its overhyped in humans.
https://examine.com/supplements/conjugated-linoleic-acid/
Thanks I will take look after my testing of Poly MVA after I burn through my 1/2 gallon supply .0 -
Does Fung have any studies that hold macros and calories constant to back his claims? Most of what i have seen from his is largely anecdotal or based on preliminary research.
There is some research to suggest there might be a small increase in metabolism and increase insulin
I am witnessing firsthand accounts where A1C has improved significantly as well as moderate weight loss, results they couldn't get from straight calorie counting. I picked 16:8 after reading tons of articles and books by Fung, Valardy, etc.
0 -
What I love about is although I am eating the same number of calories like before, the only difference is that during the fed state (the eating window), eating all those calories in a short amount of time makes me feel like I am bulking when in reality, I am eating the same freaking thing as before, but in a shorter time frame.
YES!0 -
DeeDiddyGee wrote: »
Does Fung have any studies that hold macros and calories constant to back his claims? Most of what i have seen from his is largely anecdotal or based on preliminary research.
There is some research to suggest there might be a small increase in metabolism and increase insulin
I am witnessing firsthand accounts where A1C has improved significantly as well as moderate weight loss, results they couldn't get from straight calorie counting. I picked 16:8 after reading tons of articles and books by Fung, Valardy, etc.
N=1 is great for personal experience but there are a lot of factors that could of driven the results. Carb restriction, fasting, weight loss, etc...
To suggest someome is wrong, would suggest there is evidence to back it up. The studies i have seen support thr number of meals and timing is largely unimportant. I have also seen a large amount of studies supporting low carb as beneficial for those with IR.
But that does not mean, that IF is superior (outside of personal preference). If your eating pattern allowed it, if you held calories and protein the same, that weight loss could have driven the same result. Its possible that if you also subsequently restricted carbs, it could have been the factor.
The fact is, your body will take longer to break down larger amounts of calories. So that is why I asked if you had science to back it. So Evengi is correct (which he is a PhD in biology IIRC).
Keep in mind that compliance and adherence to a diet strategy is first and foremost the most important factor. But ones experience does not negate what science tells us.2 -
DeeDiddyGee wrote: »
Does Fung have any studies that hold macros and calories constant to back his claims? Most of what i have seen from his is largely anecdotal or based on preliminary research.
There is some research to suggest there might be a small increase in metabolism and increase insulin
I am witnessing firsthand accounts where A1C has improved significantly as well as moderate weight loss, results they couldn't get from straight calorie counting. I picked 16:8 after reading tons of articles and books by Fung, Valardy, etc.
N=1 is great for personal experience but there are a lot of factors that could of driven the results. Carb restriction, fasting, weight loss, etc...
To suggest someome is wrong, would suggest there is evidence to back it up. The studies i have seen support thr number of meals and timing is largely unimportant. I have also seen a large amount of studies supporting low carb as beneficial for those with IR.
But that does not mean, that IF is superior (outside of personal preference). If your eating pattern allowed it, if you held calories and protein the same, that weight loss could have driven the same result. Its possible that if you also subsequently restricted carbs, it could have been the factor.
The fact is, your body will take longer to break down larger amounts of calories. So that is why I asked if you had science to back it. So Evengi is correct (which he is a PhD in biology IIRC).
Keep in mind that compliance and adherence to a diet strategy is first and foremost the most important factor. But ones experience does not negate what science tells us.
I do not believe IF to be superior -- I believe it to work for me, where all other programs (too many to name) were too loose and I failed (due to MY not being able to adhere). This is something I can follow...and because my meals are condensed into a small window, I feel satsified, even though eating the same things when calorie-counting. Without IF, I wouldn't know about the timing, that again works for me. Let's be friends, okay?
0 -
I have just stumbled upon this IF idea and while I'm not doing anything else but watching calories, I have realised on an average day I fast about 15 hrs between meals. I generally eat dinner around 530pm and eat breakfast after dropping my kids off at school around 9-930am. This is just normal for me and I'm wondering if its still IF or does my sleep state not count as effective as fasting until 3pm and eating late at night? I do not snack at all after dinner, a habit a taught myself a few years ago. I do not really see any bonus in terms of weightloss. I only lose weight if I keep my calories under my maintenance level.0
-
jacqulinka wrote: »I have just stumbled upon this IF idea and while I'm not doing anything else but watching calories, I have realised on an average day I fast about 15 hrs between meals. I generally eat dinner around 530pm and eat breakfast after dropping my kids off at school around 9-930am. This is just normal for me and I'm wondering if its still IF or does my sleep state not count as effective as fasting until 3pm and eating late at night? I do not snack at all after dinner, a habit a taught myself a few years ago. I do not really see any bonus in terms of weightloss. I only lose weight if I keep my calories under my maintenance level.
If you are already doing fasts it may not be as effective for you as it is for some people. I generally rarely eat after 6 pm out of habit and sometimes I skip breakfast (breakfast being at around 11 am). I'm already generally eating within an 8 hour window or shorter and I have done it when I was morbidly obese too, that's my normal. Your eating schedule appears to be within an 8 hour window so you're effectively intermittent fasting naturally.
Windowed eating is basically meant to condense calories within just a few hours so you get to eat what you feel is a large quantity of food which helps some people feel more satisfied. Hunger before starting to eat is less extreme and more tolerable than hunger between meals for many people and if you are already a lifetime intermittent faster like I am there is hardly any hunger before the first meal. If you are already having larger fewer meals it wouldn't help your hunger unless you take in all of your calories within one meal or something, which may not be practical. That's why I turned my attention to the kind of intermittent fasting that severely restricts calories on some days to achieve the same result of feeling like I'm eating pleasantly satisfying quantities on non-fast days.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions