Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.
We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

They Aren't Curves, They're Fat Rolls

245

Replies

  • Posts: 776 Member
    bbell1985 wrote: »
    lmao off being fit equals no cellulite. I have cellulite until the cows come home but you bet I'm fit.

    Again, do you somehow believe that you look like the model we are discussing? I creeped your photos and, IMHO, you do not. Your BF% is obviously much lower than hers. As I said earlier, she's very pretty but that doesn't mean she's not carrying a fair bit of extra fat.

    I guess I could have been more clear: it's not a matter of cellulite or not so that when you are fit you have none at all. Rather, it's a scale between more and less cellulite relative to your overall BF%. Her legs look like that cuz she's got a high BF%. The rest of you ladies might have cellulite--I acknowledged it's distressingly stubborn--but not like she does because you all have lower BF% than her and are almost certainly fitter than her if not just skinnier.

  • Posts: 4,571 Member

    Again, do you somehow believe that you look like the model we are discussing? I creeped your photos and, IMHO, you do not. Your BF% is obviously much lower than hers. As I said earlier, she's very pretty but that doesn't mean she's not carrying a fair bit of extra fat.

    I guess I could have been more clear: it's not a matter of cellulite or not so that when you are fit you have none at all. Rather, it's a scale between more and less cellulite relative to your overall BF%. Her legs look like that cuz she's got a high BF%. The rest of you ladies might have cellulite--I acknowledged it's distressingly stubborn--but not like she does because you all have lower BF% than her and are almost certainly fitter than her if not just skinnier.

    If you want me to DM you a picture I can. It's terrible. You have no clue.
  • Posts: 92 Member
    Because overweight people are looking to you to feel better about themselves?? I assure you, nobody gives a damn what words you want to use to describe their body.

    That's also part of the problem. If we need others to feel good about ourselves or to be motivated to take care of ourselves, we already lost the battle.
  • Posts: 776 Member
    edited June 2017

    OP: fat people cannot have any shape other than fat rolls. Never. Curves.

    First response: oh really? Here's a fat woman with curves.

    You: but she's not fit.

    I mean, no. No one said she was. Would you truly say that beautiful woman has no curves and only fat rolls? That's just baffling to me. Fat women, like all women, come in a variety of shapes and styles. Some have rolls, some are straight, some are curvy, some are a combination of curves and rolls. The idea that fat women present only one body type is wrong.

    It seems like we are talking past one another. I already said I'm not sure how to define the spectrum between fat and ??? Not fat? Skinny? Fit? Whatever word you want to use, she exists towards the fat end of the spectrum as opposed to the not fat/skinny/fit end of the spectrum.

    My comment was intended to communicate that she is pretty but also not skinny/fit/not fat. That is all. It is possible to be both. Which I'm pretty sure means I'm agreeing with most of the people up in arms with me for pointing out that she's on the heavy side because I also said she is very pretty. Feeling like nothing I say will be acceptable despite the fact I was being supportive of larger, pretty ladies.

    EDIT: Lean! That's the word I should have used. She's very pretty but those are not the legs of a lean person.
  • Posts: 92 Member
    grmrsan wrote: »

    I'm not angry about what you call it. I'm angry that you think you're so high and mighty that it is any of your *kitten* business how other people refer to their own bodies. Why do you give a *kitten*? It literally has zero impact on your life. And why in the hell do you think it's so important to come on a site like this and proclaim your opinion in a way that you you know damn good and well is going to hurt peoples feeling? And don't even try and pretend that you are educating or some *kitten*, that's *kitten* and you know it. Use whatever the *kitten* words you want, but deal with your disappointment that the world does not revolve around your opinions.

    Sorry my point went over your head.
  • Posts: 92 Member
    usmcmp wrote: »

    If we're going to attack advertising let's go to the real sources of the struggle people have when it comes to starting weight loss and to sustaining weight loss: the weight loss industry.

    Let's educate people. Let's tell them that they don't have to starve, cleanse, eat special foods, take magical pills, do certain exercises, or any combination of those to lose weight. Stick it to the weight loss industry and shame them for making it seem like weight loss requires a decoder ring of which fads and pills will make people skinny. Why should I even try because every magazine has tips, tricks, and ads that make it seem impossible. That's a far bigger issue than the word curvy.

    I can't believe it happened, but I had to Thumbs Up that one. I couldn't agree more. You highlighted another pet peeve of mine. :-)
  • Posts: 21,219 Member
    edited June 2017
    BPCycler wrote: »

    I can't believe it happened, but I had to Thumbs Up that one. I couldn't agree more. You highlighted another pet peeve of mine. :-)

    I made the same post earlier, but less words. I honestly think that we could ban companies from saying anything other than fat and it would do absolutely nothing. We have to remove the "barriers of entry" that people see when it comes to weight loss and that comes down to education as well as holding the weight loss industry more accountable for the claims.

    ETA: Most of the weight loss industry makes me angry.
  • Posts: 3,563 Member

    BPCycler wrote: »

    A Dodgers minor league team recently canceled and actually apologized for scheduling an "Hourglass Appreciation Night."

    Why? Well, because it offended people's sensibilities. But let's call fat curvy and continue promoting the idea that the unhealthiness of obesity is just wonderful. Wow, seriously!

    Well, that would kind of offend me too since I'm a (healthy weight) apple shaped woman without a curve from my ribcage to my knees...
  • Posts: 92 Member
    edited June 2017
    I made the same post earlier, but less words. I honestly think that we could ban companies from saying anything other than fat and it would do absolutely nothing. We have to remove the "barriers of entry" that people see when it comes to weight loss and that comes down to education as well as holding the weight loss industry more accountable for the claims.

    ETA: Most of the weight loss industry makes me angry.

    And "Diet" and Magic Pills. Gotta love it. I didn't start losing weight until I realized it boils down to making a lifestyle change. I've been able to go from Pretty Fat to now just kinda fat. I'm ashamed at what I did to myself and stopped making excuses. That was the barrier I had to break to finally start getting somewhere.

  • Posts: 776 Member
    How many times am I going to have to walk back and clarify my statement? I'm not arguing anything with anyone. I AGREE THAT A WOMAN CAN BE BOTH PRETTY AND NOT LEAN. Just because you are heavy doesn't mean you are not pretty and just because you are lean does not mean you are pretty. Not sure how much more clear I can be.
This discussion has been closed.