What nobody tells you about losing weight

1206207209211212394

Replies

  • idabest777
    idabest777 Posts: 97 Member
    Vanity sizing also really depends on the store. In one of my favourite stores I was down to an xs/xxs top and a 0 or 2 pant while at some other stores i'm s/m and a size 4 or 6 pant.

    I've found that usually the cheaper stores or stores or in stores where the target customer is older the vanity sizing is much worse. I got a tank top in XXS at a store aimed more at middle aged women while in other stores i was still wearing a medium or a large.
  • skymningen
    skymningen Posts: 532 Member
    idabest777 wrote: »
    Vanity sizing also really depends on the store. In one of my favourite stores I was down to an xs/xxs top and a 0 or 2 pant while at some other stores i'm s/m and a size 4 or 6 pant.

    But... that negates the whole concept of sizes! If the difference is that big anyway they could just use numbers from -X to X, so you try 0 first and then go down or up, depending on what you need. How would I ever order online if it is that bad? I am somewhat okay with there being a range on what S or M or 4 or 38 means, maybe even let it overlap with another companies range for the next size. But that they are completely different? Crazy world.

  • everher
    everher Posts: 909 Member
    For the person that asked- vanity sizing is a ploy by clothing makers to try to get you to buy their brand because you are a smaller size in it- people who say they are down to 160 and now wear a size 4- ummm nope you're not. I wish that women's sizes were the same as men's- just measurements and we wouldn't have this problem. I was 117 all through high school and wore a size 7. I would probably be a 0 now if I weighed that. Ridiculous. I shop at thrift stores and the clothes are older and sizing is more realistic. If you truly want to know your size, try to buy a clothing pattern going by your measurements- those haven't changed. You'd be shocked. Girls who are in our high school's sewing class are usually about in tears when they have to buy a clothing pattern for a size 14 when their jeans say size 2. So the teacher gets out a skirt she wore in high school and it looks pretty small- it's a 9- so they can see that sizes mean absolutely nothing.

    I think we've gone from one extreme to another with women's clothing sizes in the US honestly. I think 50 years ago you had to darn near be underweight to wear a smaller clothing size, but now if you're a normal, healthy weight you need a XS or a XXS in some cases.
  • MsMaeFlowers
    MsMaeFlowers Posts: 261 Member
    MeadowRae wrote: »
    skymningen wrote: »
    idabest777 wrote: »
    Vanity sizing also really depends on the store. In one of my favourite stores I was down to an xs/xxs top and a 0 or 2 pant while at some other stores i'm s/m and a size 4 or 6 pant.

    But... that negates the whole concept of sizes! If the difference is that big anyway they could just use numbers from -X to X, so you try 0 first and then go down or up, depending on what you need. How would I ever order online if it is that bad? I am somewhat okay with there being a range on what S or M or 4 or 38 means, maybe even let it overlap with another companies range for the next size. But that they are completely different? Crazy world.

    It really can be that bad. I have had three different sizes of pants fit at the same time. A lot of companies offer a sizing chart online, so at least that helps.

    I would say that the thing I learn when losing weight is how shallow people really are. Like why are you treating me differently now? Oh....right.

    Yeah I went thrift store shopping for pants a few weeks ago, and fit everything from a 0 to an 8 depending on the brand. Very annoying to never have any idea what size to shop for, as even the pants that use waist measurements are completely different. Compared 2 pairs of 26 that were about the same cut, and one had at least 3-4 more inches around the waist.
  • JeromeBarry1
    JeromeBarry1 Posts: 10,179 Member
    edited August 2017
    @JeromeBarry1 Oh no--I don't think THAT's what it is! Well, unless all those times I googled what a 5'6" hourglass figure looks like at various weights is catching up with me!

    @CeciliaBobilia I honestly do think that would be taken the wrong way by the advertising industry.
  • okohjacinda
    okohjacinda Posts: 329 Member
    maisiba wrote: »
    How grocery shopping is a different experience now. You're not getting judged for what you buy anymore.

    When you stand eg in the aisle with the sweets looking at chocolate, nobody looks weirdly at you anymore. You know that 'perhaps she should be eating that' look you get. Same when you line up your food at the cashier. The other day I had like 5 huge boxes of ice cream (ice cream are the treats I'm including into my diet) and nobody even blinked.

    At the same time, I'm not hiding anything in my shopping cart from plain view anymore either (did anyone else hide the "bad stuff" like sweets, cake, etc under veggies, salad, et all because you were a bit embarrassed?).

    Yep I do it now and its sort of a bittersweet thing for me because it keeps me from getting the bad stuff yet I sometimes wish I could be at goal so that I could get a piece of cake or ice cream that isn't Halo Top without the stares.
  • zindroth
    zindroth Posts: 334 Member
    edited August 2017
    - That eating healthy, veggies & low fat, lean meats) can mean eating a lot of food - some days I am just tired of eating, and still don't reach my calorie goal.

    This is a real challange for me, and that is before I add exercise back in.
  • Nony_Mouse
    Nony_Mouse Posts: 5,646 Member
    edited August 2017
    Well, I already wear a small or xs, but I'll never rock a Dora the Explorer shirt because my shoulders are too broad to wear children's sizes.

    Can absolutely rock my Thunderbirds tees, boys size 10 (NZ). Sadly awesome glow in the dark Darth Vader tee is a little short in the body thanks to my boobs, which are bigger than when I was 25. Love that tee, but not about to give up my cleavage for it.
  • VeronicaA76
    VeronicaA76 Posts: 1,116 Member
    anybeary wrote: »
    The most surprising thing is that people think nasty comments about your size are doubly okay now that you're thin. Nope. When you say, "Gawd, you're so skinny," and grimace while rolling your eyes, that's NOT a compliment. Your face betrays that it's not a compliment. Commenting on other people's bodies is just not okay, no matter what size the person is!

    There's a fine line between compliment and insult. Someone making a specific comment such as "wow, your traps are looking great" while I'm at the gym working on them is fine, but just "skinny", not always appropriate.
Do you Love MyFitnessPal? Have you crushed a goal or improved your life through better nutrition using MyFitnessPal?
Share your success and inspire others. Leave us a review on Apple Or Google Play stores!