Why is (carefully planned) rapid weight loss bad?
Replies
-
mburgess458 wrote: »TavistockToad wrote: »Obviously walking burns calories but its not going to improve cardiovascular fitness unless your baseline is so bad that walking is actually effort.
But you don't need to improve cardiovascular fitness to lose weight. Losing weight is a matter of burning more calories than you consume. Walking helps you burn more calories.
You've got it all worked out so why start this thread at all?
And everyone has said "YES".
I can guarantee that you have never seen evidence from the 80/10/10 people that you need less protein than the current body of evidence. It's more likely some dumb article that isn't backed by science. Protein requirements are higher than most will do. They assume it will bulk them up or prevent their fat loss, which is a blatant lie. Not only will it increase their energy output, improve metabolic functions and increase satiety, but high protein diets have been demonstrated to be the most successful ones.
And if you looked at the protocols by Lyle McDonald, you should see that.
16 -
Wow... because you can't go for a 6 hour walk, you won't walk at all? Just wow...
You know what? I did misspeak, and I apologize. You didn't say you won't walk at all. What you said was more like "if I can't walk when I want, where I want, for the amount of time that I want, without kids, it doesn't count". Fortunately, your body knows better.
24 -
StellaClaireE wrote: »StellaClaireE wrote: »Do you have a stroller for the kiddos? Pushing a stroller for walks is deff a good option. Mine is 2 1/2 now and riding a bike, which is nice because I have to walk at a fairly descent pace to keep up with her.
I'd love to get the almost 2 year old onto a bike omg! It can be done by 2 and a half?, omg omg, that would be awesome??? Man I had stabilisers on my bike till I was 8!
Sounds like a buggy is the same thing, take the kiddos on more walks, you'll see a difference. She loved going for walks in her stroller when she was younger. She still has training wheels(stabilizers I assume) on her bike but I have to walk at a descent pace to keep up with her. Granted she is 2 and gets distracted easily and we stop because she has to pick up a stick or a rock or just talk about the sky...
Point is though that changes can be made to get where you want to be, you just have to make up your mind and do it, you can make excuses or just do it. Hell I've been making excuses the last 3.5 years and decided to just f*&king do it. It doesn't take more than a week or so to feel it, to feel better, a little stronger, a little more motivated etc. It's not really about the scale, it's how you feel. Every day try to be better than yesterday, if it doesn't happen try again the next day.
"Get uncomfortable being uncomfortable.That's how you break the plateau and reach the next level"
I do try and go on 2 walks a day with them, but that's weather permitting (rain etc) and also sometimes I have stuff I need to get done - if we go on 2 walks in a day, between naps and feeding them that's the whole day gone ya know.
But a walk with a toddler is like you said, stopping every single bloody meter to look at another daisy lol. I prefer to walk fast so it's super frustrating but I am sure it's good for them at least.
I think you just want your fat to magically disappear. It takes time and effort just like raising kids. I have 2 of my own (5 yrs and 8 months) and I'm a full time worker and we go on walks everyday because walking is good for everyone not just for me. Children need to exercise and have a well balanced diet too.11 -
Why wait to get stronger and improve your issues before you are "skinny" enough to do it.Also, when you are maintain your muscle, that means you will have greater body fat % reductions quicker, which means you will get to a more ideal body weight and image quicker. And I can't tell you how many people I have worked with to correct the issues caused by their dieting practices (similar to yours or the typical cardio queen mentality). And I will say, it's a lot harder to rebuild what you lost, than maintaining what you have. But if you are ok with potentially, prolonging this because you don't think it will cause issues, then it's ok. You would have to live with this consequences.
It's actually quiet the opposite of what you believe. Including a combination of cardio and resistance training will improve short and long term health, improve fat loss, and will reduce your current pains caused by being so weak.
Also, we live in an age where you have tons of free resources where you don't have to craft anything. For resisntance trainng programs, you can use: https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10332083/which-lifting-program-is-the-best-for-you/p1 or go to www.fitnessblender.com for free videos. There is everything from body weight, free weight, and full lifting routines in that link. There are several books in there as well if you want to develop knowledge.
For cardio, you can use fitnesblender, go for walks, bike ride, run, etc.. Its just about finding something you are interested in.
I will say, I have never met a person who was mad they started lifting early. But I have met a ton of people who are mad they didn't start earlier because they thought like you did.
I find all the bodyweight programs I find online are far too advanced for me even when they claim to be for beginners I can't manage them. Like I can't do a pushup, only a couple (like 3 at best) of very poor form girl pushups - and the form thing is what worries me, I don't know if I am doing everything wrong and making stuff worse not better.
Listen, from someone who started equally as weak and out of shape as you describe with about 100lbs to lose when I started, I get the discouragement here. When I first got back on a bike last year after many many years of not having ridden I could barely go a block before getting winded. Slight inclines? Forget it. But I love the bike, and I kept at it and by summer's end my strength and stamina were vastly improved. I could even tackle small hills. When I started a yoga routine to add to the exercise, I was *kitten* at it. I could barely do any pose properly, could barely stretch. But with practice I gradually improved. So what if it's just 3 'very poor form' push-ups? Build the strength now. Take the advice being offered to you now. Because what's going to happen when you drop all the weight, should you not do the strength training now, is you'll still be weak. Smaller weight, but still weak. Strength isn't going to magically manifest because you're no longer carrying all that extra weight. Build it now, later you will thank you for starting early.10 -
Generally, you want to learn how to eat properly during and change the way you are eating to sustain a better more healthy weight. While I'm sure your way will work (if you have the will power to stick to it - I don't think I would) it's because when you are at matience you'll still have to adhere to portion control ect... this is a goal weight orientated way of eating. And while it's good to have a goal weight. Diets are not effective in weight management. Lifestyle changes are.4
-
I've always felt that the time spent losing weight is also time learning new habits and acclimating to your new lifestyle. it's not just about losing weight, it's about living your life while you're losing weight. don't do anything to lose weight that you're not willing to do forever.21
-
Just for me, it took a long time to store the fat I had going on 3 years ago. It took "not as long" to take it off, but for it to be fat-loss (stored fat) I had to follow a plan. That plan worked for me, as I lost almost on the dot, 1 lb per week, never got hungry, and did walk at least 4 times a week. I lost down to 118 which I think is a good amount, but with my added weight-training, the scale may go up which is ok with me. Muscle good, "too" much fat, bad.
I didn't have a lot to lose I admit. I am 5'2", and "was" 144 which put me in the shape of a potato, with toothpicks for for legs sticking out. So maybe in some people, different skeletal structure, muscle-mass, this isn't heavy. But I am small-boned, and had little muscle to speak of.
I started the em2wl, even though I wasn't into weight-training (and that has changed now, I love it, but light weights and building enough so no, more toothpicks )
I gained back 10 because I got lazy, and started eating too much of the wrong things. Now I'm back on MFP to get rid of the 10 or so lbs, and strength-trainining/weight-training. None of this is easy, for anyone, but once I get it on track, I look better (the best I can) feel better, and can continue to eat the way I've eaten while losing the weight.
I love following the TDEE number, it works for me, and I know so many others it is working for, and they had a lot more to take off than I had/have. Here's my fave link to calculate TDEE (total daily energy expenditure) and find how much food I need to consume, according to "whatever" activities I do for exercise: https://damnripped.com/tdee-calculator/1 -
I've always felt that the time spent losing weight is also time learning new habits and acclimating to your new lifestyle. it's not just about losing weight, it's about living your life while you're losing weight. don't do anything to lose weight that you're not willing to do forever.
This was so insightful I had to quote it because it's very true.
The importance of habit formation and learning cannot be overstated. Willpower will fail you eventually, even if it takes years. Habit is a stronger thing to break. Healthy, sustainable lifestyles that promote normal weight are learned and maintained through habit. Quick fixes don't promote the foundation necessary to build habits.9 -
TavistockToad wrote: »you cant get adequate nutrition on too few caloriesyour body burns muscle if you eat too few calories (your heart is a muscle)you're likely to binge if you eat too few calories...the right amount depends on what your maintenance cals are?
Just type this into a Google search, and you can read a lot of articles, believe them or not, up to you:
why your body will burn lean, muscle mass before fat?
We need to do the research on these things, and then, the proof is in the pudding whether it works or not. That's what I do, is educate myself as best I can, and I do search out others that have gone before me. I follow those that have lost the weight, built their bodies to be stronger, and yes, they look darn good
8 -
1BlueAurora wrote: »My life is not an evidence-based study, but a personal example you can consider or not. I decided to lose weight quickly. I followed MFP, but set my rate of loss at 2 pounds per week. I actually lost 2 to 2.5 pounds per week, I was so enthusiastic about counting calories and exercising (more walks, starting to run, Zumba, yoga). I was a maniac. Here was the long-term result: I lost muscle. There was still plenty of fat to burn, and to me I don't need to understand the science completely because I can look at my body and see the results. My body chose to burn muscle, too. My bicep/tricep areas are relatively limp and pocked with holes where the muscle used to be. Not exactly the look I was going for. I'm still trying to regain what muscle I used to have. Sometimes it's just a few pushups using the kitchen counter while I'm waiting for water to boil.
Here's another surprise: I started to lose my hair. I was eating "properly" - eggs, cheese, avocados, tons of vegetables, chicken, lean meats, fish, all that good stuff. BUT something wasn't apparently right nutrition-wise. Even months after I increased my calorie intake, my hair continued to fall out.
Here's another example involving my good friend. She is extremely thin after years of dieting but no exercising. Four days ago she tripped on a crack in a sidewalk and fell. She fractured and dislocated one shoulder, and fractured her knee cap. She had surgery yesterday on the knee. She was told that she has osteoporosis, which made everything about her bone breakage worse. She was told that her lack of bone density could be related to not doing weight-bearing exercise.
So, for a recap: (1) rapid weight loss is not everything one might hope. There are real drawbacks. (2) It would make some sense to do some exercise while you lose weight to retain muscle and increase bone strength. As overweight people have more weight to push around, you will definitely get some benefit by starting now with pushups, bicep curls, etc. etc. Don't wait to reach your goal weight to exercise!! Start it now.
There is a good link I posted on page one or two that you should check out. You don't need to understand the science, but if you follow a structured lifting routine, eat adequate protein, and eat around maintenance, you can work on gaining some muscle. The key is consistency with training and diet. As you get stronger, you will have a greater chance of seeing muscle gains. At the very least, you will see improvements to your body.2 -
I already had decades of yo-yo dieting and weight gain trying to stick to reasonable calorie deficit long term (1800-1400kcal) so I can't really say that this is any worse if that's the worst case scenario. It feels far more manageable, especially since there's the motivational effect of seeing a loss most days instead of a couple of times a month if I'm lucky.
How to combat this^ is not an skipping eating for 2 days.
Combating yo-yo dieting is learning new BEHAVIORS for a lifetime. Getting the weight off is not the "cure" for decades of bad eating habits.......I've been there too. I can always seem to take the weight off - because that's a temporary "project." Maintenance is not a "project"......it's forever. There a book called The Beck Diet Solution that helps you get a handle on the behavioral side of things.
Look into 5:2 - a diet that's 500 calories 2 days a week and maintenance the other 5. You still log calories and portions for all 7 days. You are practicing maintenance too.
When you get to goal - set MFP to maintenance (continue to log) and use 500 calorie days here and there to keep your weight in check.9 -
Re: pushups. I couldn't do knee pushups, so I started with wall pushups. They were too hard and I was too weak, so I stepped closer to the wall until I found the sweet spot that challenged me but didn't overwhelm me. Gradually I stepped farther and farther from the wall, then I moved to counter pushups, a lower counter, knees, assisted normal pushups (with a partially deflated exercise ball under me), and now I can do normal pushups. It took years.
I wanted to run. C25k is geared towards beginners but it was too hard for me, so I did an easier program and worked up to running 45 continuous minutes. It took years. Just because others can run 30 continuous minutes in 8 weeks didn't mean I had to give up on running or wait until I lose weight.
I don't get it. You would rather postpone something just because you're not good at it? Isn't the whole point of a progressive program to gradually get better at something?
28 -
1BlueAurora wrote: »My life is not an evidence-based study, but a personal example you can consider or not. I decided to lose weight quickly. I followed MFP, but set my rate of loss at 2 pounds per week. I actually lost 2 to 2.5 pounds per week, I was so enthusiastic about counting calories and exercising (more walks, starting to run, Zumba, yoga). I was a maniac. Here was the long-term result: I lost muscle. There was still plenty of fat to burn, and to me I don't need to understand the science completely because I can look at my body and see the results. My body chose to burn muscle, too. My bicep/tricep areas are relatively limp and pocked with holes where the muscle used to be. Not exactly the look I was going for. I'm still trying to regain what muscle I used to have. Sometimes it's just a few pushups using the kitchen counter while I'm waiting for water to boil.
Here's another surprise: I started to lose my hair. I was eating "properly" - eggs, cheese, avocados, tons of vegetables, chicken, lean meats, fish, all that good stuff. BUT something wasn't apparently right nutrition-wise. Even months after I increased my calorie intake, my hair continued to fall out.
Here's another example involving my good friend. She is extremely thin after years of dieting but no exercising. Four days ago she tripped on a crack in a sidewalk and fell. She fractured and dislocated one shoulder, and fractured her knee cap. She had surgery yesterday on the knee. She was told that she has osteoporosis, which made everything about her bone breakage worse. She was told that her lack of bone density could be related to not doing weight-bearing exercise.
So, for a recap: (1) rapid weight loss is not everything one might hope. There are real drawbacks. (2) It would make some sense to do some exercise while you lose weight to retain muscle and increase bone strength. As overweight people have more weight to push around, you will definitely get some benefit by starting now with pushups, bicep curls, etc. etc. Don't wait to reach your goal weight to exercise!! Start it now.
Thanks for telling your story on this Bluearora, I so hope many read it, and heed the dangers of rapid, weight-loss. I suppose there are exceptions, I just don't know of them;)3 -
One important thing I've also learned, is whatever "plan" I have to lose fat, the calories I choose to eat, to lose, will go up 20%, for my plan. Am I willing to eat that amount the rest of my life, oh yeah, since mine will be just below 1700. I also plan to keep my macros the same.
That's what I'll share with others is that important question, "are you willing to eat that way the rest of your life"? Something I had to think about before I got hold of the TDEE information.1 -
TavistockToad wrote: »walk for exercise
I don't know if walking counts as exercise really, it's not exactly hard work. Since having the kids I am only averaging 6000 steps a day (when carrying my phone - so outside, I don't carry it round in the house - when I used to have a wrist tracker I got 10-15k average, usually with one 30-35k day in there, in a hilly area, but that was before kids - my son can't walk far and carrying him is - as I mentioned - quite difficult).
I am trying to get out more in the evenings when the kids are in bed but I feel super guilty because it means my husband is stuck alone at home feeling lonely. Like last night I went out for a walk but I rushed home because I felt bad for him.
I really miss it though, my husband and I loved walking before we had kids, but the cost/logistics of getting childcare or the difficulty of carrying children for miles is hard to work with. I'd really like to build up to going mountaineering one day, I am genuinely sad at how trapped in the local area having kids makes us - you add in having to be home for nap time (so no whole days out just walking around anymore) - a bus or train to anywhere interesting to walk is an hour in itself so it's 2hrs round trip, getting him and the baby fed, dressed, ready etc is another 2hrs, at best you get a measly hour walk. We used to go for 6hrs or so. It's the one thing I regret about having kids - but I know once they're older and we build up some stamina we'll be able to get back into it (although I plan to have more so who knows when everything will fall into place...)
Wow... because you can't go for a 6 hour walk, you won't walk at all? Just wow...
I guess all of us with kids are just doomed
Walking is my main form of cardio. I only walk 2 miles lately, but it's working none-the-less. I do longer periods of body-weight exercise, but it's not a lot right now. I'm still losing inches and lbs (1 inch is all, 2 lbs so far). But if I weren't doing something right, I wouldn't have lost the weight, and felt so energetic. I exercise every-other-day, and sometimes I take 2 days off, but stick with my "goal" of calories and still lost 2 lbs.
On weighing, I weigh first thing in the a.m. before I "break my fast" (breakfast). Naked, and even before water, and I get my bottom number. After I lose a lb or two, I measure my areas I chose like my waist which makes me most aware of fat-gain. That's something to remember too. We are "fasting" when we sleep, that why the first thing I do is drink about 8 ounces of water, because that gets my organs ready to start their work. I heard that somewhere, can't recall where but I practice it.0 -
I admit to not reading everything and things have obviously moved to be on page 7. So forgive if this has already been mentioned.
You say you have yo-yo dieted in the past and would like to stop doing so, have trouble restricting to the level you believe you have to on an ongoing basis, and BELIEVE that you have the maintenance skills to maintain and thus can lose at a faster pace by creating large deficits.
Well, this is all excellent opportunity for you to put your money where your mouth is, so to speak.
Based on your discussion you currently have quite a ways to go before you are at the top of the normal weight range.
Because of your current weight, eating the maintenance calories for your actual current activity level, but calculated at BMI 25, will create a large deficit for a significant time period.
Possibly too large of a deficit for it to be optimal, but definitely not as large as what you initially proposed with 2 days of fasting and a day of 1600.
So, if you're confident that you don't need to build up the skills you probably need to build by creating a manageable deficit (20% to 25% of TDEE) over a long period of time... then why don't you try eating straight up at the maintenance level you will have to eat at in order to maintain your eventual weight loss.
The path from where you're at to BMI 25 is probably 2+ years long, so the strategy I am discussing won't really have to be reviewed before you already have a solid year of eating at your eventual maintenance calories and the confidence that comes from knowing you can do that and from having lost quite a bit of weight in the meanwhile!
10 -
I've skimmed through the thread, but forgive me if I've missed something.
OP, if you are comfortable doing OMAD, is there a reason you can't do this every day and be done with it (at the correct calorie level)? Why throw in the added element of completely fasting for 2 days? Do you really understand what people are telling you that there is a limit to how much body fat a person's body can burn in one day, regardless of their current "fat stores"?
Honestly I probably will make OMAD the main "everyday" plan (with 16:8 on weekends actually) but I also want to do some extended fasts in there, just for the fun of it and the challenge mostly, assuming it can't hurt.
And no... I do not currently believe that we can't burn sufficient fat to support our metabolic needs during fasting, I would like to see evidence for that.
maybe this will help you. Just the abstract but it does point out the amount of stored fat that can be accessed for energy per day.
It is not an indefinite amount as you are currently believing.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022519304004175?via=ihub
Cheers, h.11 -
How many more people, different people posting in this thread will it take for you to stop being ridiculous? My guess is never. maybe I am wrong though.17
-
Not a good idea to starve yourself for two days a week. I don't need any evidence to justify that. To me it is just COMMON SENSE. Eventually your body or mind is going to rebel or burnout with that schedule. You are not sitting on a mountain meditating. You have children, a job, family, and live in the modern world. That is enough daily stress. Adding two days when you don't eat anything sounds like it would make those days even worse. But good luck to you. It seems like you've already decided.6
-
Did we get trolled. Hard?
If so, kudos, I guess.
If not,
22 -
Here are the consequences of too rapid weight loss as I’ve witnessed from my bariatric support group.
Gall bladder failure. Brittle nails. Hair loss. Muscle loss. Heart damage.
It is hard to get enough protein with a too stiff deficit. What are you eating, chicken breast, egg whites and whey protein? A single pastry will push you over the edge.13 -
lucerorojo wrote: »Not a good idea to starve yourself for two days a week. I don't need any evidence to justify that. To me it is just COMMON SENSE. Eventually your body or mind is going to rebel or burnout with that schedule. You are not sitting on a mountain meditating. You have children, a job, family, and live in the modern world. That is enough daily stress. Adding two days when you don't eat anything sounds like it would make those days even worse. But good luck to you. It seems like you've already decided.
Yeah, this was the comment that had me shaking my head:I also want to do some extended fasts in there, just for the fun of it and the challenge mostly, assuming it can't hurt.
Clearly, we all need more challenges when it comes to our weight loss9 -
I did not read all the comments, so here is my 2 cents. Lyle McDonald talks about intermittent caloric restriction. People diet 2 days a week, high deficits around 25% of maintenance, then eat maintenance the other 5. So much like 5/2 fasting I guess.2
-
Yeah, this was the comment that had me shaking my head:I also want to do some extended fasts in there, just for the fun of it and the challenge mostly, assuming it can't hurt.
Clearly, we all need more challenges when it comes to our weight loss [/quote]
That "just for fun" part rang the alarm for me too.
Apparently OP hasn't come back so she hasn't found the validation she was looking for. Or she's made up her mind and flounced off to do her thing.
22 -
New_Heavens_Earth wrote: »
That "just for fun" part rang the alarm for me too.
Apparently OP hasn't come back so she hasn't found the validation she was looking for. Or she's made up her mind and flounced off to do her thing.
[/quote]
At least it will likely be a short-lived experiment, based on the OP's history.12 -
TavistockToad wrote: »walk for exercise
I don't know if walking counts as exercise really, it's not exactly hard work.
It is movement, and all movement counts - you don't have to beat the crap out of yourself to lose weight. I am only trying to lose 30 lbs, and I managed to bust through 14 of them in 4 months by just walking and counting calories.
7 -
JoAnna4731 wrote: »TavistockToad wrote: »walk for exercise
I don't know if walking counts as exercise really, it's not exactly hard work.
It is movement, and all movement counts - you don't have to beat the crap out of yourself to lose weight. I am only trying to lose 30 lbs, and I managed to bust through 14 of them in 4 months by just walking and counting calories.
Not only that, walking can be as challenging as you make it. It can be pretty hard work. I challenge OP to try walking as fast as her legs can manage up a hill carrying a backpack. I highly doubt she would think that walking is "not exactly hard work" after 10 minutes of that.
Really, all I hear is excuses. If someone doesn't want to work out, that's their choice, and it's okay, but coming up with all the reasons why they can't always makes me wonder how they think.15 -
Well, if we did get trolled, there is a heck of a lot of good information on here that maybe others, that are truly in need, but afraid to ask, could read.30
-
I don't think she was trolling. She has posted over 500 times on here and her photo is there. Maybe she is fasting today and going on MFP makes her think of food....6
-
I've skimmed through the thread, but forgive me if I've missed something.
OP, if you are comfortable doing OMAD, is there a reason you can't do this every day and be done with it (at the correct calorie level)? Why throw in the added element of completely fasting for 2 days? Do you really understand what people are telling you that there is a limit to how much body fat a person's body can burn in one day, regardless of their current "fat stores"?
Honestly I probably will make OMAD the main "everyday" plan (with 16:8 on weekends actually) but I also want to do some extended fasts in there, just for the fun of it and the challenge mostly, assuming it can't hurt.
And no... I do not currently believe that we can't burn sufficient fat to support our metabolic needs during fasting, I would like to see evidence for that.
'Cuz Gandhi always got that buff, ripped look when the fat over his muscles disappeared during a fast.9
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.4K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.2K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.9K Food and Nutrition
- 47.4K Recipes
- 232.5K Fitness and Exercise
- 426 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.3K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.7K MyFitnessPal Information
- 24 News and Announcements
- 1.1K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions