wilson10102018 wrote: » Pressure vessels do bad things to food. Some folks don't notice or care. That is ok. Their choice. Everyone is entitled to a preference when it comes to food prep. But, there is a reason that the only place one can find pressure vessels is in processed food factories (think Spam), pet food factories and prison or military mess halls. It is that the chemical changes in food caused by high temperature cooking under pressure are not desired by chefs. For my part, I use my old school pressure cooker for two things. Dry bean soups and homemade cat food.
WinoGelato wrote: » What bad things do you think pressure cookers do to food?
steveko89 wrote: » As someone who isn't a fan of food prepared via slow cooker, crockpot, etc. I don't understand the appeal. Numerous people have insisted to my wife and I how great they are and I just kinda shrug. I'd be more inclined to explore Sous Vide methods.
wilson10102018 wrote: » WinoGelato wrote: » What bad things do you think pressure cookers do to food? Uh, place that lovely roasting chicken in the pressure cooker, turn it on for a bit, Voila! Catfood. There is a reason why you can't find a pressure cooker in a restaurant kitchen unless they are processing dry beans. As I said, some people don't care what they eat as long as there is a lot of it. I didn't say that the stuff that comes out of pressure cooking was without nutrition.
poolchicko5 wrote: » Yes keep it, just look up different recipes of things you would normally cook and cook it in there. As a chef I was pretty anti the instant pot until last summer working 17+ hour days gave me no time to cook. It not only allowed my s/o to learn to cook some meals but I could just saute meat and/or veggies in there, throw in rice, seasoning and liquid and have a dish in less than 30 minutes. I think one of the struggles with losing weight is the time it takes to cook and prepare healthy meals. So the instant pot is on your side. Use it to your advantage!
Hamsibian wrote: » Makes excellent stock in 2 hours without the nasty aroma in the kitchen. Roast with carrots and potatoes in 50 mins, spaghetti squash in 7, mashed potatoes in 10...it's amazing!
WinoGelato wrote: » wilson10102018 wrote: » WinoGelato wrote: » What bad things do you think pressure cookers do to food? Uh, place that lovely roasting chicken in the pressure cooker, turn it on for a bit, Voila! Catfood. There is a reason why you can't find a pressure cooker in a restaurant kitchen unless they are processing dry beans. As I said, some people don't care what they eat as long as there is a lot of it. I didn't say that the stuff that comes out of pressure cooking was without nutrition. If I want roast chicken I will take the 1-2 hours to cook it in the oven at home. I haven’t cooked a whole chicken in the IP but I know people who have and shred the chicken for use in all sorts of meals and they rave about the rapid cook time and results. I don’t have cats so I have no idea if the IP would be a good cooking vessel for making food for them. I repeat it doesn’t seem like you really know much about the Instand Pot or pressure cookers and it seems you are willfully misconstruing what people here are saying. No one has said it is the ideal cooking method for all foods. I’m also not sure why you are conflating people talking about reasons to keep and enjoy an Instant Pot with eating high volumes of food with no regard for taste.
musicfan68 wrote: » Does it really save that much time though? You have to wait until it comes up to pressure which according to a friend who has one, takes 15 minutes, then it cooks for say 15 minutes for example, then it has to depressurize for another 15 minutes. 45 minutes to make chicken? I can roast one in the oven in about the same time, and make rice in the microwave in 6 minutes.
amfmmama wrote: » I got an Instapot for Chirstmas, and it is sitting in my kitchen, in the box. It was bought on sale for 70.00. Is it worth keeping? Tell me your Instapot story... good, bad, ugly. GO!