Can u eat unlimited fat as long as u hit your calorie goal?

Options
24

Replies

  • psychod787
    psychod787 Posts: 4,088 Member
    Options
    lgfrie wrote: »
    psychod787 wrote: »
    Well.... yes you could. I was speaking to a researcher. They told me keto was pretty safe, but there is SOME question about insulin sensitivity issues long term. Jury is still out.

    It seems unwise to adopt a diet for which the "jury is still out" when all you have to do is eat balanced meals and stay in a calorie deficit to lose weight.

    I fear a lot of otherwise very sensible, smart people are putting themselves in harm's way for nothing. The human body was not designed to live off 70 % fat.

    Well, we dont have much long term data on the effects of keto on humans. We do in rats. Rats do fine, B@stards stay lean as weasels. Problem is, rats dont develop the same coronary issues as humans. As far as the human body not designed for 70% fat? Humans are more like a flex fuel car, we can run on anything as long as calories are equated. Optimally, maybe not.
  • L1zardQueen
    L1zardQueen Posts: 8,754 Member
    Options
    psychod787 wrote: »
    lgfrie wrote: »
    psychod787 wrote: »
    Well.... yes you could. I was speaking to a researcher. They told me keto was pretty safe, but there is SOME question about insulin sensitivity issues long term. Jury is still out.

    It seems unwise to adopt a diet for which the "jury is still out" when all you have to do is eat balanced meals and stay in a calorie deficit to lose weight.

    I fear a lot of otherwise very sensible, smart people are putting themselves in harm's way for nothing. The human body was not designed to live off 70 % fat.

    Well, we dont have much long term data on the effects of keto on humans. We do in rats. Rats do fine, B@stards stay lean as weasels. Problem is, rats dont develop the same coronary issues as humans. As far as the human body not designed for 70% fat? Humans are more like a flex fuel car, we can run on anything as long as calories are equated. Optimally, maybe not.

    And to add, rats don't live nearly as long as humans do.
  • Hannahwalksfar
    Hannahwalksfar Posts: 572 Member
    Options
    Yes but make sure you still get your proper nutrients as best you can.
  • psychod787
    psychod787 Posts: 4,088 Member
    Options
    psychod787 wrote: »
    lgfrie wrote: »
    psychod787 wrote: »
    Well.... yes you could. I was speaking to a researcher. They told me keto was pretty safe, but there is SOME question about insulin sensitivity issues long term. Jury is still out.

    It seems unwise to adopt a diet for which the "jury is still out" when all you have to do is eat balanced meals and stay in a calorie deficit to lose weight.

    I fear a lot of otherwise very sensible, smart people are putting themselves in harm's way for nothing. The human body was not designed to live off 70 % fat.

    Well, we dont have much long term data on the effects of keto on humans. We do in rats. Rats do fine, B@stards stay lean as weasels. Problem is, rats dont develop the same coronary issues as humans. As far as the human body not designed for 70% fat? Humans are more like a flex fuel car, we can run on anything as long as calories are equated. Optimally, maybe not.

    And to add, rats don't live nearly as long as humans do.

    True, but people have a "thing" about clinical testing on higher level primates. I personally don't get it. 🤷‍♂️ Then again, I am evil. Soooo... welll.. yeah
  • MamboRumba
    MamboRumba Posts: 423 Member
    Options
    All that cheese is gonna cause constipation! Cheese is salty, too. You are gonna get cellulite.
  • erinlane93
    erinlane93 Posts: 170 Member
    Options
    joowelz wrote: »
    Can you eat unlimited animal fat as long as you hit your daily calorie goal - and lose weight?

    Eat whatever you want, if you’re in a calorie deficit you’ll loose weight.

  • Hannahwalksfar
    Hannahwalksfar Posts: 572 Member
    Options
    Cahgetsfit wrote: »
    PS - a chicken is a fowl - neither a mammal nor a reptile.

    However, it does have warm blood. I know, I've killed them before. The blood is very warm.

    Blood being warm isn’t synonymous with being warm-blooded. I assume you’re joking. Endothermic versus ectothermic.
  • L1zardQueen
    L1zardQueen Posts: 8,754 Member
    Options
    Cahgetsfit wrote: »
    PS - a chicken is a fowl - neither a mammal nor a reptile.

    However, it does have warm blood. I know, I've killed them before. The blood is very warm.

    Blood being warm isn’t synonymous with being warm-blooded. I assume you’re joking. Endothermic versus ectothermic.

    Have you ever held a reptile?
  • Hannahwalksfar
    Hannahwalksfar Posts: 572 Member
    Options
    Cahgetsfit wrote: »
    PS - a chicken is a fowl - neither a mammal nor a reptile.

    However, it does have warm blood. I know, I've killed them before. The blood is very warm.

    Blood being warm isn’t synonymous with being warm-blooded. I assume you’re joking. Endothermic versus ectothermic.

    Have you ever held a reptile?

    Well, considering my old career it would be strange if I hadn’t.