Large Framed Ladies - 5'6" Goal Weight

1235

Replies

  • camiah
    camiah Posts: 146
    I've got a large frame and am 5'6'. My goal weight right now is 150. However, if I end up weighing more than that being in awesome shape with a smokin' hot body, I won't complain. I'm mostly focused on getting my body fat percentage down to 20% or so, and getting in fantastic shape. I will admit, however, I haven't made much progress on either goal. I'm finally buckling down and getting serious about changing my behavior.
  • wlkumpf
    wlkumpf Posts: 241 Member
    I am 5'6" I can not imagine being that small. Right now my goal is 145/150. Whih is about 20-25 pounds to lose. Once I get there I may re evaluate, but I do want muscle. I don't want to be skinny fat either. I want to feel healthy, not gangly. After having three kids, if I get back to 145 I think that will feel amazing!
  • NerdyTXChick
    NerdyTXChick Posts: 155 Member
    Bump!

    I'm 5'6 and my goal is to get to 150 and then reevaluate. When I get home I'm going to try the links and see what my frame is. Thanks for posting this!
  • viad25720
    viad25720 Posts: 57 Member
    As someone who took a&p in college, there is truth to the frame thing. Look at two female skeletons side by side about same height (I have) and you can tell differences
  • calgarywolfwoman
    calgarywolfwoman Posts: 1 Member
    OK girls, I am new here so please be gentle. I am 5'5" and currently 178lbs and am large framed. Back in the day (I am 53 years young) I would have been called 'Big Boned' or 'Husky'. Right now my goal weight is 160lbs. B.C. (Before Children) I was, gasp, 138lbs. I know I will never see that again but if I can eventually reach 150lbs I will be ecstatic. Oh, FYI, I recently had a bone density scan and was informed that my bone density was 'Above Normal'. I'm thinking that's a good thing... no osteoporosis for this chickie!
  • jlplove
    jlplove Posts: 25
    I am 5'7 large framed, my goal is 145. Although in the past when I have been 145 or below, people have told me that I looked to thin, that i looked unhealthy. So I am guessing I should not go under 145.
  • palmerig88
    palmerig88 Posts: 623 Member
    Most of my pics are at your ultimate goal weight and I'm 5'6"! Current weight 139. Pic weight 140-145ish
  • dvnjustina
    dvnjustina Posts: 114 Member
    I'm 5'5" with a 6.5" bony wrist. My goal weight is 150 lbs. My sister has pretty much the same frame as me except the hips. She weighs between 130-140, and people commented on how sickly and skinny she looks. I've never been anything but over 200 lbs since puberty, so I'm not sure how I'll look (or feel) at 150.
  • CookAMH
    CookAMH Posts: 5 Member
    I'm a busty 5'6" and my first goal is to lose 30 lbs before another pregnancy (which could be over the winter), which would put me at 180. Once I'm done having kids, I would like to get to 160. I have been strength training, so 160 would be a fit, slim weight to be at. I let go of 150 a long time ago and feel 160-165 would be very realistic and very healthy, even if it's still technically overweight.

    ETA: wrist is 6 3/4", large frame according to one site.
  • foxfirekenzie
    foxfirekenzie Posts: 244 Member
    Perhaps you just have small hands! :laugh: :bigsmile: :laugh: :bigsmile:
  • misalillstead
    misalillstead Posts: 407 Member
    Yup Yup, I've got a large frame too... and my goal is 150-155.I've always been muscular & any thinner then that and I look anorexic. :(
  • ishallnotwant
    ishallnotwant Posts: 1,210 Member
    I'm currently about 150 and my next goal is 140. I plan to re-evaluate from there to see if I want to lose any more.
  • gooellie
    gooellie Posts: 39
    me to i lost 45 pounds on weigh watchers getting down to 188 and now i gained almost 100 starting over with new challenges!
  • daterminedfatburnerX
    daterminedfatburnerX Posts: 346 Member
    Im kinda of confused cuz im 5' 7 weigh atleast 200 and my wrist is like 5.1

    WAIT I FIXED IT im 6inch exact so still small boned
  • morgzz6
    morgzz6 Posts: 3 Member
    I’m 5’2” and my wrist is 6.5”
    I’m a big boned girl
    My shoulders are big, so is my torso, it’s big with a defined waist (29.9 inches) it still big for my height,
    But i got small hands and feet
    I really feel horrible cuz I’ll never have a small waist and many other girls with the same height
    What should i do?
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,557 Member
    Of course there's a difference in skeletal configuration. Wide hips, wide shoulders, especially: You'll need geometrically more meat (muscles, connective tissue, blood vessels, more) to wrap around that, and those things have weight. For women, volume of breast tissue also makes a big difference in sensible goal weight. Muscularity (relative to size) also makes a difference.

    But - if you ask me - the wrist/elbow things aren't that helpful.

    For one, wrists can be fat, too: I lost about 50 pounds, and my wrists got enough smaller that I needed to resize bracelets or they'd slip off (and I mean cuff bracelets slipping off sideways, not just clasped ones slipping off over my hand).

    For two, the body parts that make the most difference, in terms of "frame size" and weight are the big parts, like pelvic width and shoulder width, and those tend to be more obscured by body fat, while we're still overweight. That makes it hard to tell, especially for those who've been overweight for a long time.

    I have big wrists, big elbows: The frame size calculators (even at goal weight) put me at medium to large frame. And I can close my fingers around those wrists: I have big hands, wide and long. Even at BMI 19 (5'5", 116) when I briefly overshot goal weight, my ring finger is a size 10 (when obese, at 183, it was around 14).

    The thing is, despite being a freakin' 63-year-old woman, I'm built like a 14 year old boy: Narrow hips, flat butt (despite being decently strong), literally no breasts (post-bilateral-mastectomies). Shoulders are kinda wide, but that's it. At 140, I was still over-fat, even though I'm not completely devoid of muscle. Now in year 4 of maintenance, I'm sitting in the mid-130s, and that's more body fat than ideal. 125-ish would be better.

    I'm not saying anyone here is wrong about what a good goal weight for them will be. BMI is a range for a reason!

    I'm just saying it's a little more nuanced than wrist size, and whether your fingers wrap around. You get to decide what weight you'd like to be, on any basis you prefer. Most weights in the normal BMI range and a bit into the overweight BMI range can be healthy, for many women. You and your doctor are the ones to think through the health implications for you, because that's individual and situation dependent.

    Let me be very clear: I'm not saying that those my height who think their healthy weight is higher than my healthy weight are wrong. Not at all. I'm not doubting anyone. But it's also good to be thoughtful about people who might be at the other end of the body configuration continuum: Sometimes these threads devolve into "people would be skeletal/unhealthy at X height and Y (lower than the poster targets) body weight". Understanding that it's very individual, we can all support one another positively in our individual goals, right? :flowerforyou:
  • nooshi713
    nooshi713 Posts: 4,877 Member
    edited September 2019
    I don’t know if this whole wrist measurement thing is accurate. My wrist is 6.25 inches but I can easily overlap my thumb and finger. I’m 5’0”, 127 lbs, and wear a size 6. If my weight goes below 115lbs I stop menstruating. I know many girls my height who weigh 90-100lbs and don’t have this problem.

    I’m definitely not small framed because I know so many women with way tinier wrists than me. Maybe my hands are just huge.
  • cmriverside
    cmriverside Posts: 34,449 Member
    2 0 1 2 Thread.








    I don't think there really is a perfect weight for anyone, but you'll know it when you get there. As long as it's in the healthy weight range I don't think there is one weight. My weight range per the BMI chart has a 30 pound range.
  • kshama2001
    kshama2001 Posts: 28,052 Member
    morgzz6 wrote: »
    I’m 5’2” and my wrist is 6.5”
    I’m a big boned girl
    My shoulders are big, so is my torso, it’s big with a defined waist (29.9 inches) it still big for my height,
    But i got small hands and feet
    I really feel horrible cuz I’ll never have a small waist and many other girls with the same height
    What should i do?

    I'll quote myself from your thread. Also, a lot of people there asked you questions which you did not answer. In case you did not get the notifications, here is the link: https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/discussion/10766315/i-am-a-big-boned-girl
    kshama2001 wrote: »
    morgzz6 wrote: »
    I’m 5’2” and my wrist is 6.5”
    I’m a big boned girl
    My shoulders are big, so is my torso, it’s big with a defined waist (29.9 inches) it’s still big for my height,
    But i got small hands and feet
    I really feel horrible cuz I’ll never have a small waist as many other girls with the same height
    What should i do?

    I have a large frame, and when I was in high school hated my big calves and feet. But later I started doing yoga and realized how beneficial large feet were for balancing poses.

    I stopped comparing myself to other women not long after high school - when I was in the military I realized small feet were not critical in order to gain male attention, lol.
  • This content has been removed.
  • kshama2001
    kshama2001 Posts: 28,052 Member
    Sure lets revive this thread!

    I have thick, dense bones confirmed by medical scans and apparently carry considerably more muscle mass than the average woman. I have always been much stronger than any other girl I know...I used to be put in with the boys in high school sports because of this lol!

    I think want to weigh 180. Right now aiming for 215...I wanna see what my high school weight looks like now lol!.

    Yes, I'd love to see my high school weights too!
  • 5'6", large German farming build. I lost 115 lbs, and because of my frame, excess skin, and goal to be thick and muscular and not thin, I am happy between 165-170. Looking to put on more muscle over time, so I may go up a bit. There's no ideal for any frame/height, and I feel bad for anyone who subscribes to ideals. Just do you, boo. If you're happy and healthy where you're at, thumbs up. Have some confidence in your satisfaction and choices. :-)
  • scarlett_k
    scarlett_k Posts: 812 Member
    What does the circumference of your wrist have to do with your build?
  • Gisel2015
    Gisel2015 Posts: 4,189 Member
    scarlett_k wrote: »
    What does the circumference of your wrist have to do with your build?

    Wrist Size and Frame Size
    Knowing your frame size allows you to estimate a healthy weight range for your body. Wrist circumference is often used for determining frame size, since people who with larger frames also have larger wrists.

    For example, a man over 5 foot 5 inches tall, and a wrist that measures 6.5 to 7.5 inches around, has a medium frame.
    A woman over 5 foot 5 inches tall, and a wrist that measures 6.25 to 6.5 inches around, has a medium frame.
    A woman under 5 foot 2 inches tall, and a wrist between 5.5 and 5.75 inches around has a medium frame.
    A woman between 5 foot 2 inches and 5 foot 5 inches, with a wrist that measures between 6 to 6.25 inches around, has a medium frame.


    https://www.livestrong.com/article/500795-how-to-determine-ideal-body-proportions-by-height-wrist-size/
  • kshama2001
    kshama2001 Posts: 28,052 Member
    apullum wrote: »
    scarlett_k wrote: »
    What does the circumference of your wrist have to do with your build?

    After losing 100 pounds, my wrist is smaller, just like the rest of me. Obviously it’s because I lost fat around my arms, as well as everywhere else.

    Take the “frame size” claim with a grain of salt. Your wrists are made of more than just bone.

    Sure, being 100 pounds overweight would pad the wrist measurement somewhat.

    As a baseline, I've had trouble getting bracelets and non-stretchy gloves that fit since I was a (skinny) teenager. I had to have links added to the bracelets I inherited from my grandmother.
  • Annie_01
    Annie_01 Posts: 3,096 Member
    Even at my thinnest(130lbs) I had trouble with watch bands fitting. I also have wide pelvic bones. When I was pregnant with both of my children at 9 months I looked more like I was 6 months. At a 130 which is about the middle of the healthy range for me I looked like skin and bones. Wasn't pretty.
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 34,557 Member
    msalicia07 wrote: »
    6efj2irs4vs5.gif

    Looks like there’s only about a 20ish lbs difference from small to large frame size, so not much (from lowest small to lowest large, etc).

    Looks like many people are comfortable being closer to the highest end of their Frame size, and considerably more. And also believe they look “sick” if they’re remotely close to the middle range of their frame size. Perspective is fascinating.

    They know what their bodies look like, we don't.
    They know what their doctors say, we don't.
    They know their personal and cultural preferences, we don't.

    Everyone can choose her right spot, and I'll support that. I'd encourage anyone to make their choice a healthy weight, but it seems like there's pretty decent evidence that - for women, at least - some weights into the overweight BMI range aren't statistically a super-big health risk.

    Personally, at 5'5", in terms of that chart, I'd prefer to be somewhere near the upper side of small frame, to mid-medium frame (I have sort of a mixed frame (wider shoulders, narrow hips, among other things), but feel and look better on the lighter side IMO, 125-ish or so. I shared photos (at goal weight) on another thread about this topic, and some folks felt that my upper chest looks too bony, and they wouldn't want to look that way. (I tend to hold the last pounds somewhere between ribcage and upper thighs, so IMO am over-fat at heavier weights, but it's all lower body). I'm not appearance driven, it's about how I feel and how my health responds.

    I don't really care what others think; my doctor's OK with my being on the lighter side, and so am I. And I'm far from sickly. (I'd add that I'm not worried about long-term consequences much, either: I'm already 63 and doing fine so far. ;) ).

    When these threads start moving from "I'd look sick at XYZ low weight" to "a woman my height would look sick at XYZ low weight" (as sometimes happens), or similar things in the reverse direction (i.e. higher preferred weights) I feel like we're heading toward a judgemental line we don't need to cross. While I consider myself overfat at 150, even 140, I don't assume that applies to the rest of the world. I have the overall build of a 14-year-old boy, wide shoulders and narrow hips, no breasts; many other women are more hourglass shaped, with wider hips and large breasts.
  • axsxmxa
    axsxmxa Posts: 15 Member
    5'6, no clue what my frame is. Currently at 138 lbs, aiming for 130 first then reassessing from there - I like the idea of being 120 lbs but I don't know what my body's going to look like, particularly as I'd like to build some muscle eventually. So essentially 120 is my goal, but it's dependent on how I feel about how I look.
This discussion has been closed.