We are pleased to announce that as of March 4, 2025, an updated Rich Text Editor has been introduced in the MyFitnessPal Community. To learn more about the changes, please click here. We look forward to sharing this new feature with you!

Good or Bad Food?

13

Replies

  • Posts: 6,037 Member
    cwolfman13 wrote: »

    How do you figure cake is being considered the same as walnuts? I doubt many would consider cake the be an optimally nutritious food...but that has zero to do with calories. Your convoluting calories with nutrition...they aren't the same thing. Calories are just a unit of measure like an inch or mile or watt or whatever.

    and for that matter, why does it have to be one or the other...?
  • Posts: 41,865 Member
    J72FIT wrote: »

    and for that matter, why does it have to be one or the other...?

    Yup...my wife made chocolate chip cookies over the weekend and I'm having one for desert tonight. I'm pretty sure it isn't going to unwind the rest of the nutrition I had for the day or negate my spin class this evening.
  • Posts: 8,940 Member
    edited January 2020

    It was only an opinion. How I view food. What's in my mind. I never thought it would have gotten so heated. I never said I had facts. Never said that I am a nutritionist or macro expert. Solely my view.

    That opinion has led some of us down a path that led to failure. Some of what you are detecting is likely to be concern that you are headed there too. That is not to say that it is your fate. If this is a mental trick you need to do because you have so much cake in the house and it does not affect your overall relationship with food it might be fine. I don't know what others need to do to make it from one day to the next I only know what I need to do.

    What I have learned is aside from anything medical like allergies there is no such thing as junk/bad/unhealthy food and if I try to deprive myself based on labels it ends badly. If I need to segregate a food item like my addictive rice krispie treats, all joking aside, I label it as "tough to moderate." Even that label is not necessarily permanent. I have also learned that things you moderate easily normally can become tough in certain situations. It is fun trying to navigate the mental aspects of weight loss.

  • Posts: 1,661 Member
    Nony_Mouse wrote: »
    I'm just going to point out that carrot cake has walnuts in it.

    Ew. Gross. Not when *I* bake it!

    I like cake. Walnuts are gross. <-opinion.
  • Posts: 28,439 Member
    Nony_Mouse wrote: »

    Blasphemy!! Carrot cake should have walnuts both in it, and sprinkled on top of the lemon cream cheese icing.

    As to carrots vs cake, the answer is 'it depends on context' :P. But obviously putting the carrots into the cake covers your bases. Adding walnuts tips it over to being a superfood.

    But I'z allergic! I haz the sadz when carrot cake has walnuts in it
  • Posts: 5,646 Member

    But I'z allergic! I haz the sadz when carrot cake has walnuts in it

    You're excused from the walnut carrot cake then :)
  • Posts: 28,439 Member
    Nony_Mouse wrote: »

    You're excused from the walnut carrot cake then :)

    But I want carrot cake. And everyone ruins it with walnuts. Except @paperpudding, apparently.
  • Posts: 5,646 Member

    But I want carrot cake. And everyone ruins it with walnuts. Except @paperpudding, apparently.

    I would suggest an arrangement with @paperpudding to supply you with walnut-free carrot cake then. You'll need to get her to add something else to make it a superfood though, otherwise you'll never meet your goalz.
  • Posts: 7,887 Member
    edited January 2020
    jm_1234 wrote: »
    NovusDies, I believe you are correct. Likely a heuristic: mental shortcut that eases the cognitive load of making a decision.

    Lemurcat2, I don't see that much information in my view (below). Is this something I setup? I do see slightly more info in the Reports tab - thanks try2again, I never viewed this tab. I always thought micro was for premium.

    m46wwo5axks3.png

    You can switch out sodium and sugar (the 2 non macro options) for other nutrients you are more interested in (I think fiber is a better option than either of those for most people). More significantly, you can use the reports, and when you input the foods you can look at the nutrition that they have.

    If you want more than that, there are better sites, as I noted, but I think that's actually quite a lot.
  • Posts: 3,237 Member
    jm_1234 wrote: »
    NovusDies, I believe you are correct. Likely a heuristic: mental shortcut that eases the cognitive load of making a decision.

    Lemurcat2, I don't see that much information in my view (below). Is this something I setup? I do see slightly more info in the Reports tab - thanks try2again, I never viewed this tab. I always thought micro was for premium.

    m46wwo5axks3.png

    The app shows full details for all the nutrients that can be entered in mfp. The web only shows the ones you’ve selected.
  • Posts: 8,171 Member

    The app shows full details for all the nutrients that can be entered in mfp. The web only shows the ones you’ve selected.

    You can find the rest under "Reports" on the website.
  • Posts: 3,237 Member
    edited January 2020
    earlnabby wrote: »

    You can find the rest under "Reports" on the website.

    That too.

    I was thinking the app because it shows them all at once. Where the web only shows the selected ones at once.


  • Posts: 3,565 Member
    cwolfman13 wrote: »

    Yup...my wife made chocolate chip cookies over the weekend and I'm having one for desert tonight. I'm pretty sure it isn't going to unwind the rest of the nutrition I had for the day or negate my spin class this evening.

    Be careful out there... just in case :D
  • Posts: 4,099 Member
    lemurcat2 wrote: »

    Not in my experience, as plenty of cakes have as much fat, or nearly as much fat, as carbs. For example, a piece of Portillo's chocolate cake (just because it is easy to find the nutrition information) has 329 cals from fat, and 344 from carbs. Pretty close. That's consistent with the kind of breakdown I see in dessert type items I make at home, for the most part (although there are exceptions that are disproportionately fat or carb). Of course, if you buy these at the grocery store it is sometimes the case that they are lower fat to try and lower cals, but usually those are all that tasty by comparison.

    I otherwise agree with your point, but it is a personal mission to stop people from stereotyping most high fat dessert foods as simply "carbs"--too often they (although not you, of course) go on to claim that carbs are therefore the problem in everyone's diet and are unhealthy and the devil, blah, blah.

    Anyway, great post, I just had to be nitpicky since it's my hobby horse.

    I was looking at a piece of so called prepackaged cake the other day. When I did the math of the calorie density, it wasn't much less than what walnuts are. lol
  • Posts: 6,037 Member

    It's an opinion. Not scripture. Cake has less health benefits than walnuts.

    On one hand you say it's an opinion. Then you follow it up with the bolded, an absolute statement of fact.
  • Posts: 6,037 Member
    Wow. Ok. It's just my opinion. I don't think cake is good for you and walnuts are better for you. The end

    In what way?
  • Posts: 6,037 Member
    edited January 2020

    Walnuts are heart healthy and cake is not <necessarily>

    Overeating walnuts is not heart healthy. Eating cake in moderation can certainly be heart healthy. Context and dose matter...
  • Posts: 6,037 Member
    edited January 2020

    I get you. Calories aside, I just don't think cake should be considered same as walnuts. Maybe I'm wrong. Ok. It's my opinion. Idk about you but I have a hard time eating a small portion of cake. I don't eat a whole bag of walnuts either. I never thought in a million years I'd have these many disagrees over my opinion of cake

    But for the rest of us who can, and do only eat a small portion of cake, it would be fine.

    That said, what if you did not have a hard time eating only a small portion of cake? Would your opinion change?
  • Posts: 6,037 Member
    edited January 2020

    It was only an opinion. How I view food. What's in my mind. I never thought it would have gotten so heated. I never said I had facts. Never said that I am a nutritionist or macro expert. Solely my view.

    True, but you are making absolute statements as if they were facts. I apologize if it seems I'm picking on you, that said, the words we use matter. You can't make a factual, absolute statement and then back pedal and claim, "it is only my opinion...".
  • Posts: 98 Member
    J72FIT wrote: »

    True, but you are making absolute statements as if they were facts. I apologize if it seems I'm picking on you, that said, the words we use matter. You can't make a factual, absolute statement and then back pedal and claim, "it is only my opinion...".

    Find someone to "pick on" I'm over this *kitten*
  • Posts: 6,037 Member
    edited January 2020

    Find someone to "pick on" I'm over this *kitten*

    I apologize if you feel I am picking on you...
  • Posts: 98 Member
    J72FIT wrote: »

    Can you at least answer my question?

    If you did not have a hard time eating only a small portion of cake, would your opinion change?

    Does it really matter anymore? My opinion means nothing and I'm sick of being blasted over this *kitten*.
  • Posts: 8,940 Member

    Does it really matter anymore? My opinion means nothing and I'm sick of being blasted over this *kitten*.

    I do not agree that you are getting blasted but I do think it unwise to try to keep helping someone that is not asking for it nor receptive at the moment.

    I hope that in a few days this experience will not seem so raw to you and you will continue to use this forum as you need.
  • Posts: 6,037 Member

    Does it really matter anymore? My opinion means nothing and I'm sick of being blasted over this *kitten*.

    I apologize if you feel I am blasting you, that is not my intention.
This discussion has been closed.