I. F. Question

I’ve been interested in trying IF for a little while now, but as usual everything I read about it is contradictory. For example, one article states that when you fast, fat burning doesn’t happen. Instead- you burn off muscle mass. Others say you do burn fat. So I’m thoroughly confused!! I’m really active- playing hockey a few nights a week and gym after work in the afternoon.
«1

Replies

  • Thewonderofitall
    Thewonderofitall Posts: 97 Member
    I best as I know you would have to fast yourself to starvation level before your body starts burning muscle only after the fat is gone!
    I have been doing a five day 16:8 fast for a few months now and have had great success. I also try to keep my daily calories in the 1600-1700 range.
    On weekends I "Zig-Zag" deit and allow the calories to go up to around 2000. This keeps my metabolism from getting too comfortable. I also exercise 5-days a week.
    Once a month I do a 23-hour fast to reach autophagy. I have also done a 35-hour fast. It was all rather easy, just drink water whenever you're hungry and it will go away!
    Let us know how it works out for you!
  • Xellercin
    Xellercin Posts: 924 Member
    edited October 2021
    Don't worry too much about what you read about IF.

    Give it a try if you want to and see how your body reacts. However, if you are female, know that continuous IF can have very negative effects on hormonal regulation over time. (I make no assumptions on the internet even when someone claims to be male).

    Otherwise, experiment and see what works for you.

    I personally do 18:6 IF 5 days a week. I throw in two non-fasting days because I'm female and don't want my hair to fall out and crap like that.

    I have WAY more energy when I'm fasting, because I also eat fairly low calories and easily slip into ketosis, and in ketosis, I'm very energized. So if I played sports, I would want to do it fasted.

    That said, I take a salt supplement daily to raise my blood pressure. If I don't take it, fasting drops my blood pressure too much and I become non functional.

    I'm sharing all of this to show how each experience is individual. You may have none of the effects and factors that I do.

    I had to figure it out for myself by trial and error and paying attention to my body.

    One thing I will say though is that IF works best, like any diet, if it's a long-term lifestyle goal. I've seen a lot of people balloon transitioning out of IF.
  • lorib642
    lorib642 Posts: 1,942 Member
    edited October 2021
    I find it confusing. Proponents of IF say you want to fast until insulin goes down so you can burn fat. (image)

    There was a study comparing same calorie consumption but one group did every other day fast, in lean individuals. Both groups lost weight but the non fasting group lost more fat.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34135111/


    I have type 2 diabetes. My dr does not recommend I fast over 14 hours and I am not lean. It is good you are active. That will help prevent muscle loss, I believe.

    I wish I had advice, but I have been stalled in weightloss. I was hoping fasting would help but so far no change

    .922m8bidniqh.jpeg
  • cmriverside
    cmriverside Posts: 33,937 Member
    @stv1520

    You don't mention what you're hoping to accomplish/achieve by fasting nor do you mention what type of fasting you are considering.

    There are dedicated Intermediate Fasting groups on this site, you'd have to join it to post, but it has a lot of people that could talk more in depth with you. Here, from the search of Groups:
    https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/groups/browse/search?Search=intermittent+fasting

    This one from the search has nearly 900 members, looks pretty active:
    https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/group/120735-fasting-diet-intermittent-fasting

    And then there's OMAD (One Meal A Day)
    https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/group/20634-omad-revolution
  • NYPhotographer2021
    NYPhotographer2021 Posts: 506 Member
    I try to do 16:8 every day, sometimes I can make it to 18:6 and on the very rare occasions, I get to 20:4. I don't know about the fat burning aspects of it, but I find for me, that it helps me control what I eat. Being conscious of a smaller window of eating, I tend to make my meals count instead of mindless grazing like I used to do. I've been doing it for 2 months now, and hair loss is minimal. I have lost 20 lbs.
  • stv1520
    stv1520 Posts: 199 Member
    @stv1520

    You don't mention what you're hoping to accomplish/achieve by fasting nor do you mention what type of fasting you are considering.

    There are dedicated Intermediate Fasting groups on this site, you'd have to join it to post, but it has a lot of people that could talk more in depth with you. Here, from the search of Groups:
    https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/groups/browse/search?Search=intermittent+fasting

    This one from the search has nearly 900 members, looks pretty active:
    https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/group/120735-fasting-diet-intermittent-fasting

    And then there's OMAD (One Meal A Day)
    https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/group/20634-omad-revolution

    I’m currently down 28 lbs. I have around 32-33 more to go to reach my goal weight. 2 weeks ago I played hockey 5 out of 7 days. I also had a deficit every day. I was excited to weigh in on Monday but was frustrated to see that I gained a pound. Fortunately this past Monday when I weighed in I did lose 2 lbs. I’m wondering if IF would aid me in losing more weight quicker by shaking up my system. I’d probably try 16:8 to see how it goes.
  • lorib642
    lorib642 Posts: 1,942 Member
    For people confused by terms 16:8 is 16 hr fast with 8 hr eating window, OMAD is one meal a day. 5:2 is eating regular meals 5 days, restricting calories 2 days/week.
  • AnnPT77
    AnnPT77 Posts: 31,971 Member
    stv1520 wrote: »
    @stv1520

    You don't mention what you're hoping to accomplish/achieve by fasting nor do you mention what type of fasting you are considering.

    There are dedicated Intermediate Fasting groups on this site, you'd have to join it to post, but it has a lot of people that could talk more in depth with you. Here, from the search of Groups:
    https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/groups/browse/search?Search=intermittent+fasting

    This one from the search has nearly 900 members, looks pretty active:
    https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/group/120735-fasting-diet-intermittent-fasting

    And then there's OMAD (One Meal A Day)
    https://community.myfitnesspal.com/en/group/20634-omad-revolution

    I’m currently down 28 lbs. I have around 32-33 more to go to reach my goal weight. 2 weeks ago I played hockey 5 out of 7 days. I also had a deficit every day. I was excited to weigh in on Monday but was frustrated to see that I gained a pound. Fortunately this past Monday when I weighed in I did lose 2 lbs. I’m wondering if IF would aid me in losing more weight quicker by shaking up my system. I’d probably try 16:8 to see how it goes.

    I'd encourage you to have a good think about what constitutes body weight: Water (which is around 60% of body weight for the average adult), fat, muscle, bones, other useful tissue. In addition, there are things that show up on the scale that strictly speaking aren't one's body at all: Digestive contents on their way to being waste, and one's microbiome.

    Of those things, water and digestive contents are going to account for most scale-weight shifts that are quite quick and multi-pound, like 2-5 or so pounds over a day or so. A sensible rate of fat loss is slower, more days to a few weeks to show up clearly on the scale, because it plays peek-a-boo with the water/digestive contents. The other stuff is even slower/smaller in a healthy person.

    If you don't usually play hockey 5 of 7 days, it's very possible that your water retention was higher than normal (for muscle repair, basically). One needn't have sore muscles in order for that to be an explanation, but if you *did* have sore muscles, there's a high probability that water was retained.

    We're trying to lose fat, right? If so, it makes sense to figure out how the water/digestion aspects work in one's own body, and ignore them. Trying to game them for weight management is profitless, IMO.

    If you haven't run across it before, I'd recommend this as a really good, useful read:

    https://physiqonomics.com/the-weird-and-highly-annoying-world-of-scale-weight-and-fluctuations

    If it works better for you to weigh weekly - like if the scale stresses you out - that's fine. However, that does limit your ability to gain experiential knowledge of how water weight in particular fluctuates in your body. I'm a daily weigh-er, have been for years (totally unstressed and unobsessed by it). I've had many weeks during around a year of loss, almost 6 years of maintenance since, where weights 7 days apart would've given me an extremely inaccurate view of what my weight had been doing, by hitting a lowish weight on day 1, and a highish one on day 8, when somewhere mid-week there were new lows.

    It's just my opinion, but I don't think you *need* a new weight-loss strategy, probably, in order to keep losing weight. I think it would help you to have a clearer understanding of how *fat* loss works, and how it's not always exactly the same as weight loss. If you want to pursue a fasting strategy for variety or better sustainability or something like that, I'm not trying to talk you out of it. Sensible fasting strategies can be a good tool. But I think it's kind of a tangent, outside of those variety/sustainability things, given what you've said about your goals and recent experience.
  • cmriverside
    cmriverside Posts: 33,937 Member
    lorib642 wrote: »
    For people confused by terms 16:8 is 16 hr fast with 8 hr eating window, OMAD is one meal a day. 5:2 is eating regular meals 5 days, restricting calories 2 days/week.

    Are you talking to me? Just because I wrote that I sleep eight hours doesn't mean I think I'm supposed to eat the other 16.

    16:8, yes. I know what it means.

    If eat at 9AM, Noon, and 5PM and then don't eat from 5PM to 9AM, that's 16:8.
  • lorib642
    lorib642 Posts: 1,942 Member
    lorib642 wrote: »
    For people confused by terms 16:8 is 16 hr fast with 8 hr eating window, OMAD is one meal a day. 5:2 is eating regular meals 5 days, restricting calories 2 days/week.

    Are you talking to me? Just because I wrote that I sleep eight hours doesn't mean I think I'm supposed to eat the other 16.

    16:8, yes. I know what it means.

    If eat at 9AM, Noon, and 5PM and then don't eat from 5PM to 9AM, that's 16:8.

    Thanks for the clarification.

    Maybe I am the only one who gets confused by terms sometimes. Please disregard my post.