The truth about sugar subsitutes

1235

Replies

  • tsh0ck
    tsh0ck Posts: 1,970 Member
    he's right, though. the majority of those BL folks fall right back in after they leave. and it is because they didn't make a lifestyle change, they were just on a crash diet/workout program. some keep it off, sure. and some lives were changed. but most just go right back.
  • tsh0ck
    tsh0ck Posts: 1,970 Member
    after a quick search, looks like JM was the target of a class action lawsuit with her supplements. course, there are plenty of frivolous lawsuits in this country. but, still.

    also, here's a story from the new york daily news -- an unbiased source -- about her diet pills.

    http://articles.nydailynews.com/2010-01-13/entertainment/17943858_1_diet-pills-supplements-herbal
    A list of ingredients in the Jillian Michaels supplements, provided by nutritionist Natalie Chevreau, who worked with Michaels on the line of products, includes Chinese rhubarb, buckthorn, magnesium and dandelion, along with uva ursi.

    "Chinese rhubarb, buckthorn and magnesium are laxatives," Fugh-Berman says. "And dandelion is traditionally used as a diuretic. Uva ursi, which is an herbal remedy to treat urinary tract infections, can be problematic in large doses. In fact, you really shouldn't use it for more than a week because it could be harmful."

    As for the guarana contained in the Maximum Strength Fat Burner, that's a caffeine-containing herb, Fugh-Berman says. "Caffeine will increase your metabolism a little bit but it's not effective for weight loss," she says.

    While the supplements prepared with caffeine may speed your metabolism and suppress appetite in the short term, "The caffeine fix wears off quickly and then you are left with a low blood sugar, which promotes overeating," Ventrelle says.

    What many dieters don't realize is that just because something is herbal doesn't mean it's necessarily safe, Ventrelle says.

    "There just has not been enough research done on these products," she explains. "People see the words natural, organic and herbal and assume that these ingredients can't do any harm."
  • kiki41
    kiki41 Posts: 80 Member
    after a quick search, looks like JM was the target of a class action lawsuit with her supplements. course, there are plenty of frivolous lawsuits in this country. but, still.

    also, here's a story from the new york daily news -- an unbiased source -- about her diet pills.

    http://articles.nydailynews.com/2010-01-13/entertainment/17943858_1_diet-pills-supplements-herbal
    A list of ingredients in the Jillian Michaels supplements, provided by nutritionist Natalie Chevreau, who worked with Michaels on the line of products, includes Chinese rhubarb, buckthorn, magnesium and dandelion, along with uva ursi.

    "Chinese rhubarb, buckthorn and magnesium are laxatives," Fugh-Berman says. "And dandelion is traditionally used as a diuretic. Uva ursi, which is an herbal remedy to treat urinary tract infections, can be problematic in large doses. In fact, you really shouldn't use it for more than a week because it could be harmful."

    As for the guarana contained in the Maximum Strength Fat Burner, that's a caffeine-containing herb, Fugh-Berman says. "Caffeine will increase your metabolism a little bit but it's not effective for weight loss," she says.

    While the supplements prepared with caffeine may speed your metabolism and suppress appetite in the short term, "The caffeine fix wears off quickly and then you are left with a low blood sugar, which promotes overeating," Ventrelle says.

    What many dieters don't realize is that just because something is herbal doesn't mean it's necessarily safe, Ventrelle says.

    "There just has not been enough research done on these products," she explains. "People see the words natural, organic and herbal and assume that these ingredients can't do any harm."

    All the biggest loser trainers have weight loss supplements. People should be educated about what they are buying into
  • But sweetener is my best friend D:

    Yup! Mine too! I have it in moderation becaue I do notice it makes me feel hungry. But I have it on a daily basis.

    Almost evrything we eat is bad for us in some way. Even fruit and veggies. There are so many harmful chemicals that go into our produce, meat, and dairy during the production and processing of it.
  • tross0924
    tross0924 Posts: 909 Member
    And there is even worse news: studies have consistently shown that artificial sweeteners actually promote weight gain. A sweet taste induces an insulin response which causes blood sugar to be stored in tissues and fat. But artificial sweeteners do not actually increase blood sugars, so you actually can become hypoglycemic which leads to an increase in food intake.

    What I wonder is why when I wake up with a fasted blood sugar in the low 70's and then have 2 cups of coffee with 2 Tablespoons of Splenda and nothing else do I not go into insulin shock, or feel those tremors meaning my blood sugar is too low if this is true?
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,993 Member
    ninerbuff do you have a medical degree????????????? How many of your clients have kept their weight off??????? Biggest Loser has changed lives whether you like it or not...Millions of people love Jillian and she has changed lives and she promotes NATURAL FOODS....Imagine that eating food in its NATURAL...UNPROCESSED...STATE....WHAT A CONCEPT.
    Obviously you've bought into the hype. Do you believe that having a medical degree is all it takes to understand how the body works? Doesn't it look like I follow what I teach? I can be straight up honest and say that when I put clients on diets that restricted foods and drinks they liked to eat, they lost weight but eventually gained most it back. A few years back I abandoned that type of philosophy because it didn't make sense to me to have all these clients lose only to gain back. So using common sense, I took what they ate on a regular basis and had them learn how to control actual portions. Guess what happened? Weight regain dramatically dropped. Why? Because they got to eat foods they enjoyed and didn't have cravings or disappointment of being on a diet. I promote that today and though I don't have the fame that JM has, I'm more than sure that I've touched the lives of many of clients. Working in a Wellness Center, I see people daily suffering from cancer, disease, heart ailments, loss of limbs from accidents etc. and know that working with them I touch their lives. You DON'T need a TV show to do it.
    And really, unless you're growing your own food and raising and butchering your own meat, ALL foods go through processing. You don't think they just harvest/butcher it and put it in a package? There is processing of how foods are cleaned, preserved, protected against pests, etc. Even organic food goes through a chemical cleaning process (although they use "natural" chemicals) before being put on the shelves for protection.
    Truth comes from actual scientific testing and studies. If artificial sweetners were found by science to cause all the maladies claimed by opposition, then I would side with the opposition. Plain and simple.


    A.C.E. Certified Personal Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 28+ years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
  • TheDevastator
    TheDevastator Posts: 1,626 Member
    The problem with aspartame is that it creates an imbalance in the body. It's made up of aspartic acid, phenylalanine and also generates methanol. Aspartic acid is a non-essential amino acid, which stimulates NMDA receptors which in high doses can cause brain damage (it's been proven to cause Olney's lesions in rodents). Phenylalanine in large quantities interferes with production of serotonin. Serotonin regulate intestinal movements, mood, appetite, and sleep. Serotonin also has some cognitive functions, including memory and learning. Methanol is highly toxic to humans. While a healthy person can convert all these substances, why risk it? Most people have enough toxins from their environment, food and water to worry about. Other foods do have these substances in them but they also have other nutrients that can counteract their effects.
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,993 Member
    The problem with aspartame is that it creates an imbalance in the body. It's made up of aspartic acid, phenylalanine and also generates methanol. Aspartic acid is a non-essential amino acid, which stimulates NMDA receptors which in high doses can cause brain damage (it's been proven to cause Olney's lesions in rodents). Phenylalanine in large quantities interferes with production of serotonin. Serotonin regulate intestinal movements, mood, appetite, and sleep. Serotonin also has some cognitive functions, including memory and learning. Methanol is highly toxic to humans. While a healthy person can convert all these substances, why risk it? Most people have enough toxins from their environment, food and water to worry about. Other foods do have these substances in them but they also have other nutrients that can counteract their effects.
    What you need to clarify is when you state "HIGH DOSES". What is a high dose and then compare that dosage to how much is in a can of diet soda. If the dosage needed takes drinking 30 cans of diet soda at one sitting, then we can probably rest assured that it's probably not going to be an issue.


    A.C.E. Certified Personal Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 28+ years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
  • I use truvia... ._. and I'm still going to use it.
    me too.....or the walmart brand of stevia
  • wackyfunster
    wackyfunster Posts: 944 Member
    The problem with aspartame is that it creates an imbalance in the body. It's made up of aspartic acid, phenylalanine and also generates methanol. Aspartic acid is a non-essential amino acid, which stimulates NMDA receptors which in high doses can cause brain damage (it's been proven to cause Olney's lesions in rodents). Phenylalanine in large quantities interferes with production of serotonin. Serotonin regulate intestinal movements, mood, appetite, and sleep. Serotonin also has some cognitive functions, including memory and learning. Methanol is highly toxic to humans. While a healthy person can convert all these substances, why risk it? Most people have enough toxins from their environment, food and water to worry about. Other foods do have these substances in them but they also have other nutrients that can counteract their effects.
    You know what else produces methanol while being metabolized? Fruits and vegetables. You know what else produces (MUCH larger) quantities of aldehydes? Alcohol. You would have to ingest a ludicrous amount of aspartame to get more aspartic acid than you do from other food sources in a day. etc. etc.

    I am not advocating consuming artificial sweeteners, but there is really no scientific basis to this argument. It is a bunch of fear-mongering nonsense that, while 'technically' true, ignores the fact that in an average day, even a 100% healthy diet produces more of those substances than any reasonable quantity of aspartame will.

    I think it is safe to assume that ANY sweet substance in large quantities is not good for you (based upon current literature, fructose is actually the most dangerous).

    In my personal opinion, based on the info I have read, avoiding sugar syrups such as corn syrup, and high-fructose anything is a higher priority for me than avoiding artificial sweeteners.

    ---

    On another note, re: natural foods, the primary mechanism for weight loss there is not their inherent healthiness (don't get me wrong, natural foods are great, and I definitely advocate eating them), but rather the difference in thermic effect of food between "natural" and "processed" foods. In short, you get more usable calories from processed foods than from "natural" foods. Basically, if two people have a maintenance diet of 2000 calories/day on natural food, and one of them starts eating 2000 calories/day of processed foods, the processed foods eater will actually be running somewhere around a 200 calorie/day surplus, which will result in them gaining something like 2 pounds a month.

    I agree with ninerbuff: it is WAY more important for someone to be able to lose weight and get in shape then for them to follow one specific diet. Some people love paleo. Some people love the okinawan diet. Some people love IF. Hey, whatever works for you. The diet you WILL follow and that will help you get fit is infinitely better than the one that you talk about but "cheat" on and end up back where you started.
  • tbresina
    tbresina Posts: 558 Member
    I think it is just safe to say-EVERYTHING IN MODERATION PEOPLE and leave it at that.
  • islandjumper
    islandjumper Posts: 369 Member
    I use truvia... ._. and I'm still going to use it.
    me too.....or the walmart brand of stevia

    truvia is made of stevia...with a little extra so the coca cola company can patent it...but stevia is all natural. It's a leaf that's dried and crushed. If I were going to use any kind of no-cal sweetener that would be it. I just avoid sugar altogether


    And for those who are saying you need staggeringly large doses of artificial sweeteners to see effects try avoiding it for awhile then eat it again...you may be surprised. I've avoided it for about 10+ years now I get massive stomach cramps and headaches...even from something small as a piece of gum.
  • TheDevastator
    TheDevastator Posts: 1,626 Member
    The problem with aspartame is that it creates an imbalance in the body. It's made up of aspartic acid, phenylalanine and also generates methanol. Aspartic acid is a non-essential amino acid, which stimulates NMDA receptors which in high doses can cause brain damage (it's been proven to cause Olney's lesions in rodents). Phenylalanine in large quantities interferes with production of serotonin. Serotonin regulate intestinal movements, mood, appetite, and sleep. Serotonin also has some cognitive functions, including memory and learning. Methanol is highly toxic to humans. While a healthy person can convert all these substances, why risk it? Most people have enough toxins from their environment, food and water to worry about. Other foods do have these substances in them but they also have other nutrients that can counteract their effects.
    What you need to clarify is when you state "HIGH DOSES". What is a high dose and then compare that dosage to how much is in a can of diet soda. If the dosage needed takes drinking 30 cans of diet soda at one sitting, then we can probably rest assured that it's probably not going to be an issue.


    A.C.E. Certified Personal Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 28+ years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
    2-3 cans of Diet Coke (180 mg aspartame per can) causes methanol to show up in the blood.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3957170
  • TDGee
    TDGee Posts: 2,209 Member
    Did someone here order a generalized panic? Because it somehow got delivered to my house. Here you go.
    smiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gif

    smiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gifsmiley-scared002.gif
  • LilMissFoodie
    LilMissFoodie Posts: 612 Member
    likewise, being overweight is a serious health risk. artificial sweeteners help a lot of people cut calories and therefore lose weight.

    Absolutely. If your choice is between having minimal sugary foods and avoiding artificial sweeteners then I think having minimal sugary foods is a reasonable choice and more power to you! If your choice however is to continue to have sugary foods because you think sweeteners are evil then that is ridiculous. Obesity has far more proven cause of harm than sweeteners do as after masses of studies, the consensus between professional bodies remains that sweeteners are safe.
  • caramkoala
    caramkoala Posts: 303 Member
    AND.... for every "truth" about sugar substitutes being harmful or bad, there's an equal number of "truths" about sugar substitutes being harmless.

    Soooo.... I think it would be AWESOME if people were LESS inclined to CHERRY PICK their "truths".

    And I think it would be even AWESOMER if fewer people presented scientific hypotheses as "truth" when they are in fact just one of many competing hypotheses that may or may not hold true over the next 25 years of scientific testing.

    I choose to drink sugar substitutes. I've dug through pub-med rather extensively on the issue. In my personal opinion, the benefits (yummy, refreshing beverage and/or stick of gum with few calories) far outweigh the possible, but disputable "negative consequences".

    But that is my personal choice. If you choose not to partake because you're concerned about the possible risks, great! But, you know, it'd be really cool if people didn't try and present something as fact when it's not fact just to support their choice.

    In a perfect world..........sigh...
  • caramkoala
    caramkoala Posts: 303 Member
    But, you know, it'd be really cool if people didn't try and present something as fact when it's not fact just to support their choice.
    THIS! It's irresponsible to make claims of "truths" when there is no actual evidence to support them.


    A.C.E. Certified Personal Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 28+ years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    The "kinesiology" bit in your signature undermines everything you are saying. Which is unfortunate, because you speak some sense.
  • jamiem1102
    jamiem1102 Posts: 1,196 Member
    AND.... for every "truth" about sugar substitutes being harmful or bad, there's an equal number of "truths" about sugar substitutes being harmless.

    Soooo.... I think it would be AWESOME if people were LESS inclined to CHERRY PICK their "truths".

    And I think it would be even AWESOMER if fewer people presented scientific hypotheses as "truth" when they are in fact just one of many competing hypotheses that may or may not hold true over the next 25 years of scientific testing.

    I choose to drink sugar substitutes. I've dug through pub-med rather extensively on the issue. In my personal opinion, the benefits (yummy, refreshing beverage and/or stick of gum with few calories) far outweigh the possible, but disputable "negative consequences".

    But that is my personal choice. If you choose not to partake because you're concerned about the possible risks, great! But, you know, it'd be really cool if people didn't try and present something as fact when it's not fact just to support their choice.

    Couldn't have said it better myself.
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,993 Member

    2-3 cans of Diet Coke (180 mg aspartame per can) causes methanol to show up in the blood.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3957170
    Showing up in the blood also happens with alcohol or fruits. Gasp. In a couple of hours the basal levels return. And to counter:
    These studies clearly demonstrate the safety of this high-intensity sweetener for use by humans.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2653751





    A.C.E. Certified Personal Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 28+ years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,993 Member
    The "kinesiology" bit in your signature undermines everything you are saying. Which is unfortunate, because you speak some sense.
    Really? How so?


    A.C.E. Certified Personal Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 28+ years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
  • TheDevastator
    TheDevastator Posts: 1,626 Member
    Showing up in the blood also happens with alcohol or fruits. Gasp. In a couple of hours the basal levels return. And to counter:

    This takes care of the alcohol which is sort of funny:
    methanol conversion to the toxic formaldehyde and formic acid metabolites is blocked when it is co-ingested with significant amounts of ethanol in alcoholic beverages. This is because the ethanol acts as a protective factor which allows the elimination of methanol through the breath and urine before it is converted to formaldehyde


    Do you have any sources that show fruit raises the level of methanol in the blood?
    These studies clearly demonstrate the safety of this high-intensity sweetener for use by humans.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2653751
    I'm glad the author thinks so but where is the data?
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,993 Member
    Do you have any sources that show fruit raises the level of methanol in the blood?
    http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=6&ved=0CEgQFjAF&url=http://jn.nutrition.org/content/113/8/1600.full.pdf&ei=oog3T6rXCKOgiQLoq6CDCg&usg=AFQjCNHjvSmmkAF977CGG8ptPvccAyFQCg
    I'm glad the author thinks so but where is the data?
    I don't have access to open it, just like the link from the same source you provided.


    A.C.E. Certified Personal Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 28+ years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
  • caramkoala
    caramkoala Posts: 303 Member
    The "kinesiology" bit in your signature undermines everything you are saying. Which is unfortunate, because you speak some sense.
    Really? How so?


    A.C.E. Certified Personal Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 28+ years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    I would like to publicly apologise to Ninerbuff for questioning his educational background.:blushing: Until now, my only knowledge of 'kinesiology' was a "alternative, holistic, 'medical' practice' similar to Reiki. :grumble: A friend took a course once and claimed she could cure me of obesity by having me tap the lower left part of my abdomen 17 times everytime I got a craving for food.:huh: Real QUACK stuff. She encouraged people around her to go off their Dr prescribed medications and went off her own anti-depressants against her Dr's orders. :noway: She soon after had a mental breakdown. It was very sad, but because of it I have always held Kinesiology with utter contempt.:mad:

    When Ninerbuff respectfully questioned me, I took it upon myself to further educate myself, instead of getting defensive.:glasses: I found out that Kinesiology is an actual science, the science of human movement (in laymans terms).:drinker:

    Never let it be said that I can't question my own beliefs, be brave enough to do research that flies in the face of what I think I know, and apologise. I have sent a private message to Ninerbuff also.:flowerforyou:
  • The problem is that these studies reverse and contradict themselves every few years, so I do not pay attention to them any more. The only thing I can rely on is that artificial sweeteners = 0 calories.

    Remember when medical reports said: Cigarettes are good for you...milk is bad for you....Coca-Cola with real cocaine is a health tonic...
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,993 Member
    The "kinesiology" bit in your signature undermines everything you are saying. Which is unfortunate, because you speak some sense.
    Really? How so?


    A.C.E. Certified Personal Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 28+ years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    I would like to publicly apologise to Ninerbuff for questioning his educational background.:blushing: Until now, my only knowledge of 'kinesiology' was a "alternative, holistic, 'medical' practice' similar to Reiki. :grumble: A friend took a course once and claimed she could cure me of obesity by having me tap the lower left part of my abdomen 17 times everytime I got a craving for food.:huh: Real QUACK stuff. She encouraged people around her to go off their Dr prescribed medications and went off her own anti-depressants against her Dr's orders. :noway: She soon after had a mental breakdown. It was very sad, but because of it I have always held Kinesiology with utter contempt.:mad:

    When Ninerbuff respectfully questioned me, I took it upon myself to further educate myself, instead of getting defensive.:glasses: I found out that Kinesiology is an actual science, the science of human movement (in laymans terms).:drinker:

    Never let it be said that I can't question my own beliefs, be brave enough to do research that flies in the face of what I think I know, and apologise. I have sent a private message to Ninerbuff also.:flowerforyou:
    No real apology needed. By you taking the time to actually look into kinesiology more, you got a chance to see what it really is. And this site is about passing on knowledge so in the end you win. Glad you took a look at it.


    A.C.E. Certified Personal Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 28+ years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
  • iuew
    iuew Posts: 624 Member
    Truth comes from actual scientific testing and studies. If artificial sweetners were found by science to cause all the maladies claimed by opposition, then I would side with the opposition. Plain and simple.

    this.

    i work in biochem / molecular / microbiology, and i just haven't seen any peer reviewed studies that support the claims made in the anti-sweetener blogs. if the evidence supported the claims, i wouldn't be eating these products myself.

    there is nothing wrong with "natural." however, it's important to keep in mind that a lot of things are natural, including :

    high incidence of infant mortality
    an average lifespan of 40 years
    sexual maturity occurring at age eleven due to short lifespan
    smallpox, diphtheria, tetanus, and dying of a cold or flu
    getting eaten by a bear

    the natural news blogs lost me when they started their anti-vaccine crusade. the impact this has on kids makes me angry.
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,993 Member
    Truth comes from actual scientific testing and studies. If artificial sweetners were found by science to cause all the maladies claimed by opposition, then I would side with the opposition. Plain and simple.

    this.

    i work in biochem / molecular / microbiology, and i just haven't seen any peer reviewed studies that support the claims made in the anti-sweetener blogs. if the evidence supported the claims, i wouldn't be eating these products myself.

    there is nothing wrong with "natural." however, it's important to keep in mind that a lot of things are natural, including :

    high incidence of infant mortality
    an average lifespan of 40 years
    sexual maturity occurring at age eleven due to short lifespan
    smallpox, diphtheria, tetanus, and dying of a cold or flu
    getting eaten by a bear

    the natural news blogs lost me when they started their anti-vaccine crusade. the impact this has on kids makes me angry.
    I too am miffed about how the anti vaccine crusade has been going. Where whooping cough was hardly a blip in the news, it's on the uprise again probably due to the fact that people who have refused to have their children vaccinated have them playing together. That's a guess, but I do know that they've alerted my daughter's school a few times to watch for symptoms.


    A.C.E. Certified Personal Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 28+ years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition
  • rjt1000
    rjt1000 Posts: 700 Member
    Cocaine is a great appetite suppressant and increases metabolism.


    I'm sure all the drug addicted patients I advised would be glad to use that as an excuse when they need to lose weight.

    How often do you see fat crackheads?
  • rjt1000
    rjt1000 Posts: 700 Member
    Truth comes from actual scientific testing and studies. If artificial sweetners were found by science to cause all the maladies claimed by opposition, then I would side with the opposition. Plain and simple.

    this.

    i work in biochem / molecular / microbiology, and i just haven't seen any peer reviewed studies that support the claims made in the anti-sweetener blogs. if the evidence supported the claims, i wouldn't be eating these products myself.

    there is nothing wrong with "natural." however, it's important to keep in mind that a lot of things are natural, including :

    high incidence of infant mortality
    an average lifespan of 40 years
    sexual maturity occurring at age eleven due to short lifespan
    smallpox, diphtheria, tetanus, and dying of a cold or flu
    getting eaten by a bear

    the natural news blogs lost me when they started their anti-vaccine crusade. the impact this has on kids makes me angry.

    Yes, lets return to the days of smallpox and measles epidemics killing millions. And polio. Who doesn't miss seeing kids crippled by polio? Some of these anti-aspartame types need to realize that penicillin is just as "unnatural" as aspartame. Should we abandon antibiotics because they aren't "natural"?
  • tnrunningnurse
    tnrunningnurse Posts: 549 Member
    Wow it is amazing how angry some people can get during what is suppose to be a civilized debate. As far as this debate goes there is science that supports both the safety of artificial sweetners as well as the unsafeness of them. As a nurse that knows something about the human anatomy and chemical make-up of the body I make the PERSONAL choice not to use artificial sweetners, limit my intake of sugar either in raw form or agave or honey, and I also choose to use Organic meats,diary and fruits and veggies when I can. It is my belief based on medical articles that I have read that NATURAL is better for the human body than UNNATURAL I also have the belief that all the antibiotics given to livestock is the reason for resistant bacteria. And it is also a personal belief based on my own research of the topic of pesticides that organic is the way to go....I mean I am not gonna spray raid on my dinner am I. Personal attacks should not take place on a forum where all people have the same goal....To be Healthy.
    This is one of my earlier post
This discussion has been closed.