Why deprive yourself of delicious foods?
Replies
-
because demonizing foods as "bad" and then blaming weight gain on them, then makes it easier to jut 100% restrict said foods and use them as a crutch ...
when you boil it down there are no good and bad foods. What matters is your overall diet...context and dosage is important, not individual food choices...
This is incorrect. There are plenty of foods that are bad for you, even in moderation.
Sure you can stay at a normal weight from keeping it to moderation but this doesn't mean these foods aren't terrible for your overall health.-1 -
OP: Why do you care what other people are eating?? If you feel so strongly that people can eat what they want, then let people eat what they want!!!
Personally, when I eat pizza, fast food, snack stuff (chips and the like), I feel like junk. It gives me an upset stomach. I prefer to eat food that makes me feel good and that gives me energy.0 -
Why do people even care about what other people eat?0
-
Are people seriously asking about why people care what others eat on forums designed for a nutrition, healthy, and fitness forum? OP definitely came across hostile but this is a topic that does come up repeatedly in tons of threads.0
-
PerkisPower wrote: »because demonizing foods as "bad" and then blaming weight gain on them, then makes it easier to jut 100% restrict said foods and use them as a crutch ...
when you boil it down there are no good and bad foods. What matters is your overall diet...context and dosage is important, not individual food choices...
This is incorrect. There are plenty of foods that are bad for you, even in moderation.
Sure you can stay at a normal weight from keeping it to moderation but this doesn't mean these foods aren't terrible for your overall health.
please list said foods...
-1 -
Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »txteachermom wrote: »ocaudle8912 wrote: »Okay, so be prepared for a rant.
Why do people deprive themselves of foods like chocolate, fried stuff, whatever when on a diet? These foods are not the enemy! The person eating them lacks self control, which is the true enemy. I hate going through my news feed and seeing people say "I never go out to eat" "I don't eat that trash" and I'm like dude moderation is key, not deprivation.
I'm determined to show people that you can lose weight and eat "trash" whenever you please. Again, it's all about moderation.
This. All of it. Seriously. My diary is open, anyone who wants to is welcome to look at it. I eat chocolate, I eat pizza, I eat things that a lot of people may consider "trash." But guess what, I'm still losing, because I eat at a calorie deficit. That's all that matters. It's really that simple.
If you re-read the OP though, you'll see that it never says anyone said "I can't eat that trash" or "I can't go out to eat". It says "I don't". Huge difference.
People should eat what they want while losing weight, not what you or the OP wants.
I believe she was quoting people from her news feed saying "I eat trash..."
so the "I" was referring to people on her friend list and not the OP herself...
Yes, I got that. My point was, she is assuming these people think they can't eat trash or go out to eat, rather than they simply choose not to.
again, I believe her point is that there is no "trash" food ..and that you do not need to deprive yourself of said foods...
weight loss does not have to equal self torture
You also seem to be assuming deprivation and self torture. Nothing in the OP suggests that, other than her assumption.
Ok - just read all the posts on here about "evil sugar" "bad carbs" "cutting sugar 100%" "water fasts" "clean eating" etc, etc..and tell me that is not happening...
I've read a more than a few, but I don't see the point of commenting on other MFP posts here in this thread. All my comments were about this thread.0 -
Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »txteachermom wrote: »ocaudle8912 wrote: »Okay, so be prepared for a rant.
Why do people deprive themselves of foods like chocolate, fried stuff, whatever when on a diet? These foods are not the enemy! The person eating them lacks self control, which is the true enemy. I hate going through my news feed and seeing people say "I never go out to eat" "I don't eat that trash" and I'm like dude moderation is key, not deprivation.
I'm determined to show people that you can lose weight and eat "trash" whenever you please. Again, it's all about moderation.
This. All of it. Seriously. My diary is open, anyone who wants to is welcome to look at it. I eat chocolate, I eat pizza, I eat things that a lot of people may consider "trash." But guess what, I'm still losing, because I eat at a calorie deficit. That's all that matters. It's really that simple.
If you re-read the OP though, you'll see that it never says anyone said "I can't eat that trash" or "I can't go out to eat". It says "I don't". Huge difference.
People should eat what they want while losing weight, not what you or the OP wants.
I believe she was quoting people from her news feed saying "I eat trash..."
so the "I" was referring to people on her friend list and not the OP herself...
Yes, I got that. My point was, she is assuming these people think they can't eat trash or go out to eat, rather than they simply choose not to.
again, I believe her point is that there is no "trash" food ..and that you do not need to deprive yourself of said foods...
weight loss does not have to equal self torture
You also seem to be assuming deprivation and self torture. Nothing in the OP suggests that, other than her assumption.
Ok - just read all the posts on here about "evil sugar" "bad carbs" "cutting sugar 100%" "water fasts" "clean eating" etc, etc..and tell me that is not happening...
I've read a more than a few, but I don't see the point of commenting on other MFP posts here in this thread. All my comments were about this thread.
OP has not come back to clarify ..but I believe it is a general question about why people view food as "trash"...
then again I could be wrong, as I am not the OP ...0 -
PerkisPower wrote: »because demonizing foods as "bad" and then blaming weight gain on them, then makes it easier to jut 100% restrict said foods and use them as a crutch ...
when you boil it down there are no good and bad foods. What matters is your overall diet...context and dosage is important, not individual food choices...
This is incorrect. There are plenty of foods that are bad for you, even in moderation.
Sure you can stay at a normal weight from keeping it to moderation but this doesn't mean these foods aren't terrible for your overall health.
Simply not true.
0 -
Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »txteachermom wrote: »ocaudle8912 wrote: »Okay, so be prepared for a rant.
Why do people deprive themselves of foods like chocolate, fried stuff, whatever when on a diet? These foods are not the enemy! The person eating them lacks self control, which is the true enemy. I hate going through my news feed and seeing people say "I never go out to eat" "I don't eat that trash" and I'm like dude moderation is key, not deprivation.
I'm determined to show people that you can lose weight and eat "trash" whenever you please. Again, it's all about moderation.
This. All of it. Seriously. My diary is open, anyone who wants to is welcome to look at it. I eat chocolate, I eat pizza, I eat things that a lot of people may consider "trash." But guess what, I'm still losing, because I eat at a calorie deficit. That's all that matters. It's really that simple.
If you re-read the OP though, you'll see that it never says anyone said "I can't eat that trash" or "I can't go out to eat". It says "I don't". Huge difference.
People should eat what they want while losing weight, not what you or the OP wants.
I believe she was quoting people from her news feed saying "I eat trash..."
so the "I" was referring to people on her friend list and not the OP herself...
Yes, I got that. My point was, she is assuming these people think they can't eat trash or go out to eat, rather than they simply choose not to.
again, I believe her point is that there is no "trash" food ..and that you do not need to deprive yourself of said foods...
weight loss does not have to equal self torture
You also seem to be assuming deprivation and self torture. Nothing in the OP suggests that, other than her assumption.
Ok - just read all the posts on here about "evil sugar" "bad carbs" "cutting sugar 100%" "water fasts" "clean eating" etc, etc..and tell me that is not happening...
I've read a more than a few, but I don't see the point of commenting on other MFP posts here in this thread. All my comments were about this thread.
OP has not come back to clarify ..but I believe it is a general question about why people view food as "trash"...
then again I could be wrong, as I am not the OP ...
Nor am I, though I read it as a general demonizing of people who choose not to eat trash.0 -
There is a difference for people who choose not to eat certain foods and people who think they can't eat certain foods.
I get that for some people, they just feel better when they don't eat XYZ or they just can't seem to control themselves around it. I understand that's how they feel and it's not affecting me so whatever. Personally, I'd rather learn how to control it than just not eat it ever again.
But the people who think they can't are a different story. They've probably been "brainwashed" by the media that its unhealthy and full of chemicals that will kill you. But I think there's also a psychological underpinning to it:
It's easier to blame the food for you being fat, than to take responsibility for it yourself. If the food is what is making you unhealthy, then it's not your fault. That's an attractive prospect for many who are in denial about how bad their eating habits are and that they chose to eat that poorly. Maybe it's how you were raised, but once you became an adult, you chose to continue eating badly.
Personal responsibility can be a scary thing.
Me on the other hand, I find personal responsibility to be liberating. I tried to cut dessert out of my life for a long time because I felt guilty when I ate it. Now that I track my calories and macros, I know that when I eat dessert, it's ok. It fits into my daily goals and my healthy diet. No more reason to feel guilty.0 -
LavenderLeaves wrote: »Are people seriously asking about why people care what others eat on forums designed for a nutrition, healthy, and fitness forum? OP definitely came across hostile but this is a topic that does come up repeatedly in tons of threads.
Yeah, I asked it and I am serious. Why does anyone seriously care about what other people eat? It is just a game on these forums....they want you to agree with them and their philosophy or they will tell you what an idiot you are. My point is that what works for one person is their business. We do not all have to agree or eat the same way to be successful at weight loss, gain, maintenance, etc. I’m just very tired of the same people chiming in and slamming others for THEIR choices. Want to eat candy, cakes and chips every day? That’s great! Want to stay away from stuff like that because it triggers overeating/binging or causes physical issues for you PERSONALLY, then that’s great too. We are not all robots...what works for me, may not work for you. It’s what you can live with and stick to that works. I personally can’t even look at a graham cracker or the next thing I know, I have eaten the entire box and am now off looking for the salty half of my food binge fix. My solution-no graham crackers. Works for me.0 -
Need2Exerc1se wrote: »I'm new here. What the consequence of getting flagged?
My understanding is that the moderators will check it out. If they find a post that violates the forum rules, they can remove it and possibly give the poster a 'strike' of some sort. If you get enough strikes, you can be banned from the forums. But a flag is not a strike.
Also, the mods can see who flags a post. I'm not sure if they have any penalties for excessive inappropriate flagging, but I would not be surprised if that starts soon given the way some people seem to flag just for fun, causing more work for the mods.
Flagging is for spam. I'm quite sure it actually pisses off the mods when people abuse the feature, heck I wouldn't be surprised if the option was removed soon, and we'll be drowning in spam posts again because of it
OP, I honestly don't care what other people do, personally. I know that some people just can't do moderation, so they cut things out... if it works for them, *shrug*.0 -
Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »Need2Exerc1se wrote: »txteachermom wrote: »ocaudle8912 wrote: »Okay, so be prepared for a rant.
Why do people deprive themselves of foods like chocolate, fried stuff, whatever when on a diet? These foods are not the enemy! The person eating them lacks self control, which is the true enemy. I hate going through my news feed and seeing people say "I never go out to eat" "I don't eat that trash" and I'm like dude moderation is key, not deprivation.
I'm determined to show people that you can lose weight and eat "trash" whenever you please. Again, it's all about moderation.
This. All of it. Seriously. My diary is open, anyone who wants to is welcome to look at it. I eat chocolate, I eat pizza, I eat things that a lot of people may consider "trash." But guess what, I'm still losing, because I eat at a calorie deficit. That's all that matters. It's really that simple.
If you re-read the OP though, you'll see that it never says anyone said "I can't eat that trash" or "I can't go out to eat". It says "I don't". Huge difference.
People should eat what they want while losing weight, not what you or the OP wants.
I believe she was quoting people from her news feed saying "I eat trash..."
so the "I" was referring to people on her friend list and not the OP herself...
Yes, I got that. My point was, she is assuming these people think they can't eat trash or go out to eat, rather than they simply choose not to.
again, I believe her point is that there is no "trash" food ..and that you do not need to deprive yourself of said foods...
weight loss does not have to equal self torture
You also seem to be assuming deprivation and self torture. Nothing in the OP suggests that, other than her assumption.
Ok - just read all the posts on here about "evil sugar" "bad carbs" "cutting sugar 100%" "water fasts" "clean eating" etc, etc..and tell me that is not happening...
I've read a more than a few, but I don't see the point of commenting on other MFP posts here in this thread. All my comments were about this thread.
OP has not come back to clarify ..but I believe it is a general question about why people view food as "trash"...
then again I could be wrong, as I am not the OP ...
Nor am I, though I read it as a general demonizing of people who choose not to eat trash.
Ummm, I think you read it backwards...
I read it as her asking why people deprive themselves..and her last sentence said that you can eat "trash" and lose weight...
0 -
You're being baited into an Internet fight. Just a heads up.PerkisPower wrote: »because demonizing foods as "bad" and then blaming weight gain on them, then makes it easier to jut 100% restrict said foods and use them as a crutch ...
when you boil it down there are no good and bad foods. What matters is your overall diet...context and dosage is important, not individual food choices...
This is incorrect. There are plenty of foods that are bad for you, even in moderation.
Sure you can stay at a normal weight from keeping it to moderation but this doesn't mean these foods aren't terrible for your overall health.
-1 -
jenluvsushi wrote: »LavenderLeaves wrote: »Are people seriously asking about why people care what others eat on forums designed for a nutrition, healthy, and fitness forum? OP definitely came across hostile but this is a topic that does come up repeatedly in tons of threads.
Yeah, I asked it and I am serious. Why does anyone seriously care about what other people eat? It is just a game on these forums....they want you to agree with them and their philosophy or they will tell you what an idiot you are. My point is that what works for one person is their business. We do not all have to agree or eat the same way to be successful at weight loss, gain, maintenance, etc. I’m just very tired of the same people chiming in and slamming others for THEIR choices. Want to eat candy, cakes and chips every day? That’s great! Want to stay away from stuff like that because it triggers overeating/binging or causes physical issues for you PERSONALLY, then that’s great too. We are not all robots...what works for me, may not work for you. It’s what you can live with and stick to that works. I personally can’t even look at a graham cracker or the next thing I know, I have eaten the entire box and am now off looking for the salty half of my food binge fix. My solution-no graham crackers. Works for me.
I believe OP's point is there is no "bad" food ...
she just did not state it so clearly .
dosage, no individual food choice, is what matters...0 -
PerkisPower wrote: »because demonizing foods as "bad" and then blaming weight gain on them, then makes it easier to jut 100% restrict said foods and use them as a crutch ...
when you boil it down there are no good and bad foods. What matters is your overall diet...context and dosage is important, not individual food choices...
This is incorrect. There are plenty of foods that are bad for you, even in moderation.
Sure you can stay at a normal weight from keeping it to moderation but this doesn't mean these foods aren't terrible for your overall health.
please list said foods...
Google Trans fats.
All processed foods increase health risks as you age. The chemicals put into foods to make them last for years are awful for humans. It's no coincidence that healthy foods go bad quickly... because it's actual food.
Being fit and being healthy are two completely different things.
You can have 10% body fat and be extremely unhealthy on the inside (what really matters. )
0 -
You're being baited into an Internet fight. Just a heads up.PerkisPower wrote: »because demonizing foods as "bad" and then blaming weight gain on them, then makes it easier to jut 100% restrict said foods and use them as a crutch ...
when you boil it down there are no good and bad foods. What matters is your overall diet...context and dosage is important, not individual food choices...
This is incorrect. There are plenty of foods that are bad for you, even in moderation.
Sure you can stay at a normal weight from keeping it to moderation but this doesn't mean these foods aren't terrible for your overall health.
True, we should just let his misinformation go unnoticed. :insertsarcasm:0 -
PerkisPower wrote: »because demonizing foods as "bad" and then blaming weight gain on them, then makes it easier to jut 100% restrict said foods and use them as a crutch ...
when you boil it down there are no good and bad foods. What matters is your overall diet...context and dosage is important, not individual food choices...
This is incorrect. There are plenty of foods that are bad for you, even in moderation.
Sure you can stay at a normal weight from keeping it to moderation but this doesn't mean these foods aren't terrible for your overall health.
Like, say, foods containing trans fats. Cardiologists all agree those are not good for you, and it's best if you NEVER eat them. But don't try to tell some people here that...0 -
PerkisPower wrote: »because demonizing foods as "bad" and then blaming weight gain on them, then makes it easier to jut 100% restrict said foods and use them as a crutch ...
when you boil it down there are no good and bad foods. What matters is your overall diet...context and dosage is important, not individual food choices...
This is incorrect. There are plenty of foods that are bad for you, even in moderation.
Sure you can stay at a normal weight from keeping it to moderation but this doesn't mean these foods aren't terrible for your overall health.
please list said foods...
Foods containing trans fats.0 -
PerkisPower wrote: »PerkisPower wrote: »because demonizing foods as "bad" and then blaming weight gain on them, then makes it easier to jut 100% restrict said foods and use them as a crutch ...
when you boil it down there are no good and bad foods. What matters is your overall diet...context and dosage is important, not individual food choices...
This is incorrect. There are plenty of foods that are bad for you, even in moderation.
Sure you can stay at a normal weight from keeping it to moderation but this doesn't mean these foods aren't terrible for your overall health.
please list said foods...
Google Trans fats.
All processed foods increase health risks as you age. The chemicals put into foods to make them last for years are awful for humans. It's no coincidence that healthy foods go bad quickly... because it's actual food.
Being fit and being healthy are two completely different things.
You can have 10% body fat and be extremely unhealthy on the inside (what really matters. )
LOL We posted at the same time.0 -
PerkisPower wrote: »PerkisPower wrote: »because demonizing foods as "bad" and then blaming weight gain on them, then makes it easier to jut 100% restrict said foods and use them as a crutch ...
when you boil it down there are no good and bad foods. What matters is your overall diet...context and dosage is important, not individual food choices...
This is incorrect. There are plenty of foods that are bad for you, even in moderation.
Sure you can stay at a normal weight from keeping it to moderation but this doesn't mean these foods aren't terrible for your overall health.
please list said foods...
Google Trans fats.
All processed foods increase health risks as you age. The chemicals put into foods to make them last for years are awful for humans. It's no coincidence that healthy foods go bad quickly... because it's actual food.
Being fit and being healthy are two completely different things.
You can have 10% body fat and be extremely unhealthy on the inside (what really matters. )
LOL well my blood panel/health markers come back in the excellent range every year..
and processed foods are not bad for you. Whole wheat pasta is a processed food do you considerer that bad?
You can eat processed foods, hit your calorie/micro/macro goals and be fine.
Again, it is about dosage not individual food choice.
0 -
You're being baited into an Internet fight. Just a heads up.PerkisPower wrote: »because demonizing foods as "bad" and then blaming weight gain on them, then makes it easier to jut 100% restrict said foods and use them as a crutch ...
when you boil it down there are no good and bad foods. What matters is your overall diet...context and dosage is important, not individual food choices...
This is incorrect. There are plenty of foods that are bad for you, even in moderation.
Sure you can stay at a normal weight from keeping it to moderation but this doesn't mean these foods aren't terrible for your overall health.
True, we should just let his misinformation go unnoticed. :insertsarcasm:
What misinformation would that be? That trans fats are unhealthy? Go tell that to a room full of cardiologists and see what happens.0 -
PerkisPower wrote: »because demonizing foods as "bad" and then blaming weight gain on them, then makes it easier to jut 100% restrict said foods and use them as a crutch ...
when you boil it down there are no good and bad foods. What matters is your overall diet...context and dosage is important, not individual food choices...
This is incorrect. There are plenty of foods that are bad for you, even in moderation.
Sure you can stay at a normal weight from keeping it to moderation but this doesn't mean these foods aren't terrible for your overall health.
please list said foods...
Foods containing trans fats.
again, dosage, not individual food choice.
0 -
PerkisPower wrote: »PerkisPower wrote: »because demonizing foods as "bad" and then blaming weight gain on them, then makes it easier to jut 100% restrict said foods and use them as a crutch ...
when you boil it down there are no good and bad foods. What matters is your overall diet...context and dosage is important, not individual food choices...
This is incorrect. There are plenty of foods that are bad for you, even in moderation.
Sure you can stay at a normal weight from keeping it to moderation but this doesn't mean these foods aren't terrible for your overall health.
please list said foods...
Google Trans fats.
All processed foods increase health risks as you age. The chemicals put into foods to make them last for years are awful for humans. It's no coincidence that healthy foods go bad quickly... because it's actual food.
Being fit and being healthy are two completely different things.
You can have 10% body fat and be extremely unhealthy on the inside (what really matters. )
LOL We posted at the same time.
You guys could just say dairy and meat to save some work. I know I had better things to do with my 5 seconds of searching for "foods with trans fats" that I could've spent on posting a cat gif in CC&G.
OT: I don't care what people eat. I'm not part of the food diary police, 'cause, you know, glass houses and all.
0 -
ocaudle8912 wrote: »Why do people deprive themselves of foods like chocolate, fried stuff, whatever when on a diet? These foods are not the enemy! The person eating them lacks self control, which is the true enemy.
Why do alcoholics deprive themselves of drinks like whiskey, beer, wine? These drinks aren't the enemy! The person drinking them lacks self control, which is the true enemy.
0 -
It's supposed to mean that what is right for you isn't necessarily right for everyone and that moderation isn't necessarily a good thing.queen_of_disaster wrote: »Some people demonize elimination. They see moderation as black and white. You either eat in moderation, which is "good" or you eat too much/not enough junk, which is "bad."
What the what? What is that even supposed to mean?
Don't get it twisted, I never said to force yourself to eat "bad" food, LOL. Eat what you want, when you want, make sure it fits your calories, and you're good to go. No need to completely deprive yourself of sweets, breads, etc. etc. because they're arbitrarily considered "bad." No one is disputing the fact that broccoli has more micronutrients than a donut, but categorizing foods as "bad" or "good" is the definition of black and white thinking.
It's the dose that makes the poison.
But I mean, if you want to completely eliminate certain things from your diet... You do you. It's hard to learn how to eat in moderation but IMO it gets easier over time to control yourself around trigger foods if you allow yourself to have them.
This whole business of "I am superior because I include XYZ foods in my diet" gets a little ridiculous. A lot of people fall into it. My advice would be to not fall into that trap.
It's really difficult following the "moderation" thing, too, since every single person who defines it defines it differently. Some have a little of the same few treats every day. Some splurge on extremely rare occasions. Some have a bit now and then. When people try to figure out what everyone means when they say, "Eat in moderation," there is no definition. It's a lot like "clean" eating. The people who tout it are all saying something different.
Everyone has to walk their own path. Your "moderation" isn't the path for all.0 -
PerkisPower wrote: »because demonizing foods as "bad" and then blaming weight gain on them, then makes it easier to jut 100% restrict said foods and use them as a crutch ...
when you boil it down there are no good and bad foods. What matters is your overall diet...context and dosage is important, not individual food choices...
This is incorrect. There are plenty of foods that are bad for you, even in moderation.
Sure you can stay at a normal weight from keeping it to moderation but this doesn't mean these foods aren't terrible for your overall health.
please list said foods...
Foods containing trans fats.
again, dosage, not individual food choice.
Incorrect. There is no amount of trans fats that is good for you. Why do you think all food manufacturers formulate their foods to try to get the label to say "zero" grams of trans fat? Even though they do contain it, they can legally say zero because it's less than half a gram per serving . It's not good for your arteries, in any amount.0 -
ocaudle8912 wrote: »I'm determined to show people that you can lose weight and eat "trash" whenever you please.
By posting anonymously on a chat board?
BS.
0 -
Please.........:-) Self control is over rated
even more important than having self control is self awareness. The ability to determine if you have self control or not.
Eating in moderation is not for everyone, it works for some. It does not work for others. I like cake, chocolate and ice cream....Love them. I have tried eating them in moderation. Day 1 goes well...One chocolate, 2 Cookies, Day 2.. the same. by Day 3. 2 Chocolates, 5 Cookies, 2 Ice Cream. By Day 5....I stop counting the # of chocolates and cakes and ice cream and so i deprive my self for a while, have some cheat days and then deprive myself for a while.
I know i lack self control when it comes to cookies, cake, ice cream as a result, i have a cheat day, or some cheat days and then deprive my self for the other days or weeks.
Thats ok, it's also ok for those who can have it daily in moderation :-)0 -
I am truly in shock that a few of you think Trans fats are not unhealthy.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 393.7K Introduce Yourself
- 43.8K Getting Started
- 260.3K Health and Weight Loss
- 176K Food and Nutrition
- 47.5K Recipes
- 232.6K Fitness and Exercise
- 431 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.5K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.6K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 153K Motivation and Support
- 8.1K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.8K MyFitnessPal Information
- 23 News and Announcements
- 1.2K Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.6K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions