potatoes good or bad

135678

Replies

  • PeachyCarol
    PeachyCarol Posts: 8,029 Member
    Nony_Mouse wrote: »
    Just had a baked potato for lunch, with loads of cottage cheese mixed with garlic chives and a clove of garlic (cos baked potatoes are nothing without garlic imho), grated edam cheese, and chili sauce. NOM!!! Oh yeah, and some cucumber and tomato on the side.

    That sounds delicious. WANT.

  • Nony_Mouse
    Nony_Mouse Posts: 5,646 Member
    edited March 2015
    _Terrapin_ wrote: »
    Nony_Mouse wrote: »
    Just had a baked potato for lunch, with loads of cottage cheese mixed with garlic chives and a clove of garlic (cos baked potatoes are nothing without garlic imho), grated edam cheese, and chili sauce. NOM!!! Oh yeah, and some cucumber and tomato on the side.


    Is it safe to say the potato was covered with LUV?

    It sure was!!
    Nony_Mouse wrote: »
    Just had a baked potato for lunch, with loads of cottage cheese mixed with garlic chives and a clove of garlic (cos baked potatoes are nothing without garlic imho), grated edam cheese, and chili sauce. NOM!!! Oh yeah, and some cucumber and tomato on the side.

    That sounds delicious. WANT.

    MamaPeach it was actually your diary that made me realise I can fit the potatoes in, cos I know you're mod carbs too, so thanks!! TBH I'm not even sure why I'd put them in the 'too many carbs'* basket anyway. I did go a bit over my carb macro today, but not so much that I'm going to sweat it. And it's nice to have another fab option for lunch. Scrambled eggs, much as I love 'em, can get a bit boring day after day.




    *Please note I have PCOS. I do not believe carbs are in any way, shape or form evil, I just have to watch my intake.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    Nony_Mouse wrote: »
    Just had a baked potato for lunch, with loads of cottage cheese mixed with garlic chives and a clove of garlic (cos baked potatoes are nothing without garlic imho), grated edam cheese, and chili sauce. NOM!!! Oh yeah, and some cucumber and tomato on the side.

    That sounds delicious. WANT.

    It does, and the advice about garlic is spot on!
  • Need2Exerc1se
    Need2Exerc1se Posts: 13,575 Member
    It really depends on your goals and preferences. I eat potatoes, but not often. The fiber to total carb ratio makes them a "sometimes" food for me.

    I don't really like potatoes without quite a bit of fat added so the calorie count is too high to eat often.
  • wyattj99
    wyattj99 Posts: 454 Member
    I eat sweet potatoes!
  • exerciseforhealth
    exerciseforhealth Posts: 15 Member
    Eat the potato! !!! They are very nutritious and kept an entire nation alive during famine - leave the skin on, don't drown it in butter...enjoy the fricken thing; it's delicious. Get rid of the other processed shite that some companies try to pass off as "food".
  • J72FIT
    J72FIT Posts: 6,009 Member
    I've limited eating potatoes to once a week . they say there are alot of empty calories in them . anyone else eat potatoes often
    Not true at all. Potatoes are loaded with nutrition.
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    I don't really like potatoes without quite a bit of fat added so the calorie count is too high to eat often.

    Yes, this would make a difference. I like them roasted with very little fat added, so the calorie count is quite low. For example, on Monday I had 105 grams of roasted potatoes for 76 calories. With some fish and veggies it made for a lovely, substantial dinner--most importantly, to my taste. Obviously, if you don't much like potatoes, no need to worry about whether they are healthy or not. (That's why I never worry about the health benefits of rice, it usually bores me as a side dish.)
  • urloved33
    urloved33 Posts: 3,323 Member
    potatoes good. what we put on them by the tablespoonfuls - bad bad bad.
  • diannethegeek
    diannethegeek Posts: 14,776 Member
    laurielima wrote: »
    potatoes good. what we put on them by the tablespoonfuls - bad bad bad.

    Personally, I find this a little simplistic and misleading. There have been tons of great suggestions in this thread for things to put on potatoes that are not "bad, bad, bad." If the toppings fit in your calorie and nutrition goals then they're fine. If not, there are plenty of other toppings that might (assuming you want or need to top your potatoes, of course).
  • This content has been removed.
  • TheVirgoddess
    TheVirgoddess Posts: 4,535 Member
    laurielima wrote: »
    potatoes good. what we put on them by the tablespoonfuls - bad bad bad.

    What?

    I had roasted potatoes last night - I used a bit of olive oil, paprika, rosemary and onion. There was nothing bad in there at all. And they were delicious.
  • JustinAnimal
    JustinAnimal Posts: 1,335 Member
    I was surprised to find out that potatoes have a terrifying amount of Vitamin C. Try baking an orange and topping with caramelized onions...
  • sullus
    sullus Posts: 2,839 Member
    laurielima wrote: »
    potatoes good. what we put on them by the tablespoonfuls - bad bad bad.

    noooo .. the glycemic index of a baked potato is nearly 100. You can significantly reduce this by adding butter, cheese, bacon, and sour cream.
  • racheljacobsen
    racheljacobsen Posts: 537 Member
    kxbrown27 wrote: »
    Wrap a potato in foil and put in the slow cooker on low for 9 hours. That's the creamiest baked potato I've ever had. Then top it with salsa verde. Yum. Potatoes are good.

    I just started cooking my baked potatoes this way and I love it. The only draw back is you don't get the crispy skin which I love.

  • princessnik7
    princessnik7 Posts: 144 Member
    I eat sweet potates daily on the meal plan my trainer set up for me.
  • ndj1979
    ndj1979 Posts: 29,136 Member
    OP - how many "is this bad" posts are you going to post?
    -
    Potatoes are not bad for you. Excess calories are.

    end of thread/
  • jalarson23
    jalarson23 Posts: 62 Member
    I used to think potatoes weren't that healthy to eat, but after actually looking up the nutritional content of potatoes, they are actually pretty beneficial. For some reason, they just have a bad rep in pop culture and sweet potatoes are praised in their place. I wouldn't sweat the differences between the two. If you are like me and you prefer a regular potato over a sweet potato, go ahead and eat the regular potato.

    Check out the nutritional information:
    Google search for "potato nutrition"
    Google search for "sweet potato nutrition"
  • JustinAnimal
    JustinAnimal Posts: 1,335 Member
    It's that whole "carbs are the enemy" mentality.
  • jalarson23
    jalarson23 Posts: 62 Member
    It's that whole "carbs are the enemy" mentality.

    I could understand this in the right context (too much bread maybe?), but a potato? Nah, a potato is fine. As long as you try to keep your diet balanced, you are probably fine. Then again, I'm not a doctor or a nutritionist. So where are the doctors/nutritionists and what do they have to say? This all sounds like the low fat movement to me, except they replaced fat with carbs.


  • tincanonastring
    tincanonastring Posts: 3,944 Member
    Potatoes are awful! They stole my car and kicked my dog!

    badpotato.jpg
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    edited March 2015
    laurielima wrote: »
    potatoes good. what we put on them by the tablespoonfuls - bad bad bad.

    I don't put tablespoons of anything on my potatoes, except maybe low fat greek yogurt (which I currently use as an all-purpose sub for sour cream, which I never have on hand). I do put a little olive oil and salt on them, is that "bad, bad, bad"? Oh, and sure I'll put a little butter on mashed potatoes from time to time (although as noted above mixing them with meat precludes any need for that). I don't consider butter in moderation to be "bad, bad, bad." In fact, fat is a satiating and tasty addition that is also needed in our diets (not that I'm at risk of getting too little).
  • lemurcat12
    lemurcat12 Posts: 30,886 Member
    jalarson23 wrote: »
    I used to think potatoes weren't that healthy to eat, but after actually looking up the nutritional content of potatoes, they are actually pretty beneficial. For some reason, they just have a bad rep in pop culture and sweet potatoes are praised in their place. I wouldn't sweat the differences between the two. If you are like me and you prefer a regular potato over a sweet potato, go ahead and eat the regular potato.

    Check out the nutritional information:
    Google search for "potato nutrition"
    Google search for "sweet potato nutrition"

    I like variety (and think it's beneficial), so happily alternate between potatoes and sweet potatoes, but I agree that the current pop culture idea that sweet potatoes are superfoods and potatoes are "empty calories" and "fattening" is puzzling. I blame over-emphasis and misunderstanding of the glycemic index plus the occasional bizarre prejudice against "white foods"--there has been a post or two here even grouping regular potatoes with "processed" white foods. Makes me wonder if some people actually think potatoes are processed sweet potatoes. Once upon a time I would have assumed no one could think that, but time at MFP has made me jaded.
  • stevencloser
    stevencloser Posts: 8,911 Member
    jalarson23 wrote: »
    It's that whole "carbs are the enemy" mentality.

    I could understand this in the right context (too much bread maybe?), but a potato? Nah, a potato is fine. As long as you try to keep your diet balanced, you are probably fine. Then again, I'm not a doctor or a nutritionist. So where are the doctors/nutritionists and what do they have to say? This all sounds like the low fat movement to me, except they replaced fat with carbs.


    Something something starchy things bad.
  • debtiffany_
    debtiffany_ Posts: 19 Member
    Try A-1 on a baked potato, less fat and calories than butter, and delicious
  • PeachyCarol
    PeachyCarol Posts: 8,029 Member
    Nony_Mouse wrote: »
    _Terrapin_ wrote: »
    Nony_Mouse wrote: »
    Just had a baked potato for lunch, with loads of cottage cheese mixed with garlic chives and a clove of garlic (cos baked potatoes are nothing without garlic imho), grated edam cheese, and chili sauce. NOM!!! Oh yeah, and some cucumber and tomato on the side.


    Is it safe to say the potato was covered with LUV?

    It sure was!!
    Nony_Mouse wrote: »
    Just had a baked potato for lunch, with loads of cottage cheese mixed with garlic chives and a clove of garlic (cos baked potatoes are nothing without garlic imho), grated edam cheese, and chili sauce. NOM!!! Oh yeah, and some cucumber and tomato on the side.

    That sounds delicious. WANT.

    MamaPeach it was actually your diary that made me realise I can fit the potatoes in, cos I know you're mod carbs too, so thanks!! TBH I'm not even sure why I'd put them in the 'too many carbs'* basket anyway. I did go a bit over my carb macro today, but not so much that I'm going to sweat it. And it's nice to have another fab option for lunch. Scrambled eggs, much as I love 'em, can get a bit boring day after day.




    *Please note I have PCOS. I do not believe carbs are in any way, shape or form evil, I just have to watch my intake.

    You're welcome! I go a bit over my carb macro on my potato days too, but not enough that I feel poorly due to it. The taters are worth it!

    And yes, isn't it great to see that even watching carbs you can still eat the good stuff? I'm going to start calling myself a SELECTIVE carber. I only eat the carbs I really, really like.

    *Standard caveat: I don't think there's anything wrong with carbs, I moderate mine to manage fatigue levels from chronic medical conditions.

  • urloved33
    urloved33 Posts: 3,323 Member
    sullus wrote: »
    laurielima wrote: »
    potatoes good. what we put on them by the tablespoonfuls - bad bad bad.

    noooo .. the glycemic index of a baked potato is nearly 100. You can significantly reduce this by adding butter, cheese, bacon, and sour cream.

    ok lets do this guys suggestion., Homemade - Baked Potato, Fully Loaded W/Cheese, Bacon, Butter, Chives, Sour Cream, 1 potato 862 54 27 0 1,961 0

    862 calories for what he suggests we eat w the potato.

    If you think thats good have at it.

  • urloved33
    urloved33 Posts: 3,323 Member
    laurielima wrote: »
    potatoes good. what we put on them by the tablespoonfuls - bad bad bad.

    What?

    I had roasted potatoes last night - I used a bit of olive oil, paprika, rosemary and onion. There was nothing bad in there at all. And they were delicious.

    hers is better about 250 cals. Generic - Homemade Roasted Red Bliss Potatoes With Olive Oil, Rosemary, Garlic, Pepper and Salt, 227 g 243 44 11 5 48 3

    but who eats that kind of calories for a side dish. i dont'


  • cwolfman13
    cwolfman13 Posts: 41,865 Member
    edited March 2015
    laurielima wrote: »
    sullus wrote: »
    laurielima wrote: »
    potatoes good. what we put on them by the tablespoonfuls - bad bad bad.

    noooo .. the glycemic index of a baked potato is nearly 100. You can significantly reduce this by adding butter, cheese, bacon, and sour cream.

    ok lets do this guys suggestion., Homemade - Baked Potato, Fully Loaded W/Cheese, Bacon, Butter, Chives, Sour Cream, 1 potato 862 54 27 0 1,961 0

    862 calories for what he suggests we eat w the potato.

    If you think thats good have at it.

    I guess it would depend on your calorie goals wouldn't it?

    Personally, I just like mine with a little butter and some green onions and I eat it with some kind of protein source...but the above would be just fine depending on your goals.

    When I was training for my century I was eating upwards of 3200 calories per day and still losing weight...something like this would be perfect in that scenario. When I did my bulk I was also eating around 3200 calories....again...perfect for those goals.

    Context is important, you can't just pull a calorie number out of the sky and deem it "good" or "bad"
  • PeachyCarol
    PeachyCarol Posts: 8,029 Member
    Try A-1 on a baked potato, less fat and calories than butter, and delicious

    Honestly, it doesn't take a lot of butter. 5 grams of butter is only about 40 calories. It's a small pat, but if you mix it around, the flavor spreads and it's enough.

This discussion has been closed.