Cardio isn't for "fat burning".

Options
12527293031

Replies

  • jenilla1
    jenilla1 Posts: 11,118 Member
    Options
    I have to agree with OP. I trained for and ran my first marathon several years ago without watching my calories and I ended up gaining weight. I was like, "What happened?" Obviously, I was inadvertently eating back all those burned calories and then some. By the next marathon, I had found MFP, and was logging my calories. I was able to easily maintain instead of gaining. (I was in maintenance so I wasn't trying to lose. But if I had been trying to lose, I'm confident that I would have, just based on meeting my calorie goals.)

    Although of course, doing cardio will help you lose fat if it helps you get into a calorie deficit. Cardio without the deficit won't help for fat loss. I think that's what most people are thinking of when they talk about exercise helping you lose fat/weight. It does help, but only if it leads to a calorie deficit. Because calories are what really matter.
  • heybales
    heybales Posts: 18,842 Member
    edited February 2017
    Options
    jenilla1 wrote: »
    I have to agree with OP. I trained for and ran my first marathon several years ago without watching my calories and I ended up gaining weight. I was like, "What happened?" Obviously, I was inadvertently eating back all those burned calories and then some. By the next marathon, I had found MFP, and was logging my calories. I was able to easily maintain instead of gaining. (I was in maintenance so I wasn't trying to lose. But if I had been trying to lose, I'm confident that I would have, just based on meeting my calorie goals.)

    Although of course, doing cardio will help you lose fat if it helps you get into a calorie deficit. Cardio without the deficit won't help for fat loss. I think that's what most people are thinking of when they talk about exercise helping you lose fat/weight. It does help, but only if it leads to a calorie deficit. Because calories are what really matter.

    Very good.

    Also, some sites that track food, go by the method of estimating your planned/desired/expected exercise level for the week, and giving you a deficit from that TDEE.
    Which means if you don't do the workouts - you don't lose.

    And to your point, that is exactly why some articles/studies about exercise and free-living people have shown no weight loss, or gain actually.
    Left to their own devices and skills (and in a study because of being overweight, probably not great skills), people don't create a deficit.

    But most assume that for discussions on MFP - people aren't just out lying to themselves and others with their logging, for at least vast majority.
  • Chunkahlunkah
    Chunkahlunkah Posts: 373 Member
    edited February 2017
    Options
    Raynne413 wrote: »
    7lenny7 wrote: »
    There's a great Scientific American on this - https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-exercise-paradox/

    I subscribe to the magazine, and would highly recommend reading that article if you're interested in the science behind why exercise doesn't cause humans to lose weight - there's an evolutionary answer and it's really interesting!

    If you don't want to subscribe to read the article you can find it here on Issuu.

    I'll have to read it when I have time.


    Thank you so much for posting that link!!

    Yes, that was a fascinating article, thank you!

    I'm not sold on the idea of fixed energy expenditure though, and that the body generally can't increase its TDEE with exercise (aside from the article's acknowledged 200 calorie jump when going from sedentary to moderately active).

    I can definitely see the gist of their theory being true, that there's a cap on how many calories from exercise a body will lets its TDEE increase. The figure they name sounds too low to me though. I think the cap is probably dynamic and depends on the body's available calories. If a female's body can regularly eat 2400 calories, for example, then it may allow the jump from a 1900 calorie TDEE to 2400 through 500 calories of exercise. While in a place where calories are harder to come by, that level of exercise may instead just result in the metabolic adaptation they described.

    Then with the 300 participant study they did where they found couch potatoes burned 200 fewer cals than moderately active people, but that intensly active people burned the same as the moderately active...Maybe the intensely active people were that way because as a group they have a slower metabolism and need to exercise at that level to simply bring themselves up to the energy expenditure of the moderately active people?


  • Chunkahlunkah
    Chunkahlunkah Posts: 373 Member
    edited February 2017
    Options
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    Cardio is done to improve cardio vascular fitness and burn calories. It will HELP with a calorie deficit and for some that do a lot of cardio, allow one to eat more versus someone at the same weight who does little or no cardio at all.
    Like all other physical activity, GLYCOGEN will be the first thing burned before fat is even touched (ratio will vary more to fat if duration extended and/or intensity is lower) so the addage that one needs to do cardio to burn fat is a myth. You burn fat with a calorie deficit. Don't believe it? Do whatever cardio you want, but eat your TDEE. You'll more likely keep the same bodyfat percentage if you keep doing that.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png

    1) Cardio can help with a calorie deficit.
    2) A calorie deficit burns fat.
    3) Cardio doesn't burn fat. (Title) ??? I don't follow you conclusion.

    I mean, sure, exercise isn't magical. If a person doesn't have a calorie deficit, they won't lose weight. And people need to understand that. But if someone holds their CI steady and (truly) burns 250 calories a day through exercise, then, in theory, wouldn't they lose half a pound a week?

  • AnvilHead
    AnvilHead Posts: 18,344 Member
    Options
    sounds like bs. cardio is good to create a calorie deficit or to eat a bit extra food/snack

    How does it sound like BS? Read the OP again. It says exactly what you just stated. Allow me to quote from it for clarification:
    It will HELP with a calorie deficit and for some that do a lot of cardio, allow one to eat more versus someone at the same weight who does little or no cardio at all.

    Now read your post again. See how they kinda sorta like say the exact same thing in slightly different words?
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,510 Member
    Options
    sounds like bs. cardio is good to create a calorie deficit or to eat a bit extra food/snack
    Okay, so do cardio and don't create a calorie deficit. How much fat was burned doing cardio?

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png

  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,510 Member
    Options
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    Cardio is done to improve cardio vascular fitness and burn calories. It will HELP with a calorie deficit and for some that do a lot of cardio, allow one to eat more versus someone at the same weight who does little or no cardio at all.
    Like all other physical activity, GLYCOGEN will be the first thing burned before fat is even touched (ratio will vary more to fat if duration extended and/or intensity is lower) so the addage that one needs to do cardio to burn fat is a myth. You burn fat with a calorie deficit. Don't believe it? Do whatever cardio you want, but eat your TDEE. You'll more likely keep the same bodyfat percentage if you keep doing that.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png

    1) Cardio can help with a calorie deficit.
    2) A calorie deficit burns fat.
    3) Cardio doesn't burn fat. (Title) ??? I don't follow you conclusion.

    I mean, sure, exercise isn't magical. If a person doesn't have a calorie deficit, they won't lose weight. And people need to understand that. But if someone holds their CI steady and (truly) burns 250 calories a day through exercise, then, in theory, wouldn't they lose half a pound a week?
    That's creating a calorie deficit then. Again, do all the cardio you want and eat to maintenance or above. How much excess fat is burned off by cardio then? The answer is none. That's why cardio isn't for fat burning. People who do cardio for weight loss STILL have to be in a calorie deficit to lose weight, but the deficit is DEPENDENT on the intake. That's why is usually stated as EAT LESS THAN YOU BURN.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png

  • Chunkahlunkah
    Chunkahlunkah Posts: 373 Member
    edited February 2017
    Options
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    sounds like bs. cardio is good to create a calorie deficit or to eat a bit extra food/snack
    Okay, so do cardio and don't create a calorie deficit. How much fat was burned doing cardio?

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png

    I guess what you really mean by your title is that "Cardio doesn't necessarily burn fat" and within your first post that "Cardio isn't necessary for burning fat." Both of those are true, but saying "Cardio isn't for fat burning" is not and could mislead people.
  • Chunkahlunkah
    Chunkahlunkah Posts: 373 Member
    edited February 2017
    Options
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    Cardio is done to improve cardio vascular fitness and burn calories. It will HELP with a calorie deficit and for some that do a lot of cardio, allow one to eat more versus someone at the same weight who does little or no cardio at all.
    Like all other physical activity, GLYCOGEN will be the first thing burned before fat is even touched (ratio will vary more to fat if duration extended and/or intensity is lower) so the addage that one needs to do cardio to burn fat is a myth. You burn fat with a calorie deficit. Don't believe it? Do whatever cardio you want, but eat your TDEE. You'll more likely keep the same bodyfat percentage if you keep doing that.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png

    1) Cardio can help with a calorie deficit.
    2) A calorie deficit burns fat.
    3) Cardio doesn't burn fat. (Title) ??? I don't follow you conclusion.

    I mean, sure, exercise isn't magical. If a person doesn't have a calorie deficit, they won't lose weight. And people need to understand that. But if someone holds their CI steady and (truly) burns 250 calories a day through exercise, then, in theory, wouldn't they lose half a pound a week?
    That's creating a calorie deficit then. Again, do all the cardio you want and eat to maintenance or above. How much excess fat is burned off by cardio then? The answer is none. That's why cardio isn't for fat burning. People who do cardio for weight loss STILL have to be in a calorie deficit to lose weight, but the deficit is DEPENDENT on the intake. That's why is usually stated as EAT LESS THAN YOU BURN.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png

    But if you increase the burn 250 calories, you can hold CI steady (eat what you had been) and still lose half a pound a week.

    The deficit is dependent on the *relationship* between CI and CO.
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,510 Member
    Options
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    sounds like bs. cardio is good to create a calorie deficit or to eat a bit extra food/snack
    Okay, so do cardio and don't create a calorie deficit. How much fat was burned doing cardio?

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png

    you made the logical step in your original post

    exercise --> create calorie deficit --> lose fat

    you can't just come at me after I've proven why your statement is wrong and say "so don't create a calorie deficit and how much fat have your burned during exercise" because that isn't the argument that any logical person would make. Obviously if you have a rudimentary understanding of weight loss you need to create a calorie deficit to do lose weight.
    Except that there are lots and lots of people that believe that if they do cardio, they are burning fat that's significant and it's just not true. In my OP I stated that cardio burns calorie and glycogen first and foremost. To even TOUCH fat, moderated cardio sustained at about 20 minutes or more will burn a higher percentage of fat, but even then it's still not that significant.
    Not to mention a lot of people don't think they can lose weight without any form of exercise accompanying a reduced intake.
    So no you didn't prove my statement wrong. You just elaborated what I've already established in my OP.
    Thanks for playing though.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png


  • Gamliela
    Gamliela Posts: 2,468 Member
    Options
    If cardio increases hunger, some people will take the option of reducing their cardio rather than feeding it. Some people will feel more active and start moving more when they do cardio. I have heard some people posting that cardio actually decreases their hunger. So, with these factors, its not so easy to flat out state that cardio helps, or does not help fat loss.

    Its still a matter of eating less than you burn, no matter the amount of cardiovascular excersize you take.
  • ninerbuff
    ninerbuff Posts: 48,510 Member
    Options
    ninerbuff wrote: »
    sounds like bs. cardio is good to create a calorie deficit or to eat a bit extra food/snack
    Okay, so do cardio and don't create a calorie deficit. How much fat was burned doing cardio?

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png

    I guess what you really mean by your title is that "Cardio doesn't necessarily burn fat" and within your first post that "Cardio isn't necessary for burning fat." Both of those are true, but saying "Cardio isn't for fat burning" is not and could mislead people.
    No the title is right. Ask any regular gym person on a cardio machine on why they are doing it and I'll bet that 90% will say they are doing it to burn fat and lose weight.
    Argue it anyway you want, but within the community who are actually trying to LEARN how to lose weight correctly, giving them information that dispels what the fitness and diet industry has been teaching is a good thing.

    A.C.E. Certified Personal and Group Fitness Trainer
    IDEA Fitness member
    Kickboxing Certified Instructor
    Been in fitness for 30 years and have studied kinesiology and nutrition

    9285851.png