Viewing the message boards in:
Welcome to Debate Club! Please be aware that this is a space for respectful debate, and that your ideas will be challenged here. Please remember to critique the argument, not the author.

Fat Acceptance Movement

1121315171849

Replies

  • Posts: 515 Member

    Not everybody is like you. This might be hard for you to understand since it doesn't apply to you personally: For some of us, becoming overweight was not preventable. Keep that in mind. Unless you personally know that the person you are judging was able to prevent becoming overweight, don't judge.

    It is preventable.that does not mean it is the obese persons fault. I did not say nor imply that. A child is not responsible for their reasons of becoming obese - their parents are. That is the preventable part.
  • Posts: 515 Member
    MommyL2015 wrote: »

    Just to raise your anecdote with one from me, my maternal grandfather was also diagnosed with T1 as a child. He was never overweight, and for most of his life, was very healthy and active and managed it well. Ultimately, it did kill him. He died when he was in his late 60s from mismanaging it and he had lost his legs. He was not overweight when he died, if anything, he was underweight. I was 12 when he passed away and I am now 44. Being diagnosed as a child with T1 diabetes is not a mandatory ticket to obesity at all.

    Type one is most definitely not the same. That type is not based on being obese.
  • Posts: 515 Member

    Becoming overweight might not have been preventable (Think childhood obesity) by the individual, but staying that way as an adult is.

    Yep. And we are talking about fat acceptance & making (keeping?) obesity socially acceptable.
  • Posts: 11,502 Member

    Type one is most definitely not the same. That type is not based on being obese.

    Type 1 is not caused by obesity like type 2 often is, but old treatment methods for type 1 led to rapid weight gain.
  • Posts: 11,502 Member

    Type 1 is not caused by obesity like type 2 often is, but old treatment methods for type 1 led to rapid weight gain.

    These are even more recent... published after weight gain became less common with type 1 diabetics:

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16776747

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3129711/
  • Posts: 15,357 Member

    Good for him and bravo to you for remembering whether your grandfather was overweight as a child and into his adult life. I honestly don't even remember what any of my grandparents looked like when they were my age because I wasn't even born until they were much older (in fact, one of my grandparents died before I was even born).

    I'm lucky enough to have photos of my family.
  • Posts: 1,282 Member
    jofjltncb6 wrote: »

    Uh...insured medical care isn't free. It's paid for by all of the insureds.

    I didn't say it was free?

    What I'm saying is that the price you pay for insurance is not determined by anyone else's health but your own, so I think it's a bit disingenuous to act like every person who is obese is costing us all money. If they're on Medicare/Medicaid in the US, then yes, I guess you can make that argument, but I'm going to guess unhealthy people of all size are using these programs.

    It also looks like insurance companies are leaning towards having risky people pay more for insurance since they will be more likely to use it. I don't have a problem with this.
  • Posts: 2,831 Member
    snikkins wrote: »

    I didn't say it was free?

    What I'm saying is that the price you pay for insurance is not determined by anyone else's health but your own, so I think it's a bit disingenuous to act like every person who is obese is costing us all money. If they're on Medicare/Medicaid in the US, then yes, I guess you can make that argument, but I'm going to guess unhealthy people of all size are using these programs.

    It also looks like insurance companies are leaning towards having risky people pay more for insurance since they will be more likely to use it. I don't have a problem with this.

    That's not how group health insurance works and if you have insurance through your job, it's group health insurance. Pricing is based on the group risk so yes, the higher risk folks are subsidized by the lower risk folks.
  • Posts: 868 Member
    edited April 2016
    MommyL2015 wrote: »
    My mom told me stories about him and showed me pictures. I barely remember him, except that he was pretty crotchety after he lost his legs. And I never said you intentionally did anything to yourself, I simply stated that T1 diabetes is not a mandatory obesity sentence, which is true.

    We have a cousin who has type 1 and she's not overweight. She's in her 20s now.
  • Posts: 21 Member
    zyxst wrote: »








    Because I was much, much happier and less stressed. When I wanted a certain food to eat, I went and got it. I didn't have to bring out my diary and do fiddling to make it fit into my day


    I have to ask, why do you want to lose weight? (since you're on MFP)

    - Every new venture with an objective demands some sort of sacrifice. Eg. you want to get muscular, you have to put in the time and the exercises and then eat a certain diet. You want to be an opera singer, you have to put in the time, you have to give up family outings or social events with friends for example. You have to be present and accountable for your own success. And along the way you will meet all sorts of people, people who'll tell you you're doing it wrong, people who encourage you, people who will ridicule what you're doing, people who are judgemental, people who will be guides, people trying to be helpful but piss you off, the list goes on. Ultimately, you have to follow your own path and decide who and what you are or want to be. You can't stop people from judging, it's human nature.

    When the people I knew in HAES shunned me for losing weight, I left and went back to being alone knowing they were just as bad as everyone else.


    Interesting. Sounds like you hang with the wrong crowd(s), whether it's FA or the Diet people or diet buddies. Sounds like you feel better when you are on your own. I would guess that it's because you are listening to yourself, and not to what you think society wants. But it also sounds like your life revolves around your weight, make your life about something else and don't bring up your weight (ever).

    Tools like MFP and support groups are just there to attain an objective. You have to glean what you find important from the information that is out there. You may have been happier eating the way you wanted but you have to ask yourself did you feel comfortable in your own skin?
    Regardless of how you think society sees you. Do you honestly feel good on all levels? Physically, emotionally, mentally (there's more I'm sure). Only you know. Ultimately, you're allowed to be the size you want.

  • Posts: 2,831 Member
    zyxst wrote: »

    The last 4 years have been about my weight because it's in the forefront of me losing it. Before this, only doctors harped about my weight and that I should lose, though they offered no advice or alternative such as WLS (which should've been something they'd push because I was so close to dying because FAT = UNHEALTHY/DEATH). What I found completely ironic (?) when dealing with HAES/FA proponents is that most of them have a slew of health problems that could've been easier to deal with by not being morbidly obese. The basic reason I lost weight was for simple vanity - I didn't want to spend the next 30 years wearing the same pair of pants (not the same style or same brand, but the same pair because finding any clothing higher than a 4X is nigh impossible in this province).

    I don't feel comfortable in my own skin due to my depression. It won't matter if I look like whoever the sexiest/hawtest female is currently or the fattest woman in the world, I'll still not be comfy with me because my brain chemistry is broken. That's not something that can be fixed with support groups or therapy or medication. I do better on my own because I've learned people don't really care about me or how I feel and they certainly can't be bothered to help when asked.

    Thank you for the online therapy session. Now I get to fight myself to not go ham on food.

    If you've made positive lifestyle changes through clinical depression than what you have done is that much more of an accomplishment. I hope you can find the therapy or meds that help you stabilize. Not all support groups and therapists are the same. It's like any other group of people, you have to find ones with whom you can get along and who have enough similarities with you that you can share something and see eye-to-eye with them.
  • Posts: 21 Member

    Oh God.

    It's posts like these that remind me why I, like xzyst, prefer a more solitary approach to life.[/quote]

    I don't know what xzyst is, and I'm not sure if I'm being insulted. But the "Oh God!" is telling me it leans toward the not favourable. Carry on then!

  • Posts: 21 Member
    zyxst wrote: »

    The last 4 years have been about my weight because it's in the forefront of me losing it. Before this, only doctors harped about my weight and that I should lose, though they offered no advice or alternative such as WLS (which should've been something they'd push because I was so close to dying because FAT = UNHEALTHY/DEATH). What I found completely ironic (?) when dealing with HAES/FA proponents is that most of them have a slew of health problems that could've been easier to deal with by not being morbidly obese. The basic reason I lost weight was for simple vanity - I didn't want to spend the next 30 years wearing the same pair of pants (not the same style or same brand, but the same pair because finding any clothing higher than a 4X is nigh impossible in this province).

    I don't feel comfortable in my own skin due to my depression. It won't matter if I look like whoever the sexiest/hawtest female is currently or the fattest woman in the world, I'll still not be comfy with me because my brain chemistry is broken. That's not something that can be fixed with support groups or therapy or medication. I do better on my own because I've learned people don't really care about me or how I feel and they certainly can't be bothered to help when asked.

    Thank you for the online therapy session. Now I get to fight myself to not go ham on food.

    You think too much.
  • Posts: 15,357 Member
    Pinkvela wrote: »

    I don't know what xzyst is, and I'm not sure if I'm being insulted. But the "Oh God!" is telling me it leans toward the not favourable. Carry on then!

    xzyst is a user on these forums. Why assume everyone is attacking you?
  • Posts: 1,031 Member
    zyxst wrote: »

    It's that most people are arguing that fat people are costing them so much money paying for the fat person's health care which seems to be this stereotype that fat people will always have mobility issues because they're fat. I had no physical problems due to me being fat. Curious if I was the "special snowflake".

    And, I also know lots of smokers who don't have lung cancer.

    They almost certainly will, if they keep smoking.
  • Posts: 4,298 Member
    edited May 2016

    And, I also know lots of smokers who don't have lung cancer.

    They almost certainly will, if they keep smoking.

    Last I checked, fewer than 10% of lifelong smokers develop lung cancer (although smoking accounts for 90% of lung cancer cases in the US). So no, that is not true.

    I'm anti-smoking, but don't think using stats various orgs have twisted into scare tactics is productive long-term.
  • Posts: 16,049 Member
    edited May 2016
    The fear mongering definitely helped me quit smoking. The thought of lying in a hospital bed dying of something I did to myself and could have been prevented, scared me straight!
  • Posts: 1,411 Member
    The fear mongering definitely helped me quit smoking. The thought of lying in a hospital bed dying of something I did to myself and could have been prevented, scared me straight!

    I'm one that fear-mongering doesn't work on but I watched my husband's father deteriorate to a point where he could barely breathe any longer before he passed away and that was enough to scare me straight almost immediately. Watching him suffer was so, so heartbreaking. He did not have lung cancer but several other problems including COPD and emphysema. He was on all sorts of breathing medications and machines and had to have a tracheotomy. Seeing it on a television commercial is nothing but seeing it happen up close, in real life to a loved one is brain-exploding scary.
  • Posts: 4,855 Member
    stealthq wrote: »

    Last I checked, fewer than 10% of lifelong smokers develop lung cancer (although smoking accounts for 90% of lung cancer cases in the US). So no, that is not true.

    I'm anti-smoking, but don't think using stats various orgs have twisted into scare tactics is productive long-term.

    My father never didn't have lung cancer, but the second heart attack he had (smoking being a contributing cause) sure killed him.

    Lung cancer isn't the only way to die from smoking.
  • Posts: 4,298 Member
    Packerjohn wrote: »

    My father never didn't have lung cancer, but the second heart attack he had (smoking being a contributing cause) sure killed him.

    Lung cancer isn't the only way to die from smoking.

    True. One of my grandfathers died in his 40's from it. He had emphysema and throat cancer. He had a heart attack, but I was told it was as he was asphyxiating from a combination of effects from both. I know his youngest son (my uncle) got to stand and watch his father choke to death on his own blood.

    As I said. Anti-smoking.

    The problem with parroting scare-tactic stats is that the people who find out (or already knew - most smokers do because they've already been bombarded with it) dismiss everything you say after that.
  • Posts: 138 Member
    justrollme wrote: »
    This guy voices my opinion on this with a lot more eloquence than I would:


    This guy was so right on. Thanks for sharing.
This discussion has been closed.