Viewing the message boards in:

Finally found something that works

1356

Replies

  • Posts: 11,068 Member
    Kobz27 wrote: »

    Don't care

    LOL why did you bring it up then?
  • Posts: 34 Member
    Just curious what your normal diet looks like on NSNG? Can you advise what some of your daily meals are? Is it just essentially no processed foods - so protein, fresh fruit and veggies? Thanks much! Appreciate it!
  • Posts: 612 Member
    mkm81 wrote: »
    Just curious what your normal diet looks like on NSNG? Can you advise what some of your daily meals are? Is it just essentially no processed foods - so protein, fresh fruit and veggies? Thanks much! Appreciate it!

    No sugar means no fruit.
  • Posts: 1,886 Member

    Well that escalated quickly.

    0 to 100 REAL QUICK.
  • Posts: 64 Member
    I've said all I've needed to say in the thread. I'm in 2 months and feel great and the results are visible with a very low activity level. There's plenty of places to find the information if you care to look. The main basis for the diet came from vinnietortorich dot com faqs. Go there to learn about it before going on the offensive If you're just here to refute it, your efforts are futile. Im not doing harm to my body which is the only reason people would need to jump in with their opinion. I'll post continued results monthly. Have a good day, and good luck in all your personal health endeavors.
  • Posts: 13,454 Member
    Kobz27 wrote: »
    Also, vinnie tortorich has a doctorate from Tulane which is more than can be said about you people naysaying NSNG. He is one of the best fitness trainers out there. Go to his site, debate him...

    Fitness trainers are generally not that knowledgeable about health and nutrition.
  • Posts: 64 Member

    No sugar means no fruit.

    Fruits under glycemic index of 50 are what Vinnie says. General rule is eat fruits you eat with the skin on. Berries are good. Avocados are an exception to that general rule
  • Posts: 25,763 Member
    Kobz27 wrote: »
    Also, vinnie tortorich has a doctorate from Tulane which is more than can be said about you people naysaying NSNG. He is one of the best fitness trainers out there. Go to his site, debate him...

    What is your source for the doctorate claim? I can't find it on his website and his Wikipedia page (which looks like he wrote himself) doesn't have it either. When I search Google, there is nothing either. This thread comes up, but I can't find another online source for his post-graduate education.
  • Posts: 9 Member
    You'll find a body of research to back up any diet claims. The key similarity among all these diet guru's is their business strategy to capitalize on the general public's never-ending desire to find a quick fix or be part of a pretentious holier than thou diet cult. These things may work for some people some of the time, but no one should be claiming that one way is the fix for everyone. Sugar may share some of the addictive properties of certain drugs, but it is not "more addictive than crack!" If you eat tons of crap food all the time, yes your body may not feel so great. But the idea that we need to eat certain things or drink juice or buy supplements to "detox" is ridiculous. Unless your liver or kidneys are broken or you're addicted to drugs and alcohol, you don't need to "detoxify your body".
  • Posts: 883 Member
    edited June 2016
    AJ_G wrote: »

    No you haven't lol. A restrictive diet is never "the key". Do you really plan on eliminating sugar and grains from your diet for the rest or your life? No cookies, no cake, no brownies, no candy, no pasta, no cereal, no bread...for the rest of your life? Does that really seem practical or realistic to you. If that's your plan, by all means good luck, but there are better, more enjoyable, and not to mention more effective ways to go about eating healthy.

    If it works for him, it's the key. Although I wouldn't do it, this doesn't seem at all unrealistic, or even mildly difficult.

    OP: If you haven't listened to Rogan's podcasts with Rhonda Patrick, I highly recommend them.
  • Posts: 4,158 Member
    Kobz27 wrote: »

    Fruits under glycemic index of 50 are what Vinnie says. General rule is eat fruits you eat with the skin on. Berries are good. Avocados are an exception to that general rule

    Glycemic index isn't relevant for those with normal functioning bodies. It was developed specifically for diabetics. If you don't have health problems concerning insulin production or insulin resistance, then the glycemic index is meaningless.
  • Posts: 11,068 Member
    AJ_G wrote: »

    Glycemic index isn't relevant for those with normal functioning bodies. It was developed specifically for diabetics. If you don't have health problems concerning insulin production or insulin resistance, then the glycemic index is meaningless.

    It's likely meaningless for diabetics as well unless they are eating carbohydrates in isolation after a long fast.
  • Posts: 7,739 Member
    SideSteel wrote: »

    You have no idea what my or anyone else's qualifications are.


    GGGAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!

    You beat me to it.
  • Posts: 597 Member
    AJ_G wrote: »

    Anyone can stick to any diet for 30 days, that's pretty meaningless honestly. When you've gone a year without eating any grain or any sugar let me know. I won't hold my breath...

    It's been over 4 years for me and have no problems sticking with it. To me, dragging a scale out every time I put something in my mouth is too restrictive for me. I guess it's all about priorities and sugar and grains definitely aren't on the top of my list. This woe makes me feel better and that is at the top of my list. To each his own.
This discussion has been closed.