LGBT chit-chatters?

12467

Replies

  • pie_eyes
    pie_eyes Posts: 12,964 Member
    newmeadow wrote: »
    285to170 wrote: »
    Hey all :smiley: I'm 27 bisexual woman, in a monogamous relationship with my husband of 7 years <3 let's be friends! Need some motivational friends to kick me in the A** <3

    My condolences

    WTF does that even mean?

    That they feel sorry for you?


    Understand where they're coming from since I don't believe monogamy. Not as fun.

    So because they can't be in a monogamous relationship, they have to be rude about the choice I made for my life? If that's the kind of people in this chat group, I'm out.

    You are married to a man and are monogamous within your marriage, which is a lifetime commitment. Yet you still identify as bisexual?

    You seem to feel sincerely offended by the comment offered. Yet you intentionally entered a thread for LGBT people, where traditional values are not usually commonplace. Perhaps you'd be more compatible chatting in threads with monogamous women married to men who limit themselves to having sex only with their husbands.

    Have you considered entering discussions at religious sites where monogamy is valued and practiced by both the men and the women? The likelihood of becoming the recipient of comments like the one you take umbrage to is probably nil.

    MFP is about "fitness". Consequently most discussions are body related and include heaps and heaps of: 1) body consciousness, 2) body celebration, 2) body fixation, 3) body hobbies (promiscuity), 4) crude jokes, 5) sexual innuendo, 6) obsession with appearance; and 7) various expressions of dysmorphia.

    Sometimes it's more fun to lurk and count your blessings. Otherwise, like I said - go with the religious sites.


    Just because I am in a monogamous relationship with the opposite gender does not automatically mean I am someone different than I always was. Just like if I were in a monogamous relationship with a woman, I would still be Me. Try again.

    Truth
  • JustMissTracy
    JustMissTracy Posts: 6,338 Member
    salembambi wrote: »
    I'm a B, but I'm living the hetero life..lol!

    please dont get all internalized biphobic on us

    I will get my dictionary to figure out what you mean, but let me say I'm not anything phobic. I'm bisexual, and have been with a man for 23 years. Sorry if I offended, I guess I should have kept quiet?
  • jaelynsmith
    jaelynsmith Posts: 82 Member
    At any rate, I'm more attracted to personalities than genitals, So... I guess I'm the slutiest of the slut bisexuals ;):D lol
  • pie_eyes
    pie_eyes Posts: 12,964 Member
    salembambi wrote: »
    I'm a B, but I'm living the hetero life..lol!

    please dont get all internalized biphobic on us

    I will get my dictionary to figure out what you mean, but let me say I'm not anything phobic. I'm bisexual, and have been with a man for 23 years. Sorry if I offended, I guess I should have kept quiet?

    @salembambi is kinda wrung up I think Miss Tracy
  • JustMissTracy
    JustMissTracy Posts: 6,338 Member
    Aww...i'm not going thru the 4 pages, but being attracted doesn't make you slutty...nothing makes us slutty, until someone else puts that on us. And I agree with your comment above mine. We're still the same people, just because we choose to limit our sexual activities to one person, regardless who it is or what sex they are, doesn't change what we are attracted to. And in my case, it doesn't affect my relationship with hubs..he is solid, has no insecurities regarding "us".
    At any rate, I'm more attracted to personalities than genitals, So... I guess I'm the slutiest of the slut bisexuals ;):D lol

  • salembambi
    salembambi Posts: 5,585 Member
    pie_eyes wrote: »
    salembambi wrote: »
    I'm a B, but I'm living the hetero life..lol!

    please dont get all internalized biphobic on us

    I will get my dictionary to figure out what you mean, but let me say I'm not anything phobic. I'm bisexual, and have been with a man for 23 years. Sorry if I offended, I guess I should have kept quiet?

    @salembambi is kinda wrung up I think Miss Tracy

    he's right this stuff makes me slightly snappy *hug*
  • JustMissTracy
    JustMissTracy Posts: 6,338 Member
    LOL..no worries xo
  • jaelynsmith
    jaelynsmith Posts: 82 Member
    Aww...i'm not going thru the 4 pages, but being attracted doesn't make you slutty...nothing makes us slutty, until someone else puts that on us. And I agree with your comment above mine. We're still the same people, just because we choose to limit our sexual activities to one person, regardless who it is or what sex they are, doesn't change what we are attracted to. And in my case, it doesn't affect my relationship with hubs..he is solid, has no insecurities regarding "us".
    At any rate, I'm more attracted to personalities than genitals, So... I guess I'm the slutiest of the slut bisexuals ;):D lol

    I was making a joke. Bisexuals are always made out to be promiscuous lol
  • jnichel
    jnichel Posts: 4,553 Member
    salembambi wrote: »
    salembambi wrote: »
    newmeadow wrote: »
    Being in a monogamous does NOT generally mean halting all attraction to other people. I'm a lesbian in a very happy monogamous relationship, I would never ACT on my attraction to other women, but it would be a bold-face lie to pretend that I'm not just a little tempted when a beautiful woman hits on me. So, just because she is happily monogamous with her man, doesnt stop all sexual attraction she has to other men AND women.

    Being attracted to someone is one thing. Being sexual with them is another. Perhaps there's a difference of opinion of how sexuality is defined. Personally, I don't think an attraction defines a sexuality. Attractions are often fleeting, usually temporary and acting upon them is entirely optional.

    straight person defining other peoples sexualities

    what a concept

    Did someone really just flag you because the didn't agree with you? lol

    i pissed off the straights

    Yeah, no. Maybe you pissed off a straight person. Maybe you pissed off someone who doesn't like you, regardless of their orientation. Maybe you didn't piss off anyone and the person that flagged you just didn't like your post, but you didn't piss off the "straights".
  • jnichel
    jnichel Posts: 4,553 Member
    At any rate, I'm more attracted to personalities than genitals, So... I guess I'm the slutiest of the slut bisexuals ;):D lol

    I'll have you know that my balls are quite attractive.
  • salembambi
    salembambi Posts: 5,585 Member
    jnichel wrote: »
    salembambi wrote: »
    salembambi wrote: »
    newmeadow wrote: »
    Being in a monogamous does NOT generally mean halting all attraction to other people. I'm a lesbian in a very happy monogamous relationship, I would never ACT on my attraction to other women, but it would be a bold-face lie to pretend that I'm not just a little tempted when a beautiful woman hits on me. So, just because she is happily monogamous with her man, doesnt stop all sexual attraction she has to other men AND women.

    Being attracted to someone is one thing. Being sexual with them is another. Perhaps there's a difference of opinion of how sexuality is defined. Personally, I don't think an attraction defines a sexuality. Attractions are often fleeting, usually temporary and acting upon them is entirely optional.

    straight person defining other peoples sexualities

    what a concept

    Did someone really just flag you because the didn't agree with you? lol

    i pissed off the straights

    Yeah, no. Maybe you pissed off a straight person. Maybe you pissed off someone who doesn't like you, regardless of their orientation. Maybe you didn't piss off anyone and the person that flagged you just didn't like your post, but you didn't piss off the "straights".

    i did it again
  • Unknown
    edited June 2016
    This content has been removed.
  • jnichel
    jnichel Posts: 4,553 Member
    edited June 2016
    salembambi wrote: »
    jnichel wrote: »
    salembambi wrote: »
    salembambi wrote: »
    newmeadow wrote: »
    Being in a monogamous does NOT generally mean halting all attraction to other people. I'm a lesbian in a very happy monogamous relationship, I would never ACT on my attraction to other women, but it would be a bold-face lie to pretend that I'm not just a little tempted when a beautiful woman hits on me. So, just because she is happily monogamous with her man, doesnt stop all sexual attraction she has to other men AND women.

    Being attracted to someone is one thing. Being sexual with them is another. Perhaps there's a difference of opinion of how sexuality is defined. Personally, I don't think an attraction defines a sexuality. Attractions are often fleeting, usually temporary and acting upon them is entirely optional.

    straight person defining other peoples sexualities

    what a concept

    Did someone really just flag you because the didn't agree with you? lol

    i pissed off the straights

    Yeah, no. Maybe you pissed off a straight person. Maybe you pissed off someone who doesn't like you, regardless of their orientation. Maybe you didn't piss off anyone and the person that flagged you just didn't like your post, but you didn't piss off the "straights".

    i did it again

    Whatever assumptions help you sleep at night in that ivory tower. However, I've known you long enough to know that your panties would be knotted tighter than a nun's legs in a barroom is someone had the audacity to say something like, "I pissed off the gays", or Ged forbid say something like a non-vegan sign made them laugh.
  • salembambi
    salembambi Posts: 5,585 Member
    jnichel wrote: »
    salembambi wrote: »
    jnichel wrote: »
    salembambi wrote: »
    salembambi wrote: »
    newmeadow wrote: »
    Being in a monogamous does NOT generally mean halting all attraction to other people. I'm a lesbian in a very happy monogamous relationship, I would never ACT on my attraction to other women, but it would be a bold-face lie to pretend that I'm not just a little tempted when a beautiful woman hits on me. So, just because she is happily monogamous with her man, doesnt stop all sexual attraction she has to other men AND women.

    Being attracted to someone is one thing. Being sexual with them is another. Perhaps there's a difference of opinion of how sexuality is defined. Personally, I don't think an attraction defines a sexuality. Attractions are often fleeting, usually temporary and acting upon them is entirely optional.

    straight person defining other peoples sexualities

    what a concept

    Did someone really just flag you because the didn't agree with you? lol

    i pissed off the straights

    Yeah, no. Maybe you pissed off a straight person. Maybe you pissed off someone who doesn't like you, regardless of their orientation. Maybe you didn't piss off anyone and the person that flagged you just didn't like your post, but you didn't piss off the "straights".

    i did it again

    Whatever assumptions help you sleep at night in that ivory tower. However, I've know you long enough to know that your panties would be knotted tighter than a nun's legs in a barroom is someone had the audacity to say something like, "I pissed off the gays", or Ged forbid say something like a non-vegan sign made them laugh.

    "known you long enough"

    lol :)
  • jnichel
    jnichel Posts: 4,553 Member
    salembambi wrote: »
    jnichel wrote: »
    salembambi wrote: »
    jnichel wrote: »
    salembambi wrote: »
    salembambi wrote: »
    newmeadow wrote: »
    Being in a monogamous does NOT generally mean halting all attraction to other people. I'm a lesbian in a very happy monogamous relationship, I would never ACT on my attraction to other women, but it would be a bold-face lie to pretend that I'm not just a little tempted when a beautiful woman hits on me. So, just because she is happily monogamous with her man, doesnt stop all sexual attraction she has to other men AND women.

    Being attracted to someone is one thing. Being sexual with them is another. Perhaps there's a difference of opinion of how sexuality is defined. Personally, I don't think an attraction defines a sexuality. Attractions are often fleeting, usually temporary and acting upon them is entirely optional.

    straight person defining other peoples sexualities

    what a concept

    Did someone really just flag you because the didn't agree with you? lol

    i pissed off the straights

    Yeah, no. Maybe you pissed off a straight person. Maybe you pissed off someone who doesn't like you, regardless of their orientation. Maybe you didn't piss off anyone and the person that flagged you just didn't like your post, but you didn't piss off the "straights".

    i did it again

    Whatever assumptions help you sleep at night in that ivory tower. However, I've know you long enough to know that your panties would be knotted tighter than a nun's legs in a barroom is someone had the audacity to say something like, "I pissed off the gays", or Ged forbid say something like a non-vegan sign made them laugh.

    "known you long enough"

    lol :)

    Yes, you caught the typo before I did. Gold star for you. Tells me all I needed to know.
  • jaelynsmith
    jaelynsmith Posts: 82 Member
    jnichel wrote: »
    At any rate, I'm more attracted to personalities than genitals, So... I guess I'm the slutiest of the slut bisexuals ;):D lol

    I'll have you know that my balls are quite attractive.

    Hahahahaha
  • jaelynsmith
    jaelynsmith Posts: 82 Member
    _Waffle_ wrote: »
    salembambi wrote: »
    newmeadow wrote: »
    salembambi wrote: »
    newmeadow wrote: »
    285to170 wrote: »
    Hey all :smiley: I'm 27 bisexual woman, in a monogamous relationship with my husband of 7 years <3 let's be friends! Need some motivational friends to kick me in the A** <3

    My condolences

    WTF does that even mean?

    That they feel sorry for you?


    Understand where they're coming from since I don't believe monogamy. Not as fun.

    So because they can't be in a monogamous relationship, they have to be rude about the choice I made for my life? If that's the kind of people in this chat group, I'm out.

    You are married to a man and are monogamous within your marriage, which is a lifetime commitment. Yet you still identify as bisexual?

    You seem to feel sincerely offended by the comment offered. Yet you intentionally entered a thread for LGBT people, where traditional values are not usually commonplace. Perhaps you'd be more compatible chatting in threads with monogamous women married to men who limit themselves to having sex only with their husbands.

    Have you considered entering discussions at religious sites where monogamy is valued and practiced by both the men and the women? The likelihood of becoming the recipient of comments like the one you take umbrage to is probably nil.

    MFP is about "fitness". Consequently most discussions are body related and include heaps and heaps of: 1) body consciousness, 2) body celebration, 2) body fixation, 3) body hobbies (promiscuity), 4) crude jokes, 5) sexual innuendo, 6) obsession with appearance; and 7) various expressions of dysmorphia.

    Sometimes it's more fun to lurk and count your blessings. Otherwise, like I said - go with the religious sites.


    just because someone is in a committed relationship does not all the sudden make them no longer bisexual.....

    when i date someone i am always bisexual i dont suddenly only like dcks or vag

    If woman is married to a man, who identifies as monogamous, and also identifies as bisexual - it would be prudent to question what the future holds in terms of maintaining said monogamy.

    I love the bisexuals and homosexuals in my life as neighbors, friends, co-workers, family members, etc.

    But if I were being pursued romantically by a man who identified as bisexual, and he promised me commitment and monogamy whilst still identifying as bisexual - I would feel very uncertain about how he would manage temptation futuristically and decline the offer.

    oh damn i forgot

    bisexuals are sluts how silly of me

    let me just listen to someone who is not bisexual tell me what it is to be bisexual

    8i2ct1scngky.gif

    You must renounce all sexual attraction to others to remain monogamous and faithful.

    False. There are always going to be beautiful people out there. Being monogamous means you chose to ONLY be with the person you are with.

    @_waffle_ was being facetious pretty sure
    Aww...i'm not going thru the 4 pages, but being attracted doesn't make you slutty...nothing makes us slutty, until someone else puts that on us. And I agree with your comment above mine. We're still the same people, just because we choose to limit our sexual activities to one person, regardless who it is or what sex they are, doesn't change what we are attracted to. And in my case, it doesn't affect my relationship with hubs..he is solid, has no insecurities regarding "us".
    At any rate, I'm more attracted to personalities than genitals, So... I guess I'm the slutiest of the slut bisexuals ;):D lol

    @ jaelynsmith was using sarcasm too

    actually y'all got so sarcastic you couldn't figure out who was on which side of what lmao

    Probably true haha
  • jnichel
    jnichel Posts: 4,553 Member
    jnichel wrote: »
    At any rate, I'm more attracted to personalities than genitals, So... I guess I'm the slutiest of the slut bisexuals ;):D lol

    I'll have you know that my balls are quite attractive.

    Hahahahaha

    Why is this always the reaction? :'(:p
  • salembambi
    salembambi Posts: 5,585 Member
    jnichel wrote: »
    salembambi wrote: »
    jnichel wrote: »
    salembambi wrote: »
    jnichel wrote: »
    salembambi wrote: »
    salembambi wrote: »
    newmeadow wrote: »
    Being in a monogamous does NOT generally mean halting all attraction to other people. I'm a lesbian in a very happy monogamous relationship, I would never ACT on my attraction to other women, but it would be a bold-face lie to pretend that I'm not just a little tempted when a beautiful woman hits on me. So, just because she is happily monogamous with her man, doesnt stop all sexual attraction she has to other men AND women.

    Being attracted to someone is one thing. Being sexual with them is another. Perhaps there's a difference of opinion of how sexuality is defined. Personally, I don't think an attraction defines a sexuality. Attractions are often fleeting, usually temporary and acting upon them is entirely optional.

    straight person defining other peoples sexualities

    what a concept

    Did someone really just flag you because the didn't agree with you? lol

    i pissed off the straights

    Yeah, no. Maybe you pissed off a straight person. Maybe you pissed off someone who doesn't like you, regardless of their orientation. Maybe you didn't piss off anyone and the person that flagged you just didn't like your post, but you didn't piss off the "straights".

    i did it again

    Whatever assumptions help you sleep at night in that ivory tower. However, I've know you long enough to know that your panties would be knotted tighter than a nun's legs in a barroom is someone had the audacity to say something like, "I pissed off the gays", or Ged forbid say something like a non-vegan sign made them laugh.

    "known you long enough"

    lol :)

    Yes, you caught the typo before I did. Gold star for you. Tells me all I needed to know.

    I would prefer a silver star but thank you
  • jaelynsmith
    jaelynsmith Posts: 82 Member
    jnichel wrote: »
    jnichel wrote: »
    At any rate, I'm more attracted to personalities than genitals, So... I guess I'm the slutiest of the slut bisexuals ;):D lol

    I'll have you know that my balls are quite attractive.

    Hahahahaha

    Why is this always the reaction? :'(:p

    I thought you were being cheeky, not creepy ;):D haha
  • jnichel
    jnichel Posts: 4,553 Member
    jnichel wrote: »
    jnichel wrote: »
    At any rate, I'm more attracted to personalities than genitals, So... I guess I'm the slutiest of the slut bisexuals ;):D lol

    I'll have you know that my balls are quite attractive.

    Hahahahaha

    Why is this always the reaction? :'(:p

    I thought you were being cheeky, not creepy ;):D haha

    I am...was...I think. I'm rarely serious, maybe. If someone who is rarely serious tells you that they are indeed, rarely serious, does the become like a double negative? ;)
  • williejmaddox
    williejmaddox Posts: 59 Member
    daddyfitt1 wrote: »
    Straight

    people for get this a Lgbt chit chat.