This is why people gain weight, and why losing it is so hard.

1246711

Replies

  • oolou
    oolou Posts: 765 Member
    I think you've been given some great advice throughout this thread and I would second these two recommendations:

    1) Looking at a weekly calorie total so you can bank some calories on one day to be able to enjoy a higher amount of calories on another day.

    2) Intermittent fasting so that your meals are eaten in a shorter time frame (16:8). This is great if you are not a breakfast eater.

    These should help you manage your maintenance calories better if you choose to eat calorie dense food.

    Regarding pizza and other similiar food which may have a lot of oïl and fat involved, I'm right with you with regards to loving that sort of thing and yeah, I'm a bit in 'mourning' for the food I no longer eat. When I have pizza now at home I go for Dr Oetker pizza, a thin crust pizza which is not bad for calories. I ate a restaurant pizza about a month ago - and it was glorious - until I got down to the last few slices and started to feel ill. My guts were really complaining and I paid the price when I got home. My body really isn't used to eating food like that anymore and I've not been keen to repeat the experience since, although in my head I still 'love' pizza.

  • bagge72
    bagge72 Posts: 1,377 Member
    jdb3388 wrote: »
    I dunno man. I'm 5'4F (23 years old), GW is 130. I calculate my maintenance calorie intake for being 135 lb (without exercise) to be 1700. Right now, I'm not really suffering under the calorie restriction. Some things I have to sacrifice (Like eating more than two pieces of pizza ; ; ), but it's not like I'm starving. I should be okay to follow a maintenance restriction once I get to it. Especially since I'm certain my stomach will have shrunk some. And this is taking into account that I'm not..necessarily eating clean at the moment. Last night I had a Lean Pocket and a cup of those Green Giant Steamers: Lightly Sauced Macaroni and Cheese with Broccoli things. The other day I ate 4 pieces of pizza. I went a little over, but then I worked it off with some cardio.

    And I do plan to remain active. I probably won't be as active. It might end up only being 3 days a week, or when I eat a particularly big meal. At that point I'd probably just buy an elliptical for my home instead of a gym membership.

    That being said, I'm not a breakfast person. I never have been. When I eat breakfast, I don't feel any different. I stop being hungry momentarily, but then I'm hungry LONG before lunch starts. That lasts a bit, and then I'm hungry the last few hours of work, and the hour after when I get to the gym. Then I eat.

    However, I grew up in a very low income household, and I grew up hungry...so I'm kind of used to it. I never had breakfast, and I also never really brought lunch to school either (which is probably why I gained the wait in the first place. When I got a job of my own, I was eating so much more food than I would have eaten).

    Man, that pizza analogy hits me hard though, talkin about eating two pieces and four being "overboard". I can eat an entire pizza myself, and I don't mean on a dare or because someone said I couldn't. I mean like, I ate the last piece and reached for another one and said "well hell, I guess I ate it all". I hope my appetite shrinks like everyone says, but i feel like its gonna be really hard to maintain my goal weight when I get there.
    And again, this is why you're obese. (you're technically obese right, by medical standards?). You're seriously going to need a paradigm shift. Learning to cook is a good start. Learning, knowing, the calorie content of foods is a good start. You're probably one who would really benefit from using a scale to weigh foods (when you do eat at home).

    It's gotta be a life style or as you say: it will be very difficult to maintain. That lifestyle can include some pizza. But, given your height, goal weight, and sedentary lifestyle, not a lot of pizza.

    This. There are some many healthy substitutes out there that help you still enjoy the foods you love, but you have to be willing to do some research, and start cooking for yourself! Oh and just smaller portions. I mean I make some really good mac and cheese, or healthier chicken nuggets, and then make sure to fill up on vegetables as well, and you are talking to somebody who never ate vegetables because I hated them, but the more I forced myself to eat them the more I like them, and I'm up to about 4 vegetables I can eat now regularly (don't laugh). Switch out some of your daily snacks with some fruits, or opt for pop chips instead of lays. Make tacos at home, and weigh out your portions before you cook so you aren't tempted to eat more! If you do go out to eat, try to pick a meal out before hand and log it earlier in the day so you can plan out the rest of your day. It really takes a lifestyle change my friend.

  • snowflake954
    snowflake954 Posts: 8,399 Member
    Hornsby wrote: »
    Buy a bicycle. Lift a lot of heavy stuff. Look great naked. Eat all the foods you want. There's my tips that you can take to the bank.

    THIS--from a guy who knows. Listen to him.
  • T0M_K
    T0M_K Posts: 7,526 Member
    Hornsby wrote: »
    Buy a bicycle. Lift a lot of heavy stuff. Look great naked. Eat all the foods you want. There's my tips that you can take to the bank.

    THIS--from a guy who knows. Listen to him.

    I agree plus as others have said...once your to your goal, having done it the right way, your desires for all the crap may change but if not, you have to "earn" the calories if you want to eat them and you want to stay at a good healthy weight. you CAN eat anything you want. it could affect your weight or it could not affect your weight..its all dependent upon what you choose to allow to happen.

    you can't view this as i'm screwed for the rest of my life with regard to food. how utterly depressing that is.

    this is a mental game you need to win then muster the discipline to be in control.
  • htimpaired
    htimpaired Posts: 1,404 Member
    jdb3388 wrote: »
    Sued0nim wrote: »
    Here ...not even hit 1900 calories ...under maintenance ...will drink and eat that this weekend instead ..I know the sodium is out but I'm not that bothered

    And I logged my dinner in the wrong place (peanut butter and jelly sandwich)

    l291cxqbat7e.png

    I'm not saying that I can't eat 1900 calories every day, I'm just saying that, and no offense and its nothing personal, nothing on that list looks very good to me at all. I mean I am willing to eat all of those things, I'm not a picky eater, but its not what I want. I find happiness in food that taste good, things that are fried, things that have a lot of cheese and/or creamy sauces, I like soda. That's where its so hard. I'm not saying I can't do it, I'm upset because I know I'm not going to be happy doing it.

    Until you modify your opinion on food, you will struggle with keeping a healthy weight. Moreso, the health consequences of eating foods that are fried, high in saturated fat, and loaded with sugar. Plenty of people are happy eating healthier alternatives and remain within a calorie alottment. But realistically, this is why obesity is such a huge issue in society-because we've developed a taste for large portions of calorie bombs.
  • Sabine_Stroehm
    Sabine_Stroehm Posts: 19,263 Member
    LazSommer wrote: »
    jdb3388 wrote: »
    I have always counted calories daily, but I've read that some people say weekly is the way to go. Do any of you guys kinda not really worry about daily and concentrate on weekly? Eating heavy one day and light on another day to make up for it?

    Skip breakfast and eat 40g dry weight (non instant) oatmeal for lunch with peanut butter , have 3 slices of pizza for dinner. bam, full and satisfied and under cals for the day by a landslide. binge drink on Fridays. that is the plan you want and need

    That sounds supremely unhealthy as a "plan".
  • Sabine_Stroehm
    Sabine_Stroehm Posts: 19,263 Member
    LazSommer wrote: »
    Packerjohn wrote: »
    LazSommer wrote: »
    Packerjohn wrote: »
    LazSommer wrote: »
    jdb3388 wrote: »
    I have always counted calories daily, but I've read that some people say weekly is the way to go. Do any of you guys kinda not really worry about daily and concentrate on weekly? Eating heavy one day and light on another day to make up for it?

    Skip breakfast and eat 40g dry weight (non instant) oatmeal for lunch with peanut butter , have 3 slices of pizza for dinner. bam, full and satisfied and under cals for the day by a landslide. binge drink on Fridays. that is the plan you want and need

    And your heath goes to *kitten*. Where are the fruits and veggies in this program?

    For the OP. As you know 4500 calories is an insane amount on a regular basis, unless your a 200+ pound competitive athlete. As you work on cutting back you will get used to a lower number of calories. As been mentioned you can always up the activity.

    Best of luck.

    really bud?

    Yes based on your suggested menu if this is suppose to be a common occurrence.

    "Skip breakfast and eat 40g dry weight (non instant) oatmeal for lunch with peanut butter , have 3 slices of pizza for dinner. bam, full and satisfied and under cals for the day by a landslide. binge drink on Fridays. that is the plan you want and need"

    Yes because my response was not flippant and was a 100% serious attempt at giving the OP a fully sustainable diet plan that he should adhere to daily; that approach and has worked well for users such as Sued0nim.
    @Sued0nim do you agree that this is your daily approach?
  • Peregrymj
    Peregrymj Posts: 34 Member
    Maybe start at a 2500/day goal for a few weeks and see how that goes. Once you get used to that you can find ways to cut down more calories. It gets easier as you become more educated and aware of calories. You should still lose a bit on 2500/day, seeing as that's still 2000 less than your average.
    Also maybe pick up a new hobby or something. Your main source of joy shouldn't be pizza. It's a cultural thing to associate food with happiness. Unfortunately that way of thinking is killing us.
  • Sumiblue
    Sumiblue Posts: 1,597 Member
    Your "experiment" isn't a good idea, in my opinion. Don't look too far ahead. You will be a totally different person at goal weight. You start out with small changes, as everyone is telling you. You're not in a good place right now and things won't get better unless you buckle down and change your lifestyle. All the posters are telling you that and they've done it or are in the process. Listen up and get started.

    I agree with this. Why look so far ahead? Baby steps are how you get to your goal. Start cooking for yourself. That change alone will have a huge impact on your health, weight loss and satiety. Junk food is designed to make you crave it. The food designers who make it cram as much sugar, sodium and fat into it as possible for maximum impact. A little treat or junk food is fine if the rest of your diet is balanced. I eat sugar, salt and fat every day. I fit treats into my caloric plan. Making my own food allows me to eat better, know what's in my food and leaves room for treats. I would bet your daily sodium intake is very high eating the kinds of food you describe. You could drop a fair amount of water weight by home cooking.
    Your goal weight may end up changing as you lose. Especially, if you start lifting. Put on some muscle and lose fat and you might end up heavier, slimmer and get to eat more.
  • LEAS86
    LEAS86 Posts: 144 Member
    Hi OP, I can understand why you would feel that 1900 calories is low compared to the amount you were consuming before but where you were before, as you have already acknowledged, was not a healthy place.

    You mentioned above that you like fried food, creamy sauces etc - long term success is about finding a way of eating that you can stick to. Have you looked into different ways of eating - for example a Low Carb High Fat (LCHF) diet might be a good fit for you? I eat fairly low carb myself, not because I think it is the best or the only way to lose weight but because it works for me. The types of food I eat keep me full AND within my calorie goal as well as being enjoyable. My diary is public, feel free to take a look.

    Get researching. As @Sued0nim says you need to find your own way.

    Best of luck
  • T1DCarnivoreRunner
    T1DCarnivoreRunner Posts: 11,502 Member
    I can relate to OP on this. I'm 5'6" - 5'7" (somewhere in between as it measures differently every time, it seems) and 156 lbs. My goal is also 150 lbs. based on my scale's BF% (which I know is not perfect, but it is the best I have for now) and losing only fat, which will land me at 12.5% BF. When I started at 201 lbs. in Jan. 2014, the calculated BF% at 150 lbs. would have been at 11% (if I remember correctly... would have to go back to my spreadsheets from that time and check).

    Currently, my RMR calculates to just over 1,600. So I'm in a similar situation - keep in mind this is RMR, not TDEE, so the additional 300 kcal you have sounds right. When I reach my goal weight, I intend to get BodPod, VO2 Max, and RMR tests. Then I'll make whatever adjustments I need to make. After that, though, I'm going to either move towards a recomp. plan or a bulking plan. If I go to a recomp. plan, it will be more food than I can eat today because I'll be burning more. If I go to a bulking plan, it will be a whole lot more food than I eat today. In either case, I also plan to do more cardio exercise for enjoyment (hiking, trail running, possibly rock climbing).

    So those are my plans - to exercise with a purpose of increasing strength and enjoying the outdoors - and that plan just happens to mean I can eat more too.

    Just some ideas - you don't have to do the same things I'm doing, but I'm in a similar circumstance and that is how I am / will address it.
  • Machka9
    Machka9 Posts: 25,681 Member
    oolou wrote: »
    2) Intermittent fasting so that your meals are eaten in a shorter time frame (16:8). This is great if you are not a breakfast eater.

    This is going to be a quick little thread hijack and maybe I should ask elsewhere but ...

    I start eating at about 10 am and usually wrap it up by midnight. So I eat roughly every couple hours for 14 hours. Then I don't eat anything for the next 10 hours.

    Are you calling that "intermittent fasting"? I've always eaten in that pattern ... well, since I was in my late teens, 30 years ago ... because I don't eat when I'm sleeping, because I'm busy sleeping, and I'm not hungry for the first few hours in the morning.

    To me, fasting is going 24+ hours without food.

  • SLLRunner
    SLLRunner Posts: 12,942 Member
    Dano74 wrote: »
    You sound discouraged, my man. If I could offer some hope... 1899 seems extremely low for any kind of maintenance. What are your stats?

    This is what I was going to say. I'm a 5 ft 4 female at with a weight range 140-145 and I maintain in 1960 without exercise, and between 2060 and 2200 with exercise, depending on what I do. OP is a guy. Something is not right with the TDEE calc.
  • jdb3388
    jdb3388 Posts: 239 Member
    SLLRunner wrote: »
    Dano74 wrote: »
    You sound discouraged, my man. If I could offer some hope... 1899 seems extremely low for any kind of maintenance. What are your stats?

    This is what I was going to say. I'm a 5 ft 4 female at with a weight range 140-145 and I maintain in 1960 without exercise, and between 2060 and 2200 with exercise, depending on what I do. OP is a guy. Something is not right with the TDEE calc.

    It's correct. I've tried it out on 3 separate calculators and they all say the same thing.
  • Packerjohn
    Packerjohn Posts: 4,855 Member
    A lot of people have suggested exercise, lifting cardio or whatever to burn more calories. This is a great idea and definately works.

    I think though a bigger bang for the buck for a lot of people is the mindset change as one starts exercising. As one exercises more and starts to enjoy it they come to realize the diet of too many calories of high calories, low nutrition foods is keeping them from their exercise goals. This results in positive modifications to the diet.

    Just my 2 cents. Best of luck.
  • StealthHealth
    StealthHealth Posts: 2,417 Member
    edited September 2016
    Machka9 wrote: »
    oolou wrote: »
    2) Intermittent fasting so that your meals are eaten in a shorter time frame (16:8). This is great if you are not a breakfast eater.

    This is going to be a quick little thread hijack and maybe I should ask elsewhere but ...

    I start eating at about 10 am and usually wrap it up by midnight. So I eat roughly every couple hours for 14 hours. Then I don't eat anything for the next 10 hours.

    Are you calling that "intermittent fasting"? I've always eaten in that pattern ... well, since I was in my late teens, 30 years ago ... because I don't eat when I'm sleeping, because I'm busy sleeping, and I'm not hungry for the first few hours in the morning.

    To me, fasting is going 24+ hours without food.

    Going to bed at 11 and eating breakfast at 7 is fasting: It's just a short fast (hence the name of the meal: Break-Fast). You don't need to abstain for 24hrs+ to be fasting but most would not consider overnight as a "fast" in the context of what is being discussed here.

    Obviously there is not a specific number or hours/mins/seconds of abstinence after which you can claim fasting and in fact the 5:2 fast diet stipulates some calories are consumed on fasting days!?!

    So, it's all a bit of a mess, semantics wise but most (I guess) wouldn't classify midnight until 10am as a fasting protocol, as discussed here.
  • Need2Exerc1se
    Need2Exerc1se Posts: 13,575 Member
    jdb3388 wrote: »
    SLLRunner wrote: »
    Dano74 wrote: »
    You sound discouraged, my man. If I could offer some hope... 1899 seems extremely low for any kind of maintenance. What are your stats?

    This is what I was going to say. I'm a 5 ft 4 female at with a weight range 140-145 and I maintain in 1960 without exercise, and between 2060 and 2200 with exercise, depending on what I do. OP is a guy. Something is not right with the TDEE calc.

    It's correct. I've tried it out on 3 separate calculators and they all say the same thing.

    Remember those are just averages. It's not set in stone.
  • SLLRunner
    SLLRunner Posts: 12,942 Member
    jdb3388 wrote: »
    SLLRunner wrote: »
    Dano74 wrote: »
    You sound discouraged, my man. If I could offer some hope... 1899 seems extremely low for any kind of maintenance. What are your stats?

    This is what I was going to say. I'm a 5 ft 4 female at with a weight range 140-145 and I maintain in 1960 without exercise, and between 2060 and 2200 with exercise, depending on what I do. OP is a guy. Something is not right with the TDEE calc.

    It's correct. I've tried it out on 3 separate calculators and they all say the same thing.

    No it's not.

    I just used this calculator set at the sedentary setting and came up with much higher numbers. You're inputting wrong information.

    Your TDEE is: 2826 Calories per day
    Your BMR is: 2355 Calories per day
    We suggest the following for your goal to Maintain
    2826 Calories per day

    To lose to pounds a week you'd eat 2260, then your calories would decrease with every ten pounds you lose.

    Let's say you reach your goal weight of 165 (I don't know if that's your goal weight, this is just for demonstration purposes) in 2018 (100 pounds is a lot to lose), then your TDEE at sedentary would be 2063.
  • SezxyStef
    SezxyStef Posts: 15,267 Member
    Regardless of what the numbers are going to be the fact of the matter is this...you can't eat as much food as you used to after you have lost weight...for a few reasons.

    1. you will gain it back
    2. you physcially won't like it and by that I mean I thought one night eh let me see if I can eat the way I used to cause I want to...I couldn't do it...I felt ill and I didn't even get through it all.
    3. you will have learned a lot about what your body likes and wants and will keep you full.

    So once you hit maintenance your mindset will be different, your body will be different and it won't be as bad as you once thought.
  • jdb3388
    jdb3388 Posts: 239 Member
    SLLRunner wrote: »
    jdb3388 wrote: »
    SLLRunner wrote: »
    Dano74 wrote: »
    You sound discouraged, my man. If I could offer some hope... 1899 seems extremely low for any kind of maintenance. What are your stats?

    This is what I was going to say. I'm a 5 ft 4 female at with a weight range 140-145 and I maintain in 1960 without exercise, and between 2060 and 2200 with exercise, depending on what I do. OP is a guy. Something is not right with the TDEE calc.

    It's correct. I've tried it out on 3 separate calculators and they all say the same thing.

    No it's not.

    I just used this calculator set at the sedentary setting and came up with much higher numbers. You're inputting wrong information.

    Your TDEE is: 2826 Calories per day
    Your BMR is: 2355 Calories per day
    We suggest the following for your goal to Maintain
    2826 Calories per day

    To lose to pounds a week you'd eat 2260, then your calories would decrease with every ten pounds you lose.

    Let's say you reach your goal weight of 165 (I don't know if that's your goal weight, this is just for demonstration purposes) in 2018 (100 pounds is a lot to lose), then your TDEE at sedentary would be 2063.
    That calculator is very similar to the one I used. I just put in all of my information and calculated it at my goal weight. Other calculators have said 1899, this one says 1967. that's virtually the same thing. 68 calories is not enough to change anything.
  • trigden1991
    trigden1991 Posts: 4,658 Member
    As someone who has an average TDEE over 3000cals, it really makes me wonder how I managed to get up to 20% bodyfat. Then I remember Dominos, powerlifting and 10k calorie "refeeds". Moderation is key.
This discussion has been closed.