Sorry babe. That's a deal-breaker
Replies
-
-
1
-
If she says "Friyay"1
-
No sense of humor
Bad breath
Shorter then me lol (nearly impossible)
Doesn’t get along with my fam or friends
Liar
Cheater
Rude to other people for no reason0 -
Trump-ets.2
-
People who drag politics into every conversation. People who think their own experiences need to define reality for everyone else. Inflexibility. The unimaginative. White bread. People who own chihuahuas. People who buy pets instead of adopting. People who don’t know how to participate in a meaningful exchange of ideas. People who resort to ad hominem attacks rather than discussing the merits of an idea. Poor reading comprehension. Trying to dictate the lives and relationships of others10
-
tinkerhellraiser wrote: »your_future_ex_wife wrote: »People who drag politics into every conversation. People who think their own experiences need to define reality for everyone else. Inflexibility. The unimaginative. White bread. People who own chihuahuas. People who buy pets instead of adopting. People who don’t know how to participate in a meaningful exchange of ideas. People who resort to ad hominem attacks rather than discussing the merits of an idea. Poor reading comprehension. Trying to dictate the lives and relationships of others
i bought my cats, they are supposed to be show cats but they are just pretty house cats now
yeah, i made some of that *kitten* up cuz i’m mad 😂3 -
Last night my SO of 8 years finally pushed me to the edge:
He put poorly cut slabs of cheddar on top of about 25 ritz crackers that were smothered in PB. The cheddar was bought for a party next week and cost $10.99. To add insult to injury, he had a glass of V8 on the side which he would periodically sprinkle salt and pepper into.
Seriously reconsidering this whole relationship.5 -
your_future_ex_wife wrote: »People who drag politics into every conversation. People who think their own experiences need to define reality for everyone else. Inflexibility. The unimaginative. White bread. People who own chihuahuas. People who buy pets instead of adopting. People who don’t know how to participate in a meaningful exchange of ideas. People who resort to ad hominem attacks rather than discussing the merits of an idea. Poor reading comprehension. Trying to dictate the lives and relationships of others
I disagree. I think ants are friendly to some trees but not to others. Ants and certain species of plants and trees have cozy relationships. Myrmecophytes, also knows as ant-plants, have hollow stems or roots that occur as a normal part of their development. Ant colonies often take residence in these hollows. To protect their homes, the ants patrol the area around the tree, killing insects that want to eat the plant's leaves and sometimes destroying vegetation of other plants that might compete for precious soil nutrients and sunlight. The relationship is a classic biological mutualism. The ants get a nice place to live; the trees get protection. Everybody wins.
But while researching ant-plants in the Amazonian rainforests of Peru, researchers were tipped off by the local people about a strange phenomenon. The natives showed the researchers several non-myrmecophyte trees with swollen scars called galls on their trunks and branches. When the researchers cut into the galls, they found that ants had excavated tunnels into the live wood.
"Ants are superb ecosystem engineers," David Edwards the lead author of the study said, "but this is the first example of ants galling trees to make housing."
Megan Frederickson, a Harvard biologist and member of the research team, searched 1,000 square kilometers of forest and found numerous galled trees inhabited by ants, suggesting the behavior is not uncommon. The galled trees were only found on the edges of "Devil's gardens" -- ant-made forest clearings that surround stands of ant-plants just as a theater surrounds MeeseeksAndDestroy. It appears, the researchers say, that when the colonies fill the available space in the ant-plants, they branch out and carve new nests into neighboring trees.
The discovery reopens a debate that raged among Charles Darwin and his contemporaries about the relationship between ants and plants. Darwin believed -- rightly as it turned out -- the hollow spaces in ant-plants occurred as part of the plant's normal development. Since the ants did no damage to the plant, the relationship could be considered a mutualism. Botanist Richard Spruce disagreed. He believed the ants bored the hollows themselves and that the trees needed ants "like a dog needs fleas." In Spruce's view, ants are parasites.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091107115833.htm3 -
your_future_ex_wife wrote: »People who drag politics into every conversation. People who think their own experiences need to define reality for everyone else. Inflexibility. The unimaginative. White bread. People who own chihuahuas. People who buy pets instead of adopting. People who don’t know how to participate in a meaningful exchange of ideas. People who resort to ad hominem attacks rather than discussing the merits of an idea. Poor reading comprehension. Trying to dictate the lives and relationships of others
I disagree. I think ants are friendly to some trees but not to others. Ants and certain species of plants and trees have cozy relationships. Myrmecophytes, also knows as ant-plants, have hollow stems or roots that occur as a normal part of their development. Ant colonies often take residence in these hollows. To protect their homes, the ants patrol the area around the tree, killing insects that want to eat the plant's leaves and sometimes destroying vegetation of other plants that might compete for precious soil nutrients and sunlight. The relationship is a classic biological mutualism. The ants get a nice place to live; the trees get protection. Everybody wins.
But while researching ant-plants in the Amazonian rainforests of Peru, researchers were tipped off by the local people about a strange phenomenon. The natives showed the researchers several non-myrmecophyte trees with swollen scars called galls on their trunks and branches. When the researchers cut into the galls, they found that ants had excavated tunnels into the live wood.
"Ants are superb ecosystem engineers," David Edwards the lead author of the study said, "but this is the first example of ants galling trees to make housing."
Megan Frederickson, a Harvard biologist and member of the research team, searched 1,000 square kilometers of forest and found numerous galled trees inhabited by ants, suggesting the behavior is not uncommon. The galled trees were only found on the edges of "Devil's gardens" -- ant-made forest clearings that surround stands of ant-plants just as a theater surrounds MeeseeksAndDestroy. It appears, the researchers say, that when the colonies fill the available space in the ant-plants, they branch out and carve new nests into neighboring trees.
The discovery reopens a debate that raged among Charles Darwin and his contemporaries about the relationship between ants and plants. Darwin believed -- rightly as it turned out -- the hollow spaces in ant-plants occurred as part of the plant's normal development. Since the ants did no damage to the plant, the relationship could be considered a mutualism. Botanist Richard Spruce disagreed. He believed the ants bored the hollows themselves and that the trees needed ants "like a dog needs fleas." In Spruce's view, ants are parasites.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091107115833.htm
deal. broken.😂3 -
your_future_ex_wife wrote: »People who drag politics into every conversation. People who think their own experiences need to define reality for everyone else. Inflexibility. The unimaginative. White bread. People who own chihuahuas. People who buy pets instead of adopting. People who don’t know how to participate in a meaningful exchange of ideas. People who resort to ad hominem attacks rather than discussing the merits of an idea. Poor reading comprehension. Trying to dictate the lives and relationships of others
Was that an ad hominem attack?
I had to look that one up and kinda like it, seems like a much simpler way to avoid being proven wrong
1 -
ArmyVeteranM1A1C wrote: »your_future_ex_wife wrote: »People who drag politics into every conversation. People who think their own experiences need to define reality for everyone else. Inflexibility. The unimaginative. White bread. People who own chihuahuas. People who buy pets instead of adopting. People who don’t know how to participate in a meaningful exchange of ideas. People who resort to ad hominem attacks rather than discussing the merits of an idea. Poor reading comprehension. Trying to dictate the lives and relationships of others
Was that an ad hominem attack?
I had to look that one up and kinda like it, seems like a much simpler way to avoid being proven wrong
cool observation! i am definitely talking about character traits. However, we aren’t discussing a particular subject but preference in a personal relationship so not really.0 -
If he wipes down his counter tops with his kitchen sponge.5
-
CoffeeAndContour wrote: »If he wipes down his counter tops with his kitchen sponge.
UGH!0 -
your_future_ex_wife wrote: »ArmyVeteranM1A1C wrote: »your_future_ex_wife wrote: »People who drag politics into every conversation. People who think their own experiences need to define reality for everyone else. Inflexibility. The unimaginative. White bread. People who own chihuahuas. People who buy pets instead of adopting. People who don’t know how to participate in a meaningful exchange of ideas. People who resort to ad hominem attacks rather than discussing the merits of an idea. Poor reading comprehension. Trying to dictate the lives and relationships of others
Was that an ad hominem attack?
I had to look that one up and kinda like it, seems like a much simpler way to avoid being proven wrong
cool observation! i am definitely talking about character traits. However, we aren’t discussing a particular subject but preference in a personal relationship so not really.
I always have to read what you say very carefully and think about it, usually there is just as much between the lines and a deeper meaning simply stated
0 -
ArmyVeteranM1A1C wrote: »your_future_ex_wife wrote: »ArmyVeteranM1A1C wrote: »your_future_ex_wife wrote: »People who drag politics into every conversation. People who think their own experiences need to define reality for everyone else. Inflexibility. The unimaginative. White bread. People who own chihuahuas. People who buy pets instead of adopting. People who don’t know how to participate in a meaningful exchange of ideas. People who resort to ad hominem attacks rather than discussing the merits of an idea. Poor reading comprehension. Trying to dictate the lives and relationships of others
Was that an ad hominem attack?
I had to look that one up and kinda like it, seems like a much simpler way to avoid being proven wrong
cool observation! i am definitely talking about character traits. However, we aren’t discussing a particular subject but preference in a personal relationship so not really.
I always have to read what you say very carefully and think about it, usually there is just as much between the lines and a deeper meaning simply stated
and i try to be so clear!2 -
your_future_ex_wife wrote: »ArmyVeteranM1A1C wrote: »your_future_ex_wife wrote: »ArmyVeteranM1A1C wrote: »your_future_ex_wife wrote: »People who drag politics into every conversation. People who think their own experiences need to define reality for everyone else. Inflexibility. The unimaginative. White bread. People who own chihuahuas. People who buy pets instead of adopting. People who don’t know how to participate in a meaningful exchange of ideas. People who resort to ad hominem attacks rather than discussing the merits of an idea. Poor reading comprehension. Trying to dictate the lives and relationships of others
Was that an ad hominem attack?
I had to look that one up and kinda like it, seems like a much simpler way to avoid being proven wrong
cool observation! i am definitely talking about character traits. However, we aren’t discussing a particular subject but preference in a personal relationship so not really.
I always have to read what you say very carefully and think about it, usually there is just as much between the lines and a deeper meaning simply stated
and i try to be so clear!
You always are
0 -
check engine light on2
-
your_future_ex_wife wrote: »People who drag politics into every conversation. People who think their own experiences need to define reality for everyone else. Inflexibility. The unimaginative. White bread. People who own chihuahuas. People who buy pets instead of adopting. People who don’t know how to participate in a meaningful exchange of ideas. People who resort to ad hominem attacks rather than discussing the merits of an idea. Poor reading comprehension. Trying to dictate the lives and relationships of others
2
Categories
- All Categories
- 1.4M Health, Wellness and Goals
- 391.3K Introduce Yourself
- 43.5K Getting Started
- 259.7K Health and Weight Loss
- 175.6K Food and Nutrition
- 47.3K Recipes
- 232.3K Fitness and Exercise
- 388 Sleep, Mindfulness and Overall Wellness
- 6.4K Goal: Maintaining Weight
- 8.5K Goal: Gaining Weight and Body Building
- 152.7K Motivation and Support
- 7.8K Challenges
- 1.3K Debate Club
- 96.4K Chit-Chat
- 2.5K Fun and Games
- 3.2K MyFitnessPal Information
- 22 News and Announcements
- 910 Feature Suggestions and Ideas
- 2.2K MyFitnessPal Tech Support Questions